Hazro 24" HZ24W S-IPS Monitor


Recommended Posts

Just arrived. Boy this thing is wide!

Reminds me of the first time I got a decent fisheye lens.

Gonna let it warm up for about an hour then calibrate it. HD looks so good. Have you got any good wallpapers? I was looking for some HDR ones to show off the colours, but I can't find any. And also what is your refresh rate set at.

BAH 1 dead pixel in the top right.

is it a black pixel? ips monitors will show black on a dead pixel, anything else is usually a stuck pixel which can resolve itself or if you use deadpixelbuddy or something! My refresh rate is 60hz btw, it's

either way i'd let them know, they should be able to do a swap for it :)

hi Mrk & Twisted,

I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing, I have the Huey Pro and running XP + 7900GS. I'm not concerned about games or watching moveis it's pretty much for photos & web surfing / pc use only.

Having read alot about constrast shifting, i have to say I'm not that bothered by it - at least not on my Dell. So I'm mainly looking at the Hazro for better colours / better image quality. My alternative is the Lacie 324 which is S-IPA but has LUT calibration if i pay for the software bundle. So, my questions are:

- Does the Hazro satisfy your needs for photo editing? Is the lower contrast level an issue? I do a lot of B&W editing.

- Ignoring contrast shift issues, do you think the Lacie is likely to be superior monitor over the Hazro? e.g. better calibratibility/quality control/uniformity etc?

- will my Huey Pro be sufficient or do i need to upgrade to a X-rite Display 2? and where do i get the software to calibrate the internal LUT? Hazro is not making theirs available, can I use others?

Hazro is about ?460 vs Lacie ?780 (incl hood & software). I don't mind the price delta if the Lacie is a superior quality screen for photos (contrast shift aside).

The only other consideration is the Lacie is wide gamut but they way I understand it I should be ok as new versions of Photoshop/Lightroom/Office/Firefox etc will be colour 'aware' and therefore will render my colours correctly? Of course Xp itself is not and my other less critical apps are not. I assume with the right browser, i'll render web content correctly? Am I right here?

thanks in advance,

Edited by boy_lah
I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing.

I find it funny you say you're a serious and advanced photographer, and yet you only deal in sRGB? AdobeRGB is much better, sRGB is only good for web, or making sure what you're editing is displayed well on others monitors. Every pro photographer I know, as well as myself, work exclusively in AdobeRGB until ready for final print, at which point I convert to my Labs LIGHTJET profile.

I'm thinking about buying one of these, would anyone in the UK be willing to ship it to me if i buy one?

Edited by SirEvan
Wish they were available in the States -- I've been looking for a good S-IPS monitor for quite a while now. Hopefully Apple will come out with a 24" model at some point.

Read this:

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1268063

I am going to buy one as soon as they are available again. They seem to be sold out in the US. I just hope they aren't discontinued permanently because of the demand for this H-IPS panel by bigger companies like NEC, Planar, and Apple. When it is available again, I would check to make sure they haven't switched the panels around to an MVA or something.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...Sight%2bDS-263N

It uses the same H-IPS panel (LG.Philips LM260WU1) as the $950 Planar:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16824016084

NEC sells the 24" version (LG.Philips LM240WU1) LCD2490WUXi for ~$1200!

I find it funny you say you're a serious and advanced photographer, and yet you only deal in sRGB? AdobeRGB is much better, sRGB is only good for web, or making sure what you're editing is displayed well on others monitors. Every pro photographer I know, as well as myself, work exclusively in AdobeRGB until ready for final print, at which point I convert to my Labs LIGHTJET profile.

It's my passion but not my living. For my purposes, my photos are primarily viewed on the web and printed on high street labs which deal in sRGB. So although I know aRGB is wider gamut, for my personal purposes, sRGB is what I deal in.

Read this:

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1268063

I am going to buy one as soon as they are available again. They seem to be sold out in the US. I just hope they aren't discontinued permanently because of the demand for this H-IPS panel by bigger companies like NEC, Planar, and Apple. When it is available again, I would check to make sure they haven't switched the panels around to an MVA or something.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...Sight%2bDS-263N

It uses the same H-IPS panel (LG.Philips LM260WU1) as the $950 Planar:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16824016084

NEC sells the 24" version (LG.Philips LM240WU1) LCD2490WUXi for ~$1200!

hi, appreciate the help but in europe/uk - NEC 2490 / DoubleSight / Plannar not sold. Only affordable IPS option is Hazro. Apple of course but not cheap.

hi Mrk & Twisted,

I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing, I have the Huey Pro and running XP + 7900GS. I'm not concerned about games or watching moveis it's pretty much for photos & web surfing / pc use only.

Having read alot about constrast shifting, i have to say I'm not that bothered by it - at least not on my Dell. So I'm mainly looking at the Hazro for better colours / better image quality. My alternative is the Lacie 324 which is S-IPA but has LUT calibration if i pay for the software bundle. So, my questions are:

- Does the Hazro satisfy your needs for photo editing? Is the lower contrast level an issue? I do a lot of B&W editing.

