Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Not impressed.

However, they have FINALLY unified the UI (thank you lord), made Finder...less suck, and the new icons + quick view I am a fan of. I'm not sure how I feel about the new dock (the reflective floor?) and the transparent menu bar and I just hate the cover flow option in Finder. I mean cover flow for album art is a good idea because its pretty to look at. But if I have 10 doc research paper in a folder (which is often), than that cover flow option would quite simply drive me nuts. And in this specific case, decrease productivity.

--edit--

When I was in the showers just now, I thought about other stuff I do on the mac other than write papers and realized this:

I do a lot of drafting, design and publish work. IF! and Only if Cover flow can preview me Photoshop, illustrator and InDesign files on the fly, it will be extremly useful and I'll love it long time. But if not...I give up on this cover flow idea...

oh...I also though the quick preview function combined with Time Machine is a nice touch.

--edit 2--

WTF is up with the menu bar? thats a stupid design decision. (trying to look like Vista much?), THAT and the reflective dock floor are the only 2 things I have trouble justifying about the new UI right now

Edited by NeoXY
LOL what?! Those rounded curves on the Menubar have been there since System 1 (if I recall correctly) which was released somewhere in the mid-80s. ;)

Very good, but I've only been a Mac user since June 05. So probably whats nice and new to me will be old and crappy to others. Even still its gone now, look at the first post.

There ain't no curved ends anymore. In any design, whether it be a car, hi-fi system, mp3 players and so on, round edges looks much nicer than square does. I like how the menubar is curved at the edges of the display corners, makes it look trick in Tiger.

Yes, yes it may sound crummy or a who cares attitude to others but for me its little things like that which makes it shine. :)

I also would have liked to see them go more toward the iPhone designs because those are really nice. Honestly, I've never liked the brushed metal thing, and I don't like the more recent iTunes designs. This is nice, though. I'm really diggin' it.

Yeah, the iPhone UI would have been nice.

picture5hd5.pngpicture4za3.pngpicture3av6.png

Edited by voo
...

I just hate the cover flow option in Finder. I mean cover flow for album art is a good idea because its pretty to look at. But if I have 10 doc research paper in a folder (which is often), than that cover flow option would quite simply drive me nuts. And in this specific case, decrease productivity.

Yup and it's not like you can turn Cover Flow off or anything...

I think "Don't like it? don't use it!" applies here.

Very good, but I've only been a Mac user since June 05. So probably whats nice and new to me will be old and crappy to others. Even still its gone now, look at the first post.

There ain't no curved ends anymore. In any design, whether it be a car, hi-fi system, mp3 players and so on, round edges looks much nicer than square does. I like how the menubar is curved at the edges of the display corners, makes it look trick in Tiger.

Well IMO it looked nice on CRTs but it's a bit fake now on modern LCD screens. Currently I use a mod that trims down the curves of the Menubar and windows to match the iTunes corners. I can't say I have a real problem with this specific change.

But overal it's looks just way too flat. Especially the selected state matches poorly with the transparent white.

Edited by .Neo

I really like stacks. Picture grouping say all of your web browsers into a stack? Or your Adobe apps? Used right, it will definitely make the dock and desktop less cluttered.

I like the new finder features as well. Not sold on Cover Flow (it is more eye candy then productive, although very pretty eye candy), but there is a reason it isn't on by default.

I could do without the transparent menu bar. The new 3D Dock looks nice to me.

A bit off topic...but who else was generally disappointed with WWDC this year?

What happened to my new iMac? Cinema Display? An announcement/ship date for Office 07 would have been nice? Update to Pages and Keynote would have been nice? As much as 10.5 stole the show...

I hope Apple have some kind of other show...soonish

Well IMO it looked nice on CRTs but it's a bit fake now on modern LCD screens. Currently I use a mod that trims down the curves of the Menubar and windows to match the iTunes corners. I can't say I have a real problem with this specific change.

But overal it's looks just way too flat. Especially the selected state matches poorly with the transparent white.

Dunno about that. Suppose it comes down to preference really.

When you see it like this.

index_bezel20060721.png

There really isn't much to that UI that would apply to a mouse/keyboard desktop interface.

Perhaps, but it has better colours and gradients than Leopard has currently. Much more softer and useable colours.

Imagine the top parts on those little screens as the menubar.

Either way, I'm sure by the time a compatible Shapeshifter hits all these things can change. I hope!

Edited by voo
Dunno about that. Suppose it comes down to preference really.

When you see it like this.

index_bezel20060721.png

Perhaps, but it has better colours and gradients than Leopard has currently. Much more softer and useable colours.

Imagine the top parts on those little screens as the menubar.

Either way, I'm sure by the time a compatible Shapeshifter hits all these things can change. I hope!

Eh--an all blue theme like that would get heavy on your eyes. Even then, it's already pretty soft.

finder_gallery_icon20070611.jpg

There really isn't much to that UI that would apply to a mouse/keyboard desktop interface.

The idea is the color scheme, primarily. It's based on blues and white, it appears to me. So imagine that in place of the brushed metal OS X windows. Not exactly. I suppose what I really liked about the iPhone interface was the touch functions, which of course doesn't apply to the typical OS X interface.

The hardware, now, is a different story. I heard that it's a possibility that new iMac designs might borrow from the iPhone design. That I would really like. I hate the current iMacs. The screens are nice enough, but I just think the way everything sits below the screen is just ugly. And fat. I would like to see this change.

Eh--an all blue theme like that would get heavy on your eyes. Even then, it's already pretty soft.

I suppose.

I don't know what it is, but I just don't like the current Finder windows. The original OS X windows I did like, I'm pretty sure, so whatever design changes they've made since then have changed my mind.

I guess with all the resources pulled to the iPhone development, everyone's going to have to wait until the next rev to see the real next OSX GUI rev...sigh.

The only thing good about this pass is they finally got rid of the antiquated (and always pretty ghey-looking) brushed metal. But they shouldn't have gone with bleh gray when they did it. The only reason they went with brushed metal in the first place was to make the bleh gray not look so bleh, hehe.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!