Toshiba offically confirms death of HD-DVD


Recommended Posts

I've been talking to a number of people now, and the going opinion is that Blu-Ray will remain a niche market for years now. There is not that big of a benefit to spend hundreds of dollars on something that looks marginally better than DVD. The only way Blu-Ray will catch on is if they pay off the studios to only sell movies in Blu-Ray, or the prices drop to $10 per disc. Until then, DVDs will vastly outsell Blu-Ray titles. Mass adoption might happen in 3-5 years from now, since Sony has to build all new factories, which take time. Plus, if they can't get their yield rate up, they will lose billions more subsidizing disc production.

This news is plainly sickening. HD-DVD had everything going for it except the studios, of which Sony paid off to stick with their inferior, more expensive format. The consumer lost a huge battle today. Hopefully Internet downloads will take off soon, and the majority of consumers can kiss these optical formats goodbye.

I'm sorry but on my 40" display HD content looks far better than DVDs.

Keep telling yourself your upscaled DVDs look great if you want, I'd rather just enjoy HD content on my HDTV. Even now with DVDs costing nothing, I'd still rather buy a Blu Ray copy with it costing a little more. Much better cinema experience, and it "wows" your friends/whoever is watching the movie with you more.

Also Blu Ray discs themselves are not inferior, it's the hardware that was inferior - Something that will be sorted out, and with a PS3 for example, when it is sorted out, you can easily update.

Movies were fine, extras were inferior, to define.

Do you honestly think that digital distrubution will become mainstream in the next 3-5 years?

ISP's are currently trying to cutback bandwidth...not increase it. That plus most people (including myself) would like to have a physical copy of my movies makes digital downloads even less appealing.

I believe digital downloads will be the niche market...and actual physical media will continue to dominate in the future.

+1

Slow Internet speed, reduced bandwidth, high-cost per month to upgrade to a better ISP plan will not help digital download. Current offer from Microsoft XBox Live! Tops at 720p, nowhere close to FullHD.

And I like to have my movies, on a physical media that I can carry around with me, when needed. That's how most collectors wants it.

True, but it wasn't the consumers who decided the victor though. It was the movie studios who did, seriously how was HD-DVD gonna survive with only 2 major studios, I mean seriously? I'm (well I suppose the correct term now is; was) a HD-DVD support but life goes on, just means my PS3 now gets all the new HD movies, so doesn't really change much (for me).

Uh, the studios and retailers switched because they were selling more content on Blu-ray.

+1

Slow Internet speed, reduced bandwidth, high-cost per month to upgrade to a better ISP plan will not help digital download. Current offer from Microsoft XBox Live! Tops at 720p, nowhere close to FullHD.

And I like to have my movies, on a physical media that I can carry around with me, when needed. That's how most collectors wants it.

QFT, 1+, Agree

If youtube its killing the ISP and internet, HD download wont do good.

Now digital download wont be focused on internet ISP would embrace it in other way with cable television service and DVRS.

There is not that big of a benefit to spend hundreds of dollars on something that looks marginally better than DVD.

Hopefully Internet downloads will take off soon, and the majority of consumers can kiss these optical formats goodbye.

Okay first of all, dear NateB1, probably never saw a HD-DVD/Blu-Ray movie on a good 1080p HDTV. If you had done so, you would not be saying something that stupid.

Like I said, like others have said, digital download is not the solution right now. ISP will have to work something out, give faster speed, increase bandwidth, lower their price, and the provider will have to offer 1080p movies with True-HD sound with all the extras that we can get on a physical media.

Even if we do get all this, collectors will still prefer to have their movies on a disc.

QFT, 1+, Agree

If youtube its killing the ISP and internet, HD download wont do good.

Now digital download wont be focused on internet ISP would embrace it in other way with cable television service and DVRS.

Well, the current solution offered by Microsoft Xbox Live or Apple iTune all need the Internet. Even the NetFlix box use the internet for distribution.

I have access to "pay-per-view" movies rental with Videotron digital cable here, but the movie selection is limited, far from what you can have in a rental store. And they only have a handful of HD movies with only DD 5.1 sound. You don't have any extra.

so in the end what nintendo its right, HD era would not be mainstream until the next gen. And somehow i agree with Them. Now in japan where isp and internet speed its very fast digital distribution wont be an issue but at least here in latin america it will take years and years...

While I have a PS3, and preferred Blu-Ray, I wasn't in to the whole thing, but now that there is a victor, I think I will have to start purchasing some nice new ones.

And I never quite got the HD-DVD name argument, did people buy DVD because it sounded like VHS? :s

Horray! looks like Universal are now on board with Blu-ray. It was pretty much definite anyway but its nice that they have finally spoke up about it.

