Recommended Posts

  1. Time Machine and Shadow Copy are pretty different. Time Machine is a full backup solution whereas Shadow Copy just basically saves versions.
  2. Quick Look is quite a bit more advanced and functional than those little Explorer previews in XP/Vista.
  3. I freaked out about the transparency in Vista because it's everywhere. One transparent menubar isn't killing anybody's eyes here.
  4. Core Animation focuses more on the actual eye candy while leaving all the programming to the respective language (Cocoa for the most part). WPF/Avalon is kind of a hybrid programming language/animation layer. Plus, with a base like Core Image for Core Animation to work off of, you really can't go but so wrong.
  5. I thought networking seaching on Vista was nixed and, instead, you have to search the slow way (i.e. without an index) over a network

you can index a network location, but it's still pretty slow. All the other points you made are spot on though!

  1. Time Machine and Shadow Copy are pretty different. Time Machine is a full backup solution whereas Shadow Copy just basically saves versions.
  2. Quick Look is quite a bit more advanced and functional than those little Explorer previews in XP/Vista.
  3. I freaked out about the transparency in Vista because it's everywhere. One transparent menubar isn't killing anybody's eyes here.
  4. Core Animation focuses more on the actual eye candy while leaving all the programming to the respective language (Cocoa for the most part). WPF/Avalon is kind of a hybrid programming language/animation layer. Plus, with a base like Core Image for Core Animation to work off of, you really can't go but so wrong.
  5. I thought networking seaching on Vista was nixed and, instead, you have to search the slow way (i.e. without an index) over a network

1. May be you are right. Time Machine = Shadow Copy + WHS ?

2. Quick look is exactly that. View through pages of documents, play videos and music. Same as Vista.

3. Sure, apple can do no wrong.

4. Basically same as WPF. You have heard of Expression Blend, haven't you? Design in XAML and code in C# (among others). Sound similar ?

5. Network locations can be indexed even on XP now.

Well, I wasn't around when the keynote was on but I've had a good look at everything and overall, I'm pretty impressed. Note, I haven't seen the keynote video and probably wont for a little while.

New Desktop: Love the 3D Dock. I see they have updated the shadows on the icons to look like they are sitting on the floor. The little lights are a very nice touch. Stacks are f'ing fantastic. I know they will become part of my workflow pretty quickly. I'm not really liking the transparent menubar. But I think it is because of that photo they used as the wallpaper. I did see a screenshot of Leopard Server with a different wallpaper and it looked better. I wonder though, will you still be able to access a context menu where the separator used to be?

New Finder: I'm in love! Having it like iTunes 7 is a dream come true. Love the sidebar. New icons for the main folders! I also noted a downloads folder, probably used with stacks. For someone like me who is working with a lot of images all the time, Coverflow being integrated into the Finder is fantastic. Also, is Finder now a Cocoa app?

New UI: I love it. having no Aqua elements on the metal looks great. The iTunes 7 style buttons are also more tactile, which is a nice touch. Consistency is great, good to see. Seeing those awful purple plastic buttons from Mail disappear if wonderful. Thank God the folder icons have been updated.

Quick Look: Removes the need to have Quicktime Pro. That just says how great it is. Preview is nice, but it doesn't open everything. Quick Look will. I'll find it especially useful because I'm needing to take a look at files all the time.

Boot Camp: The Restart to Windows option is great. Although this has since disappeared from Apples website.

Front Row: Having the AppleTV interface is nice. I hope it is faster than Front Row 1 though.

DVD Player: Updated icon is nice but I wish they would have made it look like a DVD or something. Lots of new stuff in it that I can't wait to play with.

Safari 3: I left this for last as it seems to have been the "One more thing...". The features shown off at WWDC 06 are welcome and I don't think there is to much more that was shown off today. I have fallen in love with the expandable text boxes. Writing this post would have been a pain otherwise. The thing is I don't think I have seen any other browser do this. Makes sense to do it though when you think about it. Now, Safari on Windows. I have seen lots of people go "Oh, it's to entice people to switch to Macs!!! Like hell it will make me switch!!!!!!" Well, you're wrong. The whole reason Apple ported Safari to Windows is the fact that Safari is now on the iPhone. Apple wants Safari to be supported extremely well. It doesn't make sense for a web developer to get a Mac to just test out Safari. Also, all us Mac users benefit from this as support for Safari will increase.

Top secret features? Wasn't much there that was different from WWDC 06. Leopard is shaping up to be a nice release that I deffinatly want to get.

This is so weird. Apparently ZFS won't make it into Leopard. :/

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/06..._happening.html

and you're upset because of....????

Come on, get real - you will never need support for zetabyte of data! Never! So what's the point then??

