Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

call me crazy, but i honestly find searching (on the Start Menu at least) for an application and launching it from the results list to be a lot more convenient than hunting down all the apps. i think i'll ever need and then building a stack for them.

I also find it more convenient to use opt-space (Quicksilver) and alt-space (Spotlight), but I'm glad Vista has that feature (native), now, as well.

Stacks will be really useful for people who use a lot of shared assets and design templates. It will also be very useful for many of us designer's who work in a more chaotic manner. Kinda bunch things together, on a project, then organize, later.

It really further drives the idea of the Desktop. I'd rather work surrounded by semi-organized stacks of paper than out of a well-organized file cabinet, which is the metaphor they are going after. Done? Off to the file cabinet. I know many don't see it, but I think it's really a good-minded effort to help with productivity.

But, I can see a lot of people who will never use this feature; Especially if they hadn't included the 'Downloads' stack.

Though, I think it's a very welcome feature, IMO. :)

I was pretty surprised that the scrollbars, buttons, pop-up menus, etc. from iTunes 7 aren't default in Leopard. Why have those UI elements in iTunes (and only iTunes) if it's nowhere else on the system?

I love the way iTunes 7 looks, so I'm personally glad to see it throughout the OS. But why not get rid of the old Aqua buttons and such? They're old fashioned nowadays.

Though, this seems like one of those minor changes that could easily be made before it ships.

You honestly mean to tell me that a bunch of UI designers from Apple, a multi-billion dollar company, sat down, and the best they could come up with was a transparent menubar and some copy/pasted iTunes 7 resources?
Agreed.

perhaps i should have elaborated somewhat...

the whole UI looks kinda disjointed, maybe it's just me.

okay, so they've fallen in love with reflections, but only applied it to a construct you stare at all the time (Dock) and one you'll almost never look at ('coverflow-view in Finder). it really does feel like they copy-pasted the iTunes resource into Finder "just because they could" and not really to add any useful functionality or apparent blending with the rest of the UI.

the coverflow scrollbar and standard scrollbars everywhere else in the UI don't match. i've had this gripe with iTunes since Apple bought CoverFlow, but since i don't use iTunes, i don't really care. i just figured for a company that appears to be pretty anal about conforming to UI standards and complimentary controls that this wouldn't have gotten as far as it did. also slightly hypocritical that people bag on Vista for different toolbar backgrounds when this one has been running a muck for as long as it has. it really does look like a gimmick slapped on at the last second.

did the menu bar really need to be that transparent? unlike the Vista transparency that was "just for fun", this is transparency with no afterthought. what happens if the user chooses a wallpaper with just the wrong contrast? the text with nothing behind it to make it visible will probably get drowned out by whatever that wallpaper turns out to be. this also looks gimmicky.

no more rounded corners? was this done for function or just to differentiate from Vista? not really a big impact change but what ever for?

and what's the reasoning behind making the shadows so grossly large? they don't seem to represent z-order anymore; back in Panther, the topmost window had the largest spread on its shadow and the lower a window got in z-order, the smaller the spread was. now there only seems to be two levels of spread (sounds like pr0n :p). it feels like they just did this to create the illusion of the UI being 3D driven (when it really isn't).

might be just me but doesn't finder look a hell of a lot more cluttered with all the stuff on the Sidebar now? i hope that's not the default configuration. if it is, why do i need all of that front and centre? it looks very Vista Beta 1 and i suspect most of those links will disappear before launch (as it did with Vista eventually).

in all, it looks like they're trying to change the UI completely (making 'metal' windows standard brush) but don't want to let go of the old UI (Aqua bubbles EVAREEWARE).

Huh? The UI in OS X has been 3D driven for quite some time now. Read up on Quartz Extreme a little.

dude, you can't have a 3D based application in a 3D based window in a 3D based environment, can you?

for that to happen, all of the above would have to be treated as common geometry in the same scene. look at the demo for Spaces on the website.

and Quartz Extreme is hardware based video acceleration. it doesn't say that the UI and associated objects are drawn in 3D.

