[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DConnell said:

He may not have actually done the casting himself, but he pushed non-stop for it - references to gender changing in regeneration only began when he took the helm. Missy was the next big step, and I'm certain he had a hand in casting Jodie. 

 

This isn't wiping the slate clean of Moffatt - it's what he was working for the entire time. 

 

But why do you think Moffatt's influence can't continue just because there's a woman in the role? (Especially since that's the ultimate expression of the Moffatt Masterplan IMO!)

I dunno, don't think the casting had much to do with moffat (other than he lobied for it perhaps?), after all Chris Chibnall had worked with Joddie? seems like a hand picked choice! Also the fact that a woman is now cast opens a whole new world for love affairs (hence no sense for nardole to be around), assistants/companians, as such, clean slate in so many terms with moffat story arcs. (eg. My bet is own the new showrunner taking advantage of the things i'm mentioning to improve on moffat, or if you want to look at it that way, he has the plate served for a clean slate, whatever he choses to do, we will know until it happens I guess.)

 

16 minutes ago, Draconian Guppy said:

Also the fact that a woman is now cast opens a whole new world for love affairs

 

No thanks. That's another element of modern Who I dislike - the romantic focus. Hated Season 2 because of the 10-Rose crap. I agree with the late John Nathan-Turner - no hanky-panky in the TARDIS!

7 minutes ago, DConnell said:

No thanks. That's another element of modern Who I dislike - the romantic focus. Hated Season 2 because of the 10-Rose crap. I agree with the late John Nathan-Turner - no hanky-panky in the TARDIS!

Exactly! It could also take that point! See the possibilities!

4 minutes ago, Damo R. said:

I will be intrigued by the Cosplays at SDCC for it

ahhh good observation :hump: 

9 hours ago, Draconian Guppy said:

Also the fact that a woman is now cast opens a whole new world for love affairs (hence no sense for nardole to be around),

If there's one thing absolutely guaranteed to make me and 1000's of other Who fans stop watching the show, it's more sodding romance! NO! Dr Who has NEVER been about that, and shoehorning it in just ruins it.

 

  • Like 1

Gah, no. Not romance. Anything but that. We had entirely enough of that with Amy, Rory and Clara. River Song I could understand, because that was an important for THREE Doctors; but that's all that should have been needed.

Actually, I'd love to see River show up now that the Doctor is going to be a woman. Not because I'm some sick freak and want to see some hot lesbo action or something, but because I think they could do some great play on gender roles that way. But I suppose that would also funnel into all the hate they are currently getting about the situation. Eh, I doubt River is going to come back though at least so soon.

23 minutes ago, Damo R. said:

Oh FFS!

Honestly, some people would be happy to keep progress in the stone age. To those luddites, get over yourselves, the world doesn't revolve around you, don't like it, then don't effin watch it!

^ I know, right? I mean, sure, I'm not totally happy about the decision. I think a lot of it IS just pandering to the PC brigade, but remember that I'm coming from a history of growing up with Dr Who, specifically Pertwee and Baker for my younger years, and they were huge father figures for me. It's only natural I'd have some concern over such a huge change. Hell, YOUNG Doctor's were bad enough without switching to young woman!

 

But I will give the new Doctor a chance, just like I have all the others.  With all the recent ones I've started off not liking I've been proven wrong, so that will probably happen again.

 

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

But I will give the new Doctor a chance, just like I have all the others.  

Hit the nail on the head, (for me Capaldi was the one that turned me off), but If Jodie can bring back that 'magic' then I don't see the harm in it.
At a guess I'd think we're in similar age brackets as Pertwee and Baker were the Doctor when I was growing up too.

1 minute ago, The Evil Overlord said:

Hit the nail on the head, (for me Capaldi was the one that turned me off), but If Jodie can bring back that 'magic' then I don't see the harm in it.
At a guess I'd think we're in similar age brackets as Pertwee and Baker were the Doctor when I was growing up too.

I had many doubts about Capaldi.. His age was right, but his acting history gave me pause.  Sadly, his first season was fraught with such dreadful writing, that I actually didn't even bother to watch his next 2 until very recently.  Now he's finally gotten some decent stories, he's decided to go...

 

Eh.. 3 years seems to be the average for Dr Who actors so he's spot on there.

 

As for age.... Probably, yes! I'm 48. :) and have been a huge Who fan since as long as I can remember... About 3 years old I think, which puts me right at the end of Pertwee's era.  My earliest strong memory of the show is of a huge spider on the Doctor's back, killing him! Pretty terrifying image for a little un!

 

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I had many doubts about Capaldi.. His age was right, but his acting history gave me pause.  Sadly, his first season was fraught with such dreadful writing, that I actually didn't even bother to watch his next 2 until very recently.  Now he's finally gotten some decent stories, he's decided to go...

 

Eh.. 3 years seems to be the average for Dr Who actors so he's spot on there.

 

As for age.... Probably, yes! I'm 48. :) and have been a huge Who fan since as long as I can remember... About 3 years old I think, which puts me right at the end of Pertwee's era.  My earliest strong memory of the show is of a huge spider on the Doctor's back, killing him! Pretty terrifying image for a little un!