- Ignoring contrast shift issues, do you think the Lacie is likely to be superior monitor over the Hazro? e.g. better calibratibility/quality control/uniformity etc?

- will my Huey Pro be sufficient or do i need to upgrade to a X-rite Display 2? and where do i get the software to calibrate the internal LUT? Hazro is not making theirs available, can I use others?

Hazro is about ?460 vs Lacie ?780 (incl hood & software). I don't mind the price delta if the Lacie is a superior quality screen for photos (contrast shift aside).

The only other consideration is the Lacie is wide gamut but they way I understand it I should be ok as new versions of Photoshop/Lightroom/Office/Firefox etc will be colour 'aware' and therefore will render my colours correctly? Of course Xp itself is not and my other less critical apps are not. I assume with the right browser, i'll render web content correctly? Am I right here?

thanks in advance,

I don't think the extra colour gamut on the Lacie will give you the extra moneys worth of benefit over the Hazro really, in my working I've never had a colour issue on both the Dell 2007WFP and now this Hazro and I've done prints using online labs such as Photobox etc up to A2/A1 size without any issues with colour.

I do notice that blacks are deeper than on the Dell 2007WFP (both IPS) but still capable of retaining details in shadow areas (eg: on this test http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php I can just about see from block 2 onwards after calibration).

Colours are richer on the Hazro too but it is a larger resolution and 4" larger screen size so one would expect so especially from an IPS of this size.

Hazro are releasing the Hazro calibration suite with the monitors down the line which should have LUT calibration IIRC but it's currently being tested by them in BETA form. I used the Eye-One Match software with my display2 colorometer and had no real issues, the before/after results were excellent but it's worth noting that the "before" image looked good to start with and the "after" looks even better.

I do a monitor validation after every test and I always get a dE value of under 1, the last being 0.93 and if you're calibration experienced then you'll know anything below 1 is superior colour fidelity within the standard colour range.

Your Huey Pro should be perfectly fine I'd say!

Also I too use sRGB, it's the only way to make sure my images are seen by viewers online as they should be until Firefox 3 is out in the open fully and IE7 has colour profile awareness this won't change one bit for me!

I don't think the extra colour gamut on the Lacie will give you the extra moneys worth of benefit over the Hazro really, in my working I've never had a colour issue on both the Dell 2007WFP and now this Hazro and I've done prints using online labs such as Photobox etc up to A2/A1 size without any issues with colour.

I do notice that blacks are deeper than on the Dell 2007WFP (both IPS) but still capable of retaining details in shadow areas (eg: on this test http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php I can just about see from block 2 onwards after calibration).

Colours are richer on the Hazro too but it is a larger resolution and 4" larger screen size so one would expect so especially from an IPS of this size.

Hazro are releasing the Hazro calibration suite with the monitors down the line which should have LUT calibration IIRC but it's currently being tested by them in BETA form. I used the Eye-One Match software with my display2 colorometer and had no real issues, the before/after results were excellent but it's worth noting that the "before" image looked good to start with and the "after" looks even better.

I do a monitor validation after every test and I always get a dE value of under 1, the last being 0.93 and if you're calibration experienced then you'll know anything below 1 is superior colour fidelity within the standard colour range.

Your Huey Pro should be perfectly fine I'd say!

Also I too use sRGB, it's the only way to make sure my images are seen by viewers online as they should be until Firefox 3 is out in the open fully and IE7 has colour profile awareness this won't change one bit for me!

re: wide gamut - that's just me 'future proofing' myself. i realise i don't need it 'now'. And like yourself, i'm always in sRGB and i too use photobox so glad to hear your experience in this regards.

re: lagon test....wow! I can only see from block 7 onwards! Ok - i think this has convinced me!

Finally, glad to hear my Huey Pro will probably do the job for now until Hazro releases the calibration suite - it'll be on my potential upgrade list then.

It's my passion but not my living. For my purposes, my photos are primarily viewed on the web and printed on high street labs which deal in sRGB. So although I know aRGB is wider gamut, for my personal purposes, sRGB is what I deal in.

hi, appreciate the help but in europe/uk - NEC 2490 / DoubleSight / Plannar not sold. Only affordable IPS option is Hazro. Apple of course but not cheap.

Ahh ok I thought you were more print...yeah sRGB is good for web then...since not many people have calibrated displays, they would complain of the washed out look of the AdobeRGB color space.

No probs, in the meantime here's a pic to keep you occupied!

pc_TFT_Hazro_brushed.jpg

mmmm brushed alu ;)

so so sorry for going off topic, but what is that calendar widget you have in the bottom right?

Look what I just found in the Eye-One match software! LUT calibration!

That makes sense, I was advised by ColorConfidence (retail store specialising in color related sales) that if i get a LCD that has internal LUT and has the software to go with it, then I'll need a colorimter that can make those adjustments and the Eye-One Display 2 (not the LT model) is the best value for money. Huey Pro DOES NOT allow hardware LUT adjustments.

So....when will Hazro release that software!? :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!