[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

It'll be renewed but we won't find out for awhile, and there's been a drought of TSCC news so Summer's been keeping us company ;)

Anyone know when the BluRay release will be? I remember seeing the dvd pop up for pre order but I don't recall seeing a release date. Gotta pick up my copy to support the team :) But dvd :no: hd :yes:

Yes I am bumping this thread but no I am not bumping it with summer glau picture so those people who whine (you know who you are!) can rest easy! :p

I just rewatched the finale and you know the second time around makes me want a new season so bad...the ending is just so perfect!

I'll be re-watching it after I go see Salvation or maybe just before. Only watched Season 1 once so I'll be re-watching that again. Even though I want another season so bad, our Terminator needs are pretty damn good already. 3 classic movies, 2 tv seasons and 1 new movie and 2 more on the way. While we don't need another, it would certainly follow the trend, 3 classic movies, 3 tv seasons and 3 new movies, 3rd times the charm right? ;)

I'll be re-watching it after I go see Salvation or maybe just before. Only watched Season 1 once so I'll be re-watching that again. Even though I want another season so bad, our Terminator needs are pretty damn good already. 3 classic movies, 2 tv seasons and 1 new movie and 2 more on the way. While we don't need another, it would certainly follow the trend, 3 classic movies, 3 tv seasons and 3 new movies, 3rd times the charm right? ;)

You consider the third a classic? :blink:

While "T3" was really good, I don't consider it a "classic" compared to the likes of "T2". Each to their own though :)

Radish™

I completely agree, I don't consider "T2" a "classic" compared to "T1", but T2 is bloody good. :laugh:

Haha no no, not a "classic" I meant "old"

The classic series vs the new series.

3rd definitely no where near as good as the 1 and 2, but it's part of the same story arc more or less.

Oh right, sorry, I read that wrong. :rolleyes:

Haha no no, not a "classic" I meant "old"

The classic series vs the new series.

3rd definitely no where near as good as the 1 and 2, but it's part of the same story arc more or less.

"Vintage" :laugh:

I say "T3" rounded off the trilogy quite well.

Radish?

T3 gets a lot of hate, while it wasn't nearly as good as the others I still liked it. The same can be said for the tv series. They do a lot of things wrong but I'm a Terminator fan at heart so I love em all. T3 didn't have the same suspense as the other's had. T1 had the best story and T2 had the best action/suspense. I probably liked T2 the best but I love everything Terminator :$

The ending for T3 was my favorite part, aside from Kristanna nekkid ;) It was a great ending and if it was the last, a good way to end it. But after seeing everything McG has done I'm very happy it wasn't the last.

I have no problem with T3, but I do understand how McG and Josh Friedman would decided to just make there movies, and tv shows based on T1, and T2. It wasn't on par with those other two movies, and the story wasn't nearly as good.

I am just not a fan of this show like I SHOULD BE, I mean it's Terminator and I own season 1.

However, I am probably not going to own Season 2, at least not until it's on for very cheap. (Like 50%)

I just not really a fan of season 2. I watched it, and I can't watch it. Because there is no action not even that much suspense or good acting, IMO. It's not that good to me.

A regular drama about Terminator doesn't work.

If there is season 3, better add MORE Action/suspense!!!

I am just not a fan of this show like I SHOULD BE, I mean it's Terminator and I own season 1.

However, I am probably not going to own Season 2, at least not until it's on for very cheap. (Like 50%)

I just not really a fan of season 2. I watched it, and I can't watch it. Because there is no action not even that much suspense or good acting, IMO. It's not that good to me.

A regular drama about Terminator doesn't work.

If there is season 3, better add MORE Action/suspense!!!

Everyone can have there opinion of the show, but the show really hasn't ever had a lot of action. But the best part of the show is that it requires you to think about what's going on. The show is more about the character than it is about the action- The movies are about the action. There was a lot of slow parts about season two, but I also thought that season two also had a lot of really great episodes. One of the best was Today is the day part 1 and 2- I think that if there is a season 3 (which we'll know in six days) that there might be a little bit more action but probably not more than what was in season 2.

Everyone can have there opinion of the show, but the show really hasn't ever had a lot of action. But the best part of the show is that it requires you to think about what's going on. The show is more about the character than it is about the action- The movies are about the action. There was a lot of slow parts about season two, but I also thought that season two also had a lot of really great episodes. One of the best was Today is the day part 1 and 2- I think that if there is a season 3 (which we'll know in six days) that there might be a little bit more action but probably not more than what was in season 2.

this.

:p

It probably won't be renewed, because the lack of action/suspense affects a LOT of other viewers too, not just myself.

Terminator IS about action, without action, it would just be another show that has nothing to do with Terminator.

I just don't see how MAJORITY will accept it being a Non-action show, bearing the name 'Terminator'.

And, no matter how smart you say the show is, definitely not smart like LOST!

Well I do agree a lot of people got turned off because there wasn't much action- I think anyone that is looking for this show to be the miniature version of Terminator 2 is going to be turned off by the show. But I mean it's a tv show they can't have lots of action in every episode they do have limits on what they can put into a episode because they have limits on money and time per episode. I think the show had an awesome ending to season 2. I don't mean just the season finale- if you watch episodes 217-222 you'll see that it's some of the tv that has been on in a good while. I watch a lot of scifi, and scifi dramas and those last six episodes were in my book as good as anything the X-files ever put on TV.

The reason I brought up the X-files is because just like SCC the X-files always started out slow, and ended very well. It was always about the characters, and story and not so much about the action. I would say that TSCC has probably a 50/50 chance of renewal right now. A lot of people are saying that Doll House is probably over. I have also read that only two of the new Pilots are probably going to be aired Glee, and some other show that I can't remember right now.

It looks like there might not be a chance that TSCC will be renewed. Fox has said (EW news) that Cleveland and Glee, Human Target and Sons of Tucson are on board for new shows. If this is true then there's 1-2 hours of time left in the Fall, and Spring schedule and if Fox picks up the other two pilots they're looking at you can say good bye to this show at least on Fox. There's rumors (not from good sources) that scifi might consider picking the show up. But right now even if Fox renews the show season three might be it's last- The only way it would have to survive is if more than one of the new pilots just completely suck and they cancel them.

It seems that Fox will be letting everyone know on the 18th what there Fall and Spring schedule is but the problem is that we have no idea what shows will be airing this Fall until the 18th so Fox might give TSCC a full 22 episodes if it's in the Fall, but if it's the Spring then we're going to probably only see at the least 13 episodes, and it will probably be the last season.

The only thing I'm wondering about is if it's even possible for the show to be picked up by another network. What kind of contracts do Josh Friedman and the actors have with Fox? But it seems to me at least that if Josh Friedman is able to start looking for another network I think Syfy would be a good place to start. I hope Fox puts the show up for this Fall so we might get a 3rd, and 4th season, but with these guys you can never tell.

Just wanted to say that I agree with what you said kaotic :p The story is one of the main reasons i watch the show and i just don't think it would as good with a lot of action. You can't just have 22 episode of action because you need to develop a central story arc.

Jedi, you seem to want to have more action on a lot of shows :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!