Apple may have shipped 2.5 million Macs in spring thanks to Vista


Recommended Posts

in my opinion, the only people that have problems w/ Vista are the ones that arent using it.

...

So, I guess you feel your opinion is important enough to apply it to everyone else. For your edification, my wife has asked me to get Linux on to her Vista laptop. After using Linux for a while on her old computer, she (get this!) just prefers it, and has less issues.

What exactly is in iTunes for it to come in a 57MB installer? I know they tried to bundle Safari in iTunes updates to get people to unknowingly download their browser... but come on :)

Well, I guess you have absolutely NO idea that the iTunes installer includes Quicktime, eh? That's a required piece of software for iTunes. That brings iTunes down to about 35MB or so looking at my iTunes and Quicktime installers I have saved. Ok, what else could there be taking that much space? Well iTunes I assume includes WebKit or a stripped down intergrated Safari for the Music store. It also includes drivers for all the iPods, it does have a CD buring application built in for making music CD's, visualisers, component to share music to other iTunes in the network, stream music to Airport Express, podcast and internet radio support. For video playback I do believe Quicktime handles that for it. The fact is iTunes is just not a simple audio player to sync your music to the iPod, it has a bit more behind it.

I agree they coudl reduce the size down, WMP11 is only about 28MB or so and doesn't require something like Quicktime. However, Apple realizes on the Windows side iTunes is not necessary for everyone (ie education that streams videos of the net or something) and why the two are not intergrated together like they could be.

Actually I purchased much of the music from the iTunes Music Store, the stuff I've converted from my CD Collection I wanted the best quality I could get with some space savings so I went with AAC and then Apple Lossless. The fact that it works with my iPod and iPhone is just a perk. :)

You know, people complain about the 2MP camera on the iPhone but I've seen better pictures from the iPhone than I've seen from some N95's which have 5MP if memory serves me right. Still, a camera on a phone is still only as good as it's optics. If you want a camera, get a camera. If you want something to take quick, decent, fun pictures and spur of the moment things, then use your phone. Don't try to take production photos with your phone, if you do...wow.

So everything you do in your digital life is in step with what Apple want. All of your music is in their own format, the music player you use is theirs, the phone and portable player you use is theirs.

And there's more people ending up like this...

And they say Microsoft are taking over the world...

Soon you will be dressed in Apple clothing, live in an Apple house and be eating Apple food.

So everything you do in your digital life is in step with what Apple want. All of your music is in their own format, the music player you use is theirs, the phone and portable player you use is theirs.

And there's more people ending up like this...

And they say Microsoft are taking over the world...

Soon you will be dressed in Apple clothing, live in an Apple house and be eating Apple food.

Well technically I am wearing an Apple branded T-Shirt today, have an Apple logo on my ID badge... My house is paid for (in part) by Apple Money, and so is my food so... ;)

You know, people complain about the 2MP camera on the iPhone but I've seen better pictures from the iPhone than I've seen from some N95's which have 5MP if memory serves me right. Still, a camera on a phone is still only as good as it's optics. If you want a camera, get a camera. If you want something to take quick, decent, fun pictures and spur of the moment things, then use your phone. Don't try to take production photos with your phone, if you do...wow.

I suppose I don't really take spur of the moment pictures because I could honestly care less if a phone has a camera. I can carry around a small digital camera that'll take better pictures and can be turned on fairly quickly, I mean with a phone you still have to get it out and switch to the camera application, which depending on the phone, may be just as fast as pulling out a small digital camera and turning it on and taking the picture. Have to agree with you on taking production pictures Cara, I have a Digital Rebel for a reason, its my picture taker.

When it comes to phones, I think companies sometimes have lost sight on what the device was originally inteded to do, make phone calls. They have caught up on how much stuff they can cram into the little box sometimes. Though granted I think its pretty easy to use most cell's as a phone, just I hate to see the companies loose sight of that as I am sure some have.

So everything you do in your digital life is in step with what Apple want. All of your music is in their own format, the music player you use is theirs, the phone and portable player you use is theirs.

And there's more people ending up like this...

And they say Microsoft are taking over the world...

Soon you will be dressed in Apple clothing, live in an Apple house and be eating Apple food.

Shhh... But this is why I would not be in favor of having Apple as the dominant OS provider, replacing Microsoft.

Both companies love to use format and application lock-in. ;)

I like the look of their products. I like how OSX works (even on an old slow G3 hand-me-down PC donated to one of my kids, it is amazingly nimble). But I do not like the way they are so much like Microsoft (back in Microsoft's worst days, just before the DOJ actions).

