Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Perhaps you need to read up on Fitts' Law. From a usability standpoint, having the menus in a fixed location is a GOOD THING , especially when those menus are at the edge of the screen. The Dock also adheres to Fitts Law so long as you turn off magnification.

http://www.xvsxp.com/interface/fittslaw.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitts_law#Suc...of_Fitts.27_law

Excellent point, Road. Absolutely correct.

For all of you bitching about the transparent menubar go and download Menushade now and try out the transparency. After using it for more than a minute you realise why Apple did it. On the right wallpaper it makes it fade-in and puts much more focus on the app windows. I imagine the 3D Dock has much the same effect.

Menushade has a nice effect where you can make the menubar become more opaque as you rollover it, I hope the Leopard menubar has that.

Note: Fitt's Law does NOT work with large screens and multi-monitors. Why? Because the distance the mouse has to travel becomes larger.

Note: Fitt's Law does NOT work with large screens and multi-monitors. Why? Because the distance the mouse has to travel becomes larger.

Fitts' Law applies no matter how large the monitor is. The point of putting the menu bar at the edge of the screen is that it becomes an infinitely large target (in other words, if you quickly move your mouse in that direction, you can't help but hit it). If the menu bar is attached to a window (as in Windows or most Linux desktops), then you have to be more accurate with where you move your mouse. In fact, at higher resolutions, having the menu bar in a fixed location that cannot be missed is MORE important because the menu bars on windows become smaller at higher resolutions, making them smaller targets.

It's just that it seems detached from the application. To a first-time user, it would seem more like a system menu than the menu for the current application. At least now in Leopard the active window is more prominent so that part is more obvious. As for menus being smaller, isn't Leopard supposed to have a resolution independent UI so that controls are the same physical size despite the screen resolution?

I'm not being anti-apple, just noting that they seem to have made the menubar - one of OSX's main UI differences when compared to linux/windows - so much less prominent that there might be a greater strategy behind it.

Edited by Stetson

I think it's great!

I especially like the translucent taskbar. Now I won't have to use MenuShade.

The dock looks much better too. I think the whole way the system functions via core-animation looks slick, but I still wonder how much system resources these new features will consume...

Overall very nice imho.

Fitts' Law applies no matter how large the monitor is. The point of putting the menu bar at the edge of the screen is that it becomes an infinitely large target (in other words, if you quickly move your mouse in that direction, you can't help but hit it). If the menu bar is attached to a window (as in Windows or most Linux desktops), then you have to be more accurate with where you move your mouse. In fact, at higher resolutions, having the menu bar in a fixed location that cannot be missed is MORE important because the menu bars on windows become smaller at higher resolutions, making them smaller targets.

I understand your point (and Fitt's law) but I seriously believe it doesn't "fit" well on high resolution displays (not only "big" displays). The time spent travelling say 1000 pixels can be easily used to locate a finite target.

What exactly is so good about it? I dunno feels like the same thing as Tiger just a very minor change.

I know. I'm a Windows User, but then sometimes I get this moment where I love Apple, it happens with everything, of course then it goes away, but anyway, I thought they were making this huge new thing, I thought it was going to look like the iPhone's UI. I thought that they would have the iPhone have the same UI as Leopard because if they didn't and it was the tiger UI just like the iPod, then when Leopard comes out, the UI on the iPhone would be outdated and they would probably have to update it 4 months after it came out. But since the iPhone has it's very own UI and Leopard has it's UI, they are both new. But still, I wish Leopard had used the iPhone's UI, black, glossy, and transparent. But no they kept Aqua, they could've removed the menu bar if they made it that ugly, because now it uses the same type of transparency as Linux, no special effects like blur or anything, just normal transparency, nothing like glass. Oh well, maybe 10.6 will have a significant improvement from now specifically about the desktop and the UI.

the iTunes interface is HORRIBLE and now that they have incorporated it into the os, it makes me want to puke.

I never thought the interface was bad at all. I just STRONGLY dislike the way iTunes organizes the actual iTunes files [the files in your music folder - not in the iTunes app itself]. Very sloppy / disorganized. That's why I still use Winamp on the PC. Each Album gets its own folder in which the albums' artwork and playlists go. Clean and simple. It's also easier to get around when you have to use a "non-apple/iPod" device to transfer media to. I have a mac mini that I rarely use. I didn't think integrating it into the OS was so bad. I just wish the way it manages files was cleaner. I feel the same about iPhoto too. For a company that thrives on simplicity, they sure make a sloppy mess with apps organizing actual files. :/ just my opinion though....

I never thought the interface was bad at all. I just STRONGLY dislike the way iTunes organizes the actual iTunes files [the files in your music folder - not in the iTunes app itself]. Very sloppy / disorganized. That's why I still use Winamp on the PC. Each Album gets its own folder in which the albums' artwork and playlists go. Clean and simple.

This is disorganized? Each artist gets a folder, with subfolders for each album, how is that so different from what you just described?

itunes is the biggest joke ever, you have no idea how Infuriating it is to try to add music onto it, couldnt you SIMPLY just add single mp3's on, NO you have to put them into a special folder and all sorts of gay things happen, why couldnt you simply drag and drop.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. In the OS X version, File -> Add to Library and select the file or folder you want to add to the library. In the Windows version there are separate "Add to Library" commands for single files or for folders, but the concept is the same. Depending on your settings in iTunes' preferences, the file is either copied to the iTunes Music folder or left where it is.

This is disorganized? Each artist gets a folder, with subfolders for each album, how is that so different from what you just described?

Mainly with compilations / mixed CDs, of which I own a lot of. It tends to drop files in artist folders rather than a folder for the album. It would also be nice if/when downloading album artwork, the app would drop the image file/s directly in the artist\album folder. I don't hate iTunes, I just think the way it organizes the actual files could be a bit more neat/tidy. I may switch back at some point, but for now I'm happy with what I'm currently using. I've always thought that Apple makes great products. I just thought I'd post what I would like to see improved in some of their apps.

Edited by EXO242
Mainly with compilations / mixed CDs, of which I own a lot of. It tends to drop files in artist folders rather than a folder for the album. It would also be nice if/when downloading album artwork, the app would drop the image file/s directly in the artist\album folder. I don't hate iTunes, I just think the way it organizes could be a bit more neat/tidy.

OK, I can see how it would be a little annoying if you have mostly compilations. However, in my mind, keeping the artwork separate from the music is actually MORE neat and tidy than lumping them all in the same folder.

I stopped by the Apple store and used a Tiger machine while there. I can see why they are making the changes that they are in Panther. After using Vista for awhile now - Tiger does seem slightly dated. Not as bad as XP - but Vista seems a step forward from Tiger.

I stopped by the Apple store and used a Tiger machine while there. I can see why they are making the changes that they are in Panther. After using Vista for awhile now - Tiger does seem slightly dated. Not as bad as XP - but Vista seems a step forward from Tiger.

Panther was 10.3, I think you mean Leopard, which is 10.5.

I think he meant what he meant. I'm not so sure Apple Stores have Leopard beta running on the demo machine as i's a "developer preview" version

I think your reading comprehension is a little off today. He said he used Tiger in the store.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This is about the already discredited 2025 announcement. Not the current one, which I've heard nothing negative about in the academic literature.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!