Halo 03 |News & General| OFFICIAL


Recommended Posts

^ Exactly. It's a very good length on a respectable difficulty level (read: Heroic or higher) as many reviewers have also stated. It doesn't really make sense to go play it on Easy or even Normal and then say it's too short... come on now. :rolleyes:

I beat it on Heroic in about five hours my first run through. Don't try to pretend it isn't a short game.

Legendary extends it a little bit, but it's still fairly often that battles can be completely skipped- enemies are confined to small zones and won't leave to chase you.

The game is short. Don't make excuses up for it. That said, its replayability is infinite.

well after playing halo 3 since the 28th im gonna be trading that game in asap not even worth having in my house anymore almost all the people i know is trading the game in anywho im not dissing the game i just can not get into the game at all

Punctuation for the win!

I beat it on Heroic in about five hours my first run through. Don't try to pretend it isn't a short game.

Legendary extends it a little bit, but it's still fairly often that battles can be completely skipped- enemies are confined to small zones and won't leave to chase you.

The game is short. Don't make excuses up for it. That said, its replayability is infinite.

It's funny you should say that because I got into an argument with a clerk at my local Gamestop who was wearing a "NOOBS PLAY PS3" shirt at the Halo 3 launch (not for nothing, but if you're a clerk at a videogame store, don't wear shirts like that). Anyway, he asked "what good games are there for the PS3?". I said Heavenly Sword (which I like immensely). His rebuttal was "did it take you 6 hours to finish it? LOL". Funny that people can finish Halo 3 in less time.

And for the record, I haven't finished HS yet because I'm really trying to enjoy the game. However, rag's right, the replay value in Halo 3 kicks ass. I actually bought another 360 just so I can play in my computer room while my wife watches TV (moving the 360 is a pain, and this way I can play co-op/multiplayer with the kids).

Any story could feel like it doesn't close. Even when I saw Return of the Jedi it felt like that PART of Star Wars was closed, but look at all the books and comics put out since then. I wouldn't put the game down because of that, it's a silly argument.

I beat it on Heroic in about five hours my first run through. Don't try to pretend it isn't a short game.

Legendary extends it a little bit, but it's still fairly often that battles can be completely skipped- enemies are confined to small zones and won't leave to chase you.

The game is short. Don't make excuses up for it. That said, its replayability is infinite.

You finished Legendary by yourself in 5 hours. :| King of halo?

Heroic myself took me 10 hours. Now I'm working my way up with Legendary with several skulls.

Well, just went to load up my game on Floodgates load up is extremely slow and it gets to 30% and then jumps back to 0%, Back to main menu I go to resume campaign option and it sits there loading for 3 minutes only to come up with Failed to Load. So I go back to a previous mission and it loads up and I play from there... as soon as I get to the next mission (floodgate) I get a Disk Read Error. The disk has a few small scratches on it, which were not there when I got it. The game had loaded up Floodgates fine the other day. :angry:

Times like this I really despise the xbox and it really feels like a shoddy piece of hardware. These kinds of problems shouldn't happen. especially with such a huge game, it's extremely disappointing.

I beat it on Heroic in about five hours my first run through. Don't try to pretend it isn't a short game.

Legendary extends it a little bit, but it's still fairly often that battles can be completely skipped- enemies are confined to small zones and won't leave to chase you.

The game is short. Don't make excuses up for it. That said, its replayability is infinite.

You can't call a game short if you're skipping all the battles.

-Spenser

I'm chiming in that the AI is questionable, at best, especially when driving. At least twice now, I'd had the AI drive the warthog into a wall and keep trying to go forward while a wraith takes us out. Out of the warthog? I can't count how many times the damn AI characters jump in front of my shots and then give me the usual "same team" complaint.

just cause you don't know them munky man, don't mean they don't exist.

sound familiar? ;) :)

Haha just a bit. But in this case at least we kinda know ragn4rokk 2.0 in some ways :p

If he can prove it, I'll eat my words :)

Halo 3 most popular on Live

by Rob Purchese

Halo 3 is already the most popular game on 360, according to the amount of unique users playing the game while connected to Live.

The list of our current favourites was published on Larry "Major Nelson" Hryb's blog - the director of programming for Xbox Live - and saw Bungie's latest overtake previous champ Gears of War to claim the top spot.

