Recommended Posts

I can't find anywhere that sells the jerker! So I have to get the Fredrick. The Fredrick is still big though right? Big enough for 2 monitors and still have plenty of space?

Hmm, not sure about that man. Ikea stopped making Jerker's but you can still get a used one.

As for the the space, i don't have a Fredrick, but i would bet money that its going to be "roomy"

Edit: I dont think you'll fit two monitors by the looks of this picture;

http://www.flickr.com/photos/70862895@N00/218883457/

Hmm, not sure about that man. Ikea stopped making Jerker's but you can still get a used one.

As for the the space, i don't have a Fredrick, but i would bet money that its going to be "roomy"

Edit: I dont think you'll fit two monitors by the looks of this picture;

http://www.flickr.com/photos/70862895@N00/218883457/

I'm not sure if that's the same thing... Look here

http://www.ikea.com/gb/en/catalog/products/40111124

It says it's 140cm. That's 40cm longer than my current one, and my current one could fit another monitor easily (if it wasn't for all the shelves and stuff, that's why I'm getting a basic one lol)

Lol.... I kind of just answered my own question.

Here's my 'reverse Squeezebox':

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/1086/img0075xj9.jpg

Old AMD Athlon 64 sitting behind the set.

http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/2040/img0078pn3.jpg

Yes, it will live next to the sub lol. Sound output is from my Creative Audigy 2 sound card, using digital out (S/PDIF passthrough for external decoder) to the receiver. Darn Creative and their 3.5mm jack outputs, it took me a while to find something that would convert 3.5mm to RCA jack. Well, I found them in my basement, so what the heck. Connected via a standard 75ohm digital coaxial cable to the receiver.

The ATI thing is the receiver for my Remote Wonder II remote control.

Why I call it a 'reverse squeezebox':

The Squeezebox can stream music from a fixed source to anywhere in your home. Well, in this case, the music is located in a fixed source and any computer in the home can instruct it to play :laugh: (Remote desktop -- connected to main home gigabit network).

BUT it can stream music from my NAS.

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/9443/img0081kp6.jpg

lol 32" display, no complaints about size of the display of this media player :p

It was really courageous of you to still take the pictures of your setup even though one of your legs has been chopped off. By the look of the pictures I'd say it was your right leg?

I'm not sure if that's the same thing... Look here

http://www.ikea.com/gb/en/catalog/products/40111124

It says it's 140cm. That's 40cm longer than my current one, and my current one could fit another monitor easily (if it wasn't for all the shelves and stuff, that's why I'm getting a basic one lol)

Lol.... I kind of just answered my own question.

Weird, i was looking at this one http://www.ikea.com/ca/en/catalog/products/60111123

Is that the Fredrick desk from Ikea? I'm getting that this Friday along with my new monitor, mouse and keyboard lol :D

No idea, I got the desk from Ikea and built it a few years ago

Is that a BenQ monitor?

Nope, it's a Chimei monitor

@Evera: Is that a selfbuild-kit from a Gundam up on the shelf? If so which grade is that? Cuase mine din't have the thing where your's hangs on

I think it's master grade, 1/60

Yup! I had some time and a small can of Tremclad paint while waiting patiently for my mobo to arrive. Why not!

BTW Mr.GreanShamanGT

Yes, i like the ATI/AMD combo. I also like the idea of having only one driver package (Catalyst) that install everything at once. I'm not going for a world speed record anyway. It works, it's rock stable and i'm very satisfied.

well I gotta say, that is one sweet looking system =]

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!