Toshiba offically confirms death of HD-DVD


Recommended Posts

ok.. well guess it's time to start shopping for BD players. i'll start looking at those movies that are on sale now in BD that i've always wanted :D Time to start my collection again!!

Hmm.. other than the PS3, what's the other cheapest BD player? Since today is my birthday i think it will be a fitting gift :D

just get a ps3, its the best one out at the moment

You're Kidding...Right?

nope

I would probably be happy about this if anyone other than Sony was behind the format. It never ceases to amaze me how short the public attention span is for such vile corporations.

These "vile corporations" you talk about make our lives 10x better through the technology they provide.

I'll be damned if people would actually want Sony to never exist. Honestly, I don't care how much of an Apple/MS/Other Company here supporter you are, to actually want any one of these giants not to exist is just :no:

It's not the corporations that "promote" corruption, it's the business world itself - It's competitive, RUNS on money and is hard to stay at the top in (you're under scrutiny/public view 24/7 - the smallest of PR mistake will be spun to the high heavens and back). The whole scene these corporations are part of is "corrupt". If you consider pay offs, cut-throat tactics and the likes to be corrupt.

As a consumer though, how about you stop wasting your time thinking about this perfect world where every rival corporation shakes hands, grows daisies in plots of lands infront of their buildings and don't mind losing out on market share/money to others and just buy products that are rated well and work for you.

I suppose exploding batteries and rookits mean everything Sony do is worthless, eh? Who cares about the well reviewed Bravia TVs, they all suck. Who cares about any cameras they make, none of them are good... Who cares about the PS brand, it's never gave anything to anyone? Am I correct :laugh: ?

I don't hate MS/Nintendo/Apple/Sony or anyone really, I don't agree with everything they do, but they also do a lot of good. No one is perfect, even the president of a country makes mistakes, doesn't he/she? :whistle:

I respect your stance on disliking Sony, that's your decision, but "vile" corporations? Cmon.

I also have my window wipers on, I see through shallow marketing, and the tricks of the trades in the business world (1080p is essential!!111), but that doesn't mean I dislike the product being offered - I just don't buy into the over the top/persuasive PR/Marketing.

I would probably be happy about this if anyone other than Sony was behind the format. It never ceases to amaze me how short the public attention span is for such vile corporations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc_Association

it's not just sony you should be mad at ;) :p

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc_Association

it's not just sony you should be mad at ;) :p

To be clear, I'm not mad at Sony because of Blu-Ray, I'm mad at Blu-Ray because of Sony. In the consumer electronics industry, you'd be hard pressed to find a company with a worse track record of abusing their own customers in any way possible that would benefit their bottom line. Rootkits, DRM, useless proprietary formats, the list goes on. No company has a spotless record, but Sony has taken negative PR from an isolated incident to a trend. Sadly, as soon as you dangle a shiny new object in front of the masses, the past tends to fade awfully quickly, at least until it repeats itself. And now they'll no doubt be handed loads of cash via the PS3... a video game system they utterly failed to sell competitively except for the fact that it also happens to play Blu-Ray media.

@Audioboxer, your high-horse is lovely, but your argument doesn't hold much water. Saying that the public is better off having Sony around, despite all their abuses, just because they offer a few good products is silly. If they didn't produce the technology, someone else would, and very possibly in a more consumer-friendly fashion. But hey, thank goodness we have the RIAA around too, the world would be a sad place if nobody was able to play music.

Uh, the studios and retailers switched because they were selling more content on Blu-ray.

Wrong.

The Studios switched/backed Blu-ray because of the added level of copy protection layers it had over HD-DVD, such as AACS, BD+, BD-ROM Watermark etc while HD-DVD only had AACS which they wanted to protect their content.

This in turn switched the studios, and retailers followed because of better studio support. Blockbuster UK back in April 2007 already backed Blu-ray only because "they" thought it was the better format, yet there was hardly any hardware out, nor titles to bak this up. It was THEIR choice. Whether they were paid under the table to do this maye sound possible.

I couldn't really care what who won, but the fact is Blu-ray did NOT win this format war based on people buying Blu-ray content. It was the Consumers And Retailers decided this, coupled with the massive amount of money thrown about to get "exclusive support" over the other *cough* Warner and it was far more promoted around than HD-DVD ever was.

Still, we finally have a winner at the end of it.

Seriously. If Toshiba had actually put out some sort of competent marketing campaign for HD DVD, it probably would have won. It had a good price, excellent features, a consumer-friendly name, just no marketing.

