Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

call me crazy, but i honestly find searching (on the Start Menu at least) for an application and launching it from the results list to be a lot more convenient than hunting down all the apps. i think i'll ever need and then building a stack for them.

I also find it more convenient to use opt-space (Quicksilver) and alt-space (Spotlight), but I'm glad Vista has that feature (native), now, as well.

Stacks will be really useful for people who use a lot of shared assets and design templates. It will also be very useful for many of us designer's who work in a more chaotic manner. Kinda bunch things together, on a project, then organize, later.

It really further drives the idea of the Desktop. I'd rather work surrounded by semi-organized stacks of paper than out of a well-organized file cabinet, which is the metaphor they are going after. Done? Off to the file cabinet. I know many don't see it, but I think it's really a good-minded effort to help with productivity.

But, I can see a lot of people who will never use this feature; Especially if they hadn't included the 'Downloads' stack.

Though, I think it's a very welcome feature, IMO. :)

I was pretty surprised that the scrollbars, buttons, pop-up menus, etc. from iTunes 7 aren't default in Leopard. Why have those UI elements in iTunes (and only iTunes) if it's nowhere else on the system?

I love the way iTunes 7 looks, so I'm personally glad to see it throughout the OS. But why not get rid of the old Aqua buttons and such? They're old fashioned nowadays.

Though, this seems like one of those minor changes that could easily be made before it ships.

You honestly mean to tell me that a bunch of UI designers from Apple, a multi-billion dollar company, sat down, and the best they could come up with was a transparent menubar and some copy/pasted iTunes 7 resources?
Agreed.

perhaps i should have elaborated somewhat...

the whole UI looks kinda disjointed, maybe it's just me.

okay, so they've fallen in love with reflections, but only applied it to a construct you stare at all the time (Dock) and one you'll almost never look at ('coverflow-view in Finder). it really does feel like they copy-pasted the iTunes resource into Finder "just because they could" and not really to add any useful functionality or apparent blending with the rest of the UI.

the coverflow scrollbar and standard scrollbars everywhere else in the UI don't match. i've had this gripe with iTunes since Apple bought CoverFlow, but since i don't use iTunes, i don't really care. i just figured for a company that appears to be pretty anal about conforming to UI standards and complimentary controls that this wouldn't have gotten as far as it did. also slightly hypocritical that people bag on Vista for different toolbar backgrounds when this one has been running a muck for as long as it has. it really does look like a gimmick slapped on at the last second.

did the menu bar really need to be that transparent? unlike the Vista transparency that was "just for fun", this is transparency with no afterthought. what happens if the user chooses a wallpaper with just the wrong contrast? the text with nothing behind it to make it visible will probably get drowned out by whatever that wallpaper turns out to be. this also looks gimmicky.

no more rounded corners? was this done for function or just to differentiate from Vista? not really a big impact change but what ever for?

and what's the reasoning behind making the shadows so grossly large? they don't seem to represent z-order anymore; back in Panther, the topmost window had the largest spread on its shadow and the lower a window got in z-order, the smaller the spread was. now there only seems to be two levels of spread (sounds like pr0n :p). it feels like they just did this to create the illusion of the UI being 3D driven (when it really isn't).

might be just me but doesn't finder look a hell of a lot more cluttered with all the stuff on the Sidebar now? i hope that's not the default configuration. if it is, why do i need all of that front and centre? it looks very Vista Beta 1 and i suspect most of those links will disappear before launch (as it did with Vista eventually).

in all, it looks like they're trying to change the UI completely (making 'metal' windows standard brush) but don't want to let go of the old UI (Aqua bubbles EVAREEWARE).

Huh? The UI in OS X has been 3D driven for quite some time now. Read up on Quartz Extreme a little.

dude, you can't have a 3D based application in a 3D based window in a 3D based environment, can you?

for that to happen, all of the above would have to be treated as common geometry in the same scene. look at the demo for Spaces on the website.

and Quartz Extreme is hardware based video acceleration. it doesn't say that the UI and associated objects are drawn in 3D.