Further down titles like Rainbow Six Vegas continued to perform well, as did the Call of Duty 4 beta and, subsequently, previous instalment Call of Duty 3.

The Pro Evolution Soccer 2008 demo also made the list, joining BioShock, Forza 2, Madden NFL 08 and Guitar Hero II to round out the top ten.

Elsewhere Sonic 2 proved to be the most popular Live Arcade title of recent times, while Halo 2 retained its long-standing seat on the Xbox throne.

Source: EG

Halo 3 smashes UK 360 Record

by Rob Purchese

Halo 3 has become the second fastest selling game in UK chart history, according to Chart-Track, with one in three Xbox 360 owners in the UK buying the Microsoft-published title.

With the UK Xbox 360 installed base at 1.4 millon in the UK, estimates suggest that the Bungie-developed game shifted more than 466,000 copies in the UK alone in its first four days on sale. That figure is dwarfed only by Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, which shifted an incredible 677,000 copies in two days when it was released on PS2 back in October 2004 - but, then again, the PS2 installed base in the UK at the time was some 6.4 million according to Chart-Track.

Advertisement

Needless to say, then, that Halo 3 topped the all formats chart for the week ending 29th September. But it was also a strong week for new releases across the board.

Despite Halo 3 fever sweeping the nation, EA still managed to enjoy its best-ever opening weekend for a FIFA release with FIFA 08 charting in second place. All told, Halo 3 and FIFA 08 accounted for some 83 per cent of all 360 software sales last week. Meanwhile, last week's one and two - Tiger Woods 08 and MySims - dropped down to third and fourth.

Juiced 2: Hot Import Nights rather unpredictably outsold the far superior SEGA Rally by landing two places ahead in fifth - we blame the television advert with the boobs - while new EA IP Skate just missed out on the top ten by entering at 11th.

Activision, though, failed to break into the best sellers with Enemy Territory: Quake Wars, which was only able to manage 16th - although Transformers managed to hold onto ninth.

The rest of the top ten was padded out with familiar Nintendo names: More Brain Training, Super Paper Mario and Wii Play.

Ratatouille also failed to impact, sniffing around in 39th, but then the Pixar film on which it is based has yet to be released here.

Overall, Halo 3 managed to double the total 360 sales for the week, which prompted Forza Motorsport 2 to surge forwards 22 places, from 35 to 13.

Source: EG

My ass you did :rofl:

There is far better Halo players here than you and I doubt any of them took less than 10 hours.

I beat the game in around 10 hours on Legendary in Co-op. Solo Heroic in about the same time. Haven't gotten to Solo Legendary yet. I have all the skulls and have accessed all the terminals. My campaign goals are Solo Legendary and beating every level in the meta game scoring mode.

I'm a RPG fan so 10hours is not long to me but there is a lot of replay in the game, going back getting the skulls and terminals I found fun. Playing it on normal with friends that did not want to play any harder was actually a lot of fun, it was amazing to see how much different it is from Heroic Solo and Legendary Co-op.

On Easy or even Normal I'm sure I could rush the game and probably beat it in 4hours. But this is skipping a lot of the battles witch is really part of the game. I'm sure 5hours on heroic is possible, it would be very hard though rushing in there at that difficulty.

Gamefly Charts: Halo 3 Stays On Top, Orange Box Makes Strong Debut

This week's top rental charts from U.S. game rental company GameFly, representing the most requested games for the week ending October 1st, highlight both to-be-released and already released games in a unique demand-specific chart.

Halo 3 maintains the top spot in the overall charts for the third straight week, while just over a week ahead of its highly anticipated release, the Half Life 2 compilation The Orange Box comes into the second spot, displacing EA's Skate all the way down to the fifth position. This week marks Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare's third week in the third spot, and Project Gotham Racing 4 enters the top five in the fourth position.

What follows is a breakdown of the top titles requested by GameFly subscribers across each of the major platforms:

Xbox 360

1. Halo 3 (Microsoft), 2. Half Life 2: The Orange Box (EA) 3. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (Activision), 4. Project Gotham Racing 4 (Microsoft), 5. Skate (EA)

For the third straight week, the top five all-platform requests are identical to the top five Xbox 360 requests, reflecting the same movement and demonstrating a telling dominance for the console in the rental market.