Perhaps you are right, but I am unsure. Lack of marketing was a serious blow to HD-DVD but it wasn't really what killed it I think. The thing is the studios didn't really like HD-DVD, it offered less protection for their films, had no region protection at all and most importantly HD-DVD was cracked and Blu-Ray is not (or is it? I'm fairly sure Blu hasn't been cracked yet, but I could be wrong) and the fact that more studios aligned with Blu-Ray from word go was a sign of things to come. HD-DVD might of been more consumer friendly, but it's the studios who you really need to win over to come out on top. If HD-DVD had more of the features Blu-Ray offered and had better marketing, I think the winner would not of been as clear cut and the war would of possibly gone on for alot longer! of cause this is my opinion so take with a grain of salt.

I couldn't really care what who won, but the fact is Blu-ray did NOT win this format war based on people buying Blu-ray content. It was the Consumers And Retailers decided this, coupled with the massive amount of money thrown about to get "exclusive support" over the other *cough* Warner and it was far more promoted around than HD-DVD ever was.

Still, we finally have a winner at the end of it.

Sales numbers during every week of 2007 beg to differ. One who denies the fact that sales number were also a huge factor is a blind fool.

Lets celebrate VHD Day (Victory in High Definition Day)

the HDDVD fans can bleat on about being the 'consumer' oreinted format, but people voted with their wallets!

long live BD!

You'd better hope you don't continue to vote as much as you did before.

it has to, as its now poised to take over dvd, if they don't then dvd will continue to sell and people will skip bd as their HD source.

HD content is not poised to do anything. I don't care who makes it, DVD outnumbers HD content by a ridiculous factor, and until you see a $100 BD player (because the masses are spoiled by Wal-Mart's $29 DVD player), it's not gonna happen.

Sales numbers during every week of 2007 beg to differ. One who denies the fact that sales number were also a huge factor is a blind fool.

And why do you think it sold more than HD-DVD? More Studios supported it than HD-DVD (based on better copy protection) ---> Hence more titles than HD-DVD to choose from --> Plus PS3 was HUGE deciding factor aswell since it had a Blu-ray player built in.

Blind fool in thinking that Blu-ray won it just based on sales? The studios and hell many Retailers already decided what format they rather back which was Blu-ray even before Warner jumped ship. In retailers it had more space on the shop floor, promoted better or in a way making out like HD-DVD doesn't even exist. If HD-DVD was treated fairly both by he studios and retailers, this war would if still gone on and mayeb prehaps HD-DVD would of come on top based on cheaper costs, but its not like the Consumer even had a choice anyway.

I think a alot of PS3 owners are actually relieved Blu-ray came up on top because that's all it still good for right now (I said right now, not the future because it will hopefully be a great console for games)

Edited by PiracyX
No offense but you must be the blind fool in thinking that Blu-ray won it just based on sales.

They pretty much did... in business, you can talk about this and that, and how and why.. but it all comes down to how many widgets you sell.....

If you think it was because of any other reason, I would consider you a fool...

You'd better hope you don't continue to vote as much as you did before.

HD content is not poised to do anything. I don't care who makes it, DVD outnumbers HD content by a ridiculous factor, and until you see a $100 BD player (because the masses are spoiled by Wal-Mart's $29 DVD player), it's not gonna happen.

why not, when dvd was released, there was far more vhs content, and vhs stayed dominant for 2/3 years while dvd was being introduced, its only history repeating itself.

They pretty much did... in business, you can talk about this and that, and how and why.. but it all comes down to how many widgets you sell.....

If you think it was because of any other reason, I would consider you a fool...

That may be true but i think we all know how this game was played. The Studios and retailers muscled out HD-DVD before it even had a chance.

And why do you think it sold more than HD-DVD? More Studios supported it than HD-DVD (based on better copy protection) ---> Hence more titles than HD-DVD to choose from --> Plus PS3 was HUGE deciding factor aswell since it had a Blu-ray player built in.

Blind fool in thinking that Blu-ray won it just based on sales? The studios and hell many Retailers already decided what format they rather back which was Blu-ray even before Warner jumped ship. In retailers it had more space on the shop floor, promoted better or in a way making out like HD-DVD doesn't even exist. If HD-DVD was treated fairly both by he studios and retailers, this war would if still gone on and mayeb prehaps HD-DVD would of come on top based on cheaper costs, but its not like the Consumer even had a choice anyway.