3D driven and hardware accelerated are two different things.

Edited by ikyouCrow

Oh well, there's nothing wrong with a little UNO for Leopard. I'll upgrade for everything else, forget the UI. I'm not really sold on the iTunes 7 look but I do love how the system will have the sidebar just like iTunes. And there's nothing to say Apple won't refine some things by October.

dude, you can't have a 3D based application in a 3D based window in a 3D based environment, can you?

for that to happen, all of the above would have to be treated as common geometry in the same scene. look at the demo for Spaces on the website.

and Quartz Extreme is hardware based video acceleration. it doesn't say that the UI and associated objects are drawn in 3D.

Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant by "3D driven" then. Sorry.

dude, you can't have a 3D based application in a 3D based window in a 3D based environment, can you?

for that to happen, all of the above would have to be treated as common geometry in the same scene. look at the demo for Spaces on the website.

and Quartz Extreme is hardware based video acceleration. it doesn't say that the UI and associated objects are drawn in 3D.

3D driven and hardware accelerated are two different things.

I thought all of OSX was drawn in 3D space on flat polygons.. the same way vista is now done with DWM...

i think this was done due the cross platform popularity of iTunes, in theory making it easier for switchers, due to a common layout in a sense

i hate the look of itunes 7 and seeing the same look on entire OS makes me puke
I thought all of OSX was drawn in 3D space on flat polygons.. the same way vista is now done with DWM...

well there is a quick and dirty way to figure out:

run 3D game in a window. switch to fullscreen.

is there a mode switch, or does it just scale to full screen?

if it just scales, chances are it isn't, unless it really is and they just stretch the polygon dimensions to fill the viewport. if they do stretch, shouldn't the performance suffer a bit?

i dunno, just guessing here. haven't done any 3D gaming on OS X.

will the real Mac gaming expert please stand up! :p

well there is a quick and dirty way to figure out:

run 3D game in a window. switch to fullscreen.

is there a mode switch, or does it just scale to full screen?

if it just scales, chances are it isn't, unless it really is and they just stretch the polygon dimensions to fill the viewport. if they do stretch, shouldn't the performance suffer a bit?

i dunno, just guessing here. haven't done any 3D gaming on OS X.

will the real Mac gaming expert please stand up! :p

your point is not valid. applications can change the screen resolution, too... there are games that stretch (Mame just stretches to fill the viewport) and there are games that switch resolutions (Quake 3)

OS X's UI is hardware accelerated, which means it's kind of an OpenGL viewport. windows are rendered to surfaces and composed using flat polygons on the screen. it's the standard way to do hardware acceleration.

and you can have a 3d application in a 3d environment - and it's quite trivial, if you're using the same API (like OS X uses only OpenGL) (look at rendering to surfaces)

For

I like the look of the dock & stacks.

I like the unified interface (but then I use UNO which isn't a million miles away from this UI).

I like the look of the new Finder (has anyone seen if it will use tabs?)

I like Quick Look. But we already knew about this didn't we? :rolleyes: So it wasn't a secret

Against

I'm not keen on the menu bar transparency, black apple & spotlight icons at all (but if we can turn off the transparency then that's good).

The wallpaper is OK but that along with the menu bar look pretty Vista-ish to me.

But if these are all the 'top secret' features that have been in development for almost a year (since the last keynote showing the other features) then I think it's a little underwhelming.

I guess if they'd have just showed everything in one go then I'd have been really impressed, but it seemed a little odd sitting through demonstrations of Spaces & Time Machine when they went through them last summer.

well there is a quick and dirty way to figure out:

run 3D game in a window. switch to fullscreen.

is there a mode switch, or does it just scale to full screen?

if it just scales, chances are it isn't, unless it really is and they just stretch the polygon dimensions to fill the viewport. if they do stretch, shouldn't the performance suffer a bit?

i dunno, just guessing here. haven't done any 3D gaming on OS X.

will the real Mac gaming expert please stand up! :p

I'm pretty sure that OSX is 3D accellerated by drawing windows as flat polygons and storing their contents in texture memory... because I remember reading how microsoft "copied" it with the DWM in vista which does the same thing... vista runs in what is called "overlay" mode... and I sware OSX does the same thing...

