added 9 June 2010  

996 members have voted

  1. 1. How did you find Neowin?

    • A Google (Search) Result
      505
    • From a friend/acquaintance
      137
    • At work
      26
    • By a news story
      78
    • From TV/Radio
      3
    • Link exchange / Linked from another site
      212


Recommended Posts

On 19/12/2022 at 21:01, Squirrelington said:

Nawh I feel like it also had Win in the name. I'm sure I'll randomly remember a week from now.

I think i used to be on the same site looking for leaked betas. I’m not sure if i remember it correctly, but could it have been winbeta?

I think that there was some irc channel related to that site where you could then download the files with mirc. Atleast in win2k and win me beta days.

Edited by Joni_78
  • Like 1
On 19/12/2022 at 13:41, Joni_78 said:

I think i used to be on the same site looking for leaked betas. I’m not sure if i remember it correctly, but could it have been winbeta?

I think that there was some irc channel related to that site where you could then download the files with mirc. Atleast in win2k and win me beta days.

Yeah that might be it! I also spent a lot of time on DALnet and Efnet back in the day. And running my own ircd, whether it was unrealircd, bahamut, and whatever ircd DALnet used before bahamut... I forget. Been too long.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

How did I find Neowin? I was searching for a well known humour piece called French Military History, and Neowin was the first link I saw with the actual text. Looking around I saw that humour was one of many topics here so I accepted the offer to create an account. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
On 27/01/2023 at 14:00, cousinarlo said:

How did I find Neowin? I was searching for a well known humour piece called French Military History, and Neowin was the first link I saw with the actual text. Looking around I saw that humour was one of many topics here so I accepted the offer to create an account. 

Welcome!

For me this was many many moons ago :) (18 something years?). I wandered on a French forum called 3dchips-fr.com (it doesn't exist anymore). If I remember correctly, Neowin was mentioned in one of the posts and that's how I got here.

When I was looking up Windows XP betas way back in 2000-2001. A bunch of links came up and this site popped up. I lurked for a while (2001 to August 2003) before joining. It will be my 20th this August 2023. 😁 

Side note: Neowin’s founder Steven Parker and I both have the same birthday! 😉

I found this site during a crazy/stressful time in my life, looking for technical tips and help, etc. I think I joined just to b*tch about how complicated it was for me to try setting up the Vivaldi browser. 🙄 

Ever since Steven P. posted a "get out of here" gif pic to me of (I think) Cary Grant, pointing me toward the exit, I've felt somewhat at home, lol. 😁

--some old guy with goggles who goes by the nickname of nerim 😎

Back when Bink.Nu was just a message board itself... then when Steven Bink built his website, he added a forum to it..., later made me a moderator. It was someone there, when we were discussing XP's infamous pagefile settings vs. amount of system RAM (that convo lasted till Windows 7 release)... they mentioned that this site was one to add to your favorites as a place to come and get tons of ideas on not only tech, but ways to utilize XP beyond its selling point basics.

His site no longer exists, but I still see him post from time to time on Facebook. It has certainly been a minute.

  • 2 weeks later...

was googling to find the new updates on Edge, FIreFox & Chrome (specifically w/ regards to nVidia's super resolution patch)

and so here I am... I've heard of this site before but think I've only been on here once or twice..

I'm an avid user of guru3d though!

  • Like 2
On 09/02/2023 at 05:46, kowcop said:

Pretty sure this was the site that was founded on the back of the XP ISO leak from the viacom FTP site.. or is my memory a bit hazy?

We were almost a year old when that happened.

Neowin Founded Oct 1 2000
Windows XP (devils0wn leak): August 2001 https://www.neowin.net/news/today-marks-the-10th-anniversary-of-windows-xp-rtm/

:) 

Unfortunately we don't have a lot of the earliest articles in our db.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
On 09/02/2023 at 17:51, Steven P. said:

Windows XP (devils0wn leak): August 2001

That's not the leak I was thinking of.. it was an FTP site for VIA that had stored a very early private beta of XP (Whistler) - public beta was released a month later. I cant remember which site we were using to discuss it at the time.

Here we go.. Microsoft released the first public beta build of Whistler, build 2296, on October 31, 2000. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 09/02/2023 at 21:55, kowcop said:

That's not the leak I was thinking of.. it was an FTP site for VIA that had stored a very early private beta of XP (Whistler) - public beta was released a month later. I cant remember which site we were using to discuss it at the time.

Here we go.. Microsoft released the first public beta build of Whistler, build 2296, on October 31, 2000. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP

Bit late to reply, but it is true my motivation to start Neowin was to post info about Windows leaks, because there were no decent sites doing it. I was filling a void at the time. I met Tom Warren on EFNet, he was going by the name creamhackered and he came to Neowin and not long after (2004) he broke the news about the leaked Windows 2000 source code leak, and the rest is history 😛 

Microsoft really hated Neowin back then heh.

What really changed Neowin, was when Microsoft opened up beta testing for everyone with the Windows 8 Consumer preview back in February 2012 (although that release was also already locked down "Beta testers" had no say at all in what was ultimately released) Neowin could no longer leak pre releases to the public, because from Windows 8 people had easy access to the betas.

Microsoft really ended up managing pre releases, Windows 10 is a prime example of basic feature requests or bugs being reported thousands of times by beta testers and Microsoft just ignoring that feedback. They will do exactly what they want to do and the "beta testing" is mostly pretend and a free way to replace what used to be a professional Quality Assurance program they used to have to pay for with Windows. Now they can rely on telemetry and free feedback from thousands of Insiders (consumers).

Microsoft are also part of the problem with major corporations normalizing releasing beta quality software as a finished product with the attitude of "maybe we'll fix it later".  Windows 98 might not have the reputation as being stable as Windows XP with its NT layer but it was a product of years of beta testing, and released as a "finished product". Yearly "Service Packs" fixed what bugs that were discovered. Now we live in a time where monthly and out of bounds updates are needed to fix the poor quality of Windows 10 and 11 beta quality releases because they keep tacking on untested features and ignoring Insider feedback.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!