Recommended Posts

Mac Zealot? who me? I am PC all the way, Macs are lovely machines, and I made my computer unfriendly sister buy one, but I am sitting in front of my Vista Ultimate machine at the moment... thanks.

The point I was making, is that the XPS410 is not a good example of the 'PC are ultimately expandable' arguement, better to use say the E520 which is a real mini tower machine (as opposed to the SFF XPS410).

I am amused.. me a Mac Zealot :D

Well, then I misunderstood your "So what's your point" comment. If so, I apologize. Again, I picked it because it was in the XPS line, which is a little more high end than the E line and second because I have recently had some experience with it. I never started the expandable argument, you did. Anyways, like I said, I was just satisfying my own curiosity with this experiment and decided to share my findings. The price isn't that different, IMHO, but there are trade-offs both ways. Bluetooth and WiFi meen nothing to me in a desktop computer (and I can get a Bluetooth USB adaptor for $20-25). Either way I'm planning for a dual booting Mac as my next PC.

I have yet to find a better consumer video editing software from what iMovie offers. I don't use Garageband nearly as much as iMovie but I'm not sure if Vista comes with music authoring software? Just wondering since I have yet to move on to Vista as XP is holding me well.

Which is fair... Vista doesn't come with Music Authoring software, and to be honest I really have no idea of how Windows DVD Maker compares to iMovie as I have no real need for either. I guess that explains why iLife doesn't wow me...

Yeah, and anyone who has a system that is 3 years old has to spend for upgrades in order to run Vista. That's a reality.

That's a load of bull****. My system is two and a half years old and can run Vista just fine.

I don't hate macs, but I won't ever own one because as said before, I can do everything I want at least as good, if not better on a PC and do it for far cheaper. I also build my own systems. Yes, I've used a Mac. A few of my buddies here in the dorms have them. They're nice, but I really don't see anything special about them that would give any good reason to warrant spending the extra to get them.

And to the guy saying you pay for quality, define quality, because I don't see how any mac that would have similar specs as my 2.5 year old system would have more quality than my system. Or for example, I don't see how my friend's MacBook Pro with a Core 2 Duo has any more quality than my Dell Inspiron 6000 that I bought a year ago (when you exclude obvious spec difference). You can't just say you pay for quality without defining quality.

-Spenser

Don't forget that with the Mac you don't have to spend the time to uninstall all the bundled software and get going nice and quick. Also we got Boot Camp in the Mac world, which enables us to slap down Xp, Vista, Linux on our systems as well where as the Dell system you can install all those too, but you don't have OS X (legally).

Mac > Dell any day of the week.

Yeah & then turn around and spend $ on a monitor & decent speakers.

That's a load of bull****. My system is two and a half years old and can run Vista just fine.

I don't hate macs, but I won't ever own one because as said before, I can do everything I want at least as good, if not better on a PC and do it for far cheaper. I also build my own systems. Yes, I've used a Mac. A few of my buddies here in the dorms have them. They're nice, but I really don't see anything special about them that would give any good reason to warrant spending the extra to get them.

And to the guy saying you pay for quality, define quality, because I don't see how any mac that would have similar specs as my 2.5 year old system would have more quality than my system. Or for example, I don't see how my friend's MacBook Pro with a Core 2 Duo has any more quality than my Dell Inspiron 6000 that I bought a year ago (when you exclude obvious spec difference). You can't just say you pay for quality without defining quality.

-Spenser

No it's not. You obviously aren't the "average" user. Look at the box your PC is in & then look at a Mac. C'mon. BTW I use an Intel based XP system (haven't saved the $ for a Mac yet). I love them both. I just think that having the best of both worlds (OS X & XP) should be obvious.

Well, then I misunderstood your "So what's your point" comment. If so, I apologize. Again, I picked it because it was in the XPS line, which is a little more high end than the E line and second because I have recently had some experience with it. I never started the expandable argument, you did. Anyways, like I said, I was just satisfying my own curiosity with this experiment and decided to share my findings. The price isn't that different, IMHO, but there are trade-offs both ways. Bluetooth and WiFi meen nothing to me in a desktop computer (and I can get a Bluetooth USB adaptor for $20-25). Either way I'm planning for a dual booting Mac as my next PC.

Just did a comparison of my own, of two very high end systems -

Mac Pro vs Dell Precision

Dual Xeon 2.66

QuadroFX 4500

4Gb RAM

500Gb Hard Disc

2x20" Wide Flat Panels

Dual DVD Writers

I was actually really surprised to see the Mac Pro come in cheaper - by ?2000.

