Closing the Door to Microsoft Vista


Recommended Posts

GM is literally going bankrupt. Even if they wanted to deploy, it would suck if they said "we won't do it because we are in bad financial crysis".

So - while I am not surprised (I am sure they skipped versions before too) - I'd also take this with a grain of salt, knowing that they must be trying to cut costs anywhere they can. It just makes sense you will not invest into IT as much.

You have no idea how true that is. I know because I work for a company that provides hardware, software, network solutions to dealerships. I will leave it at that. Don't believe me? Ask any GM dealership.

Could not agree more.

If MS releases 7 in 2010 Vista will never be accepted. XP gained such a crowd becasue it was THE OS for 7 years; an eternity in computing years. Considering it lasted so long and stayed relevant is important to its loyal following but should not detract from what is good about Vista and errors that can only be blamed on bad drivers from hardware manufacturers.

Go lookup the word "fact", I think you confused it with "opinion"...

Well, in that case it is the opinion of a majority of its users that Vista is another Windows ME..... Only a very small minority, like you, don't want to see this. Some are just in too much denial to accept the facts and will blame everything except what is truly at fault here and that is Vista.

Speaking of pet peevs like the "Microsoft Vista" thing:

The thing that erks me the most are these idiot home users that post in threads like this stating "Vista is fine for me!". They have ZERO clue how software and hardware upgrades work in a cooperate environment.

This isnt your little e-mail checking, porn surfing, MySpace posting box in your office. We are talking about 100, 500, 10,000 computers running heavy software that BUILD CAR'S.

What confuses me is that people expect a fancy new system wtih extra features, but without greater hardware requirements. Am I the only person who finds that irrational? I guess it's just bashing for the sake of it.

How can something like Compiz Fusion pull these new tricks without hogging your computer?

People don't complain about the latest games requiring more graphics processing more etc so why the complaints about an OS? Also, hardware is getting cheaper all the time. In a year or two it won't cost all that much to build a system that can run Vista well.

I'm complaining about some games that clearly take more than they are supposed to. NVIDIA the way it's meant to be played. :x

Why should I pay for new parts so that someone else can make more money than is fair? Artifically making OS slower so that OEM partners can make some money.

I will proudly continue to STEAL that kind of software. It looks that this time M$ pushed it too far.

Well, in that case it is the opinion of a majority of its users that Vista is another Windows ME..... Only a very small minority, like you, don't want to see this. Some are just in too much denial to accept the facts and will blame everything except what is truly at fault here and that is Vista.

Get real - it's the vocal minority who make the "Vista = ME" crap up!

Some are just in too much denial to accept the facts

Yeah, and some zealots will fan the flames without even a basic understanding of what they are talking about!

According to all "cry-babies", Windows 95 had bags, Windows 98 was crappy, Windows ME was the biggest mistake, Windows XP was just eye-candy yet 98SE was better, and Windows Vista sucks big time.

So, according to many people, Microsoft's only good OS is Windows 98 SE and Windows 2000. Ok...

I might still run Win2000 on my enterprise, but I'd never use Windows 98 in year 2008!

Bugs happen, evolution happens, get over it and go along with it. Bugs will get fixed, so if a company doesn't want a new OS now, they're either waiting for the OS to be more stable through service packs, or they don't have the money to buy every new OS, and they always skip a version.

Making fun of Vista is a hobby for people who don't actually understand anything about tech, like Mac users and 15 year olds.

Are you implying that all the Mac users out there do not understand anything about tech?

interesting hobby you've got yourself there. :rolleyes:

This really is much ado about nothing. Someone earlier said that large corporations do not upgrade quickly. This is oh-so-true, and in fact I want to expand it to large "organizations" and even small businesses. The last place I worked still had about 50 486s running MS-DOS 6 as mainframe terminals. We didn't upgrade them because there wasn't a reason to - people needed mainframe access and the DOS towers provided it.

Likewise, when I worked at a local-government institution we skipped plenty of software upgrades (Office 2000 -----> Office 2003, some kept 2000, some kept 97, few used XP) because we didn't need them or because other IT directives took priority.

GM not upgrading to Vista is bad for Microsoft. However, remember that it's not GM's obligation to do what's good for Microsoft; it's GM's obligation to do what's good for GM. Yes, there are improvements to Vista that XP doesn't, and likely never will, have to offer. However, there has to be a cost-benefit analysis for rolling out an expensive upgrade like Vista to a COLOSSAL company like GM. Consider how many PCs they have, and the cost of doing a company-wide upgrade. Even with a corporate license, we're talking beaucoup bucks.

That doesn't even take into consideration unforeseen problems, training time, and other abstract issues like that. Vista is bound to be problematic. Not because it's Vista, because it's something different than what was running before. People need to adjust, software needs to be updated, etc. And people who think everything that ran on XP will run flawlessly on Vista are kidding themselves. Yes, most of it (probably 95% or more) will, but c'mon, we're a bunch of IT guys on this forum. If anyone knows Murphy's Law all too intimately, it's us. Sh*t always breaks, and it takes time and effort to fix, and it costs productivity while it's broken. Huge infrastructure upgrades are not the thing to do when your corporate bank accounts are hurting.

Believe me, they wouldn't be upgrading to Ubuntu 8, Windows 2008 Server, Solaris Whatever, or anything else right now either. They have software they need, and regardless of whether or not it will run on Vista, they know for a fact that it runs on their current configuration and they're going to stick with it.

