Cloverfield (2008)


Recommended Posts

haven't seen it and i probably wont ,

if it looks as horroble as it did in the trailer (recorded with a cam)

That's kind of the point. It is from first person point of view (i.e. The Blair Witch Project). The film is in the form of a home made movie, shot by a guy named Hud who is filming a going away party for his friend who is moving to Japan.

Anyone have a link to a screenshot or clip from the meteor from that last scene everyone's talking about?

Would not mind seeing that too but I have a feeling the second one is posted it will be banned. I asked my sister, who is going to see it tomorrow, to look for something in that scene. I told her what but I won't spoil it here.

On the subject of what the bloody thing looks like, any see any previous speculations that look like what you saw in the movie? I am about to Google and see what's been circulating but what I have seen so far is either a spawn of the Renkor beast or The Beast from 20,000 fathoms and it appears those were not even close.

I posted it here because people would of seen the film and wondered.

After seeing Cloverfield today, audiences around the country are still asking what the hell is the deal with the monster? Where the hell did it come from.

Well, Film School Rejects Brian Gibson and Chris Ilcisko got the inside track on the monster’s origins from the director Matt Reeves himself. If you watch the movie closely, you can see a hint of where the monster comes from...

No, not in the attack footage. Not in the news footage. In the footage from April that was accidentally erased by Hud.

This original footage doesn’t just include the budding relationship between Rob and Beth. It also has the “first” appearance of the monster.

Didn’t catch it? Well, go see the movie again, and watch carefully in the Coney Island footage at the very end. You might just see something suspicious drop into the water.

Watch the skies, my friends. Watch the skies.

Source: http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/excl...r-came-from.php

Edited by Hurmoth
Added spoiler tag to the spoiler.

Ahh, that really grinds my gears. I just got back from seeing it. And I was specifically looking for something out of my ordinary during that last scene. Can't believe I missed it.

CRAP !! I did not notice the meteor thing at the end :(

I guess I have to go watch the movie again :D

just got back... GREAT MOVIE.

Perhaps even more so then the monster, what made this movie is the great acting, these guys really pulled off making this movie believable, i actually felt as if i was watching a real documented movie of this happening.

Thank you to the person who had mentioned about the comet... i did notice it (barely) from the old footage, which must indicate the "monster" landing. although i knew it was coming, i kinda felt sad that everyone died, but i guess knowing that the video was found gives us the belief that we conquered the monster

The only thing that i was really upset about with this movie was when the monster grabbed Hud, i suppose it was just to give us an up close look at the monster, but it made no sense and would have been better without it. How does a monster the size of a sky scraper just "appear" on top of you.. doesn't make any sense

About the camera movement.. i felt the first 20-30 minutes were rough.. alot of heavy shaking and blur, which made me dizzy.. however once the action started aside from a few scenes it calmed down quite a bit and was very watchable.

Overall.. great movie, nice to see something fresh.

****, I wish I had noticed the meteor in that last scene. I loved the movie, though. Living in Brooklyn and watching it in NYC did add some wonder to it, for me.

Since you live right there, I wanted to ask you, do you feel any negativity towards the filmmakers because of them "exploiting" 9/11? I know that may sound crazy to some, but I've read a lot of negative reviews bashing the film because there is some similarities between the buildings falling, the dusk clouds, etc. with 9/11.

Since you live right there, I wanted to ask you, do you feel any negativity towards the filmmakers because of them "exploiting" 9/11? I know that may sound crazy to some, but I've read a lot of negative reviews bashing the film because there is some similarities between the buildings falling, the dusk clouds, etc. with 9/11.

Not at all. It's what happens when buildings fall and, if anything, the memory of 9/11 just made it seem a lot more realistic since I've witness the same chaos in my own city before.

Not at all. It's what happens when buildings fall and, if anything, the memory of 9/11 just made it seem a lot more realistic since I've witness the same chaos in my own city before.

Just thought I'd ask... I have actually been wondering if these critics actually lived and witnessed what happened on 9/11 first hand.

I've been reading a lot of mixed reviews just depending on where I visit (forums and such)... I think I'm going to wait for it to hit DVD, unless my friends tells me otherwise.

Here's three reviews that might change your mind: http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/review/1789, http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10917, http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10933. And the film has a 76% rating on the TomatoMeter @ RottenTomatoes (at the time of this writing).

You should give this a try. How many people here at Neowin have said that it is bad? 2-3 out of 7 pages isn't bad. The worst part about the film is the homemade video feel. While it is unique (in the fact that not very many films use this style and get away with it), it is hard on the eyes at times. But outside of that, the style of the film works because you makes you part of the film. You sit there and feel like, "Yeah, I could have filmed this event" or someone you know might have filmed this. You can only see what Hud can see, and that makes you immersed in the story even more so than any other monster film.

The other thing that I found a little annoying is there's to much opening; meaning when the film opens, the storyline that they throw you in (the people the film is about) takes way to long to get to the monster, or at least it felt that way to me. Now the reason they did that is because they want us to connect with these characters, but to be honest IMO we don't necessarily need to connect with these characters.

DVD won't do this justice, only a theater with true digital surround sound will do this film justice. I'm going back to see this film again probably next weekend, that's how much I enjoyed it, I didn't even buy Dead Silence on DVD, let alone see it twice in theaters :laugh:

DVD won't do this justice, only a theater with true digital surround sound will do this film justice. I'm going back to see this film again probably next weekend, that's how much I enjoyed it, I didn't even buy Dead Silence on DVD, let alone see it twice in theaters :laugh:

Definitely. One of the key aspects was the shaking of the floor when the footsteps of the monster were nearby. It really added a lot to the experience and put you much further into the scene.

I just got back from seeing it and really liked it. The only problem I had with it was the ending, but I expect them to tie up some loose ends later with some more viral marketing. If you have the choice between I am Legend and Cloverfield I would recommend seeing Cloverfield because you really want the theater experience for this one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!