Battlefield Bad Company


Recommended Posts

To say I am thoroughly disappointed is an understatement. :no:

How in the world they thought it would be a good idea to make your main base something that could be captured by the opposing team is absolutely beyond me. That was a mainstay in previous Conquest modes, no matter what, you always had your main base to fall back on if all of the flags were captured. GETTING RID OF THIS IS A HUGE ALTERATION TO THE GAMEPLAY ITSELF. Sorry for the all caps, but I am literally dumbfounded they chose to do this. Now that is completely gone, out of the 6 matches or so I played, half of them were over in about 4-5 minutes time, if that.

Seriously, I cannot comprehend why they chose to do get rid of always having a main base that could not be captured. :wacko: :crazy:

Granted I only played on my lunch break, and will give it another chance later on tonight, but my first impression is an extremely negative one.

I actually have been renting the game this entire time through Gamefly, I thought I purchased it but I never wound up doing so, and I may just send it back soon, as a Mode I really thought would add months of longevity to the game, appears to have been dramatically changed from past iterations, and it is now only a shallow shell of what it once was.

I hope something is wrong with the update, and they release a patch soon to fix this tragic oversight, but I think for whatever reason they thought it was a good idea to change the formula that has worked for them the past how many years now? I am just blown away, and obviously not in a good way.

So, is this mode like in BF2 then? I honestly can't remember the name of the BF2 mode but kills would decrease the team score and if you captured a flag, that area of the map would turn as a base for your team. Is that correct?

It is a bastardized version of that classic mode.

Thanks for the mini-reviews Andy/Larry. I've been curious as to how the gameplay is pretty much all day today.

I don't know what to think based on your reviews, as I do not have any expectations as to what Conquest was like on the PC side.

But from what you guys are saying, it doesn't sound too promising.

I'm not sure how much more of Gold Rush I can take. I mean I like the game mode and it plays well, but having played it for nearly 2 months now, it's getting old and I need a change. I was hoping they'd just include Conquest like it was in every other BF game, but its way different.

I can see myself playing a lot less now tbh, at least until they patch Goldrush and hopefully patch Conquest.

I think I might spend a bit more time playing the Battlefield Heroes beta

That was like getting tea-bagged in a dress :/

I hate how they tried focusing on certain gameplay elements like close quarters combat in Ascension and Oasis. The Shotgun has removed any chance of some fun and balanced CQB matches, that's for sure.

You also have to deal with extremely random spawns constantly, because the flags are pretty close together. Then you get the hang of the CQB, then you are suddenly thrown in this huge map and you have to drastically change play-style again ( Which is extremely annoying ).

What annoyed me the most was the problems we had in the beginning, like playing the same maps constantly and the bullet-lag I had throughout the game.

Don't think I'll be playing this game-mode again tonight, doesn't get any better until they at least fix a few things.

I'll stick to Goldrush (Y)

Thanks for the mini-reviews Andy/Larry. I've been curious as to how the gameplay is pretty much all day today.

I don't know what to think based on your reviews, as I do not have any expectations as to what Conquest was like on the PC side.

But from what you guys are saying, it doesn't sound too promising.

Do not get me wrong, it can still be fun to play, but it gets down to the quote I quoted below. One team can now truly completely dominate, and dominating means matches are over in minutes, literally.

One big problem I could see is the unbalanced teams, so you could have one team take all the flags within a few minutes. I agree it needs uncappable bases.

Still not sure what they were thinking getting rid of uncappable bases. Just seems so stupid to get rid of that huge, huge factor.

Over at the EA forums the knobs/noobs?can never remember which it is :), all think Conquest is amazing (well all 12 of them that post on there)

And in other news ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM

.swf'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM

.swf' WIDTH='425' HEIGHT='355' PLAY='TRUE' LOOP='TRUE' QUALITY='HIGH'>

Does the Youtube tag not work anymore?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM

Edited by BeLGaRaTh
Clan support/private rooms/team chat

Auto balancing on servers

Continued support against stats exploits

VOIP issue on PS3 (working with Sony on this)

Squads might be split up when joining a server as a squad. This is due to team balancing in the games that are being joined, and usually resolves itself in round 2.

/The Battlefield: Bad Company team

Have they put dates to these patches?

Over at the EA forums the knobs/noobs?can never remember which it is :), all think Conquest is amazing (well all 12 of them that post on there)

And in other news ...

Does the Youtube tag not work anymore?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM.swf

Here you go :p

You probably ain't kidding :rofl:

Fighting the urge not to tbh! But yeah I'll be on soon and give it another go. I've still to try End of the Line in Conquest. I doubt it's gonna change my mind much, but I'll play a few rounds of Gold Rush too.

I'm trying to think of another multiplayer game to fill the gap Conquest has left..

COD4 is just...meh, I couldn't get back into it when we played.

What about Halo 3 :woot: :p

Just had a quick 1 hour play in Conquest. Matches went from about 5 minutes to almost 10 minutes, just depends on the goal of the teams. I had one match last 4:23, reason being everyone just ran out into the middle and shot each other. Of course, you have the 1 or 2 players who know to go get flags (and they were on the other team LOL) so it went quick. The 10 minute game I was in was a lot of fun and there was a TON of jockeying for flags.

I don't mind the mode at all I just wish people would learn to play the right way. If I wanted a straight frag fest I would go get back into UT. Basically, it feels like my Gold Rush experiences. People don't defend at all - everyone is on the offensive but then they don't actually CAPTURE flags/detonate crates. I won't give up on the game because eventually this type of play will weed out.

As Larry and others mentioned, if they would just make the bases uncappable. One good example is the last match I was in. Red team had all positions captured save for one. Brilliantly (yet here is where the rub is) they took all their tanks and vehicles and lined them up on the last remaining blue position (yep, where everyone respawns). Eventually I just watched the bar tick down as lives were lost and there was no way to respawn at all. No squad, no base, nothing. Respawn, die. Respawn, die.

I think there is quite a few of us here who have played Conquest a lot in the past, and it certainly didn't help paint a better picture of the mode. Infact, being too good at the mode and you'll end up actually playing less. I'm not even kidding when I say both Sethos and I played a match which was 1.5 minutes long.

Yeah, I barely got done scratching my ass before we were done :|

But about filling the FPS gap, I have been wanting to go back to Halo 3 for a long time - Really miss the game.

Only thing keeping my from doing it is that god awful random game-mode selection. I hate playing some random matches with some messed up rulesets because that's someones idea of "fun".

Sure I can do play some matches without ranking up, but that's 1/3 of the fun in playing.

It is still like that, right? :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
    • They said by this time everyone will have flying cars. WELL...
    • A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. Maybe not as we now know that time can flow backwards.
    • Of course. Simply reverse the polarity.
    • It is clear from this aricle that "Time Is On My Side" no matter which direction it is flowing., https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?i...m%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsEj8lUx0gwY
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!