Teen use of pot can lead to dependency, mental illness ?


Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Depression, teens and marijuana are a dangerous mix that can lead to dependency, mental illness or suicidal thoughts, according to a White House report being released Friday.

A teen who has been depressed at some point in the past year is more than twice as likely to have used marijuana as teens who have not reported being depressed -- 25 percent compared with 12 percent, said the report by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy.

''Marijuana is a more consequential substance of abuse than our culture has treated it in the last 20 years,'' said John Walters, director of the office. ''This is not just youthful experimentation that they'll get over as we used to think in the past.''

Smoking marijuana can lead to more serious problems, Walters said in an interview.

For example, using marijuana increases the risk of developing mental disorders by 40 percent, the report said. And teens who smoke pot at least once a month over a yearlong period are three times more likely to have suicidal thoughts than nonusers, it said.

The report also cited research that showed that teens who smoke marijuana when feeling depressed were more than twice as likely as their peers to abuse or become addicted to pot -- 8 percent compared with 3 percent.

Experts who have worked with children say there's nothing harmless about marijuana.

''I've seen many, many kids' lives negatively impacted and taken off track because of marijuana,'' said Elizabeth Stanley-Salazar, director of adolescent services for Phoenix House treatment centers in California. ''It's somewhat Russian roulette. There are so many factors, emotional, psychological, biological. You can't predict the experimentation and how it will impact a kid.''

The drug control policy office analyzed about a dozen studies looking at marijuana use, including research by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Overall, marijuana use among teens has decreased 25 percent since 2001, down to about 2.3 million kids who used pot at least once a month, the drug control office said.

While the drop is encouraging, Walters appealed to parents to recognize signs of possible drug use and depression.

''It's not something you look the other way about when your teen starts appearing careless about their grooming, withdrawing from the family, losing interest in daily activities,'' Walters said. ''Find out what's wrong.''

source

Marijuana ruins young people's lives because if you get caught with it in some states it could permanently alter your record.

The drug itself is less addictive (and thus generally less dangerous) than cigarettes or alcohol.

I think tobacco/alcohol is far worse than marijuana, but they're never going to be made illegal with the amount of tax generated from those industries :p Thats not an excuse to use it though; it still is dangerous but I think they make it sound so much worse than it is.

The biggest worry with using marijuana is getting caught by the police, while with alcohol (even if underage drinking) and cigarettes the biggest worry is getting cancer or ridiculously drunk and puking/doing stupid things.

Anything that messes with the levels of dopamine and seratonin in your brain can lead to mental illness.

I don't see the point of using pot. It's a boring drug and so not worth it. Go running or something, that'll produce a high that's healthy.

News just in: Doing Anything with your life at any age can have appalling effects on the rest of your life. As the Government of the world we suggest that everybody proceeds to do F all in order to live the longest. Thank you.

Seriously, as Fred said, marijuana is less addictive than most legal drugs, yet it's the one that gets all this hype. I'm sure I read somewhere else from a more respectable research team that smoking pot does f all to you :p

The report also cited research that showed that teens who smoke marijuana when feeling depressed were more than twice as likely as their peers to abuse or become addicted to pot -- 8 percent compared with 3 percent.
As they would with ANY other drug/substance (cigarettes, alcohol, illegal drugs). I'm pretty sure the percentages would be alot higher for something like alcohol, however...

Thanks for the news though :D

I don't see the point of using pot. It's a boring drug and so not worth it. Go running or something, that'll produce a high that's healthy.

I agree with that completely. Pot is a downer drug. You end up with teens sitting in the wood-paneled basement of one of their parents' house getting the munchies and watching TV half-interestedly while making astute observations about nothing in particular.

At least alcohol gets you out of the house and chasing after some skirts.

I agree with that completely. Pot is a downer drug. You end up with teens sitting in the wood-paneled basement of one of their parents' house getting the munchies and watching TV half-interestedly while making astute observations about nothing in particular.

At least alcohol gets you out of the house and chasing after some skirts.

Talking from experience there Fred? :D

I see pot as more of a social thing tbh, I know *people* who used to smoke it in big groups then have crazy conversations that at the time made sense and were really important, but you really wouldn't care about now :p

Anything that messes with the levels of dopamine and seratonin in your brain can lead to mental illness.

I don't see the point of using pot. It's a boring drug and so not worth it. Go running or something, that'll produce a high that's healthy.

Totally agree with you. Screwing with your brain chemistry is NOT a good idea.

Anything that messes with the levels of dopamine and seratonin in your brain can lead to mental illness.

I don't see the point of using pot. It's a boring drug and so not worth it. Go running or something, that'll produce a high that's healthy.

What's wrong with smoking and running? While it may not be the assumed majority, there are a ton of potheads who lead very healthy, active lifestyles. Probably even healthier than many non-pot heads.

Makes writing stuff (songs, shows, etc.) a lot more enjoyable though. :p

I really think that the outcome depends a lot more on the person using it more than it does on marijuana itself. Honestly, before I did it, I thought it was the worst thing in the world and that it ruins lives, but really it's not. I mean, if you're not a retard who blows off everything just to get high with your friends, doing it ocassionaly isn't really that big of a deal. It hasn't wrecked my life, I'm still pulling in A's and B's and I'm doing pretty good, I just really think that it all depends on how you go about it. If you're doing it just to be cool around "cool people" (who are really just a bunch of losers) then it's not worth it. I see stupid stoners now-a-days who are always getting high and they're just the most immature little people I've ever seen and it just ****es me off that they think they're so cool because they smoke weed.

It's really not that bad of a drug, just don't go over the limit with it.

