Apple may have shipped 2.5 million Macs in spring thanks to Vista


Recommended Posts

Seen on AppleInsider.com:

The poor reception of Windows Vista, along with a strong Mac OS X, will help Apple continue to ship Macs at three times the industry average by the end of the spring, according to BMO Capital Markets.

While most observers are focusing on iPhone 3G, it's the Mac sales that should help drive Apple's quarter ending in June, BMO analyst Keith Bachman explains in an investment note.

The researcher maintains that Apple should ship between 2.4 to 2.5 million Macs over the three-month period and that this would equate to about a 39 percent year-over-year surge in Mac shipments -- 3.2 times the predicted industry average of just 12.2 percent.

Competitive pricing plays a part in the increased sales. Bachman notes that while Apple's lineup isn't always immediately comparable, a 2.4GHz MacBook at $1,300 is often priced only a few dollars more than the average $1,292 paid for a 13-inch notebook while running faster than most; other configurations trade storage for speed but are still close enough to sway some buyers.

Ironically, however, it may be Microsoft driving customers into Apple's hands. Ongoing jitters regarding bugs and performance in Windows Vista a year and a half after its launch are believed to be driving would-be Windows upgrade customers towards Macs, which are considered by the analyst to be less problematic, simpler, and more secure.

"Thus far, user satisfaction ratings for Vista have been weak, and startup times for Vista have been known to be much slower than the Mac OS X," Bachman says. "Thus, more than 50% of recent customers buying Macs in Apple retail stores are first-time buyers."

Continued at source

Apple's sales department should be really happy if these numbers are correct. What do you think contributes to this trend - dissatisfaction with Vista, Macs being 'en vogue' or a combination of both?

I think it's just the overall package that the consumers are loving. Microsoft have been falling way short and not all their own fault.

To some degree, you buy a Mac, it works. PC on the other hand with Vista, cheap, slow bargain PCs riddled with bloatware with 1GB of RAM that should be default 2GB for Vista along with the 3 versions of the OS, it's just confusing and puts Windows in a bad light which it has been for years and only being saved by Microsoft's sheer dominance.

The recent talk of Microsoft opening street stores like Apple is great move, late as usual though. People need to see what a Windows OS looks like on a reasonably slick looking and performing laptop or desktop. If Microsoft can get it right with these stores showing PC, Laptops, Zune, Xbox 360, Media Centres, Peripherals, 3rd Party all working together in a seamless way with no bloat, then all for the better. That's what consumers need to see from Windows OS's from now on. The complete package they can take home and enjoy with little headaches.

Bill was right years ago, usability sucks and it still does but so does presentation.

I think it's just the overall package that the consumers are loving. Microsoft have been falling way short and not all their own fault.

To some degree, you buy a Mac, it works. PC on the other hand with Vista, cheap, slow bargain PCs riddled with bloatware with 1GB of RAM that should be default 2GB for Vista along with the 3 versions of the OS, it's just confusing and puts Windows in a bad light which it has been for years and only being saved by Microsoft's sheer dominance.

I agree with you there. A large part of Vista's problems can be blamed on OEM's such as Dell and HP.

The recent talk of Microsoft opening street stores like Apple is great move, late as usual though. People need to see what a Windows OS looks like on a reasonably slick looking and performing laptop or desktop. If Microsoft can get it right with these stores showing PC, Laptops, Zune, Xbox 360, Media Centres, Peripherals, 3rd Party all working together in a seamless way with no bloat, then all for the better. That's what consumers need to see from Windows OS's from now on. The complete package they can take home and enjoy with little headaches.

Bill was right years ago, usability sucks and it still does but so does presentation.

The problem with opening retail stores is getting employees who know what their doing. I've been in Apple Stores all over the US and every time I go in, the employees are very knowledgeable. Microsoft will have to be very strict with this, otherwise customers are going to have questions that can't get answered by either lazy employees or by dumb employees.

I agree with you there. A large part of Vista's problems can be blamed on OEM's such as Dell and HP.

