Cloverfield (2008)


Recommended Posts

Saw it last night and I'll break it down:

Monster: 5/5 stars (absolutely awesome monster)

Sounds/Score: 3.5/5 stars (the parasites actually sound like they're saying, "NOM NOM NOM")

Plot: 5/5 stars

Story: 3/5 stars

Graphics: 5/5 stars (absolutely awesome CGI)

This film can't be compared to Jurassic Park. While I didn't like the film Jurassic Park, I realize it's contributions to the film industry and this film isn't a classic and never will be.

With that said, I will probably watch this film only one more time and that's so I can pause it on my HDTV when it comes out on Blu-Ray.

Overall, the film gets 4.5/5.

It's a Paramount movie... no Blu-Ray, unless they switch and give back their money.

And I want to trust you... but you loved Dead Silence :p

i saw the midnight showing and it is a very intense movie. the acting was damn good

although my favorite part were the little monsters and the noises they made "nom nom nom" and "BEEEyaaaaaaaa" :laugh:

and they were smart enough to make it a shorter than most 2 1/2 hour movies. it's only about 1 hour and 40 min

side note: this is one of those movies where people will say some stuff out loud during the movie. the crowd i was with did it a couple of times, both of which were very funny comments, and they kept it to a minimum so it actually made the movie experience much funner. but your crowd might not be as funny so be warned ;)

And I want to trust you... but you loved Dead Silence :p
I don't want to get into this in this thread, but I never said I loved Dead Silence. For it's genre (clown/doll horror film) it was pretty good. But I'm sure that there are films I'd probably disagree with you on, that doesn't mean I won't take your opinion into account when seeing a completely different in a completely different genre (monster horror film). Just my two cents though...
side note: this is one of those movies where people will say some stuff out loud during the movie. the crowd i was with did it a couple of times, both of which were very funny comments, and they kept it to a minimum so it actually made the movie experience much funner. but your crowd might not be as funny so be warned ;)

This happened during Spider-Man 3. When Peter pushed MJ to the ground and then there was silence, one guy yelled, "Oh hell no!" While we don't use that kind of language, it made my wife and I laugh along with everyone else.

I don't want to get into this in this thread, but I never said I loved Dead Silence. For it's genre (clown/doll horror film) it was pretty good. But I'm sure that there are films I'd probably disagree with you on, that doesn't mean I won't take your opinion into account when seeing a completely different in a completely different genre (monster horror film). Just my two cents though...

I was teasing (Y)

This happened during Spider-Man 3. When Peter pushed MJ to the ground and then there was silence, one guy yelled, "Oh hell no!" While we don't use that kind of language, it made my wife and I laugh along with everyone else.

I can see that in my head and it made me lol.

This movie is good in theory but realy horrible in practice

i only liked one scene that was then they were on the side of the street and the army was shooting at them, that was it

the love story really sucked and would have been better if it wasnt revolved around it.

I think any monster movie that leaves me saying, now what did that thing look like again, has problems. I still have no idea what the thing looks like in it's entirety. Sure there were MANY round the building shots, one long overhead and the last time we see it shot.. (won't elaborate on that for those who still have not seen it). But again nothing to put it into full context in my mind.

I reserve total judgment for the extended cut but for now 4/5. Oh and too short.

Has anyone else seen The Host? Good one of you like this type of film.

I think any monster movie that leaves me saying, now what did that thing look like again, has problems. I still have no idea what the thing looks like in it's entirety. Sure there were MANY round the building shots, one long overhead and the last time we see it shot.. (won't elaborate on that for those who still have not seen it). But again nothing to put it into full context in my mind.

I reserve total judgment for the extended cut but for now 4/5. Oh and too short.

Has anyone else seen The Host? Good one of you like this type of film.

