"The Amazing Spiderman" (2012)

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Grand Master

Yusuf M. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

All I can say is "Finally". A Mary Jane that I can see myself wanting to bang :D

Mary Jane is a redhead and she isn't in this movie. The person you're referring to is Gwen Stacy. :)

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

If you hung around at the end of the movie to see the hidden scene interlace during the credits, you would have seen Doc Curt Connors talks to someone in the prison cell.

Anyone know who that other person could be?

Michael Massee is the actor and is said to be Norman Osborn

Grand Master

ACTIONpack

Posted
Posted

Saw the movie last night. Was not a fan of this one. The 2002 version was a lot better. Garfield as Peter Parker was a real bad choice to play the role. The acting skills was subpar at best. You don't feel sorry for Garfield character you do with Toby but Toby is a much better actor. A big let down of the movie was how they told the story. It didn't explain the important stages of how Parker became spiderman. It seem like they wanted people to watch the 2002 to fill in the gabs in 2012. For an example when Peter was looking for te guy who kill his uncle, he falls in to an old wrestling ring and see a poster of a mask which he use to make his costume from. The problem is that he learns how to fight from wrestling which they show in the 2002 version.

The lizard was hardly in the movie. Peter hardly took any photos which is a really important hard of Peter Parker character which the movie shows that part as an after thought.

Spoiler: Who puts their name on a camera in the first place? It shows that Parker was not really bright. Also Spiderman didn't do a good job with hiding his face from the public. Which made it unrealistic to have a secret life.

Veteran

devBrian

Posted
Posted

Saw the movie last night. Was not a fan of this one. The 2002 version was a lot better. Garfield as Peter Parker was a real bad choice to play the role. The acting skills was subpar at best. You don't feel sorry for Garfield character you do with Toby but Toby is a much better actor. A big let down of the movie was how they told the story. It didn't explain the important stages of how Parker became spiderman. It seem like they wanted people to watch the 2002 to fill in the gabs in 2012. For an example when Peter was looking for te guy who kill his uncle, he falls in to an old wrestling ring and see a poster of a mask which he use to make his costume from. The problem is that he learns how to fight from wrestling which they show in the 2002 version.

The lizard was hardly in the movie. Peter hardly took any photos which is a really important hard of Peter Parker character which the movie shows that part as an after thought.

Spoiler: Who puts their name on a camera in the first place? It shows that Parker was not really bright. Also Spiderman didn't do a good job with hiding his face from the public. Which made it unrealistic to have a secret life.

Peter doesn't really start up the photo biz until college.

I thought Garfield was a fantastic Peter Parker, to be honest. He was funny, witty, and well.. not ToMac. He has great chemistry with Gwen Stacey here because he's dating Emma Stone. They played off eachother quite well.

Most of my friends that are very picky comic book readers thoroughly enjoyed the movie, some moreso than Avengers (which to me was just Expendables, Comic Book edition).

Grand Master

sharpy2k4

Posted
Posted

I thought this movie was by far better than the other SpiderMan movies with Toby M in it.

In my opinion I thought the story, the relationship between all characters and everything else was really good.

"It didn't explain the important stages of how Parker became spiderman." Actionpack

Yes it did, the spiders were being farmed for their super strength web after genetic enhancement, and one bit Parker and he turned into a spiderman. Pretty simple. I know they didn't go into great detail but that's all you needed to know tbh.

I'm not normally a fan of the Spiderman series anyway, but though this reboot was by far better than any of the other three that have been made recentley. Also, I can't stand Toby Maguire or Kirsten Dunst and preferred Garfield and Stone.

Shes so hot.

Grand Master

shakey

Posted
Posted

This movie was amazing! Loving this new era of Marvel movies. If they can keep up this pace, it is going to be great for us all.

This movie seemed best to watch in 3D. So many moments just seemed shot for 3D only. Was very well done.

Grand Master

Konstanov

Posted
Posted

This movie was amazing! Loving this new era of Marvel movies. If they can keep up this pace, it is going to be great for us all.

This movie seemed best to watch in 3D. So many moments just seemed shot for 3D only. Was very well done.

This wasn't a Marvel movie. Marvel movies are made by their parent company Disney, this movie was made by Columbia as Sony still owns the rights to make Spiderman movies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.