Also, one thing I noticed above that I wanted to clear up - Someone with a 4-year-old Mac is actually in a pretty good position to upgrade to Leopard. It runs on my 7-year-old G4 surprisingly well. I suspect it has to do with the homogeneity of Apple hardware and the fact that coding an OS for the Mac is a little like coding console games - you know exactly what you're coding for and have a better time optimizing than when you have to address a broad range of hardware.

Though when the next Mac OS comes out it'll probably leave my G4 behind. At that point...PPC Gentoo, baybeeeeeee. A glutton for punishment is me.

Alright! I hope we get a Front Page news article about every corporation that doesn't have competent enough IT staff to implement a new operating system from Microsoft. Like this story, the commentary will degrade into a comparison to Windows Millennium Edition and....Macs???

You just have to wonder what GM could possibly have to gain by admitting their incompetence. Their IT staff seems to mirror their product quality very well.

There is nothing wrong with Vista, it seems GM has a poor IT department if you ask me.

Yeah, I second that or its GMs computers are just flat out old. Any modern PC can run Vista but, its people and some companies that run that absolute basic of anything. Now, if they would've kept their computer hardware updated, then Vista would've been fine. I don't see how waiting to Windows 7 will help them. They still will have to update the hardware.....

This is NEVER going to end is it? Never ever.

It's a CLASSIC example of if you're told something enough or hear it enough, you start to believe it.

The truth is, Vista is fine, runs fine, works fine, and is the same as Windows ever was. Now, how do I get a big full stop or period to fill up this entire screen or put and end to this nonsense?

GM, upgrade your friggin computers... or just shut your doors and end it already. Holy friggin crap, why the 'F dont you have current tech? Vista runs flawlessly on new hardware...much better than anything I've experienced before it.. I absolutely hated Vista until I built my new system. So you're gonna wait until Win7? You probably wont even exist at that point.

It has nothing to do with competency. It has to do with GM having a current working configuration and not wanting to spend the money for Vista --AND-- Windows 7, opting to just wait for Windows 7 instead.

"Competency" is not defined as "ability and invariable willingness to purchase and implement every Microsoft product released."

This really does not mean much for GM or Vista.

It's perfectly understandable to skip Vista just like it was to skip XP.

While I happily use Vista I don't think it's a great product and MS could have done far better it's nothing like the disaster that many are proclaiming it to be.

While I have little issues regarding Vista X64 I will say from a business point of view I see little reason to move to Vista.

1) They most certainly are not bothered about a prettier GUI

2) They have no interest in DX10

3) They certainly don't fancy the cost

4) They don't like how Bitlocker is a Ultimate extra and isn't included in Business

I could go on, but for the average user Vista is OK, I game alot and I like Crysis so Crysis 64bit in DX10 is lovely, for those who enjoy older games, and those whom are set up and familiar with their systems then wait for Windows Seven, Vista isn't all that.

Um, BitLocker is NOT an Ultimate extra. It's part of what is included with Ultimate, and companies like GM will have some sort of Enterprise agreement. E.G. they get Vista Enterprise which is volume licence only. That includes BitLocker.

There's a number of things that IT Deparments that fully use the Windows ecosystem realise are big advantages that you only get with Vista. There's this thing called security that coroporate IT takes pretty seriously. The enhancements in Vista give it a much more secure approach throughout the OS. In particular UAC and IE7+ protected mode.

The guy who said that administration is bad in Vista is either a moron, a troll or a liar. Vista uses GPO's. The same GPO's that Windows 2000 and XP use. However MS have ADDED (not removed) a number of extra GPO's to provide additional management.

Aero, DX10, Photo Gallery, MCE are consumer technologies aimed for the consumer. However the new GPO's, UAC, mobility centre, BitLocker, NAP, Integrated search, faster boot ups / sleep are reasons companies like Commerical Airlines, Bank of America, Shell and other huge organisations are taking Vista up and deploying it as I type this up.

I don't blame GM for not jumping onto Vista. Thankfully where I work we have a 3 year hardware lifecycle (then it's auctioned off to staff) and we don't go for the very, very cheapest Dell we can get when we replace them. We also ensure that all applications (from Office through to our multi-million pound ERP Oracle system) are certified to run on the current version of Windows. MS have not changed anything regarding Vista in terms of compatibiltiy compared to XP other than to enforce the standards specified in 2002 regarding development on the Windows platform. (I wouldn't expect many Linux users to expect applications to install into /etc or /lib for example.) If GM are running an application that is not written for the operating system (Windows, not a specific version.) then they'll have the same problems with Windows Seven, Eight and Nine.

Oh and 1Gb of RAM, a P4 2.6+ and a 40Gb HD is more than enough to run Vista for a office clerk. I had my main Media Centre PC running Vista Ultimate on 512Mb, 1.3Ghz Athlon and a couple of knackered IDE disks!

Everyone here knocking vista its not all that bad. Eventually when migrating to windows 7 you will still need to upgrade your computer hardware.

Thing I like about vista is its less susceptible to malware, trojans.

Also those fo you who have waited and installed windows xp SP3 you have just opened loppholes.

vista is a good os but xp is getting old and if GM cant run vista they either have bad IT people or have they ever heard of compatability mode and running an app in admin mode?if not they need to get there heads bashed in and stop blaiming vista for there problems.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!