"The Amazing Spiderman" (2012)


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

All I can say is "Finally". A Mary Jane that I can see myself wanting to bang :D

Mary Jane is a redhead and she isn't in this movie. The person you're referring to is Gwen Stacy. :)

If you hung around at the end of the movie to see the hidden scene interlace during the credits, you would have seen Doc Curt Connors talks to someone in the prison cell.

Anyone know who that other person could be?

Michael Massee is the actor and is said to be Norman Osborn

Saw the movie last night. Was not a fan of this one. The 2002 version was a lot better. Garfield as Peter Parker was a real bad choice to play the role. The acting skills was subpar at best. You don't feel sorry for Garfield character you do with Toby but Toby is a much better actor. A big let down of the movie was how they told the story. It didn't explain the important stages of how Parker became spiderman. It seem like they wanted people to watch the 2002 to fill in the gabs in 2012. For an example when Peter was looking for te guy who kill his uncle, he falls in to an old wrestling ring and see a poster of a mask which he use to make his costume from. The problem is that he learns how to fight from wrestling which they show in the 2002 version.

The lizard was hardly in the movie. Peter hardly took any photos which is a really important hard of Peter Parker character which the movie shows that part as an after thought.

Spoiler: Who puts their name on a camera in the first place? It shows that Parker was not really bright. Also Spiderman didn't do a good job with hiding his face from the public. Which made it unrealistic to have a secret life.

Saw the movie last night. Was not a fan of this one. The 2002 version was a lot better. Garfield as Peter Parker was a real bad choice to play the role. The acting skills was subpar at best. You don't feel sorry for Garfield character you do with Toby but Toby is a much better actor. A big let down of the movie was how they told the story. It didn't explain the important stages of how Parker became spiderman. It seem like they wanted people to watch the 2002 to fill in the gabs in 2012. For an example when Peter was looking for te guy who kill his uncle, he falls in to an old wrestling ring and see a poster of a mask which he use to make his costume from. The problem is that he learns how to fight from wrestling which they show in the 2002 version.

The lizard was hardly in the movie. Peter hardly took any photos which is a really important hard of Peter Parker character which the movie shows that part as an after thought.

Spoiler: Who puts their name on a camera in the first place? It shows that Parker was not really bright. Also Spiderman didn't do a good job with hiding his face from the public. Which made it unrealistic to have a secret life.

Peter doesn't really start up the photo biz until college.

I thought Garfield was a fantastic Peter Parker, to be honest. He was funny, witty, and well.. not ToMac. He has great chemistry with Gwen Stacey here because he's dating Emma Stone. They played off eachother quite well.

Most of my friends that are very picky comic book readers thoroughly enjoyed the movie, some moreso than Avengers (which to me was just Expendables, Comic Book edition).

I thought this movie was by far better than the other SpiderMan movies with Toby M in it.

In my opinion I thought the story, the relationship between all characters and everything else was really good.

"It didn't explain the important stages of how Parker became spiderman." Actionpack

Yes it did, the spiders were being farmed for their super strength web after genetic enhancement, and one bit Parker and he turned into a spiderman. Pretty simple. I know they didn't go into great detail but that's all you needed to know tbh.

I'm not normally a fan of the Spiderman series anyway, but though this reboot was by far better than any of the other three that have been made recentley. Also, I can't stand Toby Maguire or Kirsten Dunst and preferred Garfield and Stone.

Shes so hot.

This movie was amazing! Loving this new era of Marvel movies. If they can keep up this pace, it is going to be great for us all.

This movie seemed best to watch in 3D. So many moments just seemed shot for 3D only. Was very well done.

This movie was amazing! Loving this new era of Marvel movies. If they can keep up this pace, it is going to be great for us all.

This movie seemed best to watch in 3D. So many moments just seemed shot for 3D only. Was very well done.

This wasn't a Marvel movie. Marvel movies are made by their parent company Disney, this movie was made by Columbia as Sony still owns the rights to make Spiderman movies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TechPowerUp GPU-Z 2.70.0 by Razvan Serea GPU-Z is a lightweight system utility designed to provide vital information about your video card and graphics processor. At launch, it automatically scans your system and reports the card name, GPU, release date and transistors, BIOS version, ROPs, memory type, and memory size. Main Features: Supports NVIDIA, AMD, ATI and Intel graphics devices Displays adapter, GPU and display information Displays overclock, default clocks and 3D clocks (if available) Includes a GPU load test to verify PCI-Express lane configuration Validation of results GPU-Z can create a backup of your graphics card BIOS No installation required, optional installer is available Support for Windows XP / Vista / Windows 7 / Windows 8 / Windows 10 (both 32 and 64 bit versions are supported) GPU-Z 2.70.0 changelog: Improved kernel driver security Added die size for Qualcomm Adreno 741 Added support for NVIDIA RTX 6000D, RTX Pro 500 Blackwell Embedded, Tesla V100-DGXS-32GB, PG500-216 Added support for Intel Arc Pro B70, B65, A60 ES, Alder Lake ES Added support for Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite, 778G/782G Added vendor detection for HKC/Sambada, AWES Download page: GPU-Z 2.70.0 | 11.1 MB (Freeware) View: GPU-Z Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I know I won't ever be using it to make my game. I'd rather pay humans.
    • Nah. For every indie dev that needs to create code for "stuff" or textures, it's a godsend enabler to possibly tackle a project that you may not otherwise. The end result and testing will tell the truth if everything works or doesn't, or a game is just mediocre slop, but now these tools are now there and it's the developer's duty to judge the outcome, and even more so for pro studios. And you gotta remember that they will be at an early stage.
    • whoosh my comment went over your head. Enjoy your notchless 3:2 OLED device
    • As a game dev, today was really depressing. They announced that Blueprints will be deprecated in UE6 to be fully replaced by their sh**ty Python-like Verse language... They also announced that 5.8 will be the last version of UE5 until UE6 comes out in MID 2029!!!! They have completely lost the plot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      159
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      neufuse
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!