Recommended Posts

He'll cash in at HIAC when Big Show beats Sheamus, Then Big Show will lose again really quickly

God, I really hope that doesn't happen. I'd prefer it if Ziggler won the title off Sheamus.

God, I really hope that doesn't happen. I'd prefer it if Ziggler won the title off Sheamus.

dunno don't see that happening really, why not screw the big show out of another title...after the bryan win

According to the Facebook page of Gabe Sapolsky, head DGUSA/EVOLVE booker, top independent stars PAC and Sara Del Rey have finalized WWE deals.

PAC is a high flyer, and Del Rey is widely regarded as one of the top female wrestlers in the world. No word on whether or not PAC and Del Rey will be debuting with WWE on the main roster straight off, or will be heading to developmental first.

Heyman is right about TNA, because they aren't the top dogs. But his Yankee example is terrible, because the Yankees only really care about this year. Next year, they can worry about next year. And the same thing for every year after that. Jeter and A-Rod are producing this year, and thus don't need to be let go.

TNA is different, because those old guys aren't helping them 'win'. They have OK ratings, but its not like its must-see TV.

As reported Thursday, the Divas roster page of WWE?s official NXT website, FCWWrestling.info, no longer lists Raquel Diaz, with her page deleted altogether. According to F4WOnline.com, she asked to be released from her developmental contract with WWE, which was granted.

Diaz, whose real name is Shaul Marie Guerrero, is the daughter of Vickie Guerrero and the late Eddie Guerrero. She joined developmental in October 2010, and has appeared a wrestler, valet and ring announcer. Her verbal ability was considered excellent, although her ring work was not nearly as advanced.

  • Like 1

Glad to hear Raquel Diaz is gone. She was annoying on the mic (clearly takes after

), as good as Kelly Kelly in the ring, and her gimmick was a direct ripoff of The Beautiful People.

Speaking of TNA Knockouts...

In related news, it's being reported that Bruce Prichard, TNA's Senior VP of Programming and Talent Relations, is not a big fan of women's wrestling, which might explain why the Knockouts division has not been given as much TV time as it has in the past.

Angelina Love and Velvet Sky recently left TNA on their own accord, and talents like Mickie James, Sarita, Rosita and Winter have all seen their TV roles scaled back significantly since Prichard came into power last October.

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/261683-more-on-why-beth-phoenix-is-leaving-wwe-tna-head-not-a-fan-of-womens-wrestling

So there we go, women's wrestling is falling into obscurity/nonexistance on both sides now.

Jim Ross was recently interviewed for the Oklahoma Gazette and had the following to say about Raw this Monday night, which is being advertised as a Jim Ross Appreciation Night:
"There will be a few surprises here and there. I think at the end of the day, it will be a fun night. I think we people will leave there glad that they came."

You can read more from Ross by clicking on the above link.

@MightyJordan: Who is hotter in your opinion? AJ Lee or Kaitlyn? :D

Oh, now that is just cruel! :p I'd probably say Kaitlyn, as even though AJ's a true geek/gamer girl, she's a bit too petite for my liking.

In other NXT Divas related news, the situation regarding the former Buggy Nova, aka Skyler Moon is still murky. Her profile has been missing from the NXT roster page for several weeks, but we?ve been unable to clarify exactly what?s going on. We?ll keep an eye on the story.

UPDATE: Further to the post earlier, we?ve received troubling word that Skyler/Buggy has, in fact, been checked into WWE sponsored rehab, which would explain her profile being gone from the NXT website and her absence from social media for the last month. It brings us no pleasure to report this news, but we hope she can deal with her issues. Her current status either in her rehab program or with the company at large remains unclear, but we wish her all the best at this time.

Good thing WWE made it official with Sara Del Rey recently.

WZ has learned from sources further details regarding Charlie Sheen's relationship with WWE and how things fell apart.

Sheen's one and only appearance on WWE television was Raw 1000 when he appeared via Skype. This was a verbal agreement the two parties had as they expected to continue working together?but hadn't finalized anything officially.

WWE's plan was for Sheen to appear on at least two more episodes of Raw and have a match with Daniel Bryan at SummerSlam. When WWE found out Sheen's price to step in the ring, they scrapped the whole idea.

Not only did Sheen's price play a deciding factor, but many top WWE officials brought up the worry of what his public reputation would do for WWE. Remember, this was all going on during the time WWE made many headlines on TMZ with the stage catching fire, Rosa Mendes being abused by former WWE talent and AW's comments.

In the end, WWE felt there wasn't enough of gain to overcome the risks and price of working with Sheen.

After speaking with sources, WZ has learned Ryback's appearance in the final seconds of this past week's Raw was a true last minute decision.

The final rundown that was handed out to WWE's top production people didn't feature Ryback having the stare down with CM Punk to go off the air. This fact is part of the reason why Ryback's appearance didn't appear on the titantron in front of the live crowd.

Sources tell us it was a last minute decision concerning how the show should go off the air with top WWE officials having the attitude of "let's do it and we'll figure it out."

When WWE left the arena and Albany, New York on Monday, there was no elaborate plan that had been put in action regarding Ryback. The stare down with CM Punk was done to see how it would be received.

I'll add in my input then: I'm glad they did it. I know it seems stupid, giving Ryback an instant push to the main event after months upon months of squashing jobbers, but then again, it makes up for the fact they had him squashing jobbers for way too long. Plus it means we'll get to see CM Punk facing someone besides John Cena! :D

@MightyJordan: Who is hotter in your opinion? AJ Lee or Kaitlyn? :D

IMO, Kaitlyn is hotter, but I'd rather have AJ.

I'll add in my input then: I'm glad they did it. I know it seems stupid, giving Ryback an instant push to the main event after months upon months of squashing jobbers, but then again, it makes up for the fact they had him squashing jobbers for way too long. Plus it means we'll get to see CM Punk facing someone besides John Cena! :D

Not at all what I'd want to see. I would rather him join Punk and Heyman. Ryback is terribad on the mic. Heyman is not. Plus Punk/Lesnar/Heyman/Ryback and one more person is one ridiculous Survivor Series team.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

    • earlcaulley
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!