[Mac Forum] New Apple Ads


Recommended Posts

Seems they're just furthering the misinformation about Vista. People shouldn't be dumb enough to believe everything an ad tells them. I've always felt these ads were surely a breach of some competition laws as I'm sure you're not entirely allowed to straight out bad mouth your competition in an ad, at least that's what I've been led to believe.

If every company acted in this way you'd see mcdonalds ads dissing Burger King, or nike slamming adidas. They surely don't do this for a reason.

I've been running vista since launch and have not yet had one single crash, on any of the machines i've built for it. No blue screens, no slow downs, nothing. I only turn the machine off once a month and thats usually a reboot after patch tuesday, so my uptime is pretty solid.

Like others have said, Apple should focus on their own product more in the ads, and less on the Vista bashing. Give people a reason to switch that is valid and not just ill advised and out dated opinions on a rival OS. Though try avoid getting back to the "Switcher" ads. those were awful

The hardware itself has been great. But instead of focusing on these advantages, they've decided to act like bullies and pick on others to raise their own self-esteem.

Not sure about this one Brandon, how can the underdog be the bully? Microsoft clearly out weighs Apple in the industry, I know I would never imply otherwise... I guess I just have to wonder since I know MS has been very guilty of bullying people in the past and I have to wonder if that wouldn't be just getting back a bit of what they gave others for Apple to pick at them...

Don't get me wrong, I'm not in marketing (Despite what some people may think around here I'm far to blunt and honest) and I don't understand what they do or why the do it always, but I'd suppose that badgering your opponents into feeling pressure would be ideal as it can cause them to tip their hands early and release unfinished products or reveal things that they normally wouldn't do to attempt to counter public opinion.

Just my thoughts there. :)

As for the Actors, I think Mac uses a PC and PC uses a Mac... Sick irony there. ;)

Though try avoid getting back to the "Switcher" ads. those were awful

I don't know, Ellen Feiss was my idol. (hehe, no not really.)

I have seen samples of possible ads to follow the current 'Mac/PC' campaign and I'll be honest, they are dry and bland... I think Apple will continue to use Mac/PC until such a time as results stop coming in, keep in mind how many Apple Marketing Campaigns you've seen versus those of say...Coke or Pepsi. Their brand identity changes almost monthly in their commercials, Apple remains the same with their advertising styles for years. I feel this type of consistency also helps build the ads to a point where people listen to them since they have been hearing the same thing for so long in the same way.

^^^ Apple bullies within the scope that they can. Look at iTunes and how they have dealt so firmly with the media organizations. Look at their strict terms for developers on the iPhone.

I'm not big on Microsoft's past practices to muscle out competitions. But I am certain that Apple would be just as bad, perhaps even more draconian. (reference your own point of view on how Jobs limits the varieties of Apple products to meet only the narrow types of hardware that he personally wants to see)

^^^ Apple bullies within the scope that they can. Look at iTunes and how they have dealt so firmly with the media organizations. Look at their strict terms for developers on the iPhone.

I'm not big on Microsoft's past practices to muscle out competitions. But I am certain that Apple would be just as bad, perhaps even more draconian. (reference your own point of view on how Jobs limits the varieties of Apple products to meet only the narrow types of hardware that he personally wants to see)

Absolutely agree on this.

If Apple was in Microsoft's place they would be stifling in handling their competition. In the fields they are Dominant they rule with an Iron Fist already, however, against Microsoft there is no way to do more than pick at MS...you can't bully someone who is a bigger bully than you and succeed.

These Mac ads are dispicable. I took a business class once and the Mac ads were a prime topic of what NOT TO DO! Reasons include public bullying, defamination, law suits, etc. I bet you Apple has faced all of these concerning their ads, it just hasn't gone public because Apple is better at secrecy than the CIA.

Not sure about this one Brandon, how can the underdog be the bully? Microsoft clearly out weighs Apple in the industry, I know I would never imply otherwise... I guess I just have to wonder since I know MS has been very guilty of bullying people in the past and I have to wonder if that wouldn't be just getting back a bit of what they gave others for Apple to pick at them...

Don't get me wrong, I'm not in marketing (Despite what some people may think around here I'm far to blunt and honest)

I just feel the sweety suppressive poison spreading around your "sympathizing" smile.

Some people rush away, but many flock to the sweet smell...

These Mac ads are dispicable. I took a business class once and the Mac ads were a prime topic of what NOT TO DO! Reasons include public bullying, defamination, law suits, etc. I bet you Apple has faced all of these concerning their ads, it just hasn't gone public because Apple is better at secrecy than the CIA.

Even Apple can't hide law suits against them, filings are public knowledge.

While the advertisements may appeal to the casual and less informed public, you won't get a very positive response out of a tech community like neowin. Not only the more informed buyers are uncomfortable with the ads: Could you ever imagine someone admitting he bought a Mac because he was convinced by the TV commercials? It would be laughable. The poor taste of the advertisements do not reflect the true quality of your products. The commercials are discrediting Apple.

Although they do present some of the basic features the Macs have, the advertisements are still attack-ads. Usually I'd say this is commonplace, but Apple tries to ridicule their competition to such an impossible extent that the ads seem entirely unbelievable. Personally, they give me the feeling that Apple exists only to be an antagonist to the common computer, and that their goal is not to be a good computer vendor, but to be better than the rest.

The ads are starting to become pathetic. That is the word I was looking for. This word helps me describe someone or something who won't move forward, who holds on to what might once have been former glory, who fails to show positive aspects, and must simply depend on the criticism of others to look better.

