Hazro 24" HZ24W S-IPS Monitor


Recommended Posts

Just arrived. Boy this thing is wide!

Reminds me of the first time I got a decent fisheye lens.

Gonna let it warm up for about an hour then calibrate it. HD looks so good. Have you got any good wallpapers? I was looking for some HDR ones to show off the colours, but I can't find any. And also what is your refresh rate set at.

BAH 1 dead pixel in the top right.

is it a black pixel? ips monitors will show black on a dead pixel, anything else is usually a stuck pixel which can resolve itself or if you use deadpixelbuddy or something! My refresh rate is 60hz btw, it's

either way i'd let them know, they should be able to do a swap for it :)

hi Mrk & Twisted,

I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing, I have the Huey Pro and running XP + 7900GS. I'm not concerned about games or watching moveis it's pretty much for photos & web surfing / pc use only.

Having read alot about constrast shifting, i have to say I'm not that bothered by it - at least not on my Dell. So I'm mainly looking at the Hazro for better colours / better image quality. My alternative is the Lacie 324 which is S-IPA but has LUT calibration if i pay for the software bundle. So, my questions are:

- Does the Hazro satisfy your needs for photo editing? Is the lower contrast level an issue? I do a lot of B&W editing.

- Ignoring contrast shift issues, do you think the Lacie is likely to be superior monitor over the Hazro? e.g. better calibratibility/quality control/uniformity etc?

- will my Huey Pro be sufficient or do i need to upgrade to a X-rite Display 2? and where do i get the software to calibrate the internal LUT? Hazro is not making theirs available, can I use others?

Hazro is about ?460 vs Lacie ?780 (incl hood & software). I don't mind the price delta if the Lacie is a superior quality screen for photos (contrast shift aside).

The only other consideration is the Lacie is wide gamut but they way I understand it I should be ok as new versions of Photoshop/Lightroom/Office/Firefox etc will be colour 'aware' and therefore will render my colours correctly? Of course Xp itself is not and my other less critical apps are not. I assume with the right browser, i'll render web content correctly? Am I right here?

thanks in advance,

Edited by boy_lah
I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing.

I find it funny you say you're a serious and advanced photographer, and yet you only deal in sRGB? AdobeRGB is much better, sRGB is only good for web, or making sure what you're editing is displayed well on others monitors. Every pro photographer I know, as well as myself, work exclusively in AdobeRGB until ready for final print, at which point I convert to my Labs LIGHTJET profile.

I'm thinking about buying one of these, would anyone in the UK be willing to ship it to me if i buy one?

Edited by SirEvan
Wish they were available in the States -- I've been looking for a good S-IPS monitor for quite a while now. Hopefully Apple will come out with a 24" model at some point.

Read this:

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1268063

I am going to buy one as soon as they are available again. They seem to be sold out in the US. I just hope they aren't discontinued permanently because of the demand for this H-IPS panel by bigger companies like NEC, Planar, and Apple. When it is available again, I would check to make sure they haven't switched the panels around to an MVA or something.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...Sight%2bDS-263N

It uses the same H-IPS panel (LG.Philips LM260WU1) as the $950 Planar:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16824016084

NEC sells the 24" version (LG.Philips LM240WU1) LCD2490WUXi for ~$1200!

I find it funny you say you're a serious and advanced photographer, and yet you only deal in sRGB? AdobeRGB is much better, sRGB is only good for web, or making sure what you're editing is displayed well on others monitors. Every pro photographer I know, as well as myself, work exclusively in AdobeRGB until ready for final print, at which point I convert to my Labs LIGHTJET profile.

It's my passion but not my living. For my purposes, my photos are primarily viewed on the web and printed on high street labs which deal in sRGB. So although I know aRGB is wider gamut, for my personal purposes, sRGB is what I deal in.

Read this:

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1268063

I am going to buy one as soon as they are available again. They seem to be sold out in the US. I just hope they aren't discontinued permanently because of the demand for this H-IPS panel by bigger companies like NEC, Planar, and Apple. When it is available again, I would check to make sure they haven't switched the panels around to an MVA or something.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...Sight%2bDS-263N

It uses the same H-IPS panel (LG.Philips LM260WU1) as the $950 Planar:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16824016084

NEC sells the 24" version (LG.Philips LM240WU1) LCD2490WUXi for ~$1200!

hi, appreciate the help but in europe/uk - NEC 2490 / DoubleSight / Plannar not sold. Only affordable IPS option is Hazro. Apple of course but not cheap.

hi Mrk & Twisted,

I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing, I have the Huey Pro and running XP + 7900GS. I'm not concerned about games or watching moveis it's pretty much for photos & web surfing / pc use only.

Having read alot about constrast shifting, i have to say I'm not that bothered by it - at least not on my Dell. So I'm mainly looking at the Hazro for better colours / better image quality. My alternative is the Lacie 324 which is S-IPA but has LUT calibration if i pay for the software bundle. So, my questions are:

- Does the Hazro satisfy your needs for photo editing? Is the lower contrast level an issue? I do a lot of B&W editing.

