Recommended Posts

RedBull?

It's 80mg of Caffeine, that's less than the average Coffee cup.

Taurine is given to Cats in their food...

I'm addicted to energy drinks because of caffeine now (I'm not a coffee lover)...

I only use that stuff sometimes at work when I'm really tired and not able to do anything efficiently. And then I crash that night and sleep like it's my job haha. I never used it for track or anything like that cause it seemed unnatural to me and for studying, I wouldn't use it. I'd just rely on hitting the books hard and getting good sleep. If you use it to stay up and study, you might crash and feel terrible for test day.

My opinion: study earlier, take breaks - go outside and exercise. Seriously.

I just graduated. I had a rough time keeping up with my workload in my last semester at university. I "trashed" my body drinking Pepsi, Redbull and Rockstart for a few consecutive weekends and decided to stop after. Enough was enough.

I decided that at first drinking more coffee, Redbull (or Rockstar when that "didn't work"), caffeine pills, etc. would be the solution. I didn't get work done because I'd get too wired (I'm a sensitive to caffeine) or I really didn't feel like doing the work but was wired on caffeine. Time permitting, go out with friends or exercise. You'll feel better short term and long term and be able to concentrate more.

have a good meal before the exam and that should make you feel more awake then drinking

Good, but not big, as that could make you sleepy.

I always found red bull to be great for waking me up but not keeping me awake...if I am tired nothing will help...

Same here. It can't add extra alertness. I believe it interferes with the "I need sleep" chemicals in your brain, but it doesn't stop more of them being produced.

you all are dumb. nothing can replace a good night's sleep. go to bed, get 7-8hrs and study more before the exam.

Well yes that would be ideal. I don't get why these people think it's a good idea to stay up all night and make themselves exhausted during the exam, right when they need to be wide awake and on their toes.

Personally I think that if you've done all the homework & classes you were meant to, a good nights sleep is better than silly last minute studying, especially for a subject like maths. And if you haven't done those as well as not revising, then you are an idiot, you are probably going to fail anyway and you'll deserve it.

Taurine is given to Cats in their food...

lol, and your point with that? :)

"itz like cat food omg?" :)

I think Red Bull works reasonably well for staying awake, but I think coffee works even better. Like others I recommend that if consuming caffeine, you do it on the exam. Although staying up long on the night before can be good for studying, the effect can be you're tired afterwards, and can even get blackouts in what you've learnt. That's common for people that start studying late and hard.

Edited by Jugalator
My opinion: study earlier, take breaks - go outside and exercise. Seriously.

I just graduated. I had a rough time keeping up with my workload in my last semester at university. I "trashed" my body drinking Pepsi, Redbull and Rockstart for a few consecutive weekends and decided to stop after. Enough was enough.

I decided that at first drinking more coffee, Redbull (or Rockstar when that "didn't work"), caffeine pills, etc. would be the solution. I didn't get work done because I'd get too wired (I'm a sensitive to caffeine) or I really didn't feel like doing the work but was wired on caffeine. Time permitting, go out with friends or exercise. You'll feel better short term and long term and be able to concentrate more.

QFT.

Your better off getting a early night, maybe even a bath before bed. Study in the morning, its fresh in your mind then :)

Does Red Bull work? Well, it doesn't give you wings in a literal sense but it can help pick you up and be more alert...

As far as drinking it until the small hours before a big exam, well you may be better of getting some sleep! Only having 3-4 hours sleep will lower your performance no matter what you take.

Good luck!

(Has anyone else ever drunk enough Vodka + Red Bull to pass out and then woken up at about 04:30 wide awake on a buzz from the caffine? Or is that just me???)

If I use them or pro plus (generally both together) it will keep me going for a while but even so I will hit the wall, metaphorically speaking, and need to go to sleep. I generally use them to wake me up by the balls or to keep me pepped and concentrated in lectures during the day. My attention span has been known to drift in dull periods.

(Has anyone else ever drunk enough Vodka + Red Bull to pass out and then woken up at about 04:30 wide awake on a buzz from the caffine? Or is that just me???)

I drunk about 5 glasses of it and I think all night I could hear more things in the distance then I ever could :D :laugh:

How so? How about some evidence to back this up!!!!!

It's well known that caffeine is bad for your heart (and mind). Go ask a doctor!

Anything with a high concentration of caffeine (i.e. Red Bull) is very bad for you. Not only are you creating an addiction - you're also setting it unnaturally high (i.e. you will need larger amounts to get same or similar effect in the future). You are better off drinking tea, coffee or even Coca Cola, as the caffeine level is far less. Best yet is to drink water regularly throughout the day and get a full night of sleep.

Edited by pjak

I don't think Red Bull is a proper energy drink, it's labelled as a "stimulation" drink. You might be better off with Lucozade or something instead.

And from my own experience, Lucozade really does help give you energy when you need it, but it doesn't last long.

Once time I drank 15 cans of Red bull in about 3 hours and crashed 2 hours after that, so go figure.

It's well known that caffeine is bad for your heart. Go ask a doctor!

Anything with a high concentration of caffeine (i.e. Red Bull) is very bad for you - you are better off drinking tea, coffee or even Coca Cola, as the caffeine level is far less. Best yet is to drink water regularly throughout the day and get a full night of sleep.

Caffeine, even in moderate amounts, is not bad for your heart assuming you are healthy. There are -zero- scientific studies that show a link between caffeine consumption any kind of negative/permanent effects on the heart. Please prove me wrong and post a link to one here. Thanks.

The amount of caffeine in Red Bull is less than a regular cup of brewed coffee. A regular can of Red Bull contains 80 mg of caffeine. An 8 oz cup of coffe contains 135 mg. The largest size coffee that Starbucks sells contains 259 mg of caffeine; that's over 3 cans of Red Bull. Are people keeling over from visiting Starbucks everyday? No!!!! Source: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/caffeine/AN01211

Furthermore, the caffeine in black tea has a higher bioavailability and uptake by the body is swifter than caffeine in coffee or cola. In short, while the concentration of caffeine in tea is less than coffee, the concentration of it in your blood is very similar.

You guys need to do your homework before posting responses. Cite articles and scientific studies if you can. This is how you have a valid and meaningful discussion.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!