Battlefield Bad Company


Recommended Posts

So the game is out today, I've just played two matches of the multiplayer on XBL and I'm very happy with it. If any of you played the demo you'll know it was quite laggy, but I'm pleased to say I never encountered any during my play on the final game.

There is 8 maps in total and each class has the ability to unlock two weapons from ranking up. There is also 3 weapons available to unlock using credits for each class. Two of which are weapons and another "gadget", i.e the sniper can unlock a laser guided bomb on vehicles.

On top of that there is also Wildcards, Patches and Trophies which are tasks you complete online such as "20 kills with headshots". I've not checked if they are linked with 360 achievements or not, but my guess some of them are. There is 135 in total to complete.

So yeah my first impressions are very good, it feels much closer to the pc version of the game. I like the change of unlocking weapons as it gives the game another level obviously to complete. I know there was a lot of debate when COD4 went this route as it creates an "uneven" level of play in some people's eyes. At the same time though, it encourages you to play more to unlock them yourself.

There is two things which I'm a bit on the edge of though. When sniping in the demo I thought lag was causing me to miss a lot of targets, but it seems there is some actual travel time on the bullets. Which is a good thing really, it just takes some getting used to when other games out there don't use this technique.

And also with the scoring, it seems incredibly easy to rack up some stupidly high scores. In my first match the top player had over 400 points. Now fair enough if the game had been out for a while this person might have got very skilled at the game over time, but it was only released today..I suppose it's possible they played the demo a lot, but nevertheless it's very easy to get high scores.

I'll probably post back later with some more impressions when I've played more maps etc. The one I just played was called Harest Day and the map is pretty damn big and was a lot of fun to play. Lots of grassy fields etc to hide in for sniping and farm houses/barns where the Gold Crates are kept. On the final stage of attacking it reminded me a lot of Halo 3's High Ground map, where you are running up a hill side to a small village of houses and the defenders shooting down at you.

So yeah, back later after I pwn more noobz :woot:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/645814-battlefield-bad-company/
Share on other sites

Game kicks ass, I love it. I really wish they added more game modes though, the crates get annoying after awhile, I'd rather have to capture and hold outposts. But in general the game rules, I'm highly addicted, already ranked up to a master sergeant after a few hours :)

Here in us the game came out on 23 so yeah lots of people have high score. I don't play much multiplayer but I am really impress with single player alone for a game coming out of EA I has my share of doubts.

I really like the character especially Haggard (the you and what army guy) :rofl:

Here in us the game came out on 23 so yeah lots of people have high score. I don't play much multiplayer but I am really impress with single player alone for a game coming out of EA I has my share of doubts.

I really like the character especially Haggard (the you and what army guy) :rofl:

most of the people with high scores are glitchers using the vehicle repair bug.... my friend went through the top 150 and all were glitchers except 1 guy.

Here in us the game came out on 23 so yeah lots of people have high score.

You'd think so right? But the way EA handles their servers is they split them up into regions, So I've been playing people from Europe today where it only just came out. The scoring system really is easy, even if you suck at the game you're bound to get over 100 points for almost nothing.

You'd think so right? But the way EA handles their servers is they split them up into regions, So I've been playing people from Europe today where it only just came out. The scoring system really is easy, even if you suck at the game you're bound to get over 100 points for almost nothing.

Is the scoring the same as the Beta was do you know? On average I got 300-400 points a round, and I got a few 600's as well. I was an insane player of Battlefield 2 on the comp though, so that helped a lot I think.

I am so angry right now.

I am renting the game from Gamefly and just buying it from them since it saves me $20 bucks doing so. So I rented this game and Alone in the Dark (even though I read it sucks). Well I had my two queue slots wide open for both games, and they were both shipped the same day on this past Wednesday.

Well, I check my mail today, and only one game is in the mailbox!!!! and OF COURSE it is Alone In The Dark. :angry:

Which means one of two things... either Gamefly still sucks, and I will get BF tomorrow, and/or they had to ship Battlefield from the California facility, which means I will not get it until early next week. So stupid.

Yeah from what I can tell the scoring is the exact same as the beta/demo.

I've had my first credits rewarded since last posting and unlocked the laser target and the ability to heal the soldier class. I wish they had left in medi crates like they did in Modern Combat, as there is no way to ask for a med pack from your support class team mates. At least not from what I've played so far, but I don't think it's possible.

