Microsoft admits Vista is a failure


Recommended Posts

It doesn't matter who's fault it is that some devices aren't working well in vista, users will still ditch vista, that is until everything works. So Microsoft should at least pressure hardware companies or do something about this issue, standing by the sidelines will not make the situation any better. Because the only company that's hurting from this is Microsoft. At the end of the day, people are more likely to ditch vista and take full advantage of their hardware than suffer from reduced hardware functionalities and keep vista.

Edited by Coolme
It's funny to see all the ms fanboys deffending Vista but most "regular" consumers are hating Vista. I did tech support and i remember the endless calls we use to get about customers asking if they could get rid of this Vista and get regular XP....and I would tell them to call their OEM (even though they won't do anything.....I was doing tech support for an ISP so we didnt do that)

Many people are scared of change. Those of us willing to actually embrace it and learn it are the ones with no problems with it. I was a technician at Circuit City up until a month and a half ago and while I did have customers that complained I had a good amount that were actually excited about it and loved it. It all depends on how you're predispositioned to technological change.

It doesn't matter who's fault it is that some devices aren't working well in vista, users will still ditch vista, that is until everything works. So Microsoft should at least pressure hardware companies or do something about this issue, standing by the sidelines will not make the situation any better. Because the only company that's hurting from this is Microsoft. At the end of the day, people are more likely to ditch vista and take full advantage of their hardware than suffer from reduced hardware functionalities and keep vista.

You think Microsoft is sitting on the sidelines?

You can bet your arse MS is giving Creative hell behind closed doors.

OK Vista is not like ME at all. It's stable, and it works ok. But it's not amazing or great.

I actually find idea of Microsoft using the "Wow" starts now as a dodgy campaign. After reading iWoz I realised that the whole "Wow" experience was Steve Wozniak's catch cry and I think it was unfairly used by Microsoft.

The problem with Vista is that it's got plenty of problems, drivers, interface "wtf's" and general bugs (http://www.vistasp1.net/). There is also disappointment with the bundled apps such as Windows Mail, Paint etc. And that to ship Vista Microsoft cut features right, left and center.

So overall Vista does feel like a ME V2. Enough so that I feel I wasted money upgrading hardware just for Vista. It's just not worth it.

I took a look at the website you referred to - and just chuckled for 15 minutes while I scrolled down the list.

I chuckled not at the KB articles referred on the page, but the simple fact that clearly 90% of the KB articles listed fell into one of two sets:

Set A = Problems related to hardware without sufficient drivers from hardware manufacturers

Set B = Problems related to Upgrades from XP to Vista with insufficient hardware drivers.

What even made me chuckle more was the number of KB articles related to "hibernation" wake-ups - which were clearly due to either incorrect or questionable implementation of ACPI funtions on motherboards or "Wake On xxxx" devices.

Blaming Vista's stability on 3rd Party hardware drivers is like blaming a Car manufacturer for problems with an after-market Stereo system you installed in your car: Its utter NONSENSE. Microsoft only provides minimal functionality drivers for any OS they sell - it's 3rd Party's responsibility to provide for new drivers in a timely manner, and if they didn't provide anything beyond core-level functionality it makes no sense at all to blame the people at 1 Microsoft Way in Redmond, WA for system stability problems caused by faulty / dodgey drivers from other companies.

Now, in regards to features being cut-out of Vista: Yep, there were a few - but they had excellent reasons to be cut. WinFS, for one, was slid-over to the Server group to be used in SQLServer - which actually is a much better platform scenario to be implementing WinFS at this point in time. Other things changed along the way, like GUIs, how the Sidebar appeared, etc.

If you would like to see a video of a few of the UI changes to Vista that were thought-up during the desing process, you can download this WMV file: http://s88283487.onlinehome.us/vista/LHconcepts.wmv

--ScottKin

LOL.

ill get vista when i know my pc can run it at 100% and when better drivers come out.

What better driver!???

Right now the video card driver performence for both ATI and Nvidia are on par with Windows XP. Maybe in 6 months time i can see the vista drivers out perform XP drivers. As for non-video drivers; vista provides everything you need and if not most of the Companies do. I have yet to find myself looking for vista drivers for specific drivers.

If you are having problem finding driver then its either

A. Whatever you are using is too old

B. Company is too lazy to make because the product is unpopular

Vista is better and i dont believe that its another Windows ME.

.. I wouldn't call it a Windows ME II

Anyone who calls it is a total idiot and Adrian Kingsley-Hughes from ZDNet just posted the most retarded article. No matter who he works for, CNN or MSNBC or ZDnet. What he said seemed like something to get attention. Clearly, Vista's sales have boosted Microsoft's profits and saying that Vista = ME2 is total stupidity and ignorance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
    • Get yo ass to space
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!