I think a alot of PS3 owners are actually relieved Blu-ray came up on top because that's all it still good for right now (I said right now, not the future because it will hopefully be a great console for games)

You've pretty much been spewing the same nonsense we've all heard over and over... care to share anything new? It's all over with ... what more could you possibly argue about? Is there some actual need to pick it apart for self satisfaction? "If's" and "but's" won't cut it here when debating HD-DVD... it's as good as gone. Somebody is bitter about dumping funds into a dead format it seems.

Yes, the same people that Gave us 2 Bush's and American Idol being a top show. The average consumer is a moron. Long live the hackers that will make thier lives <Sony and thier ilk> Hell >)

Lets celebrate VHD Day (Victory in High Definition Day)

the HDDVD fans can bleat on about being the 'consumer' oreinted format, but people voted with their wallets!

long live BD!

I love this engadget article (my faves in bold):

Top ten things to do with your now-defunct HD DVD player:

1. Mail it to the office of Howard Stringer in protest of Blu-ray's victory.

2. Plug it into your clothes dryer's 240-volt outlet. Woops, honey! My bad, guess we have to buy a Blu-ray player now.

3. Finally, replace your Betamax player.

4. Buy the Blu-ray player of your choice, put it in the box, attempt to return it as "defective."

5. Channel it through Whoopi Goldberg and make some pottery with it.

6. Put a Blu-ray disc in the tray and then call up Toshiba when it doesn't work. Repeatedly.

7. Put it in a time capsule, just to confuse future generations.

8. Buy a few dozen of 'em and build a little hut for your Blu-ray player.

9. Lock it alone in a room with a few lethal weapons... let it die honorably.

10. Use it to upscale DVDs, which is all you ever used it for anyways.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/19/top-ten...-hd-dvd-player/

You've pretty much been spewing the same nonsense we've all heard over and over... care to share anything new? It's all over with ... what more could you possibly argue about? Is there some actual need to pick it apart for self satisfaction? "If's" and "but's" won't cut it here when debating HD-DVD... it's as good as gone. Somebody is bitter about dumping funds into a dead format it seems.

Um, what? Wow, get off your high horse buddy. He's simply saying why he believes HD DVD lost, and in my opinion he has some valid points. Blu-ray was being promoted more, it was given more space and it was more visible to the consumers. Sales are because of this, but they were not the primary factor in Blu-ray winning simply because HD DVD wasn't given much of a chance by all the organizations who decided to jump the gun and support Blu-ray before there was a clear winner.

Um, what? Wow, get off your high horse buddy. He's simply saying why he believes HD DVD lost, and in my opinion he has some valid points. Blu-ray was being promoted more, it was given more space and it was more visible to the consumers. Sales are because of this, but they were not the primary factor in Blu-ray winning simply because HD DVD wasn't given much of a chance by all the organizations who decided to jump the gun and support Blu-ray before there was a clear winner.

Get off yours before you jump to conclusions... or are you bitter too? I agree with everything Blu-ray did right to achieve all of this - or are you not focusing those glasses again? Fact of the matter is, he is beating a dead horse. Get it? The arguements have become such a waste of time as there is no turning back what has been done... Blu-ray is now the future format. Remember, I've been linked to heading the evil Sony corporation in Gamers Hangout... so why would I be against the truth? ...but am I glad I have my Playstation 3? You betcha. :)

Get off yours before you jump to conclusions... or are you bitter too? I agree with everything Blu-ray did right to achieve all of this - or are you not focusing those glasses again? Fact of the matter is, he is beating a dead horse. Get it? The arguements have become such a waste of time as there is no turning back what has been done... Blu-ray is now the future format. Remember, I've been linked to heading the evil Sony corporation in Gamers Hangout... so why would I be against the truth? ...but am I glad I have my Playstation 3? You betcha. :)

See, you're the one that seems to have a problem with those that supported HD DVD, and you're the one creating the arguments. Up until your reply to his post, I saw no sort of arguing in this thread; it was rather a nice discussion. I'm not bitter, and neither is he. He's simply commenting on why he thought HD DVD lost. I don't see how that makes him seem bitter about anything. Just because it's over doesn't mean we can't speculate or comment on what we think went wrong with HD DVD's campaign or anything else that happened.

Seriously, you're the one calling people bitter and blind fools for not agreeing with you or for being supporters of HD DVD. That negative energy is completely unnecessary and is a big part of the problem around here right now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I imagine that was a review or something? My reviews mostly contain a lot of images and galleries, but these are all webp too, but yeah it all adds up on the page load. Would help if you were more helpful with your critique instead of bitching and moaning like a Karen 😂 Because then we might be able to fix it for you.
    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!