Vista Game Explorer Editor  

274 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you rate VGEE out of 10?

    • Excellent (9-10 out of 10)
      52
    • Very Good (8 out of 10)
      47
    • Good (7 out of 10)
      61
    • Not Good Enough (6 and below)
      71
    • I don't have Vista
      43


Recommended Posts

I can use some help here....

I am getting the same "It appears that there are no games in the list" error message. Yet when I start Vista Games Explorer I can see 3 games (Bioshock, Crysis, and Sins of a Solar Empire). I have attempted to use the NFS3.exe dummy file and for some reason Vista does not automatically download information. It just sits there with NFS3 in the games explorer.

Also, my GameUX registry has a slightly different structure than what I've seen posted here. Mine has the following

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\GameUX]
"LastSupportedGameInstallTime"=hex(b):30,00,f2,64,0e,6e,c8,01

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\GameUX\Games]

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\GameUX\Games\{0A759F0C-A9CE-4F13-98D8-FECB921A72B3}]
"ConfigInstallType"="2"
"ConfigApplicationPath"="D:\\Games\\BioShock\\Builds\\Release"
"ConfigGDFBinaryPath"="D:\\Games\\BioShock\\Builds\\Release\\Bioshock.exe"
"ApplicationId"="{626DCEE9-781B-49D7-81C0-C41CCC9386F7}"
"Title"="BioShock"
"IsSigned"=dword:00000001

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\GameUX\Games\{622AC228-E829-4892-B455-759C8964DE4C}]
"ConfigInstallType"="2"
"ConfigApplicationPath"="D:\\Games\\Sins of a Solar Empire\\"
"ConfigGDFBinaryPath"="D:\\Games\\Sins of a Solar Empire\\Sins of a Solar Empire.exe"
"ApplicationId"="{B4328592-FD76-44FB-A0AD-C4BC40D547F2}"
"Title"="Sins of a Solar Empire"
"IsSigned"=dword:00000001

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\GameUX\Games\{982CD0B3-968E-4A6D-A90D-551BF80BAE3A}]
"ConfigInstallType"="2"
"ConfigApplicationPath"="D:\\Games\\Crysis\\"
"ConfigGDFBinaryPath"="D:\\Games\\Crysis\\Tools\\VistaEssentials.dll"
"ApplicationId"="{CDC82B4A-7540-45A5-B92E-9A7C7033DBF2}"
"Title"="Crysis"
"IsSigned"=dword:00000001

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\GameUX\S-1-5-21-3033551234-229187754-3103735-1000]

In other words, the game IDs are appearing under GameUX\Games, not under my SID.

In the installer there should be an option for choosing the install scope... eg. All users or Just My User.

If all users is chosen then the game will appear under the gameUX\Games key.

If just for you is chosen then it will appear under your sid.

In the installer there should be an option for choosing the install scope... eg. All users or Just My User.

If all users is chosen then the game will appear under the gameUX\Games key.

If just for you is chosen then it will appear under your sid.

Right - only games that have the 'Games For Windows' label would be able to choose between installing locally or for all users - unsupported games added by VGEE only get added under your User-SID

Yeah - the E is supposed to stad for Entertainment Explorer - in that later versions of EE will allow you to browse other media - such as movies, music albums, etc

But it's just Games for now.

MS has called their VGE Windows Game Explorer in some places - so I thought it best to make the change early on. Some parts of the project may still have WGE - so let me know so that I can change it.

Progress update: I can view and add games in XP by creating the relevant registry keys (XP doesn't exactly have GDF support so I can use whatever registry keys I want, but most are the same as Vista).

Need to write the code that call's Julius' functions to manage games in Vista. Once adding, removing, editing games in XP and Vista is complete - I'll start using some beta testers for XP and Vista.

I've also written the code that allows you to change the toolbar images - and included some ones I found freely available on the net.

In the meantime - I need your assistance. In the toolars for EE there are to be several buttons for functions like showing EE's preferences page, Add Game, Edit, Remove, Clear, etc. Your job would be to create image files for each of these. Best ones get included in the app (if I get multiple sets I will include all and allow you to change between them).

If possible - I would really like to have one set of buttons that look similar to those on Windows Media Player 11. (ie the blue glassy Play button, etc). At the moment I only have boring text labels. When I get proper buttons - I'll have those labels as tooltips - so the buttons don't need any text in them - just icons/symbols.

A small part of two of the toolbar skins is attached below:

post-230055-1203897660_thumb.jpg

post-230055-1203897670_thumb.jpg

Hows the new one comin any eta yet?