HFS is more than enough, and I see no reason to get upset because of the rumor that Leopard was gonna feature ZFS.

and you're upset because of....????

Come on, get real - you will never need support for zetabyte of data! Never! So what's the point then??

HFS is more than enough, and I see no reason to get upset because of the rumor that Leopard was gonna feature ZFS.

:rolleyes:

Another ignorant poster who thinks the only point of ZFS is the storage capacity (although you are right that for the foreseeable future, no one will be able to use the full capacity of the system, without defying the laws of physics).

Edited by roadwarrior
and you're upset because of....????

Come on, get real - you will never need support for zetabyte of data! Never! So what's the point then??

HFS is more than enough, and I see no reason to get upset because of the rumor that Leopard was gonna feature ZFS.

:rofl: People like this amuse me.

I know it's the WWDC and doesn't have much to do about hardware updates. But I really wanted to see an update in the Mac Pro. Like come on it's there pro desktop computer and it comes with less ram standard then the MacBook Pro. Also the video card choices on it are out dated. With a few updates to the Mac Pro I could end up buying one.

is there no footage of the entire keynote?

you mean this? http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/d7625zs/event/

Can you give me a screen of previews in Vista real quick? Sorry it's been a while since I last used it.

Ironically I don't have Microsoft Office to show Previews of Office docs. :p

Pictures

picturekv1.th.jpg

Music

musicls4.th.jpg

Movies

moviesdc6.th.jpg

That is a HD clip btw. ;)

PDFs

pdfsck8.th.jpg

TXTs

txtqe6.th.jpg

movpreviewqx7.gif

pdfpreviewhp4.gif

I wouldn't say that Quick View is entirely something pulled from Vista. OS X has always had a bit of a preview system in it - mind you, very limited, like XP. Quick View (IMO) is just the next logical step. It's not like it didn't have the 'preview seeds' (in place) to expand the system.

Just like Vista - But, I think (for me) Apple's implementation is far more elegant and useful.

I'm glad they both have it and could really care less who came out with it first (and not excusing those in either camp who squabble over this nonsense) - It's all about implementation for me. :)

And Mac OS X had those previews since when? 2003 or something, or did pre-10.3 Panther versions included it as well?

Even so, Dhan, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger was released more than a year ahead of Windows Vista. That includes the Finder's preview pane. So what's your point again with brining Vista's previews up?

Edited by .Neo
And Mac OS X had those previews since when? 2003 or something, or did pre-10.3 Panther versions included it as well?

Even so, Dhan, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger was released more than a year ahead of Windows Vista. That includes the Finder's preview pane. So what's your point again with brining Vista's previews up?

Yea I know that, I use Tiger every day just to clear up. Point was...Giga asked for it. The other point was QuickView like functionality is present in Vista, I was just drawing parallels. Sure QuickView is more glossy & flashy. But I am sure it won't work that well on my iBook which can barely manage coverflow in iTunes. Not that I am complaining. Speaks volumes about apple's hypocrisy knowing they published ads about vista's new hardware requirement.

This feature doesn't deserve place in the "Top Secret" features. To be honest, I was disappointed by the "Top Secret" tag more so since Jobs commented that "so that they can't copy it in vista" or something to that effect.

AFAIK Vista previews are extensible, just as QuickView. I am not really sure about Tiger. And IMO column view is not suitable for that.

The Vista preview thing looks a lot more like Tiger's preview pane. Not very similar to Leopard's Coverflow.

Btw, I wonder... Steve said he showed us 10 Key Features once again, but how many new things out of 300 have we seen? 50? 100?

I am not comparing it to Coverflow. Coverflow is hardly apple's innovation anyway. I consider it as useless eyecandy much like glass/blur in vista.

Well I am sure there are 10 or something widgets in that of 300. :p Just like Tiger.

The other point was QuickView like functionality is present in Vista, I was just drawing parallels. Sure QuickView is more glossy & flashy.

I'm sure there will be many others parallels, they're both OSs after all.

But I am sure it won't work that well on my iBook which can barely manage coverflow in iTunes. Not that I am complaining. Speaks volumes about apple's hypocrisy knowing they published ads about vista's new hardware requirement.

Cover Flow works just fine on my 2004 eMac so I honestly don't know what you're on about. Surely it isn't exactly as smooth as it would be on a latest Intel Mac, but it works smoothly enough.

It's a bit annoying to read these assumptions when I find it hard to believe you ran the latest Mac OS X Leopard build for even a split second on your iBook. Maybe should wait and see before jumping to conclusions?

Edited by .Neo

This is how the keynote really went: www.<< filtered for offensive content >>/d/news/apple-iphone-wwdc.php

EDIT: Replace << filtered for offensive content >> to somethingawful dot com :/ There isn't anything offensive on the page anyways.

Edited by osirisX
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!