Policy regarding OS X on non-Apple Hardware


Recommended Posts

My concern is the flood of x86 posts clogging up the Apple Forums.

QFT (but probably for different reasons)

Install what you want, it's your PC, you mess it up, you fix it, every day there seems to be a new "I've hosed my partitions, help" thread, just gonna start ignoring them all.

Wow. I?m truly shocked by this announcement. A good kind of socked though. I always assumed that Neowin had the policy of, ?best to play it safe and not even go near anything remotely related to warz?. I?m happy to see that was wrong and that Neowin that is willing to embrace discussion of technologies even if there is a chance it could be used for illegal purposes (discussion of bittorrent and hacked uxtheme.dll also comes to mind). I congratulate Neowin on putting what the members want(and are legally allowed) before the interests of large corporations that see no profit in these technologies.

Also, if anyone is interested in reading up on some cases involving the legality of EULA, I happen to have favorited this link a while ago.

Flood? There are like 3 threads? :blink:

Exactly. And if there is a flood of new threads regarding OSx86, that's what the tag is for. If you see the tag and you want nothing to do with the thread, don't go in there. Not that difficult.

Flood? There are like 3 threads? :blink:

Three popped up in less than an hour after the announcement was made. I don't expect Neowin to become inundated with topics, but I sure see that number growing.

The EULA is not a contract you sign, is a contract that it is understood you agree on by just using the software purchased. If the EULA says that you can't install OSX on non-apple hardware and a court ruling says such thing is illegal, well, I'm not sure how law works in the US but.. the eula can say jack, that the parts of it that are not in accordance to the law are completely nullified.

Not to mention that as of today "apple hardware" is not any different than "non-apple hardware" except for the brand.

Three popped up in less than an hour after the announcement was made. I don't expect Neowin to become inundated with topics, but I sure see that number growing.

One of them is the announcement thread. The other two - I don't get what exactly Mac user have problems with? Do you (not you specifically Mathachew) own Apple shares or are you Steve Jobs? I mean WTF?

The law states that Apple cannot force a user to install their OS on specific hardware, that trumps any EULA Apple can come up with, I don't care who wrote it.

Quote from Apple Insider, ""a 1984 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision held that a software publisher can't require consumers to run an operating system on a specific type of hardware".

A user can use that case as precedent in their defense if Apple sues them for breach of contract, they still breached the contract.

Contracts, such as EULAs are protected by law, that's why they are written by lawyers and in lawyer speak. So they are protected by US and international laws.

Whether Neowin chooses to abide by specific things in those contracts is up to them and at their own risk to support the breaking of these clauses. I wouldn't be convinced by Neowin pulling out cases that back them up as I'm sure Apple would be more than willing to drag someone into court to prove that case wrong one of these days.

The EULA is an agreement between the end-user and the company that wrote it. We have nothing to do with it. Our support of installing things this way doesn't violate any law. The only violation is up to the user installing OS X on their PC. That's up to them to decide if they want to risk it.

A user can use that case as precedent in their defense if Apple sues them for breach of contract, they still breached the contract.

Really? Let's say that the EULA said that OS X could only be used by male people. The EULA would be deemed illegal because it's not in accordance to the law, equality and such things. No woman could ever be prosecuted by apple for breach of contract. I believe that court rulings in the US have some sort of "law" rank, unless an actual law is passed by the congress after the court ruling.

Off topic I know, but even the Microsoft Forums say that Vista has a Trial period:

http://forums.microsoft.com/Genuine/ShowPo...7&SiteID=25

The EULA is an agreement between the end-user and the company that wrote it. We have nothing to do with it. Our support of installing things this way doesn't violate any law. The only violation is up to the user installing OS X on their PC. That's up to them to decide if they want to risk it.

As much as I'm "all for allowing osx86 discussion", what you just said could be applied to cases in which threads have been closed (and maybe people banned?) for the sole mentioning of having an illegal windows installation.

Really? Let's say that the EULA said that OS X could only be used by male people. The EULA would be deemed illegal because it's not in accordance to the law, equality and such things. No woman could ever be prosecuted by apple for breach of contract. I believe that court rulings in the US have some sort of "law" rank, unless an actual law is passed by the congress after the court ruling.

In that case I presume the contract would not be legally binding as the company is clearly breaking some equality laws, lol.

Off topic I know, but even the Microsoft Forums say that Vista has a Trial period:

http://forums.microsoft.com/Genuine/ShowPo...7&SiteID=25

Funny. Certain windows-license-freak here on neowin would argue what is stated on that forum, since, well, that would mean that someone broke some sort of divine law by lending you that copy in the first place.

Jeez, someone better tell Apple! :o

No doubt they are aware. However with that wording in the EULA, it would allow them to challenge the law if so desired.

Don't believe it's been updated since this story

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/27/ap...es_safari_eula/

At one point and perhaps still does, the Vista EULA stated that the Home and Home Premium versions were not to be run virtually. You had to buy Business or Ultimate versions.

I have no doubt that many other companies have items in their EULA that wouldn't hold up in court, yet they add them to cover their bases.

In that case I presume the contract would not be legally binding as the company is clearly breaking some equality laws, lol.

Which is the case here, as it is to my understanding that court rulings in the US are like written law until an actual law is passed.

The EULA is an agreement between the end-user and the company that wrote it. We have nothing to do with it. Our support of installing things this way doesn't violate any law. The only violation is up to the user installing OS X on their PC. That's up to them to decide if they want to risk it.

Yeah I only brought it up as it seemed there were some misleading statements coming out in the conversation.

That isn't an issue of just an EULA with Vista, it's also a copyright issue. Microsoft, through the 30 day trial program, has implicitly granted you 30 days to make use of the copy of the product. Circumventing that system is breaking copyright law, not just the EULA. That is a US law and is therefore illegal where the servers for this site are housed.
Any 30-day re-imaging has nothing to do with copyright. If I take one DVD and install it every 30 days on the same computer to avoid WGA, that is a EULA issue, not a copyright one.

I do not question the direction, only the claim that re-installing Vista every 30 days violates copyright.

The reason that Mac users are so against this I think is the fear that Apple will think, right, we will have to start strengthening its security and start using sometype of validation on OSX

all these OSX86 hackingtosh folks are in danger of killing the golden goose of having a OS without any activation.

One of them is the announcement thread. The other two - I don't get what exactly Mac user have problems with? Do you (not you specifically Mathachew) own Apple shares or are you Steve Jobs? I mean WTF?

They are just annoyed that they have paid over the odds for basic pc hardware and now people can spend ?150 on leopard and run it on their own PCs.

The original rule was put in place to protect Neowin. It was a possibility that Apple would aggressively pursue any site that supported "Hackintosh" systems.

Not only has Apple not done this to our competitors but they do not even remove references from their own servers: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1282871

Neowin is a computer enthusiast community. Many of our members would like to run Hackintosh systems just for bragging rights. It isn't that different from our members who overclock their hardware. An overclocked Hackintosh box with integrated fish tank may be the ultimate geek experience. When it comes right down to it, we are here to serve our members. We are here to provide them with what they want.

Loyal Macintosh fans need not worry. Anyone who wants a production OS/X computer should be purchasing a real Macintosh computer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!