"While Universal values the close partnership we have shared with Toshiba, it is time to turn our focus to releasing new and catalog titles on Blu-ray," said Craig Kornblau, president of Universal Studios Home Entertainment.

http://www.homemediamagazine.com/news/html...rticle_ID=12118

Horray! looks like Universal are now on board with Blu-ray. It was pretty much definite anyway but its nice that they have finally spoke up about it.

"While Universal values the close partnership we have shared with Toshiba, it is time to turn our focus to releasing new and catalog titles on Blu-ray," said Craig Kornblau, president of Universal Studios Home Entertainment.

http://www.homemediamagazine.com/news/html...rticle_ID=12118

Does that mean some of the successful old hits will be coming to Blu Ray as well? I hope so (Y)

Okay first of all, dear NateB1, probably never saw a HD-DVD/Blu-Ray movie on a good 1080p HDTV. If you had done so, you would not be saying something that stupid.

Like I said, like others have said, digital download is not the solution right now. ISP will have to work something out, give faster speed, increase bandwidth, lower their price, and the provider will have to offer 1080p movies with True-HD sound with all the extras that we can get on a physical media.

Even if we do get all this, collectors will still prefer to have their movies on a disc.

I have. To me, it looks way better. However, for most people (whom I was speaking for in the previous post), they really don't care that it is 1080p - all they care about is cheap. I guess the next couple of years will show whether I'm wrong or not, but most people honestly don't care. They will upgrade to Blu-Ray when the players are $40 in Walmart, and they can purchase an HDTV for under $200. I know people who have walked up to Blu-Ray promo in Blockbuster and have said, and I quote, "That's it? That's HD? I don't know why people would spend all that money for this!" Shocking, I know. This quote is coming from a person who loves watching movies on a 60 inch SD TV with an SD DVD player. My parents are the same way, as is most of their friends.

In 3-5 years, who knows what will happen. Note that I did not say that the Internet is there today - I'm looking 3-5 years down the road. Look at Netflix - imagine subscribing to Netflix for $20 a month, like cable, except with Netflix you can watch thousands of movies instantly over Xbox Live or PSN, or, I imagine, eventually a standalone box. Of course there will always be a niche for those who like physical media, but for everyone else, instant delivery is the future.

Until then, for me personally, HD is great, but I'm fine with watching SD-DVD for a couple years now - I simply can't afford a PS3 and $30 movies right now. It's either SD-DVDs or nothing. For those that can afford HD, great! I'm happy for you.

I have. To me, it looks way better. However, for most people (whom I was speaking for in the previous post), they really don't care that it is 1080p - all they care about is cheap. I guess the next couple of years will show whether I'm wrong or not, but most people honestly don't care. They will upgrade to Blu-Ray when the players are $40 in Walmart, and they can purchase an HDTV for under $200. I know people who have walked up to Blu-Ray promo in Blockbuster and have said, and I quote, "That's it? That's HD? I don't know why people would spend all that money for this!" Shocking, I know. This quote is coming from a person who loves watching movies on a 60 inch SD TV with an SD DVD player. My parents are the same way, as is most of their friends.

In 3-5 years, who knows what will happen. Note that I did not say that the Internet is there today - I'm looking 3-5 years down the road. Look at Netflix - imagine subscribing to Netflix for $20 a month, like cable, except with Netflix you can watch thousands of movies instantly over Xbox Live or PSN, or, I imagine, eventually a standalone box. Of course there will always be a niche for those who like physical media, but for everyone else, instant delivery is the future.

Until then, for me personally, HD is great, but I'm fine with watching SD-DVD for a couple years now - I simply can't afford a PS3 and $30 movies right now. It's either SD-DVDs or nothing. For those that can afford HD, great! I'm happy for you.

This quote is coming from a person who loves watching movies on a 60 inch SD TV with an SD DVD player

Yeah fair enough SDTV! Try watching movies through an SD DVD player on a 60" HDTV.

HDTVs are pretty cheap nowadays, even in the UK you're talking about spend a few hundred pound at the low end - And the TV in your house is not a "cheap" investment, it's something you're with for many years - So I don't think a couple of hundred pounds is outside many peoples budget for a TV.

I'd say it's an essential as something like a washing machine, it costs hundreds, but you need to have it.

What im saying is the more people buying HDTVs, the more people interested in HD content.

The market is going HD whether you want it to or not, so you can stick with DVDs for another 2-3 years, but retail chains and even websites will be onto promoting and selling Blu Ray.

Of course there will always be a niche for those who like physical media, but for everyone else, instant delivery is the future.

Also JUST PLAIN WRONG.

That is the niche market until ISPs WORLDWIDE, embrace HD content and the huge bandwith bills it will run up. 720p downloads are large, 1080p downloads are colossal.