3D driven and hardware accelerated are two different things.

Edited by ikyouCrow

Oh well, there's nothing wrong with a little UNO for Leopard. I'll upgrade for everything else, forget the UI. I'm not really sold on the iTunes 7 look but I do love how the system will have the sidebar just like iTunes. And there's nothing to say Apple won't refine some things by October.

dude, you can't have a 3D based application in a 3D based window in a 3D based environment, can you?

for that to happen, all of the above would have to be treated as common geometry in the same scene. look at the demo for Spaces on the website.

and Quartz Extreme is hardware based video acceleration. it doesn't say that the UI and associated objects are drawn in 3D.

Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant by "3D driven" then. Sorry.

dude, you can't have a 3D based application in a 3D based window in a 3D based environment, can you?

for that to happen, all of the above would have to be treated as common geometry in the same scene. look at the demo for Spaces on the website.

and Quartz Extreme is hardware based video acceleration. it doesn't say that the UI and associated objects are drawn in 3D.

3D driven and hardware accelerated are two different things.

I thought all of OSX was drawn in 3D space on flat polygons.. the same way vista is now done with DWM...

i think this was done due the cross platform popularity of iTunes, in theory making it easier for switchers, due to a common layout in a sense

i hate the look of itunes 7 and seeing the same look on entire OS makes me puke
I thought all of OSX was drawn in 3D space on flat polygons.. the same way vista is now done with DWM...

well there is a quick and dirty way to figure out:

run 3D game in a window. switch to fullscreen.

is there a mode switch, or does it just scale to full screen?

if it just scales, chances are it isn't, unless it really is and they just stretch the polygon dimensions to fill the viewport. if they do stretch, shouldn't the performance suffer a bit?

i dunno, just guessing here. haven't done any 3D gaming on OS X.

will the real Mac gaming expert please stand up! :p

well there is a quick and dirty way to figure out:

run 3D game in a window. switch to fullscreen.

is there a mode switch, or does it just scale to full screen?

if it just scales, chances are it isn't, unless it really is and they just stretch the polygon dimensions to fill the viewport. if they do stretch, shouldn't the performance suffer a bit?

i dunno, just guessing here. haven't done any 3D gaming on OS X.

will the real Mac gaming expert please stand up! :p

your point is not valid. applications can change the screen resolution, too... there are games that stretch (Mame just stretches to fill the viewport) and there are games that switch resolutions (Quake 3)

OS X's UI is hardware accelerated, which means it's kind of an OpenGL viewport. windows are rendered to surfaces and composed using flat polygons on the screen. it's the standard way to do hardware acceleration.

and you can have a 3d application in a 3d environment - and it's quite trivial, if you're using the same API (like OS X uses only OpenGL) (look at rendering to surfaces)

For

I like the look of the dock & stacks.

I like the unified interface (but then I use UNO which isn't a million miles away from this UI).

I like the look of the new Finder (has anyone seen if it will use tabs?)

I like Quick Look. But we already knew about this didn't we? :rolleyes: So it wasn't a secret

Against

I'm not keen on the menu bar transparency, black apple & spotlight icons at all (but if we can turn off the transparency then that's good).

The wallpaper is OK but that along with the menu bar look pretty Vista-ish to me.

But if these are all the 'top secret' features that have been in development for almost a year (since the last keynote showing the other features) then I think it's a little underwhelming.

I guess if they'd have just showed everything in one go then I'd have been really impressed, but it seemed a little odd sitting through demonstrations of Spaces & Time Machine when they went through them last summer.

well there is a quick and dirty way to figure out:

run 3D game in a window. switch to fullscreen.

is there a mode switch, or does it just scale to full screen?

if it just scales, chances are it isn't, unless it really is and they just stretch the polygon dimensions to fill the viewport. if they do stretch, shouldn't the performance suffer a bit?

i dunno, just guessing here. haven't done any 3D gaming on OS X.

will the real Mac gaming expert please stand up! :p

I'm pretty sure that OSX is 3D accellerated by drawing windows as flat polygons and storing their contents in texture memory... because I remember reading how microsoft "copied" it with the DWM in vista which does the same thing... vista runs in what is called "overlay" mode... and I sware OSX does the same thing...

