Microsoft looks to 'Mojave' to revive Vista's image


Recommended Posts

Exactly, and by the time that everyone is on Vista, the next operating system will be coming out.

Hmm my best guess is that "7" willl be very similar to Vista,I feel Microsoft decided to keep this Windows Concept for a long time,and evolve it from vesrion 6 to 7 like MAC OSX does from 10.3 to 10.4.The UI glass will be the same or very similar,but the mayor changes will be under the hood and with new features.Immediatly when Windows "7" is realesed,the specs will be easiliy matched by any computer that days,giving the feeling to general users and expierenced,the feel of a very fast OS,positive Placebo effect?

If you see Istartedsomething.com,immediatly you realize that for the next version,things will be more polished for Windows 7,and that a mayor UI overhaul could give a bigger damage to Windows,than a benefit.

A humble opinion of a marketing professional :p

Why hasn't the corporate world migrated from 2000/XP? For once Microsoft, forgo the marketing spin and just do the right thing.

Most corporations don't automatically rush to a new OS, they care more about stability and testing their SW, than jumping to a new OS that has a prettier UI. Some companies skipped 2000, and went from NT4 to XP, and why should they all rush to Vista, if XP isn't broken? Switching to a new OS off the bat will just lead to problems, as there will be something that breaks.

So what version of Vista is "Mojave"?

I'm guessing MS would use the latest version, so SP1.

And corporate adoption of an OS isn't the best metric, corporations will stay on what works for them, unless there's a good reason to upgrade.

Nah, what is killing them is those damn mac vs pc commercials. They need to do something about those first. I think that would turn alot of this in their favor.

I really hope that the general population is smarter than to buy into Apple's lies just because they put a commercial on TV. I didn't think people enjoyed having their intelligence insulted like that.

hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

It's good in content and HD audio,see your specs,when you go in one of these rooms,you'll know that the hardware is the only factor who makes the difference into a fast and slow operating system,talking about the Windows world

By the other hand i could start this store demostration in seattle,like a test bed,to see the impact.

Edited by EduardValencia
hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

First of all you couldn't even load neowin.net in windows 3.1, and why is vista bad for HD contenet? I have never had any problems with it.

I got to thinking more about this and don't think this marketing stunt is actually a reasonable test.

My Linux computer works flawlessly but that is because I made it work that way. I can show it to people and they are amazed at how cool it is. It doesn't mean that they won't experience compatibility issues if they try to set it up on their own. Most people, because most people never install operating systems anyway, would have to buy a Linux machine which came with Linux installed for it not to have problems. The same would go for Windows (recovery CDs and partitions are tailored with the right drivers and settings for a quick reinstall if needed but that does not mean that your average Joe can install a boxed version of Windows on any PC without having to hunt up drivers and all). A properly configured system is the goal.

I'm not saying that all of the anti-Vista hype is deserved. I'm only saying this marketing stunt does not really address the problems many people complain about.

I got to thinking more about this and don't think this marketing stunt is actually a reasonable test.

...

I'm only saying this marketing stunt does not really address the problems many people complain about.

Sometimes, it is all about marketing.

Apple has a good product. But it only really took off when the marketing clicked. "Switchers" was much less successful than "I'm a Mac..."

It makes sense.

I've had more than one computer un-savvy friend who went to buy a new PC and ask me for advice. When they said "Do I want Vista? I heard it sucks." and I told them to get a Vista PC anyway, they were all surprised by it.

Same here. In fact, I've gone to all the people whom I've recommended Vista, and every single one of them is satisfied with it. No one wants to downgrade.

Yes, I know some people have issues with it on a certain configuration of hardware/software, but those are in the vast minority, at least in my experience.

Next week the headlines will read...

BREAKING NEWS - MICROSOFT RELEASES NEW OPERATING SYSTEM (WINDOWS MOJAVE) AHEAD OF SCHEDULE!

And people will be in love with a Redmond product once again. ;)

Honestly though, good attempt at brand recovery by Microsoft on Vista, however the question is can they turn this into something useful in marketing?

People's word of mouth failed them that's all..

I was under the impression that before bashing something, you should try it first.

Those "critics" or morons that where using "Mojave" without knowing it was Vista.... How could they critics something they never saw before??

You could say that Vista is bad because of this or that, but at least try it first....

I was under the impression that before bashing something, you should try it first.

Those "critics" or morons that where using "Mojave" without knowing it was Vista.... How could they critics something they never saw before??

You could say that Vista is bad because of this or that, but at least try it first....

I was just about to make the exact same comment but you beat me to it! :D At least I tried (and tried, and tried) Vista repeatedly before I decided I didn't like it. Though I admit i've been using Vista x64 at work for a few weeks now and it's a huge improvement over my previous experiences. I'd never ever slam a product without trying it - it just makes you sound like an idiot.

However quite frankly I still begrudge horsepower to get it to that point though if i'm honest! I've setup a pair of disks into a RAID0 to get some decent disk speed and stuck in 4GB of RAM! For an OS!!! We still only ever spec out our application & DB servers with 4GB and they run superbly!

Back when XP was released people were feeling the same thing except the word about Vista just spread a little too quickly.

I promise you we will look back at this and everyone will be on Vista as if it was XP, but with an exception for Windows 7 which will be out soon if it's planned for release at the right time which I'm sure it will be.

They were nooby critics too obviously. Real critics have a critical eye and critical thinking. This is just a Microsoft-planned bs. More marketing gimmics, that's exactly what we don't need. We need a solid product. Yes Microsoft, SP1 made Vista better so now focus on keeping that up.

In marketing this is called viral marketing or marketing word to word,the skeptics will tell other skeptics and the ball will rolll out that windows vista isn't slow as they percieve,this will encourage people to buy new rigs.

This marketing technique isn't fast,requires time,however it's very effective indeed.More than any commercial and magazine ad's.

If was at the global marketing department,i could take thss further,i would make demonstration stores at the mayor cities around the world,the impact could be huge huge.

Sadly enough this sort of tactics works, especially in a culture that is heavily into consumerism as the USA is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!