I'm ambivalent. I like the new functionality, i.e. Stacks, Finder, etc., but I don't really care about reflections or transparency. Although, so long as it works well, I don't see the problem. I like so many manageability aspects of OS X that they are the selling points over UI-candy.

I'm pretty sure that OSX is 3D accellerated by drawing windows as flat polygons and storing their contents in texture memory... because I remember reading how microsoft "copied" it with the DWM in vista which does the same thing... vista runs in what is called "overlay" mode... and I sware OSX does the same thing...

You guys need to seperate the terms 3d and gpu accelerated. Having a gpu accelerated UI doesn't mean you can apply any 3d effects to your UI elements. It just means that the calculations for the manipulation of UI elements (ie. moving them, resizing them, distorting them) are all done by the GPU thereby freeing your CPU to do other things. Whether or not a UI element like a window can be treated as 3d object is a totally different issue.

Ok...for all that is bitching and moaning about the transparency in the menu bar, it can be turned off. (read a few more page back, someone have confirmed it already)

Reflection on dock (which now I hate with a passion mind you) will most likely be able to turned off. JUST like how magnifaction can be turned off, and the dock can be hidden.

Cover flow? I won't use it because I hate it...

Everything else...I can live with. The new functionality of the Finder and Quick View is welcomed. Although I'm not keen on the new look, shape shifter will make things all better.

Thats my resolve. (and should be for a few other users who share my view of the new UI) End of story.

But thinking about Leopard. I think we're making too big of a deal on the UI. Time Machine, Spaces, Boot Camp integration and Core Animation are all big steps forward (possibly bigger than spotlight (10.4), and expose (10.3). So I think there will be no contest in if one should upgrade or not. But I wish Apple could have done better with the UI.

Edited by NeoXY

This have just made my day

A new feature in Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard allows users to preview files without opening them, and the technology even supports plug-ins for document types that aren't initially supported.

Quick view and cover flow is officially useful (assuming the right plug in from say -cough adobe cough- comes in)

Having a single menu bar for a multi-application desktop seems like the only bad UI feature of OSX. Especially with a push towards larger monitors and higher resolutions, having menus at the top of the screen for an app running at the bottom of a 30" display seems like the wrong way to go. Maybe they're hoping that by making it so transparent in leopard that it won't be missed so much when they make it an option or axe it completely from a future version.

Having a single menu bar for a multi-application desktop seems like the only bad UI feature of OSX. Especially with a push towards larger monitors and higher resolutions, having menus at the top of the screen for an app running at the bottom of a 30" display seems like the wrong way to go. Maybe they're hoping that by making it so transparent in leopard that it won't be missed so much when they make it an option or axe it completely from a future version.

Perhaps you need to read up on Fitts' Law. From a usability standpoint, having the menus in a fixed location is a GOOD THING , especially when those menus are at the edge of the screen. The Dock also adheres to Fitts Law so long as you turn off magnification.

http://www.xvsxp.com/interface/fittslaw.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitts_law#Suc...of_Fitts.27_law

I'm happy with it.... they refined OS X and added a some much needed features....

Still oozes sexy. ;) Clean, simple look that Apple is known for.

I mean not even Vista's team thought of adding virtual desktops to their OS. I guess that will come in a Service Pack or Powertoy.

I'm happy with it.... they refined OS X and added a some much needed features....

Still oozes sexy. ;) Clean, simple look that Apple is known for.

I mean not even Vista's team thought of adding virtual desktops to their OS. I guess that will come in a Service Pack or Powertoy.

And it only took Apple a few decades and a Linux photocopier to add Spaces to their OS...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!