Shhh... But this is why I would not be in favor of having Apple as the dominant OS provider, replacing Microsoft.

Both companies love to use format and application lock-in. ;)

I like the look of their products. I like how OSX works (even on an old slow G3 hand-me-down PC donated to one of my kids, it is amazingly nimble). But I do not like the way they are so much like Microsoft (back in Microsoft's worst days, just before the DOJ actions).

And if Apple gets in the position MS is today, they may very well have the DOJ to answer too as well. Only time will see with that but who knows.

Well technically I am wearing an Apple branded T-Shirt today, have an Apple logo on my ID badge... My house is paid for (in part) by Apple Money, and so is my food so... ;)

Case closed.

I didn't know whether you were an avid Apple supporter or whether you worked for them.

It's hard to tell nowadays ;)

Well, I guess you have absolutely NO idea that the iTunes installer includes Quicktime, eh? That's a required piece of software for iTunes. That brings iTunes down to about 35MB or so looking at my iTunes and Quicktime installers I have saved. Ok, what else could there be taking that much space?

The fact that only the setup file itself occupies 57 MB space is shameful. After installation, iTunes + Quick Time + Apple Software Update swells to a humonguous 160 MB on a Windows PC. What more can I add?

Case closed.

I didn't know whether you were an avid Apple supporter or whether you worked for them.

It's hard to tell nowadays ;)

hehe.

Honestly, my feelings about Apple came around in about 2000ish, before then I completely was anti-Apple. Once they made the change to OS X and started adopting standards I started actually looking at them and haven't looked back.

Scary thing is I use to flame Apple more than some of the people on Neowin... I'm living proof anyone can change.

hehe.

Honestly, my feelings about Apple came around in about 2000ish, before then I completely was anti-Apple. Once they made the change to OS X and started adopting standards I started actually looking at them and haven't looked back.

Scary thing is I use to flame Apple more than some of the people on Neowin... I'm living proof anyone can change.

Don't get me wrong, I like some of Apples stuff. If I had ?1200+ to blow I'd probably get an iMac or Macbook Pro. Sadly I can't see myself ever having that much to blow, the fact that I could buy components and build a better machine for 1/4 of the price does put it into perspective, for the specs of the machine they ask too much. I think if anything you're paying for the design/build quality.

I had a Mac back in the mid 90's so I know for a fact they have grown a hell of alot in popularity since then. They are now the 'in' thing.

When Snow Leopard comes out with Exchange support that works it will be the final nail in Office:Mac's coffin I think.

:laugh: Sorry, but that is just not true. There is more to Office that businesses use than just Exchange support. MS Office is the standard for business. iWork is just simply not good enough for widespread business support. And just because there is Exchange support, it doesn't mean it will work as well and as seamless as Office, especially for training purposes. Entourage does a very nice job at providing an Outlook-like environment for OS X.

Isn't it amazing how whatever an "analyst" says IS the be-all end-all truth? Let's just forget that there is absolutely no concrete evidence to support the claims, and they are essentially just a bunch of BS and anti-MS propaganda. Why does news like this have to propagate amongst the internet so quickly, and why do people actually BELIEVE this crap? What ever happened to thinking critically when reading something? I seriously lose faith in humanity when articles like this are written and people actually believe it. It's really just (yet more) mindless Vista bashing.

Don't get me wrong, I like some of Apples stuff. If I had ?1200+ to blow I'd probably get an iMac or Macbook Pro. Sadly I can't see myself ever having that much to blow, the fact that I could buy components and build a better machine for 1/4 of the price does put it into perspective, for the specs of the machine they ask too much. I think if anything you're paying for the design/build quality.

I had a Mac back in the mid 90's so I know for a fact they have grown a hell of alot in popularity since then. They are now the 'in' thing.

Saying a 'Better Machine' is relative of course. I prefer a Mac where I don't have to deal with supporting it over PCs, even the ones I've built, which seem to last about 3 years max before needing upgrades just to keep running what I have already had on there. Never figure that one out!;))

To each their own.

the[/b]> standard for business. iWork is just simply not good enough for widespread business support. And just because there is Exchange support, it doesn't mean it will work as well and as seamless as Office, especially for training purposes. Entourage does a very nice job at providing an Outlook-like environment for OS X.

Isn't it amazing how whatever an "analyst" says IS the be-all end-all truth? Let's just forget that there is absolutely no concrete evidence to support the claims, and they are essentially just a bunch of BS and anti-MS propaganda. Why does news like this have to propagate amongst the internet so quickly, and why do people actually BELIEVE this crap? What ever happened to thinking critically when reading something? I seriously lose faith in humanity when articles like this are written and people actually believe it. It's really just (yet more) mindless Vista bashing.