The code for Windows Vista is fully complete at this time.

The Features are as follows:

Ability to list games (Icon or Boxart is Displayed) In a listview control.

Ability to "Click" a game to load it's GDF information into a User Safe Editor which allows pertinent information to be edited with constraints. Items which can be edited consist of the following (but are not expressly limited to):

Game Title

Publishers

Developers

Product Version (Or Clip this value from a EXE)

Release Date

Genre

Performance Rating

Content Rating

Content Descriptors

Ability to Install a New Game without making a shortcut in the Explorer

Ability to Install a Game into the Media Center Component

Ability to Uninstall a Game in the Explorer

Ability to Uninstall a Game from the Media Center Component

Ability to Add\Remove Play Tasks

There are also plenty of other features as Ryan is working on ensuring that the Windows XP version allows an upgrade to Vista seamlessly and ensuring that all of the Vista functionality if properly backported to the XP Subsystem.

Don't quote me but I assume that as soon as the final Vista build is ready for mass testing that there will be a public beta to ensure that the code interacts with all rating systems and Vista builds in the same manner. I would also imagine that after that process there will be a XP Beta and then a RC addressing the bugs and then either a Final Version or a RC2 then a Final Version.

I realize everyone is very ancy to be able to fully be able to customize the Game Explorer. If it is warranted in some way I will release the advanced editor which allows you Create and Install Games to just the Explorer and edit the GDF Information without constraint. (Only for Vista) I will release it however with no support in light of it being for those who simply can't wait for the final product. If this is somthing you might be interested in please PM me. If the consensus is large enough I will post a public link.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all - I haven't been getting any emails from this thread which is why I haven't posted yet

Work on EE has slowed down a bit since I have started working full time now. Theoretically, not much time would be needed to start releasing private beta versions of EE - I just need to write the code that links my GUI to Julius' functions (yes Julius I still haven't done that, lol).

I have repaired the XP partition on my main desktop PC (on which I primarily use Vista) and have successfully installed VB 2008 - so I should be able to resume coding either tomorrow night or on the weekend - depending on what comes up. :blush:

Whoever is online in my IM contacts lists in Gmail or Hotmail or Xfire when I am ready to release Beta versions will have the first oppurtunity to test everything out. Followed by those who have recently sent me emails through the contact form on my old site and the email feedback link on my new site.

Now I have to go look at my profile to see why I'm not getting emails from here again.

Hey Ryan, thanks for creating this awesome program. Considering that I'm constantly playing older games which don't get added automatically, this program is essential to me. :)

I had a question, though. Is it possible to add a shortcut to VGEE under the Tools menu in Games Explorer? If not, what about anywhere else in Game Explorer's interface?

79615684hd6.jpg

That would make launching VGEE so much more convenient IMO.

You can use VGEE to create a *game* called Vista Game Explorer Editor - and that's about it.

I think if you look in the Program Files folder for VGEE - you'll find BoxArt for it or you can use your own. If you do choose to use your own, upload a copy here for the rest of us..

BoxArt is also here - http://ryzza007.googlepages.com/BoxArt.jpg

I'd say the Options are hard-coded and can't be edited.

Been using this program for a while. awesome program.

however, has anyone started getting problems since installing Service Pack 1. it was just released today, and after installing it all the games I added using VGEE aren't showing up in the game explorer. I even tried adding the games again, but they still didn't show up.

however if I click on "Load Game Information" in the program my added games show up in the list, but aren't showing up in the game explorer.

anyone else having this problem? any solution?

Well you'd think it hard to believe that MS would never have noticed my app - and in not liking been shown up by little 'ol me - they try and stop it from working.

That said - I have no plans on upgrading to SP1 (heard of other problems with it) - so you're welcome to delve into working out what's happening. Personally I would just assume that MS is no longer listing games from the registry and is getting them soley from WMI - perhaps.

When EE is released, you won't need to use the VGE at all - so then MS's failure at the VGE should be complete by then, lol.

Thanks for the heads up though.

Well you'd think it hard to believe that MS would never have noticed my app - and in not liking been shown up by little 'ol me - they try and stop it from working.

That said - I have no plans on upgrading to SP1 (heard of other problems with it) - so you're welcome to delve into working out what's happening. Personally I would just assume that MS is no longer listing games from the registry and is getting them soley from WMI - perhaps.

When EE is released, you won't need to use the VGE at all - so then MS's failure at the VGE should be complete by then, lol.

Thanks for the heads up though.

Because certains parts of the legacy process did not create WMI objects correctly the SP1 upgrade invalidates them. I have verified that using the new method any upgrade to SP1 is not at all a problem.

