Microsoft looks to 'Mojave' to revive Vista's image


Recommended Posts

Of course. There's an old adage that a person is smart, people are stupid. The consensus on any issue in a population is heavily influenced by what the cool/important people say. The cool/important people say Vista sucks, therefore, the populous believes. Obviously there will be sectors of that population who don't conform (you know, those people who use Vista daily and don't hate it, or the few who have a genuinely poor experience for whatever reason), but the vast majority are basing there opinion of something without having ever used that something (as clearly shown in these supposed videos).

QFT and sad but true.

Like I personally exprienced dozes of times with many people, vista is just better after you use it.

I know many people that were afraid of vista, got it with their new pcs or laptops, didnt understand it at first, switched back to XP and after a few days realized how better vista is.

And what's more, is the idiots claiming that SP1 solved all sorts of problems. They have no idea what they're talking about, obviously. SP1 contained NOTHING new in the way of bug fixes, as it was simply a roll-up of all the fixes to that point. SP1 was essentially marketing, nothing more.

source?

Only a couple of the fixes from SP1 were released separately AFAIK...

benchmark tests on a brand new top of the line system is different from varying setups and whats now considered legacy hardware and individual experience. i myself experience 75% loss of performance in most games compared to xp which plays them fine under vista my system struggles to get a steady smooth framerate which obviously says enough for my experience and others i know who don't have core 2 duo or quad new systems who can play games fine on xp but under vista just turns games to power point presentations and not everyone has or is able to upgrade and have systems capable of running games under xp which is what they want and need and they bag microsoft cause you get molasses quality gaming under vista. i'm not talk really old systems i'm talking last 2-3 year old and were top of line back then.

On my 5 year old dell with 2 gigs of ram and a 7600GS I had like only like a 3-10 fps loss and that was with the early crap nvidia drivers. There is definitely something wrong there. The system in that benchmark is new but it is only a mid range system... Not close to top of the line.

source?

Only a couple of the fixes from SP1 were released separately AFAIK...

Q: What features are included in Vista SP1?

A: The following end-user features are included in Windows Vista Service Pack 1:

1. A collection of previously-released and new security fixes, bug fixes, and other minor updates.

2. An update to the Windows kernel to bring the Vista kernel (version 6.0) up to date with the version in Windows Server 2008 (version 6.1).

3. A change to the Kernel Patch Protection ("PatchGuard") feature in the Vista kernel that prevents security companies like McAfee and Symantec from integrating as tightly with the OS as they could in previous Windows versions. This will include a set of APIs aimed at helping developers write code that interacts with this security feature.

4. A change to Vista's Instant Search feature that will allow third party desktop search product makers to more closely integrate their products with Windows Vista. In the initial shipping version of Vista, the Instant Search indexer still runs at full speed even if a third party product is installed, reducing overall system performance.

5. A change to Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) that will remove the Reduced Functionality Mode (RFM) and Non-Genuine State (NGS) mode for Vista installs in expired non-activated and non-genuine states. See New WGA Behavior in Windows Vista Service Pack 1 for more information about this change.

And folks, that's about it. For a more complete rundown of SP1's features, please read my showcase, Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Revealed.

Source

So, while there were a few of the newest bug fixes in SP1, it certainly was not what most believe it to be. Those claiming they know differently are spewing crap they read. Which, as should be evident by now, is largely inaccurate.

Strange. I had Vista on my PC but it just become so slow and sluggish that I had to switch back to XP to experience my first fastest responsive system I've ever seen since having ran Vista for 2 years. I can play games that under vista wouldn't even run. I tried Quake 4 in Vista and it wouldn't register as a high settings by default and ran at extremely low 640-800 and low quality settings, but after repeating the installation on XP, I am able to get extreme high and large resolution on Quake 4 without any framerate drops.

What GPU do you have? Also, what was the latest driver version you were using?

Many people with nice GPU's had the same problem when Vista came out because of terrible drivers. Those issues have been ironed out since then.

So they got to play with a hand-picked, pre-installed copy of Vista maintained by MS's own engineers. I wonder what their opinion would have been if they had to deal with it in the real world? Actually, I don't wonder, I know what it would have been. It would have been the same as everyone else has had in the real world when dealing with Vista's numerous shortcomings.

I'm glad Vista's improving, but it's not there yet, and I don't think it will be before Windows 7 ships. Vista's amounted to a beta test for Windows 7. It's a transitional OS. By late 2009, most of the problems should be gone, the drivers should be ok, and devs will understand Vista's quirks enough to avoid them.

Until then, I would still not recommend Vista to any inexperienced users, or to users of pro multimedia software. I don't even see the major selling points of Vista. Why bother? Until MS can answer that, Vista's going to continue to have lackluster sales.

It looks like they beefed up the specs on their special super test rig. They maxed out their RAM, for instance.

WXGA (1280x800)

T2400 1.83 Ghz

1 GB RAM by default.

Intel 945GM

Intel GMA 950 (128 MB)

Shipped with XP Home, fall 2006. Yup, quite the powerhouse alright. :rolleyes:

So they got to play with a hand-picked, pre-installed copy of Vista maintained by MS's own engineers. I wonder what their opinion would have been if they had to deal with it in the real world? Actually, I don't wonder, I know what it would have been. It would have been the same as everyone else has had in the real world when dealing with Vista's numerous shortcomings.

...

Can somebody mention these shortcomings, I've been running Vista for months (I'm fairly sure I'm not an MS engineer) and I haven't had a single issue.