Um...MS Office is the current standard for business, however its market-share is being eroded by OpenOffice and similar products every day. As for iWork, please. iWork operates perfectly acceptable in an Enterprise Class Environment as well as in a great many Higher Education situations. Adding in Exchange support further weakens Office:Mac as at that point you have no unique features.

Pages - One of, if not the, best Word replacement for the Mac. Opens every DOC/DOCX I've ever thrown at it.

Number - Needs work, is getting it.

Keynote - Powerpoint isn't even in Keynote's league, EVERY Keynote presentation I've ever done (100+) gets questions on how I did it, people are amazed at the quality when compared with the best Powerpoint can offer.

You truly have some twisted ideas, but thats your right.:))

As for your comment below about anti-MS Propaganda...I get the feeling you're the type who thinks IDC and Gartner make things up about Apple to fuel their support... People aren't 'mindlessly' bashing Vista...they are simply posting the common feeling and thoughts about it.

The fact that only the setup file itself occupies 57 MB space is shameful. After installation, iTunes + Quick Time + Apple Software Update swells to a humonguous 160 MB on a Windows PC. What more can I add?

Buy a bigger hard drive maybe, I don't know, I run Vista on a 300GB raptor and have no space issues, then again all my saved stuff sits on a RAID 1 array in a server. :) You probably run nLited XP or vListed Vista if you are really concerned with how much space something takes up on a hdd. Oh noes, my Windows Vista folder takes up 16.6GB, what shall I ever do with 1TB drives out, surely we are all doomed. :)

Not saying that is a good thing or what not, but get my idea.

Also, I decided to peak into the iTunes and Quicktime folders, jee, found out what is taking so much space, multi-language project files. its about 48MB for iTunes for all the languages for the resources, and about 20MB or so for Quicktime (As the main resource components take up more space then the sperate language ones). So yeah that could be about 60MB stripped out if you just wanted English but Apple decided not to cut them out, not sure if the apps themselves switch languages depending on the system setting or if they have seperate language downloads for Quicktime and iTunes.

Saying a 'Better Machine' is relative of course. I prefer a Mac where I don't have to deal with supporting it over PCs, even the ones I've built, which seem to last about 3 years max before needing upgrades just to keep running what I have already had on there. Never figure that one out! ;)

To each their own.

Better machine meaning, faster processor, faster gfx card, faster/more memory.

There's nothing relative about it. Compare the highest spec iMac (spec and price wise), then compare it to a system you can put together for the same price as the most expensive iMac.

The system you build will have far superior components, both in quality and speed and you have the freedom to use components from any manufacturer, run any OS you like and run any application.

Imagine having ?1,389.00 to spend on a new build... you'd have an amazing system for that.

The ?500 system will be cheaper and faster and you have the freedom to use components from any manufacturer, run any OS you like and run any application.

Which to me doesn't produce a 'Better' computer. Having top shelf components, unified warranty support, and (arguably again) the best OS on the planet PLUS the capability of running any other OS I want meaning any application...that is superior to me. :))

I am tired of piecework computers, when I buy a new Mac I know I'm getting my money's worth.:))

Um...MS Office is the current standard for business, however its market-share is being eroded by OpenOffice and similar products every day. As for iWork, please. iWork operates perfectly acceptable in an Enterprise Class Environment as well as in a great many Higher Education situations. Adding in Exchange support further weakens Office:Mac as at that point you have no unique features.

No, it's not. OpenOffice, while a good free product, has not put a dent into Office's market share. Go to any large corporation (exception of Apple, of course), nobody uses OpenOffice, nor iWork, nor Word Perfect, etc. Office reigns supreme amongst businesses, and will remain so in the forseeable future.

Pages - One of, if not the, best Word replacement for the Mac. Opens every DOC/DOCX I've ever thrown at it.

Number - Needs work, is getting it.

Keynote - Powerpoint isn't even in Keynote's league, EVERY Keynote presentation I've ever done (100+) gets questions on how I did it, people are amazed at the quality when compared with the best Powerpoint can offer.

You truly have some twisted ideas, but thats your right. :)

Why are my ideas twisted? I work for a large coporation, and I know how the management works. MS Office is the king. If they are using it on PC's, and there is a mac verison, of course they are going to use it on their macs. That's common sense. It doesn't matter if there is an alternative. If there is even an inkling of a compatibility mismatch problem, they will avoid using the alternative product at all costs.