The problem with opening retail stores is getting employees who know what their doing. I've been in Apple Stores all over the US and every time I go in, the employees are very knowledgeable. Microsoft will have to be very strict with this, otherwise customers are going to have questions that can't get answered by either lazy employees or by dumb employees.

Agreed. My GF swears by her Mac because she knows whenever she runs into a problem, she can just go to an Apple store and they'll take care of it for her. It seems as if getting an extended warranty for a Mac might actually be worth it, because instead of spending hours on the phone with someone you can't understand, all she needs to do is drop it off at the Apple store.

Maybe Microsoft needs to open some of their own stores. They don't have to have their own hardware, but maybe they could partner with Dell or HP and work together to get a high quality store opened. A store like the Apple store where people can just come in and play around or bring their faulty laptops in.

Maybe Microsoft needs to open some of their own stores. They don't have to have their own hardware, but maybe they could partner with Dell or HP and work together to get a high quality store opened. A store like the Apple store where people can just come in and play around or bring their faulty laptops in.

The problem with this is that Microsoft already partners with Dell/HP and many others...but they still play the blame game when there is a problem. MS tells people they have to talk to their OEM, the OEM says call Microsoft...

Apple can provide that level of service since they are the sole OEM, they make the software and the hardware so there is no one to pass the buck to.

Vista was partly my decision to move to a Mac, but also just on the strength of MacOS and the Mac hardware itself. This is something that Apple needs to get into its head, in its advertising as well - the products are strong enough without having to slate or compare themselves to the competition. It is strong enough to be sold on its own merits.

Leopard is a brilliant product. I wanted it regardless of what Microsoft were doing with Vista, etc etc!

"Ironically, however, it may be Microsoft driving customers into Apple's hands."

Ummm does the author know what irony means? It DOESN'T mean that Apple's top selling features lead to sales of their product. That's not irony.

Apple's been more than happy to tell people to buy a Mac because (1) it runs Windows Vista and (2) it runs Microsoft Office. So when people buy a Mac because it runs Vista that shouldn't shock anyone. And it's not ironic either. It's Apple's marketing tactics succeeding.

What people easily forget is Microsoft wins whether you buy Office for Mac or PC. Now they win twice if you buy a Mac, since many Mac owners have a Windows installation in some form on their computer.

There is still no proof that Mac sales have any relation to Vista being "bad".

The fact that Vista sales are performing poorly and that Brad Brooks, Microsoft's VP of Windows Vista consumer marketing stated, "'I'm a Mac... and I'm a PC,' commercials criticize Windows Vista. 'You know it. I know it. It's caused some impact.'"

"Ironically, however, it may be Microsoft driving customers into Apple's hands."

Ummm does the author know what irony means? It DOESN'T mean that Apple's top selling features lead to sales of their product. That's not irony.

Apple's been more than happy to tell people to buy a Mac because (1) it runs Windows Vista and (2) it runs Microsoft Office. So when people buy a Mac because it runs Vista that shouldn't shock anyone. And it's not ironic either. It's Apple's marketing tactics succeeding.

What people easily forget is Microsoft wins whether you buy Office for Mac or PC. Now they win twice if you buy a Mac, since many Mac owners have a Windows installation in some form on their computer.

+1

Microsoft wins until customers start realizing they don't need Windows on their Mac and moving to Alternative Software such as OpenOffice or iWork.

What people easily forget is Microsoft wins whether you buy Office for Mac or PC. Now they win twice if you buy a Mac, since many Mac owners have a Windows installation in some form on their computer.

It's to bad Office for Mac sucks and probably isn't selling very well. Office 2008 is a nightmare.

+1

Microsoft wins until customers start realizing they don't need Windows on their Mac and moving to Alternative Software such as OpenOffice or iWork.

I can't imagine most people haven't already realized that. I took Office off my Mac after the most recent update didn't help any. Never really needed it anyway.

I can't imagine most people haven't already realized that. I took Office off my Mac after the most recent update didn't help any. Never really needed it anyway.

It is a VERY slow process actually.

When Snow Leopard comes out with Exchange support that works it will be the final nail in Office:Mac's coffin I think.

