Firefox 3 drops Vista look  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. If Firefox 3 Drops the Vista Native 'Look' will you continue to use Firefox?

    • Yes
      340
    • No
      133
    • Let's get this confirmed by Mozilla first
      158


Recommended Posts

That new theme looks half decent. But honestly, am I the only one thinking Firefox 2's icon set is ten times better than what they have as 'native' icons for XP and Vista?

Anyone that wants a high quality IE-like skin, try myFirefox and also its theme settings extension:

post-99705-1204570902_thumb.png

Everything here is skinned well - menu backgrounds, the Favourites bar that pops up, and even the 404 pages. :p

post-99705-1204570916_thumb.png

ugh, I hate when Firefox looks like IE7. IE7 looks so ugly.. :|

I prefer Firefox with either the default set-up or with the Blue Ice/ iFox Smooth theme. Don't care about native graphics support as long as they have good support for theme add-ons and the browser is secure & fast.

No, they didn't f**k anything up! They never said they would include Areo Glass in Firefox! You need to use your eyes and read PROPERLY! They actually said they will make the theme "more native" on each OS. They did not say "we will include Areo Glass in Firefox 3".

The theme that was linked in Alex Faaborg's post IS more native to Vista, just like was orignally said.

I hope they keep this theme.

1.) I never once said that Mozilla is going to use Aero glass with Firefox 3.

2.) If you think that the current Vista theme looks native, then you need your eyes checked. It takes a lot more than creating newer (poor) icons for an app to blend into the native OS. Mozilla did a very half-fast job with the Vista themes.

Mozilla should have added glass to Firefox 3. If they are going to make FF3 look more native on the OS and re-work the UI, then they should go all out and do it. They shouldn't be going half-way, because they'll just be wasting all of our time. With OS X, they did go all the way, and as a result, it looks fantastic. Take a look at the OS X Firefox 3 theme, and compare it with the current Vista one. Then get back to me if you think Mozilla didn't completely drop the ball on the Vista UI.

ugh, I hate when Firefox looks like IE7. IE7 looks so ugly.. :|

I prefer Firefox with either the default set-up or with the Blue Ice/ iFox Smooth theme. Don't care about native graphics support as long as they have good support for theme add-ons and the browser is secure & fast.

i strongly agree.... WHY make firefox look like that IE7 stuff... i prefered IE6's interface much more as they changed IE7 to much... atleast so far firefox 3 still looks pretty much the same as Firefox 2... which if you ask me, thats a good thing ;)

Shocked, honestly shocked at some of the comments in here. You all forget what FF has done. And FF3 is a natural progression, that is undeniable, no matter how "non-native" YOU think it is! It definitely looks better than IE7! that POS with icons all over the place, very unintuitive IMO. Will NEVER go back to IE. Not enough customization, I don't mean skins, I mean in its stock form, I have more features to tweak to my liking. Runs beautifully.

Shocked, honestly shocked at some of the comments in here. You all forget what FF has done. And FF3 is a natural progression, that is undeniable, no matter how "non-native" YOU think it is! It definitely looks better than IE7! that POS with icons all over the place, very unintuitive IMO. Will NEVER go back to IE. Not enough customization, I don't mean skins, I mean in its stock form, I have more features to tweak to my liking. Runs beautifully.

Just IMO, but IE7 UI >>>>>>>>>>>>> FF UI.

  • 2 weeks later...
That's a mockup of the 'Places' organiser. Yep. I don't recall MozillaCorp to plan to skin the browser itself like that under Vista though. Besides, Firefox 3 uses native menus and toolbars, and will soon have the Vista icon theme... so what was your problem again?

I loved the mockup. its unfortunate that they dropped it. Seriously very disappointing. :(

Is there any actual reason why one end of the address bar is curved? These themers are doing things in order to be different, not because they make the application look good, or to improve the UI. They're introducing weird visual crap for the sake of having it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!