As for your comment below about anti-MS Propaganda...I get the feeling you're the type who thinks IDC and Gartner make things up about Apple to fuel their support... People aren't 'mindlessly' bashing Vista...they are simply posting the common feeling and thoughts about it.

Wrong. The "analyst" in this article cannot prove why mac sales are strong this spring. He is going off of the anti-Vista sentiment that is very affluent in the electronic media. That is not scientific. Also, how many of these new mac users are running Vista either fully or partially on these macs? Again, this "analyst"'s claims are just bull****, and he is riding the anti-Vista pony to guarantee himself high ratings.

Which to me doesn't produce a 'Better' computer. Having top shelf components, unified warranty support, and (arguably again) the best OS on the planet PLUS the capability of running any other OS I want meaning any application...that is superior to me. :)

I am tired of piecework computers, when I buy a new Mac I know I'm getting my money's worth. :)

Top shelf components, as in buying without a doubt THE BEST Intel chipset you can buy at the moment, THE BEST Corsair Dominator memory, THE BEST Intel Core2Duo or Core 2 Quad processor you can buy THE BEST nVidia GTX280...

You actually have choice when you build a PC and the components available are better than those that are available in Macs currently.

Better machine meaning, faster processor, faster gfx card, faster/more memory.

There's nothing relative about it. Compare the highest spec iMac (spec and price wise), then compare it to a system you can put together for the same price as the most expensive iMac.

The system you build will be cheaper and faster and you have the freedom to use components from any manufacturer, run any OS you like and run any application.

Technically you are not supposed to run Mac OS on anything but Mac hardware so that's not really true. :) The idea behind pre-built computers are that you will have one source of support for everything that came with it plus the same warrenty across the board where as home built ones could have a varying warrenties, support is generally up to the person who bought it, etc. Pre-builts just make sense for those who are not able to put together their own and troubleshoot it.

Also with Apple you are getting a set of hardware tested to work together as well as an OS that was built around a smaller set of hardware to try an eliminate some of the headaches of supporting mass amounts of hardware on the OS.

As people have said, vote with your wallet. if you don't want to pay the price then don't, if others will and enough, they will continue with their prices (See the Starbucks thread on people paying the $5 for their drinks in the Real Word news). Just because you won't pay for it, does not mean someone else will. I personally only buy their laptops while building my own desktops, that's just me though for what brand of laptop I want.

Actually I purchased much of the music from the iTunes Music Store, the stuff I've converted from my CD Collection I wanted the best quality I could get with some space savings so I went with AAC and then Apple Lossless. The fact that it works with my iPod and iPhone is just a perk. :)

You know, people complain about the 2MP camera on the iPhone but I've seen better pictures from the iPhone than I've seen from some N95's which have 5MP if memory serves me right. Still, a camera on a phone is still only as good as it's optics. If you want a camera, get a camera. If you want something to take quick, decent, fun pictures and spur of the moment things, then use your phone. Don't try to take production photos with your phone, if you do...wow.

I'm sorry, but enough of this.

You obviously love Apple. I've gotten that from all the pro-Apple sentiment. Bottom line is this. There is no way, just because YOU don't see it, that Apple is better than "others" in every single thing. Maybe you should try some other products. Saying the pictures on a N95 are worse than the 2MP on the iPhone is pretty obviously biased and it makes it seem like nothing, in your eyes, is better than your phone. The iPhone is a very nice device, but I wouldn't pick it ever because I like feedback. It's preference! You like the iPhone, but it is not "the best" device by any means.

Yes, they make a good product, yet they only have a 6 or 7 per cent stake in the US - so they can't be the best in everything now, can they?

Just like you said, I'm not trying to attack you, but you don't seem to ever see it any other way besides Apple.

No doubt that advertising helps. Bringing a product into the consumer consciousness is important. But Linux really doesn't advertise. While they have a small (an accurate term may be "minuscule") marketshare on the desktop, there has been a doubling of client Linux since March 2007, according to sources such as NetApplications Hitslink. I think that more people are aware that there are alternatives. And more people think it is acceptable to use an alternative to Windows.

Does this have anything to do with Vista? Who knows. Some stats show Vista doing better than XP did. Some show that is is a "failure". The truth, most likely, is somewhere in-between. Apple was on an upward trend long before Vista, and they are just continuing it.