People are having the same conflicts they always had with any given operating system, but now they have heard the sensationalist, tabloid horror stories about Vista they immediately shreik that the entire OS is defective upon encountering the slightest glitch.

You are definitely having an odd situation there. Gaming performance should be very much on par. What type of card do you have, and how old are the drivers for it?

I have X850 XT ViVO running catalyst 8.5. I've had enough of the bad performance though and have new parts on way including HD3870 so should be able to revise then and prove my point that vista just isn't for legacy hardware.

I have X850 XT ViVO running catalyst 8.5. I've had enough of the bad performance though and have new parts on way including HD3870 so should be able to revise then and prove my point that vista just isn't for legacy hardware.

Thats strange...I have an X800 XL and don't have any problems playing different games on my screen or even running a dual monitor setup at max resolution (1920x1200 on one and 1680x1050).

if you are talking about pure gaming at its highest settings I cannot attest to that, but as a very casual gamer and a power user I can watch 2 different SD movies at the same time or 1 HD movie with no problems in vista

People are having the same conflicts they always had with any given operating system, but now they have heard the sensationalist, tabloid horror stories about Vista they immediately shreik that the entire OS is defective upon encountering the slightest glitch.

If MS thinks that Vista isn't selling because of bad publicity, then what explains all the downgrades to XP from people who HAVE used Vista and didn't like it? What explains all the IT departments that tested Vista and decided to skip it for Windows 7? Intel skipped Vista, you don't think they're a bunch of noobs, do you?

What percentage of all Vista users went back to XP? I believe that number would be important in deciding how "bad" Vista is.

As for businesses like Intel or GM, it can be expensive to upgrade all their computers to Vista.

Why would they need to upgrade? Vista offers some security enhancements for businesses, but the rest is really consumer-centric. Businesses care more about stability and uptime, then would about most new features, even if it made the PC twice as fast, they would still have to test with their in-house and other software packages before rolling it out, and that might take months.

And yeah not to mention, it would be very expensive for new licenses and RAM upgrades.

As for businesses like Intel or GM, it can be expensive to upgrade all their computers to Vista.

Indeed. Very expensive and time consuming. You might need to upgrade the hardware, then get licenses of volume license keys or whatever it is to install the dozens or hundreds of Vista copies. Before you do all of that, you already made sure that every software needed by the employees works properly, so you did those tests in a testing environment with the computers and system that employees will be upgraded to. Once you've upgraded all the computers, it will take some time, but it shouldn't be that much to let the employees figure the little changes of the interface.

What gain has the company made to upgrade the computers to Vista? I mean, many computers today still run Windows 2000 because it works perfectly fine. If there is no benefit to the company's goals, it's not worth it.

If i were to make an educated guess on to why many (certainly not all) but many people who use vista on a new PC downgrade to XP because of all the crapware that comes preinstalled on the computer from the manufacturer.

My girlfriend's mom bought a vista laptop from sony and it could barely turn on and definitely was slow as hell.

Needless to say, her mom was not happy at all and wanted to go back to XP. I told her to give me 1 hour and her PC would be faster than before. I reinstalled Vista and did not install any of the other crap that came preinstalled and guess what....Vista ran much faster than XP ever did on her old machine.

The manufacturers are (in my humble opinion) now responsible for alot of the bad experiences that the average person is having with vista with all of the crapware that they install on your machine before the end user even gets his or her hands on it.

Does anyone know how to pronounce Mojave?

I heard Paul Thurrott pronounce it as Mo-havee in his latest podcast.

Thats the pronunciation when it comes to the desert, so I'd venture a guess he had it right on.

True. Many of the features of Vista can easily be added to XP as well. I can make XP look and act exactly like Vista. Vista was not the big change that XP was from the 9.x line. At this point I don't really care if Vista is finally working as it should have from the start. Its far too late even though at first I had actually wanted to like Vista.

Remember that XP does not use the second GPU core that Vista uses for gaming, Video and Aero. It was not built to detect a second GPU core.

whoa! i always read that guys blog and visit the site (winsupersite). usually daily. but i've never heard one of his podcasts. im gonna listen now :p

It's an excellent podcast (Y) only thing is at the moment the site seems to be down. Keep trying. :happy:

How long did they get to try out this OS and also what sort of equipment was it on? This sounds just like a canned news event given by the military.

well, it's apparently some sorts of an ad campaign in disguise, not really some scientific study. But then it's a fun and clever ad campaign. Finally Microsoft learns to do something that's actually clever and cool in their marketing efforts ;)

A quite legendary way to market, albeit perhaps a bit too late as others have suggested

BUT, after 3 years of using Vista, i've yet to experience issues :)

If i were to make an educated guess on to why many (certainly not all) but many people who use vista on a new PC downgrade to XP because of all the crapware that comes preinstalled on the computer from the manufacturer.

My girlfriend's mom bought a vista laptop from sony and it could barely turn on and definitely was slow as hell.

Needless to say, her mom was not happy at all and wanted to go back to XP. I told her to give me 1 hour and her PC would be faster than before. I reinstalled Vista and did not install any of the other crap that came preinstalled and guess what....Vista ran much faster than XP ever did on her old machine.

The manufacturers are (in my humble opinion) now responsible for alot of the bad experiences that the average person is having with vista with all of the crapware that they install on your machine before the end user even gets his or her hands on it.

Woah, someone with common sense!

Spot on the money there, Fearless!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a 10g switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports and should be a fully managed switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. if your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!