Now that's weird, I just finished watching The Host. I like it. It explains where the monster originates from :p Cloverfield was more...immersive, thanks to the way it was filmed. The Host is great too :)

loved the movie and loved the creepiness. Some scenes definitely have the OMG factor to them.

but as many reviews already point it out.. you have to get comfortable with the amateur camera work in first 15 minutes because if you don't you'll be like the couple who walked out of the movie after 30 some minutes :p

oh and I'm not certain about the ratings. PG13 ? I don't think so

THe only reason why i didn't like it was because i went with my friends we got there late

and my friend almost ****ing threw up from the screen shot by a video camera because he has a sensitive stomach and the theatre smelled like popcorn and i had a headache for hours after + i had to work which sucked with a headache

i have to give this another chance.

^ to the guy above me i went to a huge movie threatre and it was not full at all but just wanted to say about 15 people walked out of the movie.

just watched it 3 hours ago,

Tons of people in the movie at the end were like we want our money back and that stuff, personally I thoroughly enjoyed it, I wanted more more more as stated above, the ending made me unhappy cause i wanted lots more info.

That monster looked ****ed. I love how the chick explodes. lol i find it amazing Lily is the only one to survive lol.

It was worth my 10$'s also i don't get why it spit out hud or hut or what ever his name was lol. why didn't it just eat him?

Well it was a great movie i hope they have some sort of a follow up on it or something crazy maybe a 2nd movie.

I sat at the very front of the movie theater and boy was my neck sore.

PS I wonder what kind of bombs they dropped on that f ucker? 1000 pounderz? one things for sure it wasn't a Nuc

yeah I wondered about the carpet bombs too. But as soon as the camera dumb dude was like "**** yeah take that" I knew something was coming but the ****** monster still made me jump in my seat lol

But now that I think about it, they should've added more monster in the movie. I understand the whole love is blind idea but it gets frustrating when they were on the building and the army was pounding the monster.. I wanna see the damn monster and not how they climb up the stupid roof!

Posting my opinion in this thread too. :blush:

Just saw the movie, it was pretty good although the filming style was HORRIBLE.

Besides being so shakey that you can hardly see anything half of the time, they even added extra blur just to make it even harder to see.

But the monster doesn't really look anything like what it does in the picture posted, doesn't even resemble a whale. And the louse things were a lot smaller than in the picture.

The ending was cut short and they never really showed the monster in detail until the end to obviously cut the production costs. The monster was cool though, they just didn't show it getting blown up enough, where it came from, how it became...etc.

Over all I think that this movie was worth watching though, it was entertaining and that is what a movie is for.

Can someone exlplain to me what the monster was and where it came from though?

Edited by PricklyPoo
Anyone else notice the last scene when they were on the ferris wheel when they looked out over the water the meteor that was in the sky?

I looked it up more, it seems that there was something that drops into the water when they are on farris wheel so it is for sure from space.

Well this is a MAJOR spoiler so remove it if it is too much.

Link to artists' impression of monster (pictures)

Link to website

Oh and guess what, there will most likely be a Cloverfield 2....

"After the ending credits have completely run through, garbled radio static can be heard with the phrase "It's still alive" played in reverse." - Wikipidia

Edited by PricklyPoo
i don't get why it spit out hud or hut or what ever his name was lol. why didn't it just eat him?.

[i got the distinct impression that it bit him and he fell out in a couple pieces.

[Anyone else notice the last scene when they were on the ferris wheel when they looked out over the water the meteor that was in the sky?.

[No I missed that, guess its was an ET then.

Just saw the movie, it was pretty good although the filming style was HORRIBLE.

Besides being so shakey that you can hardly see anything half of the time, they even added extra blur just to make it even harder to see.

you saw the movie through the point of view of a $30 video camera!! what did you expect, an IMAX experience? the movie is SUPPOSED to look like that and it looked damn real.

Can someone exlplain to me what the monster was and where it came from though?

they never explained it

"After the ending credits have completely run through, garbled radio static can be heard with the phrase "It's still alive" played in reverse." - Wikipidia

i was wondering what that said. me and my friends couldn't make it out

i say they make a Cloverfield 2, but this time show it from the military's perspective

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!