BioShock PS3 confirmed


Recommended Posts

The rumours are true: critically acclaimed Take-Two shooter BioShock is finally, definitely coming to PlayStation 3.

Details are thin on the ground at the moment (i.e. there are none), but the next issue of UK PlayStation mag PSM3 - which is on UK newsstands June 5 - promises a lengthy preview of the PS3 version along with a depth charge of screenshots.

The highly lauded shooter was originally an Xbox 360 exclusive, but rumours of a PS3 version have been surfacing even before its release.

We called Take-Two's UK office who would only give us a flat "no comment". That being the case, expect an official announcement somewhere down the line.

There's another European mag that's touting the game in its upcoming issue too. We're beginning to see a pattern emerging here...

We've no idea what, if anything, the PS3 version will get in the way of extra content. The only extra stuff 360 and PC versions got post-release were new plasmids. But frankly we had such a bloody good time exploring Rapture on PC and 360 that we're well up for another dive on PS3.

Read our gushing Xbox 360 review here.

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=189519

(Y)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/638506-bioshock-ps3-confirmed/
Share on other sites

I say what is the point. The game has been and gone last August and they had anytime before Christmas to release it. Personally i think it is a waste of time when they could just bring BioShock 2 to the PS3 or something.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

Bioshock isn't in the same league as the MGS saga ;)

I hope this is a joke. I mean both games can't be compared but i said it once and ill say it again, the best MGS was the first one. Where this great Saga u talk of? MGS2 and MGS3 were beyond poor. I am not saying MGS4 will be though and i hope it's not.

I say what is the point. The game has been and gone last August and they had anytime before Christmas to release it. Personally i think it is a waste of time when they could just bring BioShock 2 to the PS3 or something.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

The point is, not everybody bought a 360. The PS3 will get Bioshock and Bioshock 2.

As for the whole porting thing, maybe, maybe not - they may actually invest some time and do a proper job and implement those things in. The PS3 is more than capable.

I say what is the point. The game has been and gone last August and they had anytime before Christmas to release it. Personally i think it is a waste of time when they could just bring BioShock 2 to the PS3 or something.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

I hope this is a joke. I mean both games can't be compared but i said it once and ill say it again, the best MGS was the first one. Where this great Saga u talk of? MGS2 and MGS3 were beyond poor. I am not saying MGS4 will be though and i hope it's not.

Did you not read my post above? I was talking about ease of porting.

If you two want to challenge me on importance anyway, I'll admit I do believe the MGS saga (spanning 6 main games, and what 3/4 portable now?) is much bigger than the one title that Bioshock is - That's not comparing how good the games are, it's comparing their fanbase and size.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

And I wouldn't expect you to think any differently.

I hope this is a joke. I mean both games can't be compared but i said it once and ill say it again, the best MGS was the first one. Where this great Saga u talk of? MGS2 and MGS3 were beyond poor. I am not saying MGS4 will be though and i hope it's not.

He meant from a porting point of view.

Its your opinion on MGS2 and 3. Personally I found them all to be excellent.

I meant in terms of being easily ported.

Ah I see

As for Bioshock, I wouldn't count on a fantastic port tbh, especially when 2K are working on a sequel and they only advertised for PS3 developers after the game was released. Anyone who works with software dev knows that it's a royal pain trying to work out how something was built that you never worked on yourself.

But good to see it reach another audience (Y)

The point is, not everybody bought a 360. The PS3 will get Bioshock and Bioshock 2.

As for the whole porting thing, maybe, maybe not - they may actually invest some time and do a proper job and implement those things in. The PS3 is more than capable.

Oh i think maybe it will just by looking at every game released thus far on both PS3 and X360. I never said the PS3 wasn't more than capable, just it will run inferior probably to the X360, just like the PC version outruns the X360 version with the right hardware.

I have no doubts It'll look amazing, but as many developers has said, porting a 360 Game to Playstation 3 is a lot more difficult than the other way around. So I'm almost sure we are gonna see some downscaling, texture, resolution or other.

I agree. While the main Developers will be working/or probably already working on BioShock 2 they will pass on the development code to someone else in 2K games to port it, hence why i think the PS3 version will be inferior.

come to think of it, bioshock is UE3 based right? UT3 on PS3 looks and plays fantastically, all the hard work of bringing the game over to the PS3 codebase is essentially there.

That's a fair point, can anyone confirm it does run on the Unreal 3 engine?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!