I hear a lot of people saying how its not a dangerous drug etc. This is a common misconception as it can ruin lives in many ways. 1 being paranoia. It can present itself long after you last smoked it and will ruin your thought processes in every day life. Also, its not cheap. You will find yourself spending money on it, when there are more important things to buy, like food for example.

If you can limit yourself, its not advisable, but will not present real problems. But if you have an addictive personality, steer well clear. It will eff up your life.

I'm skeptical, Me and my friends never were ****ed because of Cannabis more so than just being high.

Anyone I know who had those thoughts pertaining to the stated above had them before they ever even touched Cannabis (Including myself, and I feel it helped bring me out of those bad periods of my life).

Now weed does have an effect on people and does change them a lot but I disagree with the statement that it screws up so many of them as much as stated above, and I am willing to bet that these people had issues far before their use of Cannabis. And to say because of their use of it is why they are more screwed up is an assumption that shouldn't be made.

I know a good few teenagers who smoke cannabis, and they are all very happy, they have never seemed in any sort of negative mood. Some of them are even heavy smokers of cannabis, while some aren't but still smoke it more than once a month.

The majority of them are very fast runners, and they all drink. Some even take worse drugs.

I'm not saying that smoking cannabis will make you healthy, or run fast, I've just never seen anything wrong with them who do smoke it.

I used to smoke it, and I NEVER had any suicidal thoughts, I thought it was a great experience, just laughing at everything that isn't funny in any way lol, but I stopped it a while ago.

*sigh* I don't do the stuff, but I've had friends that do. It does have GOOD uses, just like whiskey does (ever heard of the tactic to cure a baby's sore tooth by rubbing whiskey in their mouth? ^_^). I agree with Fred and others who believe that it is a pointless drug. However, I also know that there are reasons why teens smoke marijuana. There is the whole issue of rejection by one's peers. Smoking marijuana is a way to feel like you belong somewhere - even if that "somewhere" is with other potheads. In fact, I would say that using it could actually be rehabilitative somewhat. You can feel socially adept rather than socially inept. Of course, I wouldn't recommend long-term usage of the stuff. Anything that can affect your nervous system technically should be considered harmful. Then again, skydiving is harmful, but people do it. Riding on a plane is harmful, but people do it. Why should this be any different? Everybody is aware of the risks.

In addition, the results of using marijuana don't affect only teens. It isn't like adults are magically immune to its long-term effects. *sigh* Also, how long did this study take? 40 years? After all, back then it was the 1960s... If people were using it that long, I can understand the findings of this study. However, I really do doubt the findings of this study. Did they investigate whether the addicts had previous medical history of another illness or possibly genetically inherited problems? In all seriousness, it is like saying "I got dyscalculia because I smoked marijuana, though I already had dyslexia when I was using the stuff."

*sigh* (again)

Edit: One last thing. Has anybody ever heard of salvia (technically named "salvia divinorum")? Umm... I witnessed firsthand how amazingly horrible those things can make people act just a few months ago. One of my roommates smoked some salvia cigarettes (I think 10x), and he went nuts. He nearly kicked another person's door, and went running wildly like...wow. That's the best way I can describe it. Again, that was my firsthand account. It doesn't have that effect on everybody, and the high doesn't last nearly as long as pot. In fact, it probably has to do with the will of a person. If they're weak-willed, the effects take over. My other roomie tried it, and he was fine other than the short and intense high that he got. However, I really think that if something were to be made illegal, it should be salvia.

Edited by rpgfan
I'm skeptical, Me and my friends never were ****ed because of Cannabis more so than just being high.

Anyone I know who had those thoughts pertaining to the stated above had them before they ever even touched Cannabis (Including myself, and I feel it helped bring me out of those bad periods of my life).

Now weed does have an effect on people and does change them a lot but I disagree with the statement that it screws up so many of them as much as stated above, and I am willing to bet that these people had issues far before their use of Cannabis. And to say because of their use of it is why they are more screwed up is an assumption that shouldn't be made.

Not everyone suffers ill effects from pot use, but it does make the chance of it much greater than the person who has never smoked pot.

I'll be completely honest. I was incredibly sick before I tried it when I was 18. In no way do I believe it made my bipolar worse than it is today. I KNOW I've suffered from depression and later bipolar since I was probably eight and I tried it because I was so sick (I was very manic and making VERY bad decisions during that time in my life). But I do firmly believe that if a healthy person makes smoking pot a normal habit in their life, they are more susceptible to having mental health problems later on. It doesn't guarantee that they'll end up with depression or something else, it just makes it more likely.

nothing is better than smoking up with friends, chillin and getting the munchies so that you can order KFC :)

Except maybe going out with your girlfriend grabbing a steak and getting laid. Not that one activity precludes the other, but just saying.

Except maybe going out with your girlfriend grabbing a steak and getting laid. Not that one activity precludes the other, but just saying.

haha, ok ok, i'll include some sex aswell.... "getting the munchies..start nibbling on my girlfriend :D

Except maybe going out with your girlfriend grabbing a steak and getting laid. Not that one activity precludes the other, but just saying.

Why not smoke some with your lady then go get the steak. It'll be the best steak you've EVER had. Smoke another bowl then have sex. Everyone wins.

Rath, how about chillin with friends right after work, then going out with the girl and then eating the steak and getting laid?

Sounds awesome to me :D (and it sounds like you wouldn't object :p )

Pot isn't my thing, but it isn't uncommon for me to meet my friends at a bar and share a few beers after work and prior to my date. So yeah I totally relate.

Why not smoke some with your lady then go get the steak. It'll be the best steak you've EVER had. Smoke another bowl then have sex. Everyone wins.

Now I know cigarette smoke dulls the taste buds. Doesn't Pot do the same thing?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!