Recommended Posts

Someone please kill this thread. Seriously. I have to say, considering how few people have experienced Windows 7 yet, how can anyone possibly expect it to suck? I mean, first of all, its based on vista..... and that's not a bad thing. Vista is a great OS, it just needs some good tweaking and a lil drano to get rid of the bottlenecks. The fact that they're building 7 off of Vista is actually a good thing, because they won't have the same problems vista did with regard to writing a new kernel. They just have to tweak the one they already have. It is good. It may not be great, but its definitely good. If 7 improves on what we've achieved with Vista/2008 SP2, then there's nowhere to go but up.

Thats not really an option for MS, they are still losing market share with Vista SP1 and can't be sure to turn that around with SP2, to them, its a major risk to gamble.

That would make sense if it were true... What market share are they losing? Any sources?

I can't believe the thread starter thought Microsoft would make it compulsory to have a touchscreen montior :laugh: hahahaha!

Oh dear...

Back to the topic in question: I am really looking forward to Windows 7, I think it's going to be fantastic! The new taskbar is genius!

I can't believe the thread starter thought Microsoft would make it compulsory to have a touchscreen montior :laugh: hahahaha!

Oh dear...

Back to the topic in question: I am really looking forward to Windows 7, I think it's going to be fantastic! The new taskbar is genius!

+1

i for one wouldn't mind touch screen as an added bonus :) , that would be pretty cool

  • 3 weeks later...
That would make sense if it were true... What market share are they losing? Any sources?

I didn't mean a substantial market loss, more of a continual downward progression, and my original statement should really state windows in general, not just Vista. Though the bad PR with Vista has not help (which mainly consisted of idiots like the starter of this thread judging Vista without actually trying it, or trying to use it on hardware that is not really suitable). Heres a source (http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9121938) I should mention that the article does indicate that there was a recent rise in market share before dropping below 90%.

Cheers

Hynesy

+1

i for one wouldn't mind touch screen as an added bonus :) , that would be pretty cool

Yeah, but only if they made it so that my normal LCD screen magically became an uber multi-touch touch screen. Then I'll be impressed!

In regards to the topic, I've been using W7 for about a week now, and it's really quite impressive, and surprisingly stable (albeit not perfect yet :)).

Windows 7 (Build 7000) is pretty impressive in my opinion, it might not please the crowd but it's got a lot of fit and finish already and we're not even at the release candidate stage yet, there's only a few things that really bother me about it:

  • Programs being removed from the frequently used list in the Start Menu if they are pinned to the taskbar.
  • Jump lists are a bit touchy at this stage, although with some more refinement and with more 3rd party applications which support it this should be a non-issue.
  • Internet Explorer 8 is unstable as hell, I don't know if it's a conflict with Adobe Flash Player 10 or what it is, but anything with Flash or any web page that uses AJAX seems to cause the tab to crash.

From trying build 6801 I think it will be an improvement over vista but if you don't like vista then you probably wont like seven ether. As for system requirements there much the same.

I can't stand Vista, but I like 7. It has the refinement and the performance that Vista should have had to begin with.

From trying build 6801 I think it will be an improvement over vista but if you don't like vista then you probably wont like seven ether. As for system requirements there much the same.

I think thats a load of rubbish, the use of system resources has been drastically reduced already.

I've had the chance to try it out, it's certainly much faster than Vista and many of the annoyances from Vista have been fixed. All this and it's still in beta. However Windows Explorer does suck still. Incredibly enough I think they've made it even worse than it was in Vista. There are third party alternatives so it's not the end of the world. I'll use the File Manager from Windows NT 3.51 if it comes down to it.

I personally don't like Vista, but I haven't really seen enough of 7 to determine whether it is going to be good or "suck". It's a thought in the back of my mind that it could, but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt for now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!