Stargate Universe (Season 1)


Poll added by Fred Derf on April 10th  

157 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should lead on Destiny?



Recommended Posts

Did anyone notice Eli wearing a red shirt?

As a sci fi geek I figured he of all people would be very weary of their off-world attire.

Maybe they don't get Star Trek in the Star Gate world.

O'Neill referenced Star Trek in SG1 (wanting to call the Prometheus "The Enterprise"), and I've seen in a trailer that Eli will make a reference to Star Wars at some point.

Oh man! This is the kind of Stargate I've been dreaming of. It combines elements from Stargate SG-1/Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica. Like Phantom Helix? b>said, "Battlegate Unilactica":p:p

Sick of people whining that they dont like it, dont like it? dont watch it, dont spoil it for the rest of us by being the vocal minority i dont want this show ending prematurely because loads of people are whining about not liking it and the people that do like it are just content with having watched it and not saying how much they like it.

Sick of people whining that they dont like it, dont like it? dont watch it, dont spoil it for the rest of us by being the vocal minority i dont want this show ending prematurely because loads of people are whining about not liking it and the people that do like it are just content with having watched it and not saying how much they like it.

Whoa, calm down. There's no point in reading something that bothers you. See a post about someone's hatred of SGU? Don't read all of it. And I don't think they would cancel a show simply because a small number of people complain about it online.

yeah. More clich?d rubbish. It only took them a week to do the OMG RUNNING OUT OF TIME thing with the stargate. That's going to get overused.

As opposed to SG-1 where they used that plot device in the very first episode ;))

I'm sure they'll find a way around the time limit soon enough.

yeah. More clich?d rubbish. It only took them a week to do the OMG RUNNING OUT OF TIME thing with the stargate. That's going to get overused.

Uh no, episode 3 was the 3rd part of the series premier, it wasnt a seperate episode. So technically it was part of the first 2 episodes storyline so in context it was fine them using the plot device seen as its the first time theyve gone off ship.

Sick of people whining that they dont like it, dont like it? dont watch it, dont spoil it for the rest of us by being the vocal minority i dont want this show ending prematurely because loads of people are whining about not liking it and the people that do like it are just content with having watched it and not saying how much they like it.

People say they don't like it because they didn't, and because it's a free world where people can express their opinions on say a discussion forum. and because they want the show to be better.and maybe not a episode by episode repeat of the previous two stargates.

If the show is mediocre and you never say anything, how are the writers going to know that they need to improve ?

also your logic fails. the tv stations don't care what the vocal minority(which so far seems to be quite major), They care about pure hard viewer numbers. so by your logic, if you want all the people who don't like it to not watch it rather than complain so the show might be improved... that has a bigger chance of getting the show canceled.

Uh no, episode 3 was the 3rd part of the series premier, it wasnt a seperate episode. So technically it was part of the first 2 episodes storyline so in context it was fine them using the plot device seen as its the first time theyve gone off ship.

You missed my point entirely. They will end up using it again and again to create fake tension because the SG writers have been lazy for years. They've always loved throwing in impossible last minute saves against a ticking clock, heck they even referenced it themselves in the 200th episode of SG-1

Sick of people whining that they dont like it, dont like it? dont watch it, dont spoil it for the rest of us by being the vocal minority i dont want this show ending prematurely because loads of people are whining about not liking it and the people that do like it are just content with having watched it and not saying how much they like it.

Shows aren't cancelled on people bitching online, else Big brother, xfactor and other stuff would have been canceled YEARS ago. Shows live or die by ratings, that's about it.

and just because I'm whining about it, doesn't mean I'm not going to watch it all. I clearly like it enough to spend an hour or so of my time a week watching it, it just bores me when the writers resort to boring clich?'s that have been done to death a million times before in previous Stargate/Sci-fi shows. It makes for predictable and ultimately dull TV.

Sick of people whining that they dont like it, dont like it? dont watch it, dont spoil it for the rest of us by being the vocal minority i dont want this show ending prematurely because loads of people are whining about not liking it and the people that do like it are just content with having watched it and not saying how much they like it.

Did Jedi steal your password?

Why do people have to call this funny names like Battlestargate: Lost in Deep Space Voyager 9. It's a sci-fi in space. Tons of things have been done already and there may be similar themes in SGU but I don't see any blatant copying going on.

Atlantis had me face palming a lot because they carbon copied many episodes SG-1. So far I am not getting that feeling on SGU but we'll see how that turns out once the first season is done.

