neowin_34242 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Sorry if that gets you really excited! Unfortunately I don't have access to the build, but from what I see the build number seems to be 6519! See if someone confirms! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Laughing Man Share Posted January 17, 2008 Here we go again :p Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neufuse Veteran Share Posted January 17, 2008 Sorry if that gets you really excited! Unfortunately I don't have access to the build, but from what I see the build number seems to be 6519! See if someone confirms! And you know this how?.. unless you can provide credentials no one will believe you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raa Share Posted January 17, 2008 Yeah sorry, i'll use my usual quote. Source? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unto Darkness Share Posted January 17, 2008 And you know this how?.. unless you can provide credentials no one will believe you +1 And I was VERY EXCITED when i saw your topic...Bummer.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iconboy Share Posted January 17, 2008 sometimes i dont think you CAN use a source, if you know what i mean ;) :p Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven P. Founder Share Posted January 17, 2008 What? Where? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximum Error Share Posted January 17, 2008 what a complete waste of a thread! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NienorGT Share Posted January 17, 2008 And I say it's build 6520! Who's believe me? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
+.Vamp Subscriber² Share Posted January 17, 2008 I heard that 'OS X 11' is here too! build 1337. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unto Darkness Share Posted January 17, 2008 And I say it's build 6520! Who's believe me? I do! :D I heard that 'OS X 11' is here too! build 1337. Okay this is too much :laugh: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neowin_34242 Author Share Posted January 17, 2008 You guys are playing it way too much man. It's fine if you don't believe until a valid source confirms. But if you are more observant then you'd remember my previous posts on Vista betas were hardly fake news. I have seen the files, just don't have access to grab them yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDX1 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Windows 7 is tasty. It's nice having multiple friends at MS, one who is testing it. :yes: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Antonius Share Posted January 17, 2008 read this topic... https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...4&st=0& Looking at it, it seems M1 has been shipped to keypartners so bits of info could have been leaked. Wouldnt suprise me if a copy of the alpha?? would be leaked soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger H. Veteran Share Posted January 17, 2008 source people! Not that we don't believe you but we wanna read it and digest it for ourselves and make up our mind and then have someone else........ ok nevermind, we don't believe you. :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neowin_34242 Author Share Posted January 17, 2008 source people! Not that we don't believe you but we wanna read it and digest it for ourselves and make up our mind and then have someone else........ ok nevermind, we don't believe you. :) fair enough. but what if you see it yourself (as in my case), how can you say source? I think I brought this point up before (when I posted Vista beta info and no one believed me). Are you saying it's better not to post then post then? Everyone wants to know more about the next release of Windows, and share what you know helps. I'm just sharing what I see and what I know.... you can use your own discretion on its validity, but saying stupid things (not you KoDeXeRo, you have a good point here) just ruin the Neowin spirit. If you guys think it's better not to post if it's not verifiable by a third party, I will stop posting Win 7 news then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jporter Share Posted January 17, 2008 This seems to be "true" actually if I may believe the story, source: http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/35641/118/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven P. Founder Share Posted January 17, 2008 fair enough. but what if you see it yourself (as in my case), how can you say source? I think I brought this point up before (when I posted Vista beta info and no one believed me). Are you saying it's better not to post then post then? Everyone wants to know more about the next release of Windows, and share what you know helps. I'm just sharing what I see and what I know.... you can use your own discretion on its validity, but saying stupid things (not you KoDeXeRo, you have a good point here) just ruin the Neowin spirit.If you guys think it's better not to post if it's not verifiable by a third party, I will stop posting Win 7 news then. Nah, don't stop posting about it please ;) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unto Darkness Share Posted January 17, 2008 Oh no, its okay....Tell us more about it....I don't care if it is verified or not, so long as I get something juicy! :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMaster23 Share Posted January 17, 2008 this reminds me of the longhorn alpha days in 2003 / 2004 .. oh how those builds suck :p well they were innovative but slow and unstable... suits the name alpha then can't wait to get my hands on a new alpha build :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPero Share Posted January 17, 2008 We dont want build numbers, we want features! :) Keep posting please! Cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unto Darkness Share Posted January 17, 2008 We dont want build numbers, we want features! :) Keep posting please! Cheers ^ +1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel Blue01 Share Posted January 17, 2008 With no source should this thread remain open? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dovellas Share Posted January 17, 2008 It s possibile Windows Vista SP2 = Vienna? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger H. Veteran Share Posted January 17, 2008 well i was only messing... even if i don't have a valid source we like speculation too. Hey, isn't that how Neowin got started? :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts