Microsoft looks to 'Mojave' to revive Vista's image


Recommended Posts

Exactly, and by the time that everyone is on Vista, the next operating system will be coming out.

Hmm my best guess is that "7" willl be very similar to Vista,I feel Microsoft decided to keep this Windows Concept for a long time,and evolve it from vesrion 6 to 7 like MAC OSX does from 10.3 to 10.4.The UI glass will be the same or very similar,but the mayor changes will be under the hood and with new features.Immediatly when Windows "7" is realesed,the specs will be easiliy matched by any computer that days,giving the feeling to general users and expierenced,the feel of a very fast OS,positive Placebo effect?

If you see Istartedsomething.com,immediatly you realize that for the next version,things will be more polished for Windows 7,and that a mayor UI overhaul could give a bigger damage to Windows,than a benefit.

A humble opinion of a marketing professional :p

Why hasn't the corporate world migrated from 2000/XP? For once Microsoft, forgo the marketing spin and just do the right thing.

Most corporations don't automatically rush to a new OS, they care more about stability and testing their SW, than jumping to a new OS that has a prettier UI. Some companies skipped 2000, and went from NT4 to XP, and why should they all rush to Vista, if XP isn't broken? Switching to a new OS off the bat will just lead to problems, as there will be something that breaks.

So what version of Vista is "Mojave"?

I'm guessing MS would use the latest version, so SP1.

And corporate adoption of an OS isn't the best metric, corporations will stay on what works for them, unless there's a good reason to upgrade.

Nah, what is killing them is those damn mac vs pc commercials. They need to do something about those first. I think that would turn alot of this in their favor.

I really hope that the general population is smarter than to buy into Apple's lies just because they put a commercial on TV. I didn't think people enjoyed having their intelligence insulted like that.

hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

It's good in content and HD audio,see your specs,when you go in one of these rooms,you'll know that the hardware is the only factor who makes the difference into a fast and slow operating system,talking about the Windows world

By the other hand i could start this store demostration in seattle,like a test bed,to see the impact.

Edited by EduardValencia
hmmm... i wonder who those people were ... i can grab some random dudes off the street and put them in front of vista and get the same results .. then again one must be well informed about an operating system to say wow yeah it sux ....

while vista is good in some ways it sux in others .... (ie HD content video/audio) ... but if one uses vista for e-mail and web surfing ... bah 3.1 cna do that too ... but other things like pff .. i dono... high def pron lets say ... maybe another story :D

First of all you couldn't even load neowin.net in windows 3.1, and why is vista bad for HD contenet? I have never had any problems with it.

I got to thinking more about this and don't think this marketing stunt is actually a reasonable test.

My Linux computer works flawlessly but that is because I made it work that way. I can show it to people and they are amazed at how cool it is. It doesn't mean that they won't experience compatibility issues if they try to set it up on their own. Most people, because most people never install operating systems anyway, would have to buy a Linux machine which came with Linux installed for it not to have problems. The same would go for Windows (recovery CDs and partitions are tailored with the right drivers and settings for a quick reinstall if needed but that does not mean that your average Joe can install a boxed version of Windows on any PC without having to hunt up drivers and all). A properly configured system is the goal.

I'm not saying that all of the anti-Vista hype is deserved. I'm only saying this marketing stunt does not really address the problems many people complain about.

I got to thinking more about this and don't think this marketing stunt is actually a reasonable test.

...

I'm only saying this marketing stunt does not really address the problems many people complain about.

Sometimes, it is all about marketing.

Apple has a good product. But it only really took off when the marketing clicked. "Switchers" was much less successful than "I'm a Mac..."

It makes sense.

I've had more than one computer un-savvy friend who went to buy a new PC and ask me for advice. When they said "Do I want Vista? I heard it sucks." and I told them to get a Vista PC anyway, they were all surprised by it.

Same here. In fact, I've gone to all the people whom I've recommended Vista, and every single one of them is satisfied with it. No one wants to downgrade.

Yes, I know some people have issues with it on a certain configuration of hardware/software, but those are in the vast minority, at least in my experience.

Next week the headlines will read...

BREAKING NEWS - MICROSOFT RELEASES NEW OPERATING SYSTEM (WINDOWS MOJAVE) AHEAD OF SCHEDULE!

And people will be in love with a Redmond product once again. ;)

Honestly though, good attempt at brand recovery by Microsoft on Vista, however the question is can they turn this into something useful in marketing?

People's word of mouth failed them that's all..

I was under the impression that before bashing something, you should try it first.

Those "critics" or morons that where using "Mojave" without knowing it was Vista.... How could they critics something they never saw before??

You could say that Vista is bad because of this or that, but at least try it first....

I was under the impression that before bashing something, you should try it first.

Those "critics" or morons that where using "Mojave" without knowing it was Vista.... How could they critics something they never saw before??

You could say that Vista is bad because of this or that, but at least try it first....

I was just about to make the exact same comment but you beat me to it! :D At least I tried (and tried, and tried) Vista repeatedly before I decided I didn't like it. Though I admit i've been using Vista x64 at work for a few weeks now and it's a huge improvement over my previous experiences. I'd never ever slam a product without trying it - it just makes you sound like an idiot.

However quite frankly I still begrudge horsepower to get it to that point though if i'm honest! I've setup a pair of disks into a RAID0 to get some decent disk speed and stuck in 4GB of RAM! For an OS!!! We still only ever spec out our application & DB servers with 4GB and they run superbly!

Back when XP was released people were feeling the same thing except the word about Vista just spread a little too quickly.

I promise you we will look back at this and everyone will be on Vista as if it was XP, but with an exception for Windows 7 which will be out soon if it's planned for release at the right time which I'm sure it will be.

They were nooby critics too obviously. Real critics have a critical eye and critical thinking. This is just a Microsoft-planned bs. More marketing gimmics, that's exactly what we don't need. We need a solid product. Yes Microsoft, SP1 made Vista better so now focus on keeping that up.

In marketing this is called viral marketing or marketing word to word,the skeptics will tell other skeptics and the ball will rolll out that windows vista isn't slow as they percieve,this will encourage people to buy new rigs.

This marketing technique isn't fast,requires time,however it's very effective indeed.More than any commercial and magazine ad's.

If was at the global marketing department,i could take thss further,i would make demonstration stores at the mayor cities around the world,the impact could be huge huge.

Sadly enough this sort of tactics works, especially in a culture that is heavily into consumerism as the USA is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!