UEFA Champions League


UEFA CL 2008/2009  

105 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win UEFA CL 2008/2009?

    • Arsenal
      12
    • Liverpool
      10
    • Barcelona
      31
    • Inter
      2
    • Manchester United
      30
    • Chelsea
      6
    • Real Madrid
      4
    • Other
      10
  2. 2. Top Scorer?

    • Kaka
      1
    • Henry
      5
    • Eto'o
      13
    • Ronaldinho
      2
    • Fernando Torres
      16
    • Ronaldo
      21
    • Other
      47


Recommended Posts

Oh, definately. A good referee (probably not Paul Ince's favourite though)

My girlfriend thought for years his surname was "Cleaner" - I didn't bother setting her straight. :-P

IIRC Incey got sent off for calling him a "Bald Italian t**t"... I lol'd when I read that a couple of weeks after the match.

+1

The argument against not bringing in replays in football is really stupid IMO.. they say it will affect the flow of the game.. like the match is never stopped for freekicks or conslting the linesman!

Maybe a little, but in my opinion a small price to pay to prevent injust decisions. Obviously they shouldn't have it for every decision, maybe just a guy in a room watching the cameras that can radio the ref if he sees something the ref doesn't.

The clock doesn't stop. If you consult replays then there's going to be a lot of added time.

That doesn't have to be the rule, it could be added on under stoppages, but again I add a worthwhile evil for the sake of ensuring decisions are correct. Football may be an old sport, but IMO modern technology should be brought into it

UEFA will take a look at this, he could be in serious trouble for that. I see where he is coming from, but seriously, its just unprofessional.

Well I hope Barca own Man utd but it isn't going to happen. They got completely dominated today and if they do the same thing in the final it will be a tea party for man utd.

Which game did you see dude? how can you say that Chelsea dominated the game??? the only thing they did was faint each time a bar?a player was near them to get a foul a kick it to Drogba, if that's football, i've been seeing another sport all my life.

this said there were 2 penalties not 4, the handballs. anything else is just some effect the Bar?a players have over Chelsea ones, if they get close, the fall dead.

If someone has to claim about the Ref is Bar?a, in both games they. if one team is trying to play and the other is making fouls to stop them, the ref should chow cards, yet bar?a got the same cards in first leg and was about in the second if it isn't for the reaction of some players at the end of the game.

Anyway, if you play a semifinal of champions league, at home, against 10 players, and you hole team is in your field behind the ball and the visitant team defense is in the middle field to push up, you really don't deserve to go further.

if it's not clear enough, i'm a bar?a supporter, i lost my voice screaming at the goal!!!!!!

Go Bar?a Go!!!! let bring it home!!!!!

typical sour grapes chelsea.

got an early lead and then managed to miss easy chances that could have sealed it. get a gift when abidal gets sent off for anelka tripping himself and with a full half hour with a 1 man advantage they still looked ordinary.

then when they had to do a simple defensive clearance they failed and then sat back. iniesta is 20 yards out, right in front of goal and the nearest chelsea defender is where? about 8 yards away. cech has to complete his one and only save of the game and doesn't.

then they have the usual hissy fit because it's easier to blame the referee than look at their own failings.

they got punished for their lax approach.

Which game did you see dude? how can you say that Chelsea dominated the game??? the only thing they did was faint each time a bar?a player was near them to get a foul a kick it to Drogba, if that's football, i've been seeing another sport all my life.

this said there were 2 penalties not 4, the handballs. anything else is just some effect the Bar?a players have over Chelsea ones, if they get close, the fall dead.

If someone has to claim about the Ref is Bar?a, in both games they. if one team is trying to play and the other is making fouls to stop them, the ref should chow cards, yet bar?a got the same cards in first leg and was about in the second if it isn't for the reaction of some players at the end of the game.

Anyway, if you play a semifinal of champions league, at home, against 10 players, and you hole team is in your field behind the ball and the visitant team defense is in the middle field to push up, you really don't deserve to go further.

if it's not clear enough, i'm a bar?a supporter, i lost my voice screaming at the goal!!!!!!

Go Bar?a Go!!!! let bring it home!!!!!

Pretty sure I watched the same game as you. The post game commentators even agreed. Chelsea DOMINATED Barca. If you think different you are just being a pansy.

It's not even worth arguing to you the penalty situations....

I don't think drogba and ballack should of done what they did but its not the first time we have seen players react towards a ref. I hope barca beat man utd but its more than likely not doable.

thank god Barca won, even though i'm not a fan, i'm glad they won.+ i felt sorrow just to think about the possibility will see 2 british teams at the final.

besides, chelsea played ugly soccer. bunch of tossers, every slight tap, drogba fell like he was shot with 0.50 cal.

it was sweet sweet victory, after all the fake show's, and uncalled red card.

go barca, in the final, i hope you will show us the soccer you played vs RealMadrid.

All of those penalty shouts wouldn't have mattered had Drogba finished that chance he had.

Shame he's terrible.

Lol, yeah.

I saw some of the replays today, I doubt any of those handball claims would have been given in the Premiership, the defenders were like 3 feet away each time and the chelsea player thumped the ball at them. The Barca guys could barely move out of the way :p

It was a decent game, with two very good goals - unfortunately the Chelsea players just needed to suck it up and move on.

Pretty sure I watched the same game as you. The post game commentators even agreed. Chelsea DOMINATED Barca. If you think different you are just being a pansy.

It's not even worth arguing to you the penalty situations....

I don't think drogba and ballack should of done what they did but its not the first time we have seen players react towards a ref. I hope barca beat man utd but its more than likely not doable.

well maybe i understand dominating a game differently that you do, but i respect the defensive game Chelsea made, great tactically, but if you want to get further, you need to score and do something more than throwing the ball to the front and let Drogba fight alone.

the bar?a did their game, trying each time to move the ball to get to the goal, it was impossible thanks to the great job Chelsea guys did.

About the penalties, i still say the only two real ones were the handballs. if you talk about Malouda one, the fault was out the area, what happened inside is normal, players don't suddenly disappear. & i don't see any chelsea fan blaming Drogba for missing clear chances to score, or Hiddink for changing his best stryker for a difender when they were playing HOME against 10 players with two middlefilders (Toure & Keita) as defenders.

Anyway, if Chelsea had qualified yesterday, none would have said they didn't deserve it, but they payed for not going for the game when they should've done.

Best of lucks for next time Greg (while it's not against Bar?a of course;);) )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • The funny thing here is that like 70% or so of the web browser users use 'Google Chrome' as web browser. What I don't understand is that why on earth would ANYONE choose 'Google Chrome' on Windows when 'Microsoft Edge' is not just better in most things, but it's already there right out of the box for the Windows users. Microsoft Edge has less data collection (yes, that's a fact), less RAM usage and is more optimized for Windows (as it's a Microsoft product) right out of the box. I'm sure you will come with the argument of bloat in Microsoft Edge. Sure, but most of that can be fixed with a simple tool (there are many good ones out there for this). Yes, that require a couple of clicks in the same way as it requires several clicks to install 'Google Chrome'. And I'm sure you really love the 4 GB of AI-slop data 'Google Chrome' is downloading for Chrome without you agreeing to it. Fun right? Sure, the way Microsoft is pushing 'Microsoft Edge' on users might not be the best way of doing it and might need to change. But I would never choose 'Google Chrome' over 'Microsoft Edge' today anyways. I'm sure there was a period back in the days when 'Google Chrome' actually was better in most things, but that period is not today.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
    • That stupid annoying Sign in with Google on all these sites now... get the fk outta here
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!