[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

Yep, like so called Star Trek fans deriding Discovery because of an inclusive cast of characters. Doctor Who is kinda the same actually, though it isn't specified by Starfleet :D


I've never seen Broadchurch before (though because David Tennant is in it, I wanna watch it) nor have I ever heard of this actress. But like Matt Smith before her (and to a lesser extent Tennant) going with a relative unknown in the part usually works out. As long as the scripts are there, I'm sure she'll be awesome as the Doctor.

 

And to all the people saying this is it, I'm out or bah a woman shouldn't be the Doctor etc - its just a TV show. Really? That's what your going to get angry about?

i'd rather watch trek than who though, it's been seriously over hyped and overrated since it was resurrected all those years ago. The last one i enjoyed was the Paul MG one, all the "modern" ones are just the same old stuff in each new series and London is featured way too much. I remember when the doctor visited other places...not all this "dr gets stranded in London in X year".

 

If the bbc didn't have dr who, the crappy soaps and the lame talent / competitive reality garbage they would cease to exist, which is sad, as the license fee seems to pay for all that junk and pees me off.

 

which is why i rarely tune in to actual broadcast tv (still watch a bit of sport and the odd docu) but mainly get my tv fix online from us and other countries.

 

 

9 hours ago, BritBronco said:

Those people are stupid, and can hardly call themselves fans.

And this kind of attitude is likely to drive away the ones who are on the fence or not in favor but willing to give her a chance (like me). Honestly, the accusations of misogyny on Facebook and fan forums leveled at anyone who isn't wholeheartedly in love with Jodie are going to hurt her acceptance more than anything else.

 

I grew up with the Doctor as a father/crazy uncle figure and that's how I think he works best. I didn't like Davison or Smith because they were too young for the role. (Honestly, I'd be a lot closer to on board if they'd cast Maggie Smith - badass granny Doctor? Yes please!) But I'm still going to give Jodie a chance - unless the SJW fans pi** me off too badly.

  • Like 1
12 hours ago, Damo R. said:

I like the idea what she might bring to the role but seen alot of people go "No that's it I'm not watching anymore"

You can't trust "people".  "People" like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis.

  • Like 3

I'll keep watching Doctor Who and the casting looks great, but I am fed up of the PC brigade nonsense, because the role went to different male leads since the 60's it has to be a woman now? Plus all the comments on how women aren't respected enough for lead roles? Oh I guess Captain Janeway didn't happen 22 years ago on Trek? :rolleyes: 

 

Give the role to a deserving actor/actress, change it up a bit, sure? But enough of the nonsense that goes along with it, yes women are different than men, whoppeedo!

 

BTW to be clear I support the casting of Jodie Whittaker.

  • Like 3

I'm very sad to see Capaldi go but I'm really glad to see David Bradley actually playing the Doctor instead of the actor playing the Doctor. I think this years Christmas special is going to be really good.

 

I don't know Jodie Whittaker but the general opinion seems to that she's a good actress, I'm sure she can pull it off. There's been plenty of hints of the doctor regenerating into a woman and Missy worked out really well. Can't wait for the next series.

 

 

I've always loved how the Doctor has been a crazy old man running round the universe in his blue box.  This really changes things and will probably lead to a reboot being required at some point because we are losing a big part of what makes the Doctor the Doctor. 

11 minutes ago, Bamsebjørn said:

I'm very sad to see Capaldi go but I'm really glad to see David Bradley actually playing the Doctor instead of the actor playing the Doctor. I think this years Christmas special is going to be really good.

 

I don't know Jodie Whittaker but the general opinion seems to that she's a good actress, I'm sure she can pull it off. There's been plenty of hints of the doctor regenerating into a woman and Missy worked out really well. Can't wait for the next series.

 

 

What do you mean "instead of the actor playing the Doctor"? William Hartnell, the original actor who played him died in the early 70's I think.

Not to be "that guy" but having a woman in charge of the Tardis doesn't mean we're going to get stories where she backed into a planet or something, does it? :D

4 minutes ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

What do you mean "instead of the actor playing the Doctor"? William Hartnell, the original actor who played him died in the early 70's I think.

Not to be "that guy" but having a woman in charge of the Tardis doesn't mean we're going to get stories where she backed into a planet or something, does it? :D

lol_vladimir_putin.gif

1 hour ago, Bamsebjørn said:

I'm very sad to see Capaldi go but I'm really glad to see David Bradley actually playing the Doctor instead of the actor playing the Doctor. I think this years Christmas special is going to be really good.

 

I don't know Jodie Whittaker but the general opinion seems to that she's a good actress, I'm sure she can pull it off. There's been plenty of hints of the doctor regenerating into a woman and Missy worked out really well. Can't wait for the next series.

 

 

I disagree that Missy worked out well, but that was more the fault of the writers than Michelle Gomez. There were a few moments when she had a Roger Delgado quality to her, and if they'd ran with that Missy would have been awesome. Unfortunately those moments were massively overwhelmed by "Evil Mary Poppins".

  • Like 1
On 2017-7-15 at 1:01 PM, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

Really don't get why they're announcing it beforehand, we're supposed to find out during the Christmas special so it's a surprise, then people bitch about it for a few weeks and the person ends up being great. Now people are going to bitch about it for a few months, we'll see them at Christmas for about 30 seconds and then have to wait for 7 months or something.

 Paparazzi leaks :/ 

 

Though folks have to realize, casting a woman, was a much needed break to get rid of the moffat universe. eg. river song, impossible girls (all the girls always live forever no? So always possible comeback). 

 

My key points

 

What will assistant be? male, female? bi?

Master? Idem

All women doctor who? 

 

4 minutes ago, NinjaGinger said:

I have nothing against wowen but a female Doctor is like having a black James Bond, you just dont.

Well who says?  Bond has pretty much all but been named as a callsign, so why such a comment?

  • Like 1
5 minutes ago, NinjaGinger said:

I have nothing against wowen but a female Doctor is like having a black James Bond, you just dont.

I'd rather have Idris Elba as Bond than Daniel Craig ...

I'd rather have Optimus Prime as a  Kenworth K100, but we don't get what we want always.  Life's a bitch!

 

Whoah, how have I just typed "bitch" and it not get obfuscated with #????

 

This one is not my fault!

  • Like 2
2 minutes ago, Draconian Guppy said:

Craig hater :p

And proud of it! Watched his first two outings as Bond and had enough. Casino Royale was good in spite of him - a good Bond movie with a horrible lead actor. It would have been phenomenal with better casting. Quantum of Solice was just garbage, and I refuse to see any more Bond films with Craig in the role.

1 hour ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

What do you mean "instead of the actor playing the Doctor"? William Hartnell, the original actor who played him died in the early 70's I think.

Not to be "that guy" but having a woman in charge of the Tardis doesn't mean we're going to get stories where she backed into a planet or something, does it? :D

 

I mean, David Bradley played William Hartnell in "An Adventure in Space and Time". This time we get to see him play an actual Doctor Who story.

 

Being a woman doesn't have anything to do with getting the Tardis backed into a planet, the doctor has never been a good "Tardis driver".

  • Like 2

nardole isn't happy:

 

 

 

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/doctor-who/8052694/How-Doctor-Who-nearly-became-the-Time-Lady.html

 

 

The creator of Doctor Who urged the BBC to give the character a sex change in a desperate bid to prevent the series from being cancelled, it can be revealed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!