Microsoft admits Vista is a failure


Recommended Posts

I always liked XP way better anyways so for me this is nothing new. It's about time people start waking up and noticing that.

Waking up and noticing what? That Vista is technically superior to XP in practically every way, or how for my needs, Vista works flawlessly? Good thing all the world doesn't agree with your opinion.

If microsoft admitted this or didnt, its true.. Vista is a failure..

In what way? You mean it's a failure besides the fact that Vista had a stronger start than XP did back in 2001? Or it's a failure because it's a major technical upgrade over XP? How exactly do you define failure?

I'm using vista and I'm fairly happy with everything, What does upset me is the following

to me visually its nothing more than a fancy new GUI with an added security layer. Allot of features have been dumbed down for example disk defrag and ntbackup (im sure theres more) and sometimes it hangs (i think because of this added securirty) other then that Im very happy with it the media centre stuff seems allot better then mce 2005. However it is new feature lacking to be fair.

People are only calling it a failure because its not moving as fast as some expected and because some feel it shipped to soon.

The Fiji Islands will make things more smoother.. relax

Vista's great on my 1.5GB P4 3Ghz etc..

But don't run it on a Core Duo 512MB laptop with a 5400rpm hdd, it's pretty slow even with a 1GB flash drive in ready boost

Edited by Windam
At that point, it became clear as day that this was nothing more than any poorly constructed rant from an anti-MS zealot. I'd be embarrassed if an article like that was ever posted on the front page of Neowin.

You mean something like that MS shouldn't touch firefox article...

:p

People who say it sucks:

1. Single core CPU

2. 512 MB

3. Old video card

People who say it rocks:

1. Dual Core CPU

2. 4 GB

3. good or great video card.

With the right hardware then Vista really performs well. I've run it on different systems and more memory is the BIG issue. With 2 to 4 gigs it performs well, with 1 GB it's OK and 512MB don't even bother.

As part of my last build, I set aside some money to buy Vista. After making use of the activation grace period, I used that money to buy a legit XP Pro license. There were just too many annoyances for me. Off the top of my head, I don't like what they did with Windows Explorer and there's weird "junctions" all over the place (Access Denied). Maybe in a year or so I'll give it another go. I have a feeling that MS won't be fixing things that we find annoying though, as they consider them new features.

the fact that a major manufacturer has decided to continue offering XP pre-installed is a sign that the customer isn't happy with an OS that still has many driver and peripheral issues.

The fact is that a major manufacturer offered it because some people wanted XP on their systems and that probably speaks for less than 1% of the PC users. I read somewhere that they recieved about 10,000 applications (was some BPN article). I as a customer want Vista if I get a new customer because I do not want to spend a couple hundered bucks again to get Vista down the road...Vista performs like XP at the least and is a better OS anyday. People whining about hardware need to get over it because you cant always sit around wuth 512 MB of RAM especially when the games, operating systems and other applications are becoming more power hungry. Move on with the technology, if you dont have the money... then you probably arent being productive enough to make money with the next gen stuff anyways.

If microsoft admitted this or didnt, its true.. Vista is a failure..

Mmkay, thanks for your opinion that has no base.

What's all this talk about Win Me? For me Me was as stable as 98 was.

ROLF i stopped there !

Wow, you were a luck one. ME destroyed my system one fine morning when I went to burn a CD. Took it into the shop, the guy looked at me and laughed. Walked out with a new internal system and Win 98 SE.

Vista Ultimate X64 rocks!!!! The problem with Vista is that is not the OS the problem is the third party applications that their developers are so lazy to make it Vista compatible but the OS is awesome!!!!!! no problem so far here!!!! I am really happy with vista.

SO TRUE!!!

I have Vista Ultime x64 on my notebook and as second OS on my development machine, and it works almost perfectly.

I'm still keeping Windows XP for day-to-day development tasks, because I have already Delphi installed in XP and I don't want to lose so much time reinstalling it in Vista, but one day I will do that.

Also, it's true: many developers are lazy and they don't do much to port applications to Vista. That's why I am not updating ZipGenius 6 anymore: that's a Windows XP-based application and Vista needs different programming techniques, so that I decided to start from scratch and write a truly new version of my software, keeping Vista in mind.

Vista works fine for me.

P4 Dual processor, 1GB RAM, nvidia 7300 256MB graphics card,160GB Sata.

My frnd runs in 1GB , integrated 946motherboard with aero enabled, 80GB harddisk..he too runs fine!.

Author of that story is a Win ME person.

well its true... vista is just XP on steroids no hardware support on older stuff that everyone uses, no one wants it and its XP with a theme

Wow... This is simply false. Please get your facts straight.

As part of my last build, I set aside some money to buy Vista. After making use of the activation grace period, I used that money to buy a legit XP Pro license. There were just too many annoyances for me. Off the top of my head, I don't like what they did with Windows Explorer and there's weird "junctions" all over the place (Access Denied). Maybe in a year or so I'll give it another go. I have a feeling that MS won't be fixing things that we find annoying though, as they consider them new features.

Why are you even bothered about junctions? Just learn the new locations of the folders and keep hidden files hidden and you won't ever see them again. How else is Microsoft to reorganise things while retaining backwards compatibility with old software? You'll be waiting a long time for an operating system without Junctions to be honest, the number of them will increase if anything.

Oh and for the record, Vista Ultimate x64 runs fine on my machine. It's a Dual Core Athlon X2 4600+, with 2gb Ram and a 7600GT 256mb Graphics card. I love Vista and will never go back to XP. I just can't wait for SP1 so we can start some test deployments at my place of work.

Wow... This is simply false. Please get your facts straight.

1: my mums 1 yr old laptop has NO vista drivers (except for wi-fi)

2: Dell has started selling XP again due to demand: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6575089.stm

3: vista is XP with a different theme and slower! (on my system)

i dont just talk rubbish ya know ;)

Edited by nicholas-c

i OWN vista.. yes i purchased vista ultimate, and i have also had the opportunity (haha) to play with Windows ME.. and i gotta say, ME is a giant piece of crap.

Vista on the other hand.. is perfect! The glass is perfect, it works flawless, no lagging, and no other crap, when i plug ANYTHING into a USB port, or add hardware, vista detects right away and install.

I also owned XP, and i think vista is 2x better then XP anyday.

Besides, I work at Best Buy and when customers come asking for XP, the only reason I heard so far (from over 50 customers both home and business) that Vista might be different and hard to get used to. Once we show them Vista hands on and few of its features, they walk out with it.

LOL - It would be a choice if Best Buy offered XP anymore. I just checked out their site and they don't have any new PCs listed that still come preloaded with XP.

Vista is not XP on steroids: it's completely different since its kernel. Mark Russinovich wrote a very nice review of what's under the hood. I can't find the link at this time, but I will post it here as soon as I find it again.

If you feel your computer is slower with Vista, well... nobody is forcing you to keep Aero turned on all the time. Vista's GUI can be reduced to a mere Win2K clone and your system will gain a good amount of "speed", while keeping almost all features.

LOL - It would be a choice if Best Buy offered XP anymore. I just checked out their site and they don't have any new PCs listed that still come preloaded with XP.

That has nothing to do with Best Buy. It's the actual computer manufacturers. The only one that offers XP anymore is Dell, and they are obviously not being sold in stores in the first place.

-----

I don't know about anybody else, but to me it seems like the only people who bash Vista are the ones who have no clue what they're talking about.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!