Like a parasite, the Mac ads depend on possible (if not completely fictional) negative aspects of competitors, much to their dismay (and our annoyance). Apple has to move on.

I personally find the Apple ads that attack Windows users rather insulting, I'm both a Windows and Mac user and I prefer to have my own opinions of the software I use with my computer - instead I?m forced to watch childish advertisements that have no true depth or meaning in their output.

I personally find the Apple ads that attack Windows users rather insulting, I'm both a Windows and Mac user and I prefer to have my own opinions of the software I use with my computer - instead I’m forced to watch childish advertisements that have no true depth or meaning in their output.

Is someone forcing you to watch these ads? :rolleyes:

Anyway, I don't like the ads. Quite simply because they are not telling the truth. I do like the concept though, if it would be based on nothing but the truth. Now it just makes Apple look immature and not a very trustworthy company. I would rather buy something from a company that seems to be run by people who are grown up and all serious then from a company that makes the impression of being run by 'cool' people like 'Mac'.

I don't like the ads. I was thinking about buying a iMac or Macbook, but now I'm not sure what I want.

One thing that irritates me, is the whole "Mac community" thing. Is there some place Mac people go and drink coffee and talk about Apple brotherhood? Is there land or some place where this so-called "community" lives? I don't feel my computer or hardware makes me (or anyone else) any less or any better. If you have to make a big deal about what kind of computer you have, you're nothing but a douche.

I don't like the ads. I was thinking about buying a iMac or Macbook, but now I'm not sure what I want.

One thing that irritates me, is the whole "Mac community" thing. Is there some place Mac people go and drink coffee and talk about Apple brotherhood? Is there land or some place where this so-called "community" lives? I don't feel my computer or hardware makes me (or anyone else) any less or any better. If you have to make a big deal about what kind of computer you have, you're nothing but a douche.

The Apple, or Mac, Community is very strong as Apple users have a long standing tradition of being very helpful among other Mac users in a way rarely seen outside of the individual Linux groups.

I know some feel that their Apple equipment make them better, however as a rule the 'Apple Community' is just a the majority of Apple owners who enjoy conversing with other Apple users and helping to better the whole. There are elements that are elitist, however the majority of us prefer just to use the title Apple Community to signify the sort of family and community that we have. :)

I think the ads are great and they remind me how much of an idiot I was to purchase Vista. I still use it (because I'm a sadomasochist), but will replace it when I can afford an iMac.

I can relate to the crashing aspect of 'Calming Tea'. My computer may not be slow, but it certainly crashes a lot (never did with XP) and using the sleep function is risky because there is a 50/50 chance of blue screen. I've been a lifelong PC user and I refuse to be hosed by Microsoft again.

The Apple, or Mac, Community is very strong as Apple users have a long standing tradition of being very helpful among other Mac users in a way rarely seen outside of the individual Linux groups.

I know some feel that their Apple equipment make them better, however as a rule the 'Apple Community' is just a the majority of Apple owners who enjoy conversing with other Apple users and helping to better the whole. There are elements that are elitist, however the majority of us prefer just to use the title Apple Community to signify the sort of family and community that we have. :)

That's all fine and dandy. I'm not passing judgement one way or the other. It's when people have to "preach" to me about what they use and why it's better; Mac, Windows or *nix. What people fail to mention is, "This works best FOR ME and what I DO."

I have a friend who's in a band here in Sac and he came to me for computer advice. "Jason, what kind of computer should I get?" I responded, "What are you planning to do with your computer?" G man:"I want to create music, check my email and surf the net." So I told him to get a Mac. I explained the differences between the two (XP and 10.4) and what would be best for his intended use. We went to the Apple store in Arden Mall and he bought the 20" iMac with the G5 CPU. Years later he still loves his computer. He doesn't game, he's not computer savvy and he just wanted a tool to create music and stay connected.

Sorry for feeling the need to explain that, but I believe that philosophy would work well in Apple's advertising. Show people differences, let them make the informed decision.

I think the ads are great and they remind me how much of an idiot I was to purchase Vista. I still use it (because I'm a sadomasochist), but will replace it when I can afford an iMac.

I can relate to the crashing aspect of 'Calming Tea'. My computer may not be slow, but it certainly crashes a lot (never did with XP) and using the sleep function is risky because there is a 50/50 chance of blue screen. I've been a lifelong PC user and I refuse to be hosed by Microsoft again.

wow that is extreme. Did you ever take efforts to investigate the BSOD or crashes? I keep my Vista desktop/laptop on sleep all the time. My uptime is usually equal to the duration between patches.

That's all fine and dandy. I'm not passing judgement one way or the other. It's when people have to "preach" to me about what they use and why it's better; Mac, Windows or *nix. What people fail to mention is, "This works best FOR ME and what I DO."

I have a friend who's in a band here in Sac and he came to me for computer advice. "Jason, what kind of computer should I get?" I responded, "What are you planning to do with your computer?" G man:"I want to create music, check my email and surf the net." So I told him to get a Mac. I explained the differences between the two (XP and 10.4) and what would be best for his intended use. We went to the Apple store in Arden Mall and he bought the 20" iMac with the G5 CPU. Years later he still loves his computer. He doesn't game, he's not computer savvy and he just wanted a tool to create music and stay connected.

Sorry for feeling the need to explain that, but I believe that philosophy would work well in Apple's advertising. Show people differences, let them make the informed decision.

This is exactly what should be done. Every single time I see an ad currently I just roll my eyes and don't give it a second thought.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!