GTAIV - PS3 vs 360


Recommended Posts

I know the PS3 version will look better on my setup, PS3 is hooked up to a 1080p LCD, 360 to a 720p tv. I'm still getting the 360 version as that is what my friends have. Honestly though, who cares about graphics anyway, most games look pretty amazing anymore regardless of what platform they're on. The other GTA games all looked like crap, but they were awesome anyway.

You people arguing over this have serious issues. In the end, everyone will get it for the system they have chosen and are stuck with that. No one's opinion matters nor will all this discussion change anything... unless you're big enough of a tool to switch consoles because the other system's version seems better, based on mostly uninformed opinions.

There's a great head to head video on IGN, but I think you have to be an insider to watch it. Basically what it all boils down to is you should get the version your friends have so you can play together. They also said the differences are very minor, barely noticeable unless you're looking at both versions side by side. Arguing over which is better is pointless because it's an amazing game on both systems. The comic that Audioboxer posted makes a good point, Sony and the PS3 fans really want to win one. I may rent it for PS3 at some point because I have a few friends on there playing it already, but I bought the 360 version.

You have got to be joking :laugh: !

Scirwode

The comic is a joke at how if a topic like this is posted, it's almost instantly flooded with a ton of gamers for "each side" which = server fail :p

GTA 4 in-game TV better on PS3

Full-screen option not available in Xbox 360 version.

In the process of making our GTA 4 comparison video we've noticed one major difference between the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions of the game - there is no full-screen video mode for in-game TV in the Xbox 360 version.

We're not sure why - maybe it's because the video files could be stored in higher quality on the Blu-ray disc - but there is an option to watch TV shows in full screen (well, as near as) in the PS3 version of GTA 4. This feature is missing from the Xbox 360 version, with the player forced to view what's on the box in a small viewing area.

It's not a massive blow to the Xbox 360, but some of the short TV shows are certainly worth a look and we'd much rather watch them in full screen rather than strain our eyes viewing the smaller Xbox 360 version.

Look out for our full comparison very soon, but in the mean time head over to our 10/10 GTA 4 review.

Source: http://www.videogamer.com/news/29-04-2008-8155.html

:laugh:

Seriously, I'll beat anyone over the head with a chicken that starts arguments over that!

On a serious note, anyone watch any TV shows yet? They're frickin hilarious :laugh: Rockstar are funny guys!

Well I've played both versions and they're pretty much identical.

Only difference I can really notice is the filter each seem to use for drawing scenery in the distance. The 360 has a sort of "painting" effect, where as the PS3 is just more of a blur effect.

PS3 vs 360 GTAIV dithering pics 400 % zoom

Another look at the two console versions of GTAIV zoomed in by 400%. The pics show an ever so slight edge in the PS3 version.

400360.jpg

4003602.jpg

4003603.jpg

400PS3.jpg

400PS3B.jpg

400PS3C.jpg

Source: http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1...p;postcount=507

Gamesradar:PS3/360 GTA4 pop-in comparison

Gamesradar makes a draw-in comparison between the two consoles.

Video: http://n4g.com/NewsCom-140705.aspx

For every person saying the PS3 is better, there's someone saying the 360 is better. Point in case:

http://www.videogamer.com/features/article...4-2008-389.html

THEIR money is on the 360 version.

This is seriously stupid, get whatever version YOU want for YOUR OWN reasons, don't go by what someone else has said because you wont notice a bloody thing.

For every person saying the PS3 is better, there's someone saying the 360 is better. Point in case:

http://www.videogamer.com/features/article...4-2008-389.html

THEIR money is on the 360 version.

This is seriously stupid, get whatever version YOU want for YOUR OWN reasons, don't go by what someone else has said because you wont notice a bloody thing.

I actually own both versions and they are 99.99% identical. The reason I prefer the PS3 version are all personal preferences. I prefer the pad, and the reliability/quietness of the PS3 consoles

Nothing in it, if anything the PS3 (as we know) doesn't have as much 'pop up'

So far, I only noticed pop-ups on the PS3 version. Just take this comparison for example, and count the pop-ups on both versions: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/209601.html

Yeah... none on the xbox 360 footage and only a few on PS3 version :rolleyes:

So far, I only noticed pop-ups on the PS3 version. Just take this comparison for example, and count the pop-ups on both versions: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/209601.html

Yeah... none on the xbox 360 footage and only a few on PS3 version :rolleyes:

That has to be one of the worst comparison video's I've seen.

I'll stick to my own eyes, plus those of all the reviewers when I say that the PS3 has less pop up than the 360. Not that it makes any massive difference.

Sorry, but what the hell does zooming in at 400% have to do with anything?

Do you all wear milk bottle glasses or something? :/ Honestly stfu, buy whichever version suits your needs best

Actually it's to do with how each renders distant objects, and it does make things look different.

As I said earlier the 360 looks more like a painting in the distance, the PS3 just looks like a blurred back drop.

It took a little while for me to adjust to the graphics style, as I've spent years playing GTA:SA on super sharp PC graphics, hell, might even still play SA cos I loved the cross country police chases.

After playing the 360 version, the PS3 version did look different but I actually prefer it now.

I purchased both the PS3 version and the 360 version, and I have to say the PS3's graphics are better (the lighting seems to be way more realistic), but I have to say because of this the frame rates do suffer. Also I noticed on the 360 the colours seem to be more vibrant, and I didn't change any of the display settings so that I found weird.

Disclaimer: my eyes are different from yours and this is just what I saw with mine while playing both versions. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!