I'm ambivalent. I like the new functionality, i.e. Stacks, Finder, etc., but I don't really care about reflections or transparency. Although, so long as it works well, I don't see the problem. I like so many manageability aspects of OS X that they are the selling points over UI-candy.

I'm pretty sure that OSX is 3D accellerated by drawing windows as flat polygons and storing their contents in texture memory... because I remember reading how microsoft "copied" it with the DWM in vista which does the same thing... vista runs in what is called "overlay" mode... and I sware OSX does the same thing...

You guys need to seperate the terms 3d and gpu accelerated. Having a gpu accelerated UI doesn't mean you can apply any 3d effects to your UI elements. It just means that the calculations for the manipulation of UI elements (ie. moving them, resizing them, distorting them) are all done by the GPU thereby freeing your CPU to do other things. Whether or not a UI element like a window can be treated as 3d object is a totally different issue.

Ok...for all that is bitching and moaning about the transparency in the menu bar, it can be turned off. (read a few more page back, someone have confirmed it already)

Reflection on dock (which now I hate with a passion mind you) will most likely be able to turned off. JUST like how magnifaction can be turned off, and the dock can be hidden.

Cover flow? I won't use it because I hate it...

Everything else...I can live with. The new functionality of the Finder and Quick View is welcomed. Although I'm not keen on the new look, shape shifter will make things all better.

Thats my resolve. (and should be for a few other users who share my view of the new UI) End of story.

But thinking about Leopard. I think we're making too big of a deal on the UI. Time Machine, Spaces, Boot Camp integration and Core Animation are all big steps forward (possibly bigger than spotlight (10.4), and expose (10.3). So I think there will be no contest in if one should upgrade or not. But I wish Apple could have done better with the UI.

Edited by NeoXY

This have just made my day

A new feature in Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard allows users to preview files without opening them, and the technology even supports plug-ins for document types that aren't initially supported.

Quick view and cover flow is officially useful (assuming the right plug in from say -cough adobe cough- comes in)

Having a single menu bar for a multi-application desktop seems like the only bad UI feature of OSX. Especially with a push towards larger monitors and higher resolutions, having menus at the top of the screen for an app running at the bottom of a 30" display seems like the wrong way to go. Maybe they're hoping that by making it so transparent in leopard that it won't be missed so much when they make it an option or axe it completely from a future version.

Having a single menu bar for a multi-application desktop seems like the only bad UI feature of OSX. Especially with a push towards larger monitors and higher resolutions, having menus at the top of the screen for an app running at the bottom of a 30" display seems like the wrong way to go. Maybe they're hoping that by making it so transparent in leopard that it won't be missed so much when they make it an option or axe it completely from a future version.

Perhaps you need to read up on Fitts' Law. From a usability standpoint, having the menus in a fixed location is a GOOD THING , especially when those menus are at the edge of the screen. The Dock also adheres to Fitts Law so long as you turn off magnification.

http://www.xvsxp.com/interface/fittslaw.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitts_law#Suc...of_Fitts.27_law

I'm happy with it.... they refined OS X and added a some much needed features....

Still oozes sexy. ;) Clean, simple look that Apple is known for.

I mean not even Vista's team thought of adding virtual desktops to their OS. I guess that will come in a Service Pack or Powertoy.

I'm happy with it.... they refined OS X and added a some much needed features....

Still oozes sexy. ;) Clean, simple look that Apple is known for.

I mean not even Vista's team thought of adding virtual desktops to their OS. I guess that will come in a Service Pack or Powertoy.

And it only took Apple a few decades and a Linux photocopier to add Spaces to their OS...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!