- Ignoring contrast shift issues, do you think the Lacie is likely to be superior monitor over the Hazro? e.g. better calibratibility/quality control/uniformity etc?

- will my Huey Pro be sufficient or do i need to upgrade to a X-rite Display 2? and where do i get the software to calibrate the internal LUT? Hazro is not making theirs available, can I use others?

Hazro is about ?460 vs Lacie ?780 (incl hood & software). I don't mind the price delta if the Lacie is a superior quality screen for photos (contrast shift aside).

The only other consideration is the Lacie is wide gamut but they way I understand it I should be ok as new versions of Photoshop/Lightroom/Office/Firefox etc will be colour 'aware' and therefore will render my colours correctly? Of course Xp itself is not and my other less critical apps are not. I assume with the right browser, i'll render web content correctly? Am I right here?

thanks in advance,

I don't think the extra colour gamut on the Lacie will give you the extra moneys worth of benefit over the Hazro really, in my working I've never had a colour issue on both the Dell 2007WFP and now this Hazro and I've done prints using online labs such as Photobox etc up to A2/A1 size without any issues with colour.

I do notice that blacks are deeper than on the Dell 2007WFP (both IPS) but still capable of retaining details in shadow areas (eg: on this test http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php I can just about see from block 2 onwards after calibration).

Colours are richer on the Hazro too but it is a larger resolution and 4" larger screen size so one would expect so especially from an IPS of this size.

Hazro are releasing the Hazro calibration suite with the monitors down the line which should have LUT calibration IIRC but it's currently being tested by them in BETA form. I used the Eye-One Match software with my display2 colorometer and had no real issues, the before/after results were excellent but it's worth noting that the "before" image looked good to start with and the "after" looks even better.

I do a monitor validation after every test and I always get a dE value of under 1, the last being 0.93 and if you're calibration experienced then you'll know anything below 1 is superior colour fidelity within the standard colour range.

Your Huey Pro should be perfectly fine I'd say!

Also I too use sRGB, it's the only way to make sure my images are seen by viewers online as they should be until Firefox 3 is out in the open fully and IE7 has colour profile awareness this won't change one bit for me!

I don't think the extra colour gamut on the Lacie will give you the extra moneys worth of benefit over the Hazro really, in my working I've never had a colour issue on both the Dell 2007WFP and now this Hazro and I've done prints using online labs such as Photobox etc up to A2/A1 size without any issues with colour.

I do notice that blacks are deeper than on the Dell 2007WFP (both IPS) but still capable of retaining details in shadow areas (eg: on this test http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php I can just about see from block 2 onwards after calibration).

Colours are richer on the Hazro too but it is a larger resolution and 4" larger screen size so one would expect so especially from an IPS of this size.

Hazro are releasing the Hazro calibration suite with the monitors down the line which should have LUT calibration IIRC but it's currently being tested by them in BETA form. I used the Eye-One Match software with my display2 colorometer and had no real issues, the before/after results were excellent but it's worth noting that the "before" image looked good to start with and the "after" looks even better.

I do a monitor validation after every test and I always get a dE value of under 1, the last being 0.93 and if you're calibration experienced then you'll know anything below 1 is superior colour fidelity within the standard colour range.

Your Huey Pro should be perfectly fine I'd say!

Also I too use sRGB, it's the only way to make sure my images are seen by viewers online as they should be until Firefox 3 is out in the open fully and IE7 has colour profile awareness this won't change one bit for me!

re: wide gamut - that's just me 'future proofing' myself. i realise i don't need it 'now'. And like yourself, i'm always in sRGB and i too use photobox so glad to hear your experience in this regards.

re: lagon test....wow! I can only see from block 7 onwards! Ok - i think this has convinced me!

Finally, glad to hear my Huey Pro will probably do the job for now until Hazro releases the calibration suite - it'll be on my potential upgrade list then.

It's my passion but not my living. For my purposes, my photos are primarily viewed on the web and printed on high street labs which deal in sRGB. So although I know aRGB is wider gamut, for my personal purposes, sRGB is what I deal in.

hi, appreciate the help but in europe/uk - NEC 2490 / DoubleSight / Plannar not sold. Only affordable IPS option is Hazro. Apple of course but not cheap.

Ahh ok I thought you were more print...yeah sRGB is good for web then...since not many people have calibrated displays, they would complain of the washed out look of the AdobeRGB color space.

No probs, in the meantime here's a pic to keep you occupied!

pc_TFT_Hazro_brushed.jpg

mmmm brushed alu ;)

so so sorry for going off topic, but what is that calendar widget you have in the bottom right?

Look what I just found in the Eye-One match software! LUT calibration!

That makes sense, I was advised by ColorConfidence (retail store specialising in color related sales) that if i get a LCD that has internal LUT and has the software to go with it, then I'll need a colorimter that can make those adjustments and the Eye-One Display 2 (not the LT model) is the best value for money. Huey Pro DOES NOT allow hardware LUT adjustments.

So....when will Hazro release that software!? :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!