Recommended Posts

Excellent post... (Y)

Neither have you.

How about I start?

For instance buying a MacBook Pro over a Dell laptop... you have a 1-inch thick, magnesium alloy casing, backlit keys, built in webcam, 802.11n and the ability to legally run both OSX and any other OS which runs on the x86 architecture. What does the Dell offer? plastic fantastic, possibly a webcam on the more expensive models, bluetooth on the more expensive models, as far as I know currently no 802.11n just 802.11g and certainly no backlit keys. You can't run OSX on those Dell laptops either.

I have to say the iMacs are nothing more than glorified word processors. Great for joe average, but not so great for those who need a more substantial system.

MacPro is also over rated and you can build a better specced system for a lot less money.

Nobody needs magnesium alloy casing or backlit keys. Most people don't use a webcam. x.11n is hardly needed at the current moment. And if I wanted to run OSX, I would get a Mac, but I don't see the advantage of OSX over Windows, so long as you're not a complete retard when using your computer. Everything you listed are just specs for the computer, which I would separate from quality because, in his argument, you pay more for a similar spec'd computer because you are paying for quality. The case and the keys and the webcam are unnecessary gimmicks that don't really make it more quality - they just make it appear to have more quality. Also, that magnesium alloy case didn't stop my buddies optical drive from becoming unusable when he picked it up from that corner one too many times.

I don't need to define quality for that guy, as I made no arguments about the quality of one over the other, except that I didn't see how macs had better quality because he didn't define it.

I agree with the last two points you make.

I also agree with loki. Build quality is more of the quality this should be pointed at, given the other guy's argument, and Macs aren't anything special in that area.

Also, the other guy's post that you quoted at 'excellent'. It's not really. It's also a flamebait post, so it's actually really amusing that he posted it at all.

-Spenser

Well, I started on the PC world, I consider myself an "enthusiast" - I was like many here building my computers from the groundup, and I really like it...you are proud of yourself for building a nice computer and well you get to tweak it after and everything that follows. I didn't hated Apple and never had much interest on it either, mostly because you could never choose what you put inside, and that for me was a "no no" at the time.

But after sometime I got tired of building everything (choosing your components, putting everything together, installing all the software etc...), I went to a friends house who showed me his mac running OS X..It was a hugge change for me as I never had the chance of using one...And the first thing that caught my attention was how everything worked seamlessly on OS X (applications, user interface, etc..wasn't impressed on the hardware though). After some researchs and a good deal from a friend I ended up buying a Powerbook. The hardware was ok, but what I liked most about it was OS X..that made all the difference for me. Off course I still wish today I could have more flexibilty in choosing my components (that's one thing I really miss, like gfx cards and sound cards mostly) but I'm giving up that flexibilty in exchange of all the benefits that OS X brings me.

Anyway thats my story :)

So, I'm a PC user, who's about to buy a MacBook Pro.... unlike people in here, I couldn't give two ****s what sort of computer someone uses.

But people who argue about consoles, computers, browsers, video cards, OS's, mobo brands, CPU's are all just, well, stupid really. Whats the damned point?

People who get upset because others who argue about consoles, computers, browsers, video cards, OS's, mobo brands, CPU's are all just, well, stupid really. Whats the damned point?

For the record, this is a discussion board, we are discussing things. Mac/PC has been discussed before, it will be dicussed again. Get over it.

So far you have contributed zero to this thread and just helped take it further off course, feel free to try to rebut, but i'm moving on.

People have interests and hobbies they are passionate about. There will be heated discussions, debates, etc.

Horse-enthusiasts will argue about horses. Aviation afficionados will argue over thrust/weight ratios, weapons systems, whatever.

This site is about computers, software, and various forms of tech. Welcome to Neowin.

Do you want to:

- Tweak left right and center?

- Lap heatsinks and cut the case up to install 12cm fans?

- Overclock to within a few hertz of stability?

- Benchmark new drivers every time the become available?

- Hunt for that 50% overclocking CPU, or the GPU with unlockable pipes?

- Want to stay on the treadmill of constantly buy better, faster components to keep the latest and greatest games FPS up?

- Impress yourself with your PC surgery skills (aka PC Lego)?

- Play the latest and greatest version of PC Game 200x (DX10 boobies!)?

If you answer yes to any of the above, then a Windows PC is the only game in town. You'll also find more enthusiasts under the bonnet of a Ford Focus or a Vectra tweaking and cleaning ready for the run down to the supermarket car park than you will under the bonnet of a Mercedes...

I read the comment about the Macbook with the titanium cover... I have a friend with one of those laptops and he hates it. It looks horrible after less than a year's use. :/ Beautiful when new, though.

Yeah, and anyone who has a system that is 3 years old has to spend for upgrades in order to run Vista. That's a reality.

Another vote for reality (and you not knowing what it is)

my 3.5 year old system, runs Vista like a dream.

I have 3 other computers at my work that I have upgraded already, all are 3 years old, all run Vista just great.

Get a clue before you talk about something. :blink:

I read the comment about the Macbook with the titanium cover... I have a friend with one of those laptops and he hates it. It looks horrible after less than a year's use. :/ Beautiful when new, though.

I have a Powerbook G4 (Aluminimum) thats over a year old, and a MacBook Pro that's pushing 6 months. Both still look great just like when I got them. Everything needs care I guess your friend just didn't take care of his properly.

I have a Powerbook G4 (Aluminimum) thats over a year old, and a MacBook Pro that's pushing 6 months. Both still look great just like when I got them. Everything needs care I guess your friend just didn't take care of his properly.

You're right. I have no idea how he took care of it. However, my mother happens to have one of those Dell laptops with the metallic finish cover (I don't know what material it really is). I know she does nothing special to it and it still looks good. It might've been an isolated instance but it's my only close interaction with an Apple laptop.

Also, I forgot about this. It might be a closer competitor to the iMac:

It's for sale at local stores for $1,799.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!