<snip>

Source - Gamasutra

That last bit has less to do with Halo and more to do with the huge lineup of awesome 360 games, but who'd have thunk Halo 3 would be on top :p

-Spenser

Hell Halo might be a short game in some people's eyes, I don't dispute that. Doing it in 5 hours on heroic though? I doubt that a lot. The very fact that the jackals in the game can kill you within 2 shots throws it out the window imo. That doesn't even take into account brutes and the flood which eat a lot of time up.

Like I said, if he can proove it, go for it :p

You guys are proving my point.

I'm working my way through Legendary right now, and I'm finding it far more difficult. Still, I've only played six or seven hours and I only have two missions left (4 and 5, which aren't exactly the longest). That said, on this playthrough I've been doing some missions with one other person co-op and some by myself. So that might have cut down some time. Still, me and brother wandered around plenty on those co-op missions, so that's some extension right there.

And I'm actually very good at Halo's campaign. I've played Halo 1 very often over the past five years. I've beaten the game on Legendary literally dozens and dozens of times. Halo 3 I've already gone through four times, I believe. Halo 2 I only finished once, for anyone interested.

Skulls + Heroic helps to toughen things up a bit, but it's still not a huge difference (unless you turn on Tilt with Famine, ogod!). Either way, it's not the difficulty we're arguing about- it's length. And the game is still short, any way you slice it.

Here's some more info for you nonbelievers: when I'm exploring, each level might take me upwards of two hours. But through normal play (not on Normal, mind), the game is fairly short. That's not a bad thing, though. Don't know what you guys are getting all tied up about.

Bioshock took me 30 hours. Metroid Prime 3 recently took me a little over 10. For some people, the times for those games were reversed. You see? Not everyone gets through games at the same pace. They're not like movies, with a set running time.

A little aside: I was just telling my brother you guys didn't believe how quickly I finished the game. He started laughing about how if we were doing co-op we probably could've finished in three hours. That's a little exaggeration on his part, but that's a remark coming from someone whose new favorite game is H3. The length doesn't matter, guys. It's the quality.

edit:

Here's a link for u doodz.

A half an hour on Heroic, with almost all the skulls turned on. Co-op, granted, but still.

Edited by ragn4rokk 2.0

Hell if you did do it, I'm impressed. I certainly couldn't do it. Maybe If I replayed Halo 1 and 2 like you have I may be betetr at it. Really thoguh I just don't have the time to devote just to Halo.

Now your bro is saying 3 hours? Oh jeez, you really are pushing it :p

Dang, you must be amazing. I'm not bad, but it takes me a little bit to beat a level on Heroic because I'm more strategic because I hate dying -- even if not dying means I take longer. Want to play co-op Legendary the week of Thanksgiving to get me that achievement? :laugh:

Yeah Ayepecks, I'm all for that offer :)

The ironic thing is, I'm not all that great at multiplayer. On Halo 1 I was great- but then, so was anyone with a decent skill with the pistol. But now I think my K/D ratio is hovering around .75 :/

I'm better at objective games, but my Halo 3 slayer skills could use some work.

I haven't played online multiplayer yet... still have to see how good I am. I can dominate my roommate and a few other people on the track team at the university I'm at at it, but that's offline, and I don't know how good they all really are.

He did die 27 times, or 9 times... either way, 36 times total.

I haven't played online multiplayer yet... still have to see how good I am. I can dominate my roommate and a few other people on the track team at the university I'm at at it, but that's offline, and I don't know how good they all really are.

Why not give online multiplayer a go yet? It's really the only way to get better.

Damn, either I am just rubbish on at this game or most others are amazing. Everyone seems to be marching through this game on Heroic and Legendary, I am going through on Normal, fairly simple but I still die alot. Though as much as I love games I am not a hardcore gamer, I just don't have the patience or concentration to play through on such high difficulties.

I might give it ago... but ehh....

EDIT:

Also is there a way to rewind in the save movies?? It seems like a basic feature which doesn't seem to be there.

Edited by freedom77
TeamXbox guide to the IWHBYD Skull. :happy:

1191054152.jpg

your reward... :p

Apparently you only need the last 7 notes so you don't need to do that much jumping

http://www.halo3planet.com/halo-3-skull-lo...s/iwhbyd-skull/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!