I think a lot of Mac sales has to do with the increase advertising they have been doing. For a while you never saw any Mac ads on TV and in the past year or so, there are a lot of them. Not to mention that every year more and more PCs/Macs are being sold. But Macs are never going to become as popular as PCs unless they take over the business side of things,

Vista isnt "bad". The major turn off for most people concerning Vista is the hardware requirements to run it. I have vista ultimate at home (64 bit) and it works great on my system. Everything I have installed works without problem. I also installed Vista on my laptop (wanted to force myself to learn it cuz I need to for my job) and that works just fine. I also have Vista on a test system at work and have no issues. Vista actually loads all my apps faster than on my Windows XP system.

Macs for personal use are ok for a normal user who doesnt know much and wants the Mac store to fix everything for them. You also dont have as much software options for the Mac as you do for the PC.

We use Macs at work (the new gen g5s) and they are a pita to get working on the network properly. Printing is a pita as well. Also, the hardware is EXPENSIVE. I bought an extra 2gb of RAM and it costs my work $500. You can get the same speced RAM for a PC for a little over $100. Video cards are more expensive and I dont even want to know how much more the other components are. Plus, one thing that irritates me about the Mac is the inability to eject the damn CDROM drive without having to use the eject key on the keyboard. But I wont rant to much about this since I could go on and on... :)...I do like how the G5s have their HD bays setup. No cables to mess with and the HD plug in directly to the mainboard via a daughterboard....now that is slick

Oh, on a side note I compared my Quad Core AMD system to a new quad core G5 and my AMD is faster :)

It is a VERY slow process actually.

When Snow Leopard comes out with Exchange support that works it will be the final nail in Office:Mac's coffin I think.

I had forgotten about Exchange support. To bad Microsoft doesn't offer just Entourage like they do for Outlook on Windows.

We use Macs at work (the new gen g5s) and they are a pita to get working on the network properly. Printing is a pita as well. Also, the hardware is EXPENSIVE. I bought an extra 2gb of RAM and it costs my work $500. You can get the same speced RAM for a PC for a little over $100. Video cards are more expensive and I dont even want to know how much more the other components are. Plus, one thing that irritates me about the Mac is the inability to eject the damn CDROM drive without having to use the eject key on the keyboard. But I wont rant to much about this since I could go on and on... :)

Not picking on you but thought I'd point out some problems with your logic...

Apple systems integrate with TCP/IP networks flawlessly...what problems did you have trying to get them to work on a network? With built in Active Directory / Open Directory support I guess I'm at a loss there...

2GB for a G5 Tower costs $133.98 + shipping/tax from Crucial... Video cards are a bit harder to come by, admittedly. The rest of the components should be simple PC parts, such as IDE Drives, SCSI Drives, SAS, PCI cards... Normal cheap parts.

I won't address the software issue as it's personal preference.

I had forgotten about Exchange support. To bad Microsoft doesn't offer just Entourage like they do for Outlook on Windows.

Why give up an Office Sale, it's the only reason Corporations are buying it! ;)

I think a lot of Mac sales has to do with the increase advertising they have been doing.

...

No doubt that advertising helps. Bringing a product into the consumer consciousness is important. But Linux really doesn't advertise. While they have a small (an accurate term may be "minuscule") marketshare on the desktop, there has been a doubling of client Linux since March 2007, according to sources such as NetApplications Hitslink. I think that more people are aware that there are alternatives. And more people think it is acceptable to use an alternative to Windows.

Does this have anything to do with Vista? Who knows. Some stats show Vista doing better than XP did. Some show that is is a "failure". The truth, most likely, is somewhere in-between. Apple was on an upward trend long before Vista, and they are just continuing it.

Not picking on you but thought I'd point out some problems with your logic...

Apple systems integrate with TCP/IP networks flawlessly...what problems did you have trying to get them to work on a network? With built in Active Directory / Open Directory support I guess I'm at a loss there...

2GB for a G5 Tower costs $133.98 + shipping/tax from Crucial... Video cards are a bit harder to come by, admittedly. The rest of the components should be simple PC parts, such as IDE Drives, SCSI Drives, SAS, PCI cards... Normal cheap parts.