Of course, I can't afford a ?4000 computer... but just goes to say the value discussion is really a non-starter.

I do believe that Apple should bring out a mid-range tower style computer (For those of us that won't buy an iMac)... I think they are missing out on a massive chunk of the market by not having one.

once a mac hater, always a mac hater.

stop drinking so much haterade, people...

if this were a swamp, you'd be an allihater...

sure, come on up. take the elehater...

not really, i used to hate macs (played around with some OS8 and OS9 macs and totally hated it....then tried 10.1 still didnt like it, it wasn't until i tried 10.3 that i fell in love with OSX)

Yeah & then turn around and spend $ on a monitor & decent speakers.

No it's not. You obviously aren't the "average" user. Look at the box your PC is in & then look at a Mac. C'mon. BTW I use an Intel based XP system (haven't saved the $ for a Mac yet). I love them both. I just think that having the best of both worlds (OS X & XP) should be obvious.

Ya still didn't define quality.

-Spenser

Don't forget that with the Mac you don't have to spend the time to uninstall all the bundled software and get going nice and quick. Also we got Boot Camp in the Mac world, which enables us to slap down Xp, Vista, Linux on our systems as well where as the Dell system you can install all those too, but you don't have OS X (legally).

Mac > Dell any day of the week.

Did you end up keeping your iWork or Office:Mac trials? Did you also keep all of the iLife components?

Don't forget that with the Mac you don't have to spend the time to uninstall all the bundled software and get going nice and quick.

Last time I checked OS X came preinstalled with all sorts of fun trial software such as Office 2004 "Test Drive", Quickbooks, and iWork.

Try again.

Last time I checked OS X came preinstalled with all sorts of fun trial software such as Office 2004 "Test Drive", Quickbooks, and iWork.

Try again.

Indeed, but mac fans tend to forget that stuff. It's not preinstalled junk-ware on a mac. On a mac it has to be candy coated, so it's wonderful because it makes life easier. (You must have forgot about the double standard).

iLife is overrated.

There is no reason to buy a PC nowadays. You get the benefit of Mac OS X & u can run XP or Vista (don't know about the Mac drivers). Plus u get a beautiful machine.
unless you want a better video card, or more storage, or a different sound card.....
unless you want a better video card, or more storage, or a different sound card.....

well an mac pro could do all of that but it's a bit pricey, so we'll talk about the more mainstream imac. You can do all that except the video card one. The sound card can be replaced by a usb one, and the storage, well apple allows you to have up to 750gb. Now if you want you can get a firewire or usb enclosure and add as many gbs as you want.

well an mac pro could do all of that but it's a bit pricey, so we'll talk about the more mainstream imac. You can do all that except the video card one. The sound card can be replaced by a usb one, and the storage, well apple allows you to have up to 750gb. Now if you want you can get a firewire or usb enclosure and add as many gbs as you want.

Actually, no. Mac Pro is clearly geared for servers/workstations. Intel Xeon is a server cpu, any motherboard that offers 8 memory slots is definitely a server motherboard, and Nvidia Quadro FX is workstation graphics.

Like many people said before, it is definitely a matter of personal preference/uses.

If you are an enthusiast who lives for gaming/overclocking then buying a mac would be stupid, since they don't offer 2x 8800GTX SLI, Core 2 Extremes, Soundblaster X-FI Elite Pro, SCSI hard disks, or unlocked bios.

But if you run a server or a workstation then macs would be a great choice over pcs because of the stability they offer and customer support and warranty in case it breaks down. Whereas in a custom built pc, you would have to deal with it yourself.

I sold my mac mini because it's too slow compared to my Athlon 64 X2 system.

Alright, so let me get this straight:

You sold a first-gen PPC (waaay obsolete architecture - G4 right?) Mac Mini because it is slower than your *obviously* faster 64-bit AMD rig (which is currently quite behind in performance compared to current Intel models anyway.)

Ok. So what? Do I congratulate you for perhaps doing the obvious? Or do I tell you to visit the Apple site to find out what everyone has known since what, January 2006?

I'm not sure what the point of your total of two posts was. I certainly hope it wasn't for the glee of inciting a flame-war. Seems you disappeared after informing everyone that the grass is green.

I don't even own a mac, I am just sick of all sides throwing insults. And why is it you have to stab at the Mac people? Windows, and Linux users are all just as bad.

