Stargate Universe (Season 1)


Poll added by Fred Derf on April 10th  

157 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should lead on Destiny?



Recommended Posts

Also is it just me. or I thought Eli and Chloe had a thing going. lol
Yeah Eli likes her but its clear she likes the bad boys or the taller type not the geek type...like real life really :rofl:

Yeah, I think the writers have been very clever in putting this in... I reckon it's something that a lot of the old SG1/SGA demographic can empathise with. I know I've had similar experiences when I was younger... just not the other side of the universe trapped in close quarters! :p

I dont know if this theory or idea is too farfetched but When rush said Destiny lacked the capability to dial back to Earth did he mean power wise or method to get back to Earth? If it's just power during the last episode do youthink it would have been possible for them to attempt a dial to Earth while the ship was inside the star? lol If it's power they lack. and the Ship uses the sun to collect power. They potentially have a big enough power source to do so. Just thinking out loud.

Also is it just me. or I thought Eli and Chloe had a thing going. lol

I think the point of this ship was to travel the same path as their previous ships ones who dropped the stargate like mentioned in the show. So the path would be there ever those ships went. How far those ships have gone is unknown. But it's possible it went on forever since the method they use to recharge is to dive into a star.

Let's not forget that it took the power of a special planet with Naquadria (spelt that wrong but I think you know what I mean) to power the Stargate so much that it was able to connect to Destiny for a short period. But let's not forget that the ship is now only 40% of power which means that whatever is holding it back from 100% could be faulty capacitors, a system leak, or, Destiny's shield might not have been powerful enough or could stand the stress of being inside of a star for a period of time which could charge it to 100% (find that unlikely since the ship is being charged so the shields would be charged).

You need to remember that this ship was launched millions of years ago, well before Atlantis, most likely when the Stargates were first built and they needed something to seed the galaxies with them.

So if that's true, that means that Destiny might not be actually capable of dialling back to Earth with such little power.

I have no doubt this might take a turn like they did in Atlantis where they are able to dial Earth regularly because of a new power source or they are able to fix the ship or the ships capacitors for them to do that.

I think the problem with dialling back is related to distance in proportion to power. Further away, more power required. Since they are so far away its likely not possible using the same means they might have intended to use originally. Then again they planned to gate there when it was at the edge of the Universe so I assume they had some means other than mystery planet to get there.

I think the problem with dialling back is related to distance in proportion to power. Further away, more power required. Since they are so far away its likely not possible using the same means they might have intended to use originally. Then again they planned to gate there when it was at the edge of the Universe so I assume they had some means other than mystery planet to get there.

The gate address was a mystery, the gate address turned out to be a "code" to dial the Destiny's gate. If you remember the last symbol, it was Earth's point of origin, but it wasn't Earth they were on. They also realised that they needed the exact amount of power needed to power the address, so that in it's self is pretty much a code. They had no real way of knowing they were going, that's why they had the communication stones, but it's possible they had to generators but left them behind after the base got attacked.

There wont be an all ranging new enemy in this one, there's a quote for that somewhere in this thread; there will only be instances where they might encounter various and sundry aliens who cause them trouble. Though I'm sure the point of the traitor will come up.

I quite like this idea. It became apparent with the last two series that they were suffering from the 'power ranger' complex. Each time they defeat an enemy, another one comes along with a bigger gun/sword/ship/robot etc.

It would be great to see episodic content like the first few episodes of sg1 and pretty much most of Star Trek, whereby each episode is kind-of a self contained entity but following a subtle series-long story line.

Don't they need to know an exact point of origin to dial outside of the galaxy they are in?

I just finished watching episode 5 :)

With normal Stargates, yes, but it's obvious the Ancients (who remember are the gate builders/designers) came up with a system which can map to the Destiny.

There is one possible way I think they could of done this and I believe it can be down to the other Stargates. Remember, Destiny is following another ship which is planting the Stargates, so maybe the Stargates/DHDs themselves help make the calculations to the Destiny. A bit like how you can use bread crums to find your way back etc. The Destiny was using it's FTL drive either when they dialled the gate. You can see at the beginning of the first episode where the ship drops out of FTL.

I remember the scene you mentioned Tony but were they dropping out or just jumping in? I remember it happening several times in the first episodes. I believe the first time they were jumping in as no one seemed to notice. Second time they did and saw it was stopped. That being the case Destiny could have dropped out when the dialling sequence started.

Assuming the origin was always supposed to be Earth (hence code) they likely intended to use the ZPM's from Atlantis (prior to it leaving) or maybe they didn't take the power requirements into consideration. I remember Atlantis needed to drain the ZPM in the outpost because it was so far away. I don't think the number of chevrons makes the difference I think its the distance the wormhole needs to go? But I could be wrong.

I remember the scene you mentioned Tony but were they dropping out or just jumping in? I remember it happening several times in the first episodes. I believe the first time they were jumping in as no one seemed to notice. Second time they did and saw it was stopped. That being the case Destiny could have dropped out when the dialling sequence started.

Assuming the origin was always supposed to be Earth (hence code) they likely intended to use the ZPM's from Atlantis (prior to it leaving) or maybe they didn't take the power requirements into consideration. I remember Atlantis needed to drain the ZPM in the outpost because it was so far away. I don't think the number of chevrons makes the difference I think its the distance the wormhole needs to go? But I could be wrong.

Destiny did drop out of FTL when the dialling sequence started, or at least, it dropped out to establish a connection. I remember an episode where they had a gate on a Goa'uld ship, but it couldn't be used when it was in Hyperspace.