The UK is nowhere near ready for HD downloading to be the standard, nowhere near at all. Many other countries aren't either. I don't even think America would be fully equiped for it yet either.

It will exist, but as I said downloading will be the niche market for those with the pleasure of being able to spend high monthly fees to get "unlimited" bandwith, fast speeds, and be able to chew through 5-10 movies a month ONTOP of their normal PC internet usage.

Consumer associations in spain are advising people that purchased HD-DVD players to return them (regardless of the date of purchase) because, basically, it will never be able to fulfill expectations ( you know, you'll never find more than 30 HD-DVD titles ANYWHERE, and that's saying much :p).

I would probably be happy about this if anyone other than Sony was behind the format. It never ceases to amaze me how short the public attention span is for such vile corporations.

On the other side was The Mother Of All Evil (aka M$). They've sure been acting a lot naughtier than Sony ever.

Haha, Microshot.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't use Edge, I don't even use Windows these days as my main driver. Mac these days I use and Zen browser
    • Apple releases iOS 26.5.2 with dozens of security fixes for iPhone by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has released iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2, which are security-only updates for the iPhone and the iPad. The update brings a bunch of security fixes for WebKit, WebRTC, WebKit Storage, WebKit Canvas, Web Extensions, libxslt, IOGPUFamily, and even the kernel. Some of the WebKit issues that were fixed could have allowed malicious web content to disclose sensitive user information, exfiltrate cross-origin data, crash Safari, or process restricted web content outside the browser sandbox. One notable WebKit Storage bug could let a malicious website to silently hijack clipboard data, according to Apple’s description. Other WebKit-related flaws involved memory corruption, use-after-free bugs, type confusion, out-of-bounds writes, permissions problems, and cross-origin data handling issues. The update also includes three kernel-related fixes. Apple says one of the flaws could let an app write kernel memory or cause unexpected system termination, while another may leak sensitive kernel state, and a third could corrupt kernel memory or terminate the system unexpectedly. Although Apple hasn't described them as remote web attacks, kernel bugs are still important to fix, as they can sometimes be chained with other flaws to escape app or browser restrictions. The updates are available for iPhone 11 and later, iPad Pro 12.9-inch 3rd generation and later, iPad Pro 11-inch 1st generation and later, iPad Air 3rd generation and later, iPad 8th generation and later, and iPad mini 5th generation and later. Similar security fixes also came with the latest update to macOS Tahoe 26.5.2, which Apple released on the same day. That overlap is not surprising, since Safari, WebKit, WebRTC, and other underlying components are shared across Apple’s platforms. Users are advised to update their devices sooner rather than later as these security fixes are crucial. iOS 26.5.2 can be installed from Settings > General > Software Update. Similarly, Mac users can find macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 through System Settings > General > Software Update.
    • Taken them long enough, that is one good thing. I still refuse to have a Whatsapp account, because it still need a phone number to have an account. don't want to give Meta my phone number
    • Good think I still have SDRAM and FP RAM sitting around.
    • Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker with Google apps is now at its lowest price with 47% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker at its all-time low price with a 47% discount. The device features an AMOLED touchscreen display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 that should offer improved scratch resistance and durability. The Charge 6 is equipped with a range of sensors including an optical heart rate sensor, a 3-axis accelerometer, built-in GPS with GLONASS support, red and infrared sensors for SpO2 monitoring, a skin temperature sensor, an ambient light sensor, a vibration motor, NFC, and multipurpose electrical sensors compatible with the ECG and EDA Scan apps. Heart rate is recorded every second during exercise tracking and every five seconds during normal daily use. The device requires the Google Health app for setup and synchronisation. Furthermore, Bluetooth provides wireless connectivity for syncing and communication with devices running Apple iOS 16.4 or later and Android 11.0 or later. The tracker stores up to 7 days of minute-by-minute activity data and retains daily activity totals for the previous 30 days. In terms of water resistance, the Fitbit Charge 6 has a 5 ATM rating that should make it suitable for swimming and water activities. The tracker operates in temperatures ranging from 14°F to 113°F and at altitudes of up to 28,000 feet. Moreover, the included Infinity band is made from a flexible silicone material and features a loop-and-peg fastening. The small band fits wrists measuring 5.1 to 6.7 inches, while the large band fits wrists measuring 6.7 to 8.3 inches. Both small and large bands are included in the box. When it comes to battery performance, the Fitbit Charge 6 should deliver up to 7 days of battery life under typical usage conditions. Features such as the Always-On Display, built-in GPS, and SpO2 monitoring increase power consumption and may require more frequent charging. The rechargeable lithium-polymer battery should take approximately two hours to charge from empty to full. Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker with Google Apps: $85.45 (Amazon US) - 47% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!