They really arn't. Mac users will fight to the death. They just never give up.

@OP:

That's a shame, but I guess if you're not getting any use out of a piece of kit it's probably a good idea to sell it off :) MacMinis are dinky little things, kinda handy with that box with a handle too. I quite like the idea of it being a sort of portable hard drive with connections/inputs & outputs , an OS and a sturdy case.

@Many of the unfortunate resulting replies:

Word to the wise: fanboyism is idiotic in the extreme. Another little bit of information: there's nearly always a lot of irony in somebody saying "all the users of [opposing brand] are fanboys".

Why do so many people care about what type of computer other people use? It's a sad situation when you feel you need to push your computing decisions onto others for what reason, to justify your decision by having others make it too? Make your choice, go with your preference, and shut the hell up about it. There are pros and cons to every choice, and everyone has their own personal preference and a right to it.

It's as bad as little children arguing over which brand of toy is better, except they're also then badmouthing the other brand too.

In fact, it's worse, because little children have the excuse of not knowing better. Grown adults acting in such a way is frankly embarrassing. It stretches my belief that these kind of petty, pointless arguments are still so rife.

Me? I like PCs and I like Macs too. I haven't tried Linux yet. And you know what? I couldn't give a rat's ass what platform/os/whatever the next person is using, and you know why? Because I have other things that aren't as infinitely trivial as that to concern myself with.

Seems like every single time somebody makes a topic with even the slightest hint that they use a mac, there's a group of idiots waiting to jump in with their super-important opinions on why everyone should use [their favourite OS/brand] because [competing OS/brand] is [derogatory comment], instead of what could have been a thread with something interesting to read instead of the same old rehashed fanboy war-cries.

Ugh. :sleep:

They really arn't. Mac users will fight to the death. They just never give up.

Flamebait. For the most part the mac users here are being completely reasonable.

I put it to you that you just contradicted your own point, you are as bad as it gets. Go troll elsewhere.

Word to the wise: fanboyism is idiotic in the extreme. Another little bit of information: there's nearly always a lot of irony in somebody saying "all the users of [opposing brand] are fanboys".

Why do so many people care about what type of computer other people use?

This has nothing really to do with computers or any other topic.

It's for the debate. People love to argue. They love to debate things.

It's part of our nature.

Flamebait. For the most part the mac users here are being completely reasonable.

I put it to you that you just contradicted your own point, you are as bad as it gets. Go troll elsewhere.

Excellent post... (Y)

Ya still didn't define quality.

-Spenser

Neither have you.

How about I start?

For instance buying a MacBook Pro over a Dell laptop... you have a 1-inch thick, magnesium alloy casing, backlit keys, built in webcam, 802.11n and the ability to legally run both OSX and any other OS which runs on the x86 architecture. What does the Dell offer? plastic fantastic, possibly a webcam on the more expensive models, bluetooth on the more expensive models, as far as I know currently no 802.11n just 802.11g and certainly no backlit keys. You can't run OSX on those Dell laptops either.

I have to say the iMacs are nothing more than glorified word processors. Great for joe average, but not so great for those who need a more substantial system.

MacPro is also over rated and you can build a better specced system for a lot less money.

For instance buying a MacBook Pro over a Dell laptop... you have a 1-inch thick, magnesium alloy casing, backlit keys, built in webcam, 802.11n and the ability to legally run both OSX and any other OS which runs on the x86 architecture. What does the Dell offer? plastic fantastic, possibly a webcam on the more expensive models, bluetooth on the more expensive models, as far as I know currently no 802.11n just 802.11g and certainly no backlit keys. You can't run OSX on those Dell laptops either.

What a lame arguement... Dell laptops also offer features that are not available on MacBooks/MacBook Pros regardless how much I hate the things (Dell Laptops that is).

I personally define quality as build quality, and from experience it is not something the MacBook Pro has in spades either...

Again, I have to turn to my favourite laptop brand IBM, to show you what build quality is all about.

Edited by L0KI
Flamebait. For the most part the mac users here are being completely reasonable.

I put it to you that you just contradicted your own point, you are as bad as it gets. Go troll elsewhere.

So, I'm a PC user, who's about to buy a MacBook Pro.... unlike people in here, I couldn't give two ****s what sort of computer someone uses.

But people who argue about consoles, computers, browsers, video cards, OS's, mobo brands, CPU's are all just, well, stupid really. Whats the damned point?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!