Still loving it and some of the maps are really nice, there is a good mix. Last one I played was in a country village with quite low lighting and a heavy mist.

Still getting used to the layout of them but that will come in time (Y)

Game kicks ass, I love it. I really wish they added more game modes though, the crates get annoying after awhile, I'd rather have to capture and hold outposts. But in general the game rules, I'm highly addicted, already ranked up to a master sergeant after a few hours :)

I think there adding that game mode with a patch later on.

Is the scoring the same as the Beta was do you know? On average I got 300-400 points a round, and I got a few 600's as well. I was an insane player of Battlefield 2 on the comp though, so that helped a lot I think.

I am so angry right now.

I am renting the game from Gamefly and just buying it from them since it saves me $20 bucks doing so. So I rented this game and Alone in the Dark (even though I read it sucks). Well I had my two queue slots wide open for both games, and they were both shipped the same day on this past Wednesday.

Well, I check my mail today, and only one game is in the mailbox!!!! and OF COURSE it is Alone In The Dark. :angry:

Which means one of two things... either Gamefly still sucks, and I will get BF tomorrow, and/or they had to ship Battlefield from the California facility, which means I will not get it until early next week. So stupid.

It could also mean that no one wants AITD (as its not even worth a rent IMO) so they sent you the crappy stuff first.

Send AITD back and wait for BFBC to arrive ... you wont regret it. unless you want to be bored out of your mind with AITD and thus never want to play another console game in your life (yes its that bad)

Yeah 1st Battlefield game I've played and I'm loving it for the most part. As per another thread my ownly issues is that sometimes you spawn right in front of the opposition when you select to spawn from your base. With bases as large as they are surely they can spawn you away from these people so that you don't die after 1 second. Fair enough if you get sniped, but being knifed 2 seconds in is a bit dumb.

Secondly some people I've played with have been a tad annoying. Playing as a sniper and getting in good positions to have a squad mate spawn to your area and open fire with some smg's or whatever on enemies 200m away while basically standing on you and giving your position. Duno if you can, but it'd be great to be able to split yourself off from a squad or join another one for instances where you have these fools in your squad as it can make playing certain roles such as snipers pretty difficult when they are constantly giving you away without disregard. Not the games fault, but there are some clueless people out there.

Havent touched the single player but yet so I can't comment on that.

Yeah 1st Battlefield game I've played and I'm loving it for the most part. As per another thread my ownly issues is that sometimes you spawn right in front of the opposition when you select to spawn from your base. With bases as large as they are surely they can spawn you away from these people so that you don't die after 1 second. Fair enough if you get sniped, but being knifed 2 seconds in is a bit dumb.

Secondly some people I've played with have been a tad annoying. Playing as a sniper and getting in good positions to have a squad mate spawn to your area and open fire with some smg's or whatever on enemies 200m away while basically standing on you and giving your position. Duno if you can, but it'd be great to be able to split yourself off from a squad or join another one for instances where you have these fools in your squad as it can make playing certain roles such as snipers pretty difficult when they are constantly giving you away without disregard. Not the games fault, but there are some clueless people out there.

Havent touched the single player but yet so I can't comment on that.

Yeah I've pretty much stuck to spawning at the nearest checkpoint rather than with my squad because of this reason. Also it doesn't make much sense when you don't have a choice which squad member you want to spawn beside, and the only choice is someone getting owned.

And same here, I went straight for the multiplayer :laugh:

Tried to play earlier on and the servers wouldn't allow me to connect. Seems EA have had some problems. There was bad news for PS3 players as well when the scheduled maintenance went ###### up for Sony and you couldn't play online at all.

It doesn't feel quite as "tight" as COD4 but I've enjoyed my first few goes at it.

Is there a way of changing the stick sensitivity? I'm not sure whether I'm still used to how I've got COD4 set or whether Bad Company has some "inertia" which causes me to overshoot my target :/

Absolutely loving Bad Company so far. The maps are ALL good, and very nicely laid out. The sound is superb and while the graphics aren't mind blowing (I mean come on, it's still the BF2 engine pretty much) they look great and the destruction is very well done.

Very much looking forward to conquest DLC (and hopefully a few new maps to go along with it)

I wish people would stop treating this as a Team Deathmatch game when it clearly isn't.

So many idiots online too interested in just racking up kills and letting the other team blow up the crates!

It's one of the reasons I don't play online much anymore. It's getting worse and worse.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!