Microsoft looks to 'Mojave' to revive Vista's image


Recommended Posts

Exactly, and by the time that everyone is on Vista, the next operating system will be coming out.

Hmm my best guess is that "7" willl be very similar to Vista,I feel Microsoft decided to keep this Windows Concept for a long time,and evolve it from vesrion 6 to 7 like MAC OSX does from 10.3 to 10.4.The UI glass will be the same or very similar,but the mayor changes will be under the hood and with new features.Immediatly when Windows "7" is realesed,the specs will be easiliy matched by any computer that days,giving the feeling to general users and expierenced,the feel of a very fast OS,positive Placebo effect?

If you see Istartedsomething.com,immediatly you realize that for the next version,things will be more polished for Windows 7,and that a mayor UI overhaul could give a bigger damage to Windows,than a benefit.

A humble opinion of a marketing professional :p

Why hasn't the corporate world migrated from 2000/XP? For once Microsoft, forgo the marketing spin and just do the right thing.

Most corporations don't automatically rush to a new OS, they care more about stability and testing their SW, than jumping to a new OS that has a prettier UI. Some companies skipped 2000, and went from NT4 to XP, and why should they all rush to Vista, if XP isn't broken? Switching to a new OS off the bat will just lead to problems, as there will be something that breaks.

So what version of Vista is "Mojave"?

I'm guessing MS would use the latest version, so SP1.

And corporate adoption of an OS isn't the best metric, corporations will stay on what works for them, unless there's a good reason to upgrade.

Nah, what is killing them is those damn mac vs pc commercials. They need to do something about those first. I think that would turn alot of this in their favor.

I really hope that the general population is smarter than to buy into Apple's lies just because they put a commercial on TV. I didn't think people enjoyed having their intelligence insulted like that.

hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

It's good in content and HD audio,see your specs,when you go in one of these rooms,you'll know that the hardware is the only factor who makes the difference into a fast and slow operating system,talking about the Windows world

By the other hand i could start this store demostration in seattle,like a test bed,to see the impact.

Edited by EduardValencia
hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

First of all you couldn't even load neowin.net in windows 3.1, and why is vista bad for HD contenet? I have never had any problems with it.

I got to thinking more about this and don't think this marketing stunt is actually a reasonable test.

My Linux computer works flawlessly but that is because I made it work that way. I can show it to people and they are amazed at how cool it is. It doesn't mean that they won't experience compatibility issues if they try to set it up on their own. Most people, because most people never install operating systems anyway, would have to buy a Linux machine which came with Linux installed for it not to have problems. The same would go for Windows (recovery CDs and partitions are tailored with the right drivers and settings for a quick reinstall if needed but that does not mean that your average Joe can install a boxed version of Windows on any PC without having to hunt up drivers and all). A properly configured system is the goal.

I'm not saying that all of the anti-Vista hype is deserved. I'm only saying this marketing stunt does not really address the problems many people complain about.

I got to thinking more about this and don't think this marketing stunt is actually a reasonable test.

...

I'm only saying this marketing stunt does not really address the problems many people complain about.

Sometimes, it is all about marketing.

Apple has a good product. But it only really took off when the marketing clicked. "Switchers" was much less successful than "I'm a Mac..."

It makes sense.

I've had more than one computer un-savvy friend who went to buy a new PC and ask me for advice. When they said "Do I want Vista? I heard it sucks." and I told them to get a Vista PC anyway, they were all surprised by it.

Same here. In fact, I've gone to all the people whom I've recommended Vista, and every single one of them is satisfied with it. No one wants to downgrade.

Yes, I know some people have issues with it on a certain configuration of hardware/software, but those are in the vast minority, at least in my experience.

Next week the headlines will read...

BREAKING NEWS - MICROSOFT RELEASES NEW OPERATING SYSTEM (WINDOWS MOJAVE) AHEAD OF SCHEDULE!

And people will be in love with a Redmond product once again. ;)

Honestly though, good attempt at brand recovery by Microsoft on Vista, however the question is can they turn this into something useful in marketing?

People's word of mouth failed them that's all..

I was under the impression that before bashing something, you should try it first.

Those "critics" or morons that where using "Mojave" without knowing it was Vista.... How could they critics something they never saw before??

You could say that Vista is bad because of this or that, but at least try it first....

I was under the impression that before bashing something, you should try it first.

Those "critics" or morons that where using "Mojave" without knowing it was Vista.... How could they critics something they never saw before??

You could say that Vista is bad because of this or that, but at least try it first....

I was just about to make the exact same comment but you beat me to it! :D At least I tried (and tried, and tried) Vista repeatedly before I decided I didn't like it. Though I admit i've been using Vista x64 at work for a few weeks now and it's a huge improvement over my previous experiences. I'd never ever slam a product without trying it - it just makes you sound like an idiot.

However quite frankly I still begrudge horsepower to get it to that point though if i'm honest! I've setup a pair of disks into a RAID0 to get some decent disk speed and stuck in 4GB of RAM! For an OS!!! We still only ever spec out our application & DB servers with 4GB and they run superbly!

Back when XP was released people were feeling the same thing except the word about Vista just spread a little too quickly.

I promise you we will look back at this and everyone will be on Vista as if it was XP, but with an exception for Windows 7 which will be out soon if it's planned for release at the right time which I'm sure it will be.

They were nooby critics too obviously. Real critics have a critical eye and critical thinking. This is just a Microsoft-planned bs. More marketing gimmics, that's exactly what we don't need. We need a solid product. Yes Microsoft, SP1 made Vista better so now focus on keeping that up.

In marketing this is called viral marketing or marketing word to word,the skeptics will tell other skeptics and the ball will rolll out that windows vista isn't slow as they percieve,this will encourage people to buy new rigs.

This marketing technique isn't fast,requires time,however it's very effective indeed.More than any commercial and magazine ad's.

If was at the global marketing department,i could take thss further,i would make demonstration stores at the mayor cities around the world,the impact could be huge huge.

Sadly enough this sort of tactics works, especially in a culture that is heavily into consumerism as the USA is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!