Battlefield Bad Company


Recommended Posts

To say I am thoroughly disappointed is an understatement. :no:

How in the world they thought it would be a good idea to make your main base something that could be captured by the opposing team is absolutely beyond me. That was a mainstay in previous Conquest modes, no matter what, you always had your main base to fall back on if all of the flags were captured. GETTING RID OF THIS IS A HUGE ALTERATION TO THE GAMEPLAY ITSELF. Sorry for the all caps, but I am literally dumbfounded they chose to do this. Now that is completely gone, out of the 6 matches or so I played, half of them were over in about 4-5 minutes time, if that.

Seriously, I cannot comprehend why they chose to do get rid of always having a main base that could not be captured. :wacko: :crazy:

Granted I only played on my lunch break, and will give it another chance later on tonight, but my first impression is an extremely negative one.

I actually have been renting the game this entire time through Gamefly, I thought I purchased it but I never wound up doing so, and I may just send it back soon, as a Mode I really thought would add months of longevity to the game, appears to have been dramatically changed from past iterations, and it is now only a shallow shell of what it once was.

I hope something is wrong with the update, and they release a patch soon to fix this tragic oversight, but I think for whatever reason they thought it was a good idea to change the formula that has worked for them the past how many years now? I am just blown away, and obviously not in a good way.

So, is this mode like in BF2 then? I honestly can't remember the name of the BF2 mode but kills would decrease the team score and if you captured a flag, that area of the map would turn as a base for your team. Is that correct?

It is a bastardized version of that classic mode.

Thanks for the mini-reviews Andy/Larry. I've been curious as to how the gameplay is pretty much all day today.

I don't know what to think based on your reviews, as I do not have any expectations as to what Conquest was like on the PC side.

But from what you guys are saying, it doesn't sound too promising.

I'm not sure how much more of Gold Rush I can take. I mean I like the game mode and it plays well, but having played it for nearly 2 months now, it's getting old and I need a change. I was hoping they'd just include Conquest like it was in every other BF game, but its way different.

I can see myself playing a lot less now tbh, at least until they patch Goldrush and hopefully patch Conquest.

I think I might spend a bit more time playing the Battlefield Heroes beta

That was like getting tea-bagged in a dress :/

I hate how they tried focusing on certain gameplay elements like close quarters combat in Ascension and Oasis. The Shotgun has removed any chance of some fun and balanced CQB matches, that's for sure.

You also have to deal with extremely random spawns constantly, because the flags are pretty close together. Then you get the hang of the CQB, then you are suddenly thrown in this huge map and you have to drastically change play-style again ( Which is extremely annoying ).

What annoyed me the most was the problems we had in the beginning, like playing the same maps constantly and the bullet-lag I had throughout the game.

Don't think I'll be playing this game-mode again tonight, doesn't get any better until they at least fix a few things.

I'll stick to Goldrush (Y)

Thanks for the mini-reviews Andy/Larry. I've been curious as to how the gameplay is pretty much all day today.

I don't know what to think based on your reviews, as I do not have any expectations as to what Conquest was like on the PC side.

But from what you guys are saying, it doesn't sound too promising.

Do not get me wrong, it can still be fun to play, but it gets down to the quote I quoted below. One team can now truly completely dominate, and dominating means matches are over in minutes, literally.

One big problem I could see is the unbalanced teams, so you could have one team take all the flags within a few minutes. I agree it needs uncappable bases.

Still not sure what they were thinking getting rid of uncappable bases. Just seems so stupid to get rid of that huge, huge factor.

Over at the EA forums the knobs/noobs?can never remember which it is :), all think Conquest is amazing (well all 12 of them that post on there)

And in other news ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM

.swf'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM

.swf' WIDTH='425' HEIGHT='355' PLAY='TRUE' LOOP='TRUE' QUALITY='HIGH'>

Does the Youtube tag not work anymore?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM

Edited by BeLGaRaTh
Clan support/private rooms/team chat

Auto balancing on servers

Continued support against stats exploits

VOIP issue on PS3 (working with Sony on this)

Squads might be split up when joining a server as a squad. This is due to team balancing in the games that are being joined, and usually resolves itself in round 2.

/The Battlefield: Bad Company team

Have they put dates to these patches?

Over at the EA forums the knobs/noobs?can never remember which it is :), all think Conquest is amazing (well all 12 of them that post on there)

And in other news ...

Does the Youtube tag not work anymore?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWbmOG2oM.swf

Here you go :p

You probably ain't kidding :rofl:

Fighting the urge not to tbh! But yeah I'll be on soon and give it another go. I've still to try End of the Line in Conquest. I doubt it's gonna change my mind much, but I'll play a few rounds of Gold Rush too.

I'm trying to think of another multiplayer game to fill the gap Conquest has left..

COD4 is just...meh, I couldn't get back into it when we played.

What about Halo 3 :woot: :p

Just had a quick 1 hour play in Conquest. Matches went from about 5 minutes to almost 10 minutes, just depends on the goal of the teams. I had one match last 4:23, reason being everyone just ran out into the middle and shot each other. Of course, you have the 1 or 2 players who know to go get flags (and they were on the other team LOL) so it went quick. The 10 minute game I was in was a lot of fun and there was a TON of jockeying for flags.

I don't mind the mode at all I just wish people would learn to play the right way. If I wanted a straight frag fest I would go get back into UT. Basically, it feels like my Gold Rush experiences. People don't defend at all - everyone is on the offensive but then they don't actually CAPTURE flags/detonate crates. I won't give up on the game because eventually this type of play will weed out.

As Larry and others mentioned, if they would just make the bases uncappable. One good example is the last match I was in. Red team had all positions captured save for one. Brilliantly (yet here is where the rub is) they took all their tanks and vehicles and lined them up on the last remaining blue position (yep, where everyone respawns). Eventually I just watched the bar tick down as lives were lost and there was no way to respawn at all. No squad, no base, nothing. Respawn, die. Respawn, die.

I think there is quite a few of us here who have played Conquest a lot in the past, and it certainly didn't help paint a better picture of the mode. Infact, being too good at the mode and you'll end up actually playing less. I'm not even kidding when I say both Sethos and I played a match which was 1.5 minutes long.

Yeah, I barely got done scratching my ass before we were done :|

But about filling the FPS gap, I have been wanting to go back to Halo 3 for a long time - Really miss the game.

Only thing keeping my from doing it is that god awful random game-mode selection. I hate playing some random matches with some messed up rulesets because that's someones idea of "fun".

Sure I can do play some matches without ranking up, but that's 1/3 of the fun in playing.

It is still like that, right? :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They aren't going to want to. Most would just go with the 17 Pro and save money. Why would they want to spend $300 for basically the same thing? It's not worth it if there are hardly any changes from year to year.
    • 24H2 rolled out to the Release Preview Channel in early June 2024, so this coming a bit later in the Experimental Channel (formerly Dev) doesn't really say much more than earlier H2 releases that came out in October. I am not sure what the thinking is here by putting it in Experimental, one would think that the 26H2 stamp means features are locked down and it's now bug tested until October? I don't even pretend to understand Microsoft's strategy for Windows Insider Program though
    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The entire world moved to the vastly superior and now universally supported Dolby Atmos technology a very long time ago, mate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      543
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!