Why do people have to call this funny names like Battlestargate: Lost in Deep Space Voyager 9. It's a sci-fi in space. Tons of things have been done already and there may be similar themes in SGU but I don't see any blatant copying going on.

Atlantis had me face palming a lot because they carbon copied many episodes SG-1. So far I am not getting that feeling on SGU but we'll see how that turns out once the first season is done.

maybe because it IS lost in space with a Stargate twist.

and by twist, I mean they're reusing thr atlantis script.

let get throught he steps here

1. gather unlikely crew: check

2. impress with stargate and cool unknown technology: check

3. travel through stargate to unkown location: check

4. No way back: check

5. limited communication: check

6: food/water/air crisis: check

7: partially solve food/water/air crisis: check

8: lose some people that will later return as enemyallies: check

9: Meet awesome humanoi(cheap makeup) alien that will become part of the exploratory crew: not yet, possibly first sign with the ship that dropped off at the end.

Eventually we'll get to the point where they get a gate back to earth or atlantis partially working so they can skip back and forth or drop off supplies. but probably not this season. First we have to milk the all alone with no equipment on a broken ship aspect. not like we've seen that before... Then comes the intergalactic super aliens that have been taking potshots at this shops and probably the gate seeders through the milennia. I bet we'll be paying a visit to the first downed gate seeder near the middle or end of this season.

I agree with Rob, unless we see blatant copying from other shows/episodes, then we should just watch it for enjoyment. I mean if you see a wookie, a light saber, pointy earred freaks, cybornetic crap,..then cry about it. What we should see is a continuation of some of the same themes that occurred with SGA and SG1. SGU will expand upon what we know from the two previous shows and some things will be new. The Gould have been round for thousands of years. Who's to say that the group the SG1 were fighting werent' the only ones? Who's to say that all of the replicators or Orai have been defeated? Just relax and enjoy the ride. At least we do have a possible decent SCI FI show to watch.

You know I had a good chuckle in the irc yesterday suggesting that dr who drop in to SGU, I think I'd find it amazingly amusing. With no dominant bad guy in this series there will be a decent amount of skirmish action with lots of new or reused ideas thrown in to the fray but some idea's you've seen before are bound to show up.

Hey a sci-fi show in space, with stargates. So far it's ok, but what other sci-fi shows are out there right now? So I'll take what I can get.

This is what keeps syFy in business and probably why they changed name.

With noone else making SciFi they have no competition, so they can make do with a single show, on a fairly low budget, and fill the rest up with re-runs and reality and straight to dvd tv movies.

When's that Star War live action show coming anyway ? shouldn't that be right around the corner by now, we're already on season two of clone wars.

This is what keeps syFy in business and probably why they changed name.

With noone else making SciFi they have no competition, so they can make do with a single show, on a fairly low budget, and fill the rest up with re-runs and reality and straight to dvd tv movies.

When's that Star War live action show coming anyway ? shouldn't that be right around the corner by now, we're already on season two of clone wars.

I miss the days of having several space sci-fi shows to choose from.

I watched ep3. I'm thinking, what about the air and water? Do they have an endless supply or something? What's with the lime? I forgot what they were going to do with it. Don't care to watch again for that. It's alright, but could be better.

I watched ep3. I'm thinking, what about the air and water? Do they have an endless supply or something? What's with the lime? I forgot what they were going to do with it. Don't care to watch again for that. It's alright, but could be better.

The lime is used to filter out CO2. Spaceships recycle everything from what you pee to what you exhale. They do this to some extent on the international space station as well. It means the supplies last longer.

I watched ep3. I'm thinking, what about the air and water? Do they have an endless supply or something? What's with the lime? I forgot what they were going to do with it. Don't care to watch again for that. It's alright, but could be better.

lime absorbs carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate... the fact that lime does this is part of high school level science and important in the 'carbon cycle', it was also explained in the episode for people that weren't already aware ;)

also, if you look on epguides.com you will see in a few episodes time that there is one called 'water', this, coupled with the fact that a number of times the word ration is used in the first three episodes would mean that no, there is not an endless supply.

seriously, next time, watch the show properly, or just not at all :p

You know I had a good chuckle in the irc yesterday suggesting that dr who drop in to SGU, I think I'd find it amazingly amusing. With no dominant bad guy in this series there will be a decent amount of skirmish action with lots of new or reused ideas thrown in to the fray but some idea's you've seen before are bound to show up.

Hahaha. I had a good laugh when I read that in #neowin [iRC]. :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!