Recommended Posts

Quote

In accordance with its Talent Wellness Program, WWE has suspended Raymond Leppan (Adam Rose) and Ryan Parmeter (Konnor) each for 60 days effective immediately for a second violation of the company’s policy.

http://www.wwe.com/article/raymond-leppan-ryan-parmeter-suspended

Quote

WWE announced on Saturday that The Undertaker would not be appearing during the ongoing WWE European tour after all.

 

Over the past week, The Undertaker’s status for the tour has changed a number of times. When WWE announced on Friday that Triple H and Shane McMahon were added to the tour, it was because they were both going in place of The Undertaker.

 

Originally, The Undertaker was going to work the entire tour. His schedule was then cut down to three days, then two, and finally, zero.

 

The WWE live event coming up in Newcastle on Wednesday, which was originally going to be Undertaker’s only house show as part of the tour, was announced as having Triple H vs. Dean Ambrose as the main event, Kalisto vs. Ryback vs. Alberto Del Rio for the U.S. title and AJ Styles vs. Chris Jericho.

http://www.sescoops.com/the-undertaker-no-longer-appearing-on-any-shows-on-wwe-european-tour/

6 hours ago, TDT said:

Well ######'em then. :angry:

What's the big deal? It's not exactly a secret that Bullet Club take a lot of inspiration from the nWo (and the Young Bucks from DX, too).

  • Like 2
22 hours ago, MightyJordan said:

What's the big deal? It's not exactly a secret that Bullet Club take a lot of inspiration from the nWo (and the Young Bucks from DX, too).

I know, but I really hate rehashes, and even more so when it comes to the nWo. Some things are much better left as they ended, instead of trying to milk them again and again... I don't question their skills, I didn't even knew about them till just recently, but IF they're trying to be the rebirth of nWo, they'll have as much success as that tag team that tries to imitate Legion of Doom (can't remember their stupid name right now).

 

P.S. I was reading a discussion on this subject, and someone said "bullet club is to the nWo as bo dallas is to john cena" :laugh:

Quote

According to a press release issued today by World Wrestling Entertainment, heir-apparent Shane McMahon definitively defeated The Undertaker at WrestleMania, thereby earning the right to control Monday Night Raw.

 

“Shane McMahon vanquished The Phenom® at the Grandest Stage of Them All®,” reads the press release, WWE issued today to “quell confusion” over the subject.

 

“So tonight, Shane-O-Mac® will once again exercise his hard-earned right to run Monday Night Raw®!”

 

According to the press release, McMahon hurled The Undertaker off the “75-foot-tall Hell in a Cell®” structure, then defeated the Deadman via clean pinfall at the 21:38 mark.

 

In accordance with the air-tight stipulations of the match, says the press release, McMahon earned control of Raw and The Undertaker has retired.

 

Countless irate fans have taken to social media to insist they actually witnessed The Undertaker win the match, thereby nullifying the stipulations, but WWE dismisses these claims as “a mass hallucination.”

http://www.kayfabenews.com/wwe-insists-shane-mcmahon-defeated-undertaker-wrestlemania/

21 hours ago, TDT said:

I know, but I really hate rehashes, and even more so when it comes to the nWo. Some things are much better left as they ended, instead of trying to milk them again and again... I don't question their skills, I didn't even knew about them till just recently, but IF they're trying to be the rebirth of nWo, they'll have as much success as that tag team that tries to imitate Legion of Doom (can't remember their stupid name right now).

 

P.S. I was reading a discussion on this subject, and someone said "bullet club is to the nWo as bo dallas is to john cena" :laugh:

Bullet Club was always a parody of stables. 

19 hours ago, Damo R. said:

lol reigns wins

No doubt. They won't dare give AJ the title.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, episode said:

No doubt. They won't dare give AJ the title.

Yeah it would be nice but at the end of the day Vince will see him as TNA and will always come close

 

Usos vs Gallows/Anderson next week on Raw

Adam Rose explaining his suspension...

 

Quote

I was not going to respond to my suspension but I feel I have to. I have two sons that will one day read that news about there daddy and a sister that died from complications related to a life long battle with heroin. 

So I feel the absolute need and right to respond and let the truth be known.

I am pretty sure this response will meet nowhere near the publicity that my suspension did and that this response is tantamount to career suicide. 
But I feel for my sons my sister and rest of my family... you the Wwe universe have the right to the know the truth over my suspension and what it was for. 

I will also quote my Dr in my response as he was as shocked and appalled by this suspension. 

I can say right now I did not do anything knowingly wrong and was taking prescribed medication that my Dr and I followed all the correct protocol on.

My actual response and Doctors response will be coming soon. So before you judge, know the facts. 

My family and I are still collecting ourselves from this blow. I have zero anger or animosity against the WWE. But feel the administrators over the WWE Welnness policy were just simply not right in taking this action. 

But I feel facts are the facts and my family and I will will be the ones putting our lives back together after this mess.

My response will be up soon along with my Doctors. 


 

7 hours ago, BiGdUsTy said:

I know it's wrong to speak ill of the dead, but being subjective - did anyone NOT see this coming?  Recent (last few years) interviews just reeked of unmanaged depression - that mixture of denial, boundless optimism and absolute fantasy indulgence.  She had serious issues compounded by a wannabe-Marylin complex.  Horrible thing to say, but this is pretty much the only way she will be at peace.  RIP

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!