I can get AD integration working but have had some issues using it. Its not flawlessly and it can be a pain. This is my experience.

And the memory is not that cheap. The 1st Gen G5s had regular memory the same as a PC and are cheap. The new Gen G5s have 2 daughter boards that hold the memory and plug in to the main board. Each memory stick has a heatsink/cooler on the side. This memory is what costs $250 per 1gb.

No doubt that advertising helps. Bringing a product into the consumer consciousness is important. But Linux really doesn't advertise. While they have a small (an accurate term may be "minuscule") marketshare on the desktop, there has been a doubling of client Linux since March 2007, according to sources such as NetApplications Hitslink. I think that more people are aware that there are alternatives. And more people think it is acceptable to use an alternative to Windows.

Does this have anything to do with Vista? Who knows. Some stats show Vista doing better than XP did. Some show that is is a "failure". The truth, most likely, is somewhere in-between. Apple was on an upward trend long before Vista, and they are just continuing it.

You also have to remember that Linux is free and there are a million different flavors out there to choose from. People like free stuff and I like Linux and wish i had more time to learn it. Ubuntu all the way!! :)

I can get AD integration working but have had some issues using it. Its not flawlessly and it can be a pain. This is my experience.

And the memory is not that cheap. The 1st Gen G5s had regular memory the same as a PC and are cheap. The new Gen G5s have 2 daughter boards that hold the memory and plug in to the main board. Each memory stick has a heatsink/cooler on the side. This memory is what costs $250 per 1gb.

Odd, I've setup AD on tons of Macs without issue... If you could be more specific as to the problems you're having I'd be happy to make suggestions.

As for the memory, can you perhaps toss me a G5 Model Number that uses that memory so I can look it up specifically, I haven't been able to find any G5 memory that expensive.

Yeah... I'm sure the fact that Macs are a fashion statement has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

A Mac Pro is a fashion statement? Wow, next time you see someone walking around with one please take a picture! Or even an iMac, I guess it could be carried like a backpack...

A Mac Pro is a fashion statement? Wow, next time you see someone walking around with one please take a picture! Or even an iMac, I guess it could be carried like a backpack...

Are you actually questioning the fact that Macs are the new "cool in thing"? If so... please open your eyes! At the Uni where I work there are hundreds if not thousands of students walking around with Macbooks/iPods/iPhones.

I haven't been able to find any G5 memory that expensive.

Me neither. I told you via pm that the situation in my country its quite bad yet I managed to fill my old Powermac up to 8GBs

in my opinion, the only people that have problems w/ Vista are the ones that arent using it.

i have nothing against OS X, but this whole fear of Vista and losing XP is mind boggling to me.

"waaah Vista doesnt run well on my XP machine from 2001!"

"waaah Vista doesnt work well with my PCI 28.8k modem from 1992!"

Are you actually questioning the fact that Macs are the new "cool in thing"? If so... please open your eyes! At the Uni where I work there are hundreds if not thousands of students walking around with Macbooks/iPods/iPhones.

I know that they are the in technology at the moment, but that is not solely due to looks. Apple is the best selling computer in higher education, students not only enjoy the looks of Apple's equipment but also the stability and increased functionality over traditional PC's. :)

iPods are everywhere, again, best (arguable by some, not for this thread) and most established portable entertainment device on the market.

iPhones, same as above only with phone capabilities. :)

Looks count, functionality counts for more.

Are you actually questioning the fact that Macs are the new "cool in thing"? If so... please open your eyes! At the Uni where I work there are hundreds if not thousands of students walking around with Macbooks/iPods/iPhones.

If you want to use that as your excuse for the reason Macs are becoming popular then go ahead but the real reason is because most people want a computer that they don't have to maintain and can just get their work done on with little hassle. People are also realizing how unintuitive Windows can be which is the hallmark of a Mac. I'm sure their are a few shallow people who just got Macs because they think it's cool but for the majority of people it's much more then that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a 10g switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports and should be a fully managed switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!