 

42, I used to watch re runs with by brothers who are both older

Quote

 

Kris Marshall was a red hot favourite to take on the iconic role of Doctor Who but it seems that may be everyone was looking at the wrong role all this time as he is now reportedly considering the role of the assistant.

 

Marshall shocked fans when he quit his popular BBC drama Death In Paradise out of the blue, leading to speculation he had been cast as the new Doctor, taking over from Peter Capaldi.

A shock announcement on Sunday July 16 however confirmed that the BBC had instead hired a woman to take on the role which has been familiar to many for decades, and now it has been alleged that Marshall is instead on the top of the list to take over from Pearl Mackie as the assistant.

 

‘Kris is a big fan of the show and the BBC are a big fan of his,’ a source told the The Sun.

 

Former companions include Jenna Coleman, Billie Piper, and Karen Gillan; Pearl joined the show in 2016 but has stepped down after one series.

Matt Lucas will remain as a second assistant.

 

 

5 hours ago, The Evil Overlord said:

Hit the nail on the head, (for me Capaldi was the one that turned me off), but If Jodie can bring back that 'magic' then I don't see the harm in it.
At a guess I'd think we're in similar age brackets as Pertwee and Baker were the Doctor when I was growing up too.

I'm willing to give her a chance, but I'm very skeptical - I like the Doctor as a father/mentor type character - even Matt Smith was wrong for the part IMO. But better writing could have changed my mind, and it could do so here as well. Similarly, I LOVE Capaldi as the Doctor, but stopped watching because I hated the stories he was in. Got so disgusted with the terrible scripts that I didn't even watch the last season. Hell Bent was pretty much the worst episode of the entire series, old and new.

 

Similarly, I always felt Peter Davison was too young for the part, and worse, his portrayal was totally boring. He's the least of the actors in the role so far. Even the much-maligned Colin Baker injected his Doctor with loads of character and genuinely came off as alien.

 

As long as she's better than Davison and Smith, and Chibnall hires decent writers, I'll watch. If not, there's always the next regeneration. I ignore the Davison era, I can ignore the Whitaker era too if it isn't up to par.

 

  • Like 1
14 hours ago, DConnell said:

I'm willing to give her a chance, but I'm very skeptical - I like the Doctor as a father/mentor type character - even Matt Smith was wrong for the part IMO. But better writing could have changed my mind, and it could do so here as well. Similarly, I LOVE Capaldi as the Doctor, but stopped watching because I hated the stories he was in. Got so disgusted with the terrible scripts that I didn't even watch the last season. Hell Bent was pretty much the worst episode of the entire series, old and new.

 

Similarly, I always felt Peter Davison was too young for the part, and worse, his portrayal was totally boring. He's the least of the actors in the role so far. Even the much-maligned Colin Baker injected his Doctor with loads of character and genuinely came off as alien.

 

As long as she's better than Davison and Smith, and Chibnall hires decent writers, I'll watch. If not, there's always the next regeneration. I ignore the Davison era, I can ignore the Whitaker era too if it isn't up to par.

 

We are now sworn enemies, :p 

  • Like 3
5 minutes ago, DConnell said:

Hey, at least I can watch Matt. The Peter Davison era is like watching paint dry ...

Liked Tom Baker as Doctor Who but wasn't a fan of the others until the reboot.

  • Like 1
19 minutes ago, DConnell said:

Hey, at least I can watch Matt. The Peter Davison era is like watching paint dry ...

My most hated (mebbe a bit strong) Doctor was Sylvester McCoy, just could not stomach him in the role, maybe it was because I'd grown out of it (I'm an older guy like you 2, 49) and had fond memories of Tom Baker.

  • Like 1
14 minutes ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

My most hated (mebbe a bit strong) Doctor was Sylvester McCoy, just could not stomach him in the role, maybe it was because I'd grown out of it (I'm an older guy like you 2, 49) and had fond memories of Tom Baker.

Syl worked best with Ace - he isn't the best Doctor, but the 7-Ace team is amazing.The right companion can really make the Doctor work. That's one reason I'm not as hard on Colin as some people - he was saddled with the worst companions of the classic show! Maybe if they'd borrowed Frobisher from the comics ... Or if they hadn't tried to pass Peri off as an American ... who couldn't hold her "American" accent for a full line. :rolleyes: Peri was my most hated companion until Rose came along.

 

And it's also why I could watch Matt despite his portrayal just not clicking for me - Rory was awesome. Problem was Moffatt had the attitude that the companion was more important than the Doctor.

 

 

3 hours ago, DConnell said:

Syl worked best with Ace - he isn't the best Doctor, but the 7-Ace team is amazing.The right companion can really make the Doctor work. That's one reason I'm not as hard on Colin as some people - he was saddled with the worst companions of the classic show! Maybe if they'd borrowed Frobisher from the comics ... Or if they hadn't tried to pass Peri off as an American ... who couldn't hold her "American" accent for a full line. :rolleyes: Peri was my most hated companion until Rose came along.

 

And it's also why I could watch Matt despite his portrayal just not clicking for me - Rory was awesome. Problem was Moffatt had the attitude that the companion was more important than the Doctor.

 

 

Storylines were stupid as well, imperial daleks vs renegade daleks, cybermen who were more camp than scary, too reminiscent of 1960's England (complete with 'no blacks allowed' signs in shop windows etc.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!