Due to the numerous requests I have attached my class tester so any bugs that are present will be resolved before the final inclusion in WGEE.

I was going to write a guide but instead decided not to. If you are unsure of how to use this app then please do not.

First off... This is not a full featured application by any standard. The purpose of this application was to ensure my class was working as expected and wrapped the win32 elements correctly and without issue.

That said...

When you first load the application you will see ALL games which are in the game explorer. To install a new game simply click Install then select the GDFBinary.dll in the folder of the game. After that please select the exe of the game so the proper play link can be created.

After that the list will refresh and you will see the new game (Will probaly be Supreme Commander) in the list.

(Please not my class supports All Users and Current User but for the sake of simplicity I have only enabled the All Users flag so games installed will be visible to all users.)

If you would like the rating to be displayed I have already signed my dll with authenticode... you only need to change a single registry value to allow the rating to show up.... the registry value will be located at HKLM\SOFTWARE\MICROSOFT\Windows\CurrentVersion\GameUX\Games\<NEWGAMEGUID>

Change the DWORD Value IsSigned to 1 and close and reopen games explorer and you will see the rating in the preview pane of the Game Explorer in Vista.

At that point you can click the new game and edit all of the data in the text box including the rating game name and developers, WEI etc. Rating information can be found in the XLS file Ryan posted a few pages back.

After that you simply click update.

To update the GDF Picture you will need to simply click on the space of the image under the label GDF Thumbnail.

When this is complete click update and the changes will be saved.

The view button gives you a preview of how the games will look in the explorer under both views (Boxart and Icon) it has no other functional purpose.

This is pretty much the scope of my class tester. There are a plethora of other things built into the class but I have not created the GUI Controls for them and will not be going into how one would use them.

If there is anyone who would like to have a look at the class code please PM me and I will discuss it with you.

If there are any futher questions please ask and I will do my best to answer but please remember THIS IS A TEST APPLICATION and there is not really any support.

To use please RENAME the ATTACHMENT from test.zip to test.rar and extract.

If you do happen to find something you think is a bug please post away.

test.zip

So you are confirming that VGEE doesn't work with SP1, Julius?

Limited alpha versions to test certain parts of EE should be available in a few weeks - just as long as the Mega Car-Pack for TDU on PC doesn't come out first :)

I cannot either confirm or deny however I can see why after a SP1 Update when the WMI Storage containers are being setup that if their data was incomplete they would not be placed back into the container. Therefore I assume this is a per user problem. Depending on how many and which games they were initially copied from.

What I can confirm is that after a SP1 Upgrade all games which I added with my class are still present and working as expected.

Thanks for the info - I might post something on the web site about SP1 later.

As for me - I just installed SP1 on my Vista Virtual PC (that's running on my main Vista OS) to see how things go for a few weeks - then I might update my real PC too.

  • 2 weeks later...

Julius and I are both working on the project together - he's focusing on the Vista side of things, while I focus on XP and the main UI of the app itself.

Which site are you talking about ryo, the ryzza007 one or the vge.editor one? I did update it a few weeks back - there isn't a great deal for me to add since Julius is currently working on the project, before sending the most up-to-date version back to me to continue working on.

April is a busy month for me - so coding is mostly restricted to late at night.

VGEE doesn't make GDFs, and the GDF editor in the SDK won't be able to edit games added to the VGE since EE will make the GDF and immediately save it to a dll file (which can't be opened in the SDK). Not that you'd need to since EE let's you edit everything.

Well my previous predictions were all up the creek - but I'm guessing that early (incomplete) beta versions for a small number of testers will be available some time in April - and that public betas will come out around May. I could get most of the XP functions down pat in a few hours, then we need to work on finishing the UI. And I have to see where Julius is up to.

And I still need some button/icon images to use in the toolbars - any help would be much appreciated, otherwise chances are they'll look rubbish if I have to come up with something. :)

VGEE doesn't make GDFs, and the GDF editor in the SDK won't be able to edit games added to the VGE since EE will make the GDF and immediately save it to a dll file (which can't be opened in the SDK). Not that you'd need to since EE let's you edit everything.

Well, I was trying to use the SDK to make a new GDF for one of my games, as your VGEE doesn't edit ESRB ratings. But I don't know what to do with the files it generated.

From the looks of things, E-Explorer will take care of everything I could possibly want to do with the VGE. Can't wait to get my hands on it.

And I mean http://vge.editor.googlepages.com/e-explorer. Last update says 20/02/2008.

Edited by ryoran109
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!