[Official] Warhammer Online


Recommended Posts

"The countdown has officially begun. Mark your calendars! September 18th is the Day of Reckoning," said Mark Jacobs, founder and general manager of Mythic Entertainment. "For the last three years, the entire team at Mythic has poured their hearts into making Warhammer Online the next great MMORPG. We are so excited to open up this world and share it with the fans that will live in it, quest in it, go to war in it and make it come alive."

Fans looking forward to laying siege to their enemy's capital city will have several pricing options available, beginning with a $14.99 monthly subscription. Additionally, collectible 30- and 60-day prepaid Game Time Cards will be available at many game retailers. WAR subscription options include:

Monthly Subscription: $14.99 USD

3-Month Subscription: $41.97 ($13.99 per month)

6-Month Subscription: $77.94 ($12.99 per month)

http://warhammervault.ign.com/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/654256-official-warhammer-online/
Share on other sites

Doesn't it bother any of you that you'll be paying for a game at release from which many key components have been pulled, just to hit that release date? They pulled a bunch of content, major cities/start zones even whole classes... I'll wait to give them my money plus a monthly subscription until the game is up to the condition that it was originally intended to be released in.

Didn't mean that as World of Warcraft being crap, just meant Warhammer being crap compared to WoW :p

Depends what you're looking for. If you're looking for large PvP battles and city raids. Then yeah you'll love it. I don't understand the WoW comparisons because while they are MMOs. They have two completely diffrent ideas on how to go about things. You won't be seeing any 25 man or 40 man raids running through some dungeon for loot in WAR.

Doesn't it bother any of you that you'll be paying for a game at release from which many key components have been pulled, just to hit that release date? They pulled a bunch of content, major cities/start zones even whole classes...

Nope.

They pulled classes back to the drawing board that they deemed boring (I can't go in to details but... *nod*). They didn't want classes to be three button routines (much like a lock in WoW). No starting zones were pulled.

You are correct in saying that two capitols were put on hold. It's much diffrent to WoW though. These cities grow, open new zones when you progress, they have to be balanced for the RvR & PvE challenge when people manage to take all the tiers. You make it sound like it's something easy to fix! Unless you've seen them first hand you'll have no idea what you are talking about. They still have a good couple of months to get them in working order, as it's going to be a while till someone manages to take over a city!

I can understand that people might be worried about content after the AoC saga. But I assure you. Keeps are in, citys are in and we've tested them. ;)

  • 2 weeks later...
Doesn't it bother any of you that you'll be paying for a game at release from which many key components have been pulled, just to hit that release date? They pulled a bunch of content, major cities/start zones even whole classes... I'll wait to give them my money plus a monthly subscription until the game is up to the condition that it was originally intended to be released in.

You do of course realize Blizzard has done the same exact thing...Zul'Aman, for example? I could list more, but quite frankly, I don't feel like cludging through a bunch of WoW-related crap right now.

I can't wait for Warhammer. I've loved the lore for years...hope it lives up to everything I hope it will.

Doesn't it bother any of you that you'll be paying for a game at release from which many key components have been pulled, just to hit that release date? They pulled a bunch of content, major cities/start zones even whole classes... I'll wait to give them my money plus a monthly subscription until the game is up to the condition that it was originally intended to be released in.

No it doesn't bother me, WoW has been around for almost 5 years now, and still has bugs.

Also when WoW got released I remember there were no raid zones whatsoever in it because they didn't make the deadline for them and numerous zones just had basic questing. Not to mention they keep doing it, Black Temple for example in WoW wasn't even implemented when BC got released, it was deployed later during the expansion.

Definitely looking forward to Warhammer, I'll try it out and see how it goes. I hope it delivers, we need a competitor for WoW, too much newbies and clueless persons entering WoW not to mention they're making the game too easy.

I currently play the Closed beta for Europe. I have a feeling its missing some factors :(

I cant talk into detail atm about it, due to a agreement you have to stick with. :p

Also, there are still alot of bugs. And a whole lot of graphic glitches.

Yes you can and I've not seen many glitches on my Sorc, then again I've not played a marauder which apparently is the worst offender.

So far though. It's in MUCH better condition than AoC, there is enough content from 1-40 and RvR is fantastic fun. But we still need the CtD fixing and the balancing sorted (we've seen the due changes but just waiting for them to be implemented).

WoW killer? No. That's not what it's aiming for it's a niche game. Though it will blow the kneecaps of AoC with a shotgun though.

edit:

:D

maglockm002gm9.th.jpg

Edited by Spookie
Doesn't it bother any of you that you'll be paying for a game at release from which many key components have been pulled, just to hit that release date? They pulled a bunch of content, major cities/start zones even whole classes... I'll wait to give them my money plus a monthly subscription until the game is up to the condition that it was originally intended to be released in.

You should reserch something before you talk about it. 4 captial cities were removed, they replaced each with a huge fortress and the cities that werent moved also had a fortress placed at the end of their t4 zone. I don't think that those classes or cities were even beta tested either. MAybe a select group but the elder testers Ive talked too never saw them. There is still 20 classes(thats 11 more then wow 10after LK) They did not remove a single zone, they all made it in it was just the 4 cities.

Yes you can and I've not seen many glitches on my Sorc, then again I've not played a marauder which apparently is the worst offender.

So far though. It's in MUCH better condition than AoC, there is enough content from 1-40 and RvR is fantastic fun. But we still need the CtD fixing and the balancing sorted (we've seen the due changes but just waiting for them to be implemented).

WoW killer? No. That's not what it's aiming for it's a niche game. Though it will blow the kneecaps of AoC with a shotgun though.

edit:

:D

maglockm002gm9.th.jpg

I wouldn't call it niche. A niche game to me is something with under 200,00-300,000 subs. WAR will get 1mil+ within a year and imo even more.

Also here is the new trailer which I think is the greastest of all time.

http://mythicmktg.fileburst.com/war/us/hom...nematic_08.html

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!