We have no way to know if Atlantis is still on Earth, but I assumed that the ZPM's were drained after the fight with Todd's mate with that super hive ship.

Yea but FTL is different than Hyperspace so presumably it might be possible to dial while in it, but unlikely.

And I was referring to the Ancients, I assume they didn't plan on leaving Earth when they sent Destiny out. So theoretically they would have still been there when they planned to board Destiny.

Yea but FTL is different than Hyperspace so presumably it might be possible to dial while in it, but unlikely.

And I was referring to the Ancients, I assume they didn't plan on leaving Earth when they sent Destiny out. So theoretically they would have still been there when they planned to board Destiny.

Maybe thats the exact reason why the ship uses FTL instead of hyperspace.

yeah i'm starting to agree with the people who feel the Colonel is a weak leader. Dr. Rush seems the only one who has the guts to tell people the reality of a situation, and he gets griefed for it. Yet another episode as well where I feel the Senator's daughter didn't add anything at all to the episode other than a pretty face.

overall I thought there was some pretty poor choices made by the characters, obviously because of writing. When the guy pulled out his gun on the sandmist, bugs whatever..i said -_-. Seriously who pulls a gun on a mist of sand or a swarm of insects, I understand they had to kill this random guy as part of the story but they could have seriously did it in a smarter way. When Eli and Dr. Rush got into it about the seriousness of the alien problem, it seemed so un-Eli-like. He's never outright just disrespected Dr. Rush or anybody like that on the show, and that was just simple disrespect that whole scene. Again I understand that's how it is written and that's how they are setting up stuff, but I just wish they did it in a better way and not so cliche or out of the blue.

yeah i'm starting to agree with the people who feel the Colonel is a weak leader. Dr. Rush seems the only one who has the guts to tell people the reality of a situation, and he gets griefed for it. Yet another episode as well where I feel the Senator's daughter didn't add anything at all to the episode other than a pretty face.

overall I thought there was some pretty poor choices made by the characters, obviously because of writing. When the guy pulled out his gun on the sandmist, bugs whatever..i said -_-. Seriously who pulls a gun on a mist of sand or a swarm of insects, I understand they had to kill this random guy as part of the story but they could have seriously did it in a smarter way. When Eli and Dr. Rush got into it about the seriousness of the problem, it seemed so un-Eli-like. He's never outright just disrespected Dr. Rush or anybody like that on the show, and that was just simple disrespect taht whole scene. Again I understand that's how it is written and that's how they are setting up stuff, but I just wish they did it in a better way and not so cliche.

yep...it was pretty funny and stupid that he held a gun against bugs and tried to shoot them.

I mean come on, really! Writers! It is a fictional story and all, we get that, but that doesn't mean it has to be stupid, right?

That was an alright episode. (Y)

Earlier in the thread it was mentioned that Destiny plots a course based on data received from seeding ships ahead, I was wondering if they could use that data to determine what's ahead (i.e. planets, resources, etc)?

Also does anyone have any spoilers/leaks/details on the pod that flew off Destiny a few episodes back?

Yea but FTL is different than Hyperspace so presumably it might be possible to dial while in it, but unlikely.

And I was referring to the Ancients, I assume they didn't plan on leaving Earth when they sent Destiny out. So theoretically they would have still been there when they planned to board Destiny.

Nah, I still think the ship needs to drop out of FTL for it to establish a connection, otherwise the timing would be too good..

Nah, I still think the ship needs to drop out of FTL for it to establish a connection, otherwise the timing would be too good..

I agree with that otherwise they wouldn't need that timer in the gate room. Also in the episode when they were in the desert, Eli had to put his arm through the gate so it wouldn't disconnect.

The first season of Stargate Universe is ?in the can,? as they say in the ?biz.

Principal photography wrapped on the show yesterday, capping off eight months of filming Season One?s 20 episodes. Among the last cast members to leave the set were Alaina Huffman (?Tamara Johansen?), David Blue (?Eli Wallace?), Brian J. Smith (?Matthew Scott?), Patrick Glimore (?Dale Volker?), Jennifer Spence (?Lisa Park?), Peter Kelamis (?Adam Brody?), Haig Sutherland (?Hunter Riley?), and Julia Benson (?Vanessa James?), consulting producer Joseph Mallozzi said on his blog.

And not everyone is guaranteed to survive ?Incursion,? the show?s 2-part season finale.

Meanwhile, post-production on the second half of the season continues into 2010.

What about a return trip for Season Two? Syfy has not yet announced whether or not it will renew the show, but expectations are high. The show has been doing well in the ratings, at least outperforming Sanctuary and last year?s numbers for Stargate Atlantis.

SGU is currently the U.S. cable network?s second highest-rated program, after Ghost Hunters, and its highest-rated drama, according to TV by the Numbers, with more than 2 million viewers on Friday nights (Live + Same Day).

Word on the renewal could come at any day, with at least preliminary ratings in for five episodes now ? fully one-quarter of the season.

In Vancouver, the show?s writing team has already started spinning stories and assigning episode slots for Season Two, Mallozzi said. The season finale will be penned by Paul Mullie, with Mallozzi, Brad Wright, Robert C. Cooper and Carl Binder also adding to the first five.

New episodes of Season One should air into December, then take a break until March or April. (Syfy will begin airing the Battlestar Galactica prequel series, Caprica, in January.)

Don?t miss this week?s brand new episode of Stargate Universe on Syfy! ?Water? airs at 9 p.m. (8 Central).

Gateworld

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      591
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!