Also, look at the *overall base number* of systems in service. Has the total number of systems gone up or down? Also, what's the CPU breakdown? (You simply won't find many P-IIIs running Vista or a modern Linux distribution; however, these same P-IIIs make great basic 2000/XP/older Linux clients).

How many systems are multi-OS (two or more operating systems)? A lot of Macs (especially modern Macs) don't run *just* Tiger or Leopard, they may also run XP or/and Vista. The very fact that you can run Vista on a Mac isn't exactly a plus for OS X.

I'm sorry, but enough of this.

You obviously love Apple. I've gotten that from all the pro-Apple sentiment. Bottom line is this. There is no way, just because YOU don't see it, that Apple is better than "others" in every single thing. Maybe you should try some other products. Saying the pictures on a N95 are worse than the 2MP on the iPhone is pretty obviously biased and it makes it seem like nothing, in your eyes, is better than your phone. The iPhone is a very nice device, but I wouldn't pick it ever because I like feedback. It's preference! You like the iPhone, but it is not "the best" device by any means.

Yes, they make a good product, yet they only have a 6 or 7 per cent stake in the US - so they can't be the best in everything now, can they?

Just like you said, I'm not trying to attack you, but you don't seem to ever see it any other way besides Apple.

No attack taken. :)

I do love Apple, without a doubt or argument from me. However, that said, I don't agree with everything Apple does.

My ultra-portable preference is a Lenovo X300, not MacBook Air. Why? It's just flat superior in virtually every respect. Apple has some serious catching up to do there.

The lack of a Mini-Tower / Tower computer...market-share pointlessly lost.

Even the iPhone, yes, I feel it is the best out there in its class. However, it lacks simple features such as tactile feedback on the touch screen, factory video recording (which keeps getting yanked from the FW for some reason), and something as simple as a cover for the camera lens when not in use. (PS, for the record my longest standing/lasting phone to date is a Nokia 6800 so I respect Nokia quite strongly.)

Don't think just because I'm Pro apple I mindlessly feel they have the superior product on all fronts, they don't, but if any company is working hard to get to that point I'd say Apple is indeed leading the pack. :)

Top shelf components, as in buying without a doubt THE BEST Intel chipset you can buy at the moment, THE BEST Corsair Dominator memory, THE BEST Intel Core2Duo or Core 2 Quad processor you can buy THE BEST nVidia GTX280...

You actually have choice when you build a PC and the components available are better than those that are available in Macs currently.

Have to remember, just because it is the latest and greatest does NOT mean it is the best quality. Oh yes, lets take a gander at the latest, greatest nVidia chipsets from this generation and past, oh yeah, data corruption issues, even not widespread still an issue in a "top shelf component", oops, did I just debunk that for you?

Cara was going at more quality than, lets get the most expensive and fastest thing on the market that just came out that may have problems! I do remember waiting for the 45nm processors for laptops, Dell or Apple was my decision on a laptop, guess who got the "top shelf component" first? Sure wasn't Dell, I had my 45nm laptop before Dell got sold theirs.

And again, if someone wants the latest greatest they can get it built or build it themselves, there as specific uses for that much processing power, memory speed and GPU power.

Aside from the Mac Pro, all of the Apple computers are heavily intergrated in terms of stuff like video cards. You can only put so much power in the space they have in their Mac Mini, iMac, and laptops. Yes they are behind in video card support, but I am not sure if Apple is to blame there or the video card manufactures, I know on the older G3/G4 Mac's the video card had to have a Mac firmware flashed on it for it to work with a Mac, can't say if that is the case with the current Mac Pro's or not, maybe Cara can answer that one for us. If not, then it would be a matter of support at the driver level, and points at the card manufacture and Apple both because Apple generally puts new hardware support in a 10.X.X release depending on the release of the OS. Apple I think pretty much wants to throughly test the drivers instead of having the manufacture spit them out, even though there is the WHQL, doesn't mean the driver has to be signed unless its x64.

I think Apple makes some great products, but I simply can't see myself switching to them full-time. I use them a lot at college because that's what my department uses for editing and such, but it just doesn't appeal to my like Windows does. Never had a problem with Apple, though, and doubt I ever will. Just don't see a need to change, especially when I love gaming (practically Apple's kryptonite).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's in the Insider's group so yes it's technically beta, though these days it's hard to see much of a difference unless you opt for the most extreme beta builds, which I don't. When I moved here from the Release Preview channel I did so primarily because I wanted to see how well the restored taskbar functionality (restored from Win10, and earlier) is working and whether it was time to finally abandon SAB--and it is--working fine, so far. Not as polished as SAB, but it'll do for me.
    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      222
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!