Hazro 24" HZ24W S-IPS Monitor


Recommended Posts

Just arrived. Boy this thing is wide!

Reminds me of the first time I got a decent fisheye lens.

Gonna let it warm up for about an hour then calibrate it. HD looks so good. Have you got any good wallpapers? I was looking for some HDR ones to show off the colours, but I can't find any. And also what is your refresh rate set at.

BAH 1 dead pixel in the top right.

is it a black pixel? ips monitors will show black on a dead pixel, anything else is usually a stuck pixel which can resolve itself or if you use deadpixelbuddy or something! My refresh rate is 60hz btw, it's

either way i'd let them know, they should be able to do a swap for it :)

hi Mrk & Twisted,

I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing, I have the Huey Pro and running XP + 7900GS. I'm not concerned about games or watching moveis it's pretty much for photos & web surfing / pc use only.

Having read alot about constrast shifting, i have to say I'm not that bothered by it - at least not on my Dell. So I'm mainly looking at the Hazro for better colours / better image quality. My alternative is the Lacie 324 which is S-IPA but has LUT calibration if i pay for the software bundle. So, my questions are:

- Does the Hazro satisfy your needs for photo editing? Is the lower contrast level an issue? I do a lot of B&W editing.

- Ignoring contrast shift issues, do you think the Lacie is likely to be superior monitor over the Hazro? e.g. better calibratibility/quality control/uniformity etc?

- will my Huey Pro be sufficient or do i need to upgrade to a X-rite Display 2? and where do i get the software to calibrate the internal LUT? Hazro is not making theirs available, can I use others?

Hazro is about ?460 vs Lacie ?780 (incl hood & software). I don't mind the price delta if the Lacie is a superior quality screen for photos (contrast shift aside).

The only other consideration is the Lacie is wide gamut but they way I understand it I should be ok as new versions of Photoshop/Lightroom/Office/Firefox etc will be colour 'aware' and therefore will render my colours correctly? Of course Xp itself is not and my other less critical apps are not. I assume with the right browser, i'll render web content correctly? Am I right here?

thanks in advance,

Edited by boy_lah
I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing.

I find it funny you say you're a serious and advanced photographer, and yet you only deal in sRGB? AdobeRGB is much better, sRGB is only good for web, or making sure what you're editing is displayed well on others monitors. Every pro photographer I know, as well as myself, work exclusively in AdobeRGB until ready for final print, at which point I convert to my Labs LIGHTJET profile.

I'm thinking about buying one of these, would anyone in the UK be willing to ship it to me if i buy one?

Edited by SirEvan
Wish they were available in the States -- I've been looking for a good S-IPS monitor for quite a while now. Hopefully Apple will come out with a 24" model at some point.

Read this:

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1268063

I am going to buy one as soon as they are available again. They seem to be sold out in the US. I just hope they aren't discontinued permanently because of the demand for this H-IPS panel by bigger companies like NEC, Planar, and Apple. When it is available again, I would check to make sure they haven't switched the panels around to an MVA or something.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...Sight%2bDS-263N

It uses the same H-IPS panel (LG.Philips LM260WU1) as the $950 Planar:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16824016084

NEC sells the 24" version (LG.Philips LM240WU1) LCD2490WUXi for ~$1200!

I find it funny you say you're a serious and advanced photographer, and yet you only deal in sRGB? AdobeRGB is much better, sRGB is only good for web, or making sure what you're editing is displayed well on others monitors. Every pro photographer I know, as well as myself, work exclusively in AdobeRGB until ready for final print, at which point I convert to my Labs LIGHTJET profile.

It's my passion but not my living. For my purposes, my photos are primarily viewed on the web and printed on high street labs which deal in sRGB. So although I know aRGB is wider gamut, for my personal purposes, sRGB is what I deal in.

Read this:

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1268063

I am going to buy one as soon as they are available again. They seem to be sold out in the US. I just hope they aren't discontinued permanently because of the demand for this H-IPS panel by bigger companies like NEC, Planar, and Apple. When it is available again, I would check to make sure they haven't switched the panels around to an MVA or something.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...Sight%2bDS-263N

It uses the same H-IPS panel (LG.Philips LM260WU1) as the $950 Planar:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16824016084

NEC sells the 24" version (LG.Philips LM240WU1) LCD2490WUXi for ~$1200!

hi, appreciate the help but in europe/uk - NEC 2490 / DoubleSight / Plannar not sold. Only affordable IPS option is Hazro. Apple of course but not cheap.

hi Mrk & Twisted,

I'm a serious / advanced photographer looking for an upgrade from my current Dell 2407WFP. I only deal in sRGB for web + high street printing, I have the Huey Pro and running XP + 7900GS. I'm not concerned about games or watching moveis it's pretty much for photos & web surfing / pc use only.

Having read alot about constrast shifting, i have to say I'm not that bothered by it - at least not on my Dell. So I'm mainly looking at the Hazro for better colours / better image quality. My alternative is the Lacie 324 which is S-IPA but has LUT calibration if i pay for the software bundle. So, my questions are:

- Does the Hazro satisfy your needs for photo editing? Is the lower contrast level an issue? I do a lot of B&W editing.

- Ignoring contrast shift issues, do you think the Lacie is likely to be superior monitor over the Hazro? e.g. better calibratibility/quality control/uniformity etc?

- will my Huey Pro be sufficient or do i need to upgrade to a X-rite Display 2? and where do i get the software to calibrate the internal LUT? Hazro is not making theirs available, can I use others?

Hazro is about ?460 vs Lacie ?780 (incl hood & software). I don't mind the price delta if the Lacie is a superior quality screen for photos (contrast shift aside).

The only other consideration is the Lacie is wide gamut but they way I understand it I should be ok as new versions of Photoshop/Lightroom/Office/Firefox etc will be colour 'aware' and therefore will render my colours correctly? Of course Xp itself is not and my other less critical apps are not. I assume with the right browser, i'll render web content correctly? Am I right here?

thanks in advance,

I don't think the extra colour gamut on the Lacie will give you the extra moneys worth of benefit over the Hazro really, in my working I've never had a colour issue on both the Dell 2007WFP and now this Hazro and I've done prints using online labs such as Photobox etc up to A2/A1 size without any issues with colour.

I do notice that blacks are deeper than on the Dell 2007WFP (both IPS) but still capable of retaining details in shadow areas (eg: on this test http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php I can just about see from block 2 onwards after calibration).

Colours are richer on the Hazro too but it is a larger resolution and 4" larger screen size so one would expect so especially from an IPS of this size.

Hazro are releasing the Hazro calibration suite with the monitors down the line which should have LUT calibration IIRC but it's currently being tested by them in BETA form. I used the Eye-One Match software with my display2 colorometer and had no real issues, the before/after results were excellent but it's worth noting that the "before" image looked good to start with and the "after" looks even better.

I do a monitor validation after every test and I always get a dE value of under 1, the last being 0.93 and if you're calibration experienced then you'll know anything below 1 is superior colour fidelity within the standard colour range.

Your Huey Pro should be perfectly fine I'd say!

Also I too use sRGB, it's the only way to make sure my images are seen by viewers online as they should be until Firefox 3 is out in the open fully and IE7 has colour profile awareness this won't change one bit for me!

I don't think the extra colour gamut on the Lacie will give you the extra moneys worth of benefit over the Hazro really, in my working I've never had a colour issue on both the Dell 2007WFP and now this Hazro and I've done prints using online labs such as Photobox etc up to A2/A1 size without any issues with colour.

I do notice that blacks are deeper than on the Dell 2007WFP (both IPS) but still capable of retaining details in shadow areas (eg: on this test http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php I can just about see from block 2 onwards after calibration).

Colours are richer on the Hazro too but it is a larger resolution and 4" larger screen size so one would expect so especially from an IPS of this size.

Hazro are releasing the Hazro calibration suite with the monitors down the line which should have LUT calibration IIRC but it's currently being tested by them in BETA form. I used the Eye-One Match software with my display2 colorometer and had no real issues, the before/after results were excellent but it's worth noting that the "before" image looked good to start with and the "after" looks even better.

I do a monitor validation after every test and I always get a dE value of under 1, the last being 0.93 and if you're calibration experienced then you'll know anything below 1 is superior colour fidelity within the standard colour range.

Your Huey Pro should be perfectly fine I'd say!

Also I too use sRGB, it's the only way to make sure my images are seen by viewers online as they should be until Firefox 3 is out in the open fully and IE7 has colour profile awareness this won't change one bit for me!

re: wide gamut - that's just me 'future proofing' myself. i realise i don't need it 'now'. And like yourself, i'm always in sRGB and i too use photobox so glad to hear your experience in this regards.

re: lagon test....wow! I can only see from block 7 onwards! Ok - i think this has convinced me!

Finally, glad to hear my Huey Pro will probably do the job for now until Hazro releases the calibration suite - it'll be on my potential upgrade list then.

It's my passion but not my living. For my purposes, my photos are primarily viewed on the web and printed on high street labs which deal in sRGB. So although I know aRGB is wider gamut, for my personal purposes, sRGB is what I deal in.

hi, appreciate the help but in europe/uk - NEC 2490 / DoubleSight / Plannar not sold. Only affordable IPS option is Hazro. Apple of course but not cheap.

Ahh ok I thought you were more print...yeah sRGB is good for web then...since not many people have calibrated displays, they would complain of the washed out look of the AdobeRGB color space.

No probs, in the meantime here's a pic to keep you occupied!

pc_TFT_Hazro_brushed.jpg

mmmm brushed alu ;)

so so sorry for going off topic, but what is that calendar widget you have in the bottom right?

Look what I just found in the Eye-One match software! LUT calibration!

That makes sense, I was advised by ColorConfidence (retail store specialising in color related sales) that if i get a LCD that has internal LUT and has the software to go with it, then I'll need a colorimter that can make those adjustments and the Eye-One Display 2 (not the LT model) is the best value for money. Huey Pro DOES NOT allow hardware LUT adjustments.